Received Date: March 03, 2011; Accepted Date: April 24, 2012; Published Date: April 30, 2012
Citation: Rubin G, Rinott MG, Wolovelsky A, Shalev SA, Rozen N (2012) Familial Occurrence of Kienbock’s Disease. Orthop Muscul Syst 1: 112. doi: 10.4172/2161-0533.1000112
Copyright: © 2012 Rubin G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Visit for more related articles at Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research
In 1910 Robert Kienbock for the first time described a series of 16 cases of lunate “traumatic malacia” . This was the first osteonecrotic clinical report of the ulnar and has since been termed as Kienbock’s disease. Kienbock’s disease tends to occur in active adults aged between 20 and 40 years . It is usually a unilateral condition but several cases of bilateral disease have been described . The etiology of the disease is unknown and many causes have been proposed. Gelberman et al. investigated the vascular anatomy of the lunate and suggested a theory of “repeated trauma mechanism” as the most likely cause of Kienbock’s disease . The vascular vulnerability of the lunate was also demonstrated by Panagis et al.  Another hypothesis suggested that venous congestion plays a role in this disease  The anatomy of the lunate and the distal radius and ulna may be of importance to the appearance of the disease, also an association between ulnar negative variance and Kienbock’s disease has been described in the literature [7- 10]. Some authors found flattened radial inclination [10-11] and smaller lunate  predisposing to the disease. Systemic etiology has not been established but reports of the disease associated with other conditions such as septic emboli, sickle cell disease, gout, carpal coalition, cerebral palsy and corticosteroid use have been described . Familial cases of kienbock’s disease have not been reported  apart from one incident of two brothers with bilateral disease . In this article we present the first reported case of a mother and daughter with unilateral Kienbock’s disease, along with a radiographic and genetic study of the case.
The mother was diagnosed as suffering from left Kienbock’s disease when she was 29 years old. She is right-handed and complained of left wrist pain for several years; the diagnosis was made by plain x-ray and a TC99-bone scan (Figure 1). She underwent distal radial shortening and is asymptomatic at present.
The daughter was diagnosed with left Kienbock’s disease when she was 16 years old. She is right-handed and complained of left wrist pain for two years; the diagnosis was made by plain x-ray (Figure 2), TC99- bone scan and MRI (Figure 3). She refused any surgical treatment.
We performed a radiographic comparison between the patients (Table 1). The ulnar variance was measured according to the recommendation of Palmer and Epner [15,16]. They both had a negative ulnar variance (Mother-3 mm, Daughter-1 mm). Radial inclination angle was measured and found to be flattened as compared to Tsuge and Nakamura’s report of normal individuals (23.9 ± 2.8 Vs. 25.2 ± 2.8)  (Mother-20, Daughter-21). As part of the investigation, a family tree was made (Figure 4) and we performed chromosomal analysis to rule out familial structural variant. The family tree was characterized by multiple consanguineous marriages, as often seen in Arab Moslem families in our region. The karyotype of both affected individuals (mother and daughter) was normal 46XX (peripheral lymphocytes).
|Age of onset||29||16|
Table 1: Anatomical comparison between the mother and the daughter.
We described a case of familial kienbock’s disease, with the two patients demonstrating similar clinical and anatomical characteristics. The radiographic study demonstrated ulnar minus and flattened radius in both patients. These findings match the anatomical variances that were suggested to predispose the disease. Possible environmental (nongenetic) causes for the condition in these two women were revoked.
It is generally accepted that Kienbock’s is a sporadic disease; therefore environmental factors could be considered as prime etiologic factors. But the recurrence of a similar phenotype in the two individuals we present, a mother and her daughter, raises the premise genetic factor involvement and predispose for the disease. The pedigree complies both monogenic and multifactorial inheritance. For example, vertical transmission is consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance. Scarcity of affected individuals in such a large family can be explained either by de-novo mutation of the mother, or reduced penetrance or variable expression of the clinical features in other carriers, consequently other affected individuals were overlooked. Since the family is characterized by multiple consanguineous marriages, autosomal recessive inheritance, manifesting as pseudo-dominant transmission, should also be considered.
However, other types of inheritance cannot be fully excluded based on the available data. Presently no genetic cause is known to associate Kienbock’s disease. Therefore, we performed chromosomal analysis, assuming that any chromosomal rearrangement, in particular if segregates with the clinical phenotype in the family - might lead to suspected genomic regions. Since the chromosomal analysis was normal, we could not speculate with regard to genetic etiology, or suggest further molecular investigation. If more familial cases become available, it would be possible to investigate this in the future.