alexa Family Support in Stroke Rehabilitation | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2329-9096
International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Family Support in Stroke Rehabilitation

Shinichiro Maeshima*

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine II, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Japan

*Corresponding Author:
Shinichiro Maeshima
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine II
School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date September 16, 2013; Accepted Date: September 18, 2013; Published Date: September 20, 2013

Citation: Maeshima S (2013) Family Support in Stroke Rehabilitation. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 1:e104. doi: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000e104

Copyright: © 2013 Maeshima S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

As rehabilitation medicine has become more widespread, rehabilitation intervention has become a standard treatment that is provided from the early stages of a stroke. Thus, disuse syndrome caused by excessive rest, which had been frequently encountered in the recent past, has become rare. However, it is common to observe patients becoming bedridden when they return home from a rehabilitation hospital. Because patients are provided with rehabilitation in wellequipped hospital wards during their hospitalization, they are able to engage in sufficient physical and cognitive activity; however, at home they are unable to maintain the same level of activity, which gradually leads to disuse and an inability to move.

How can this be Possible?

Is this a problem with the medical staff whoplace patients in a situation where they are unable to continue therapy at home because they received specialized rehabilitation at the hospital? or is this a problem with the patients and their families who maintain a passive attitude toward rehabilitation?

Regardless of the cause, if patients do not practice the rehabilitation they conducted while in the hospital at home, in the long-term they would be wasting both their time and money.

To avoid this, rehabilitation specialists must create training programs that are based on the home lifestyle of the patient while the patient is still in hospital. Because rehabilitation works toward reintegration into society, it must include the creation of a lifestyle that will allow the patient to return to society even if the patient is left with a disability. The rehabilitation plan should not be based on the patient visiting a hospital or facility to participate in training.

Family members also have an important role to play in the reintegration of the patient into society. Therefore, both the patient and his or her family members must be provided with guidance while the patient is still in the hospital. Family members must understand the illness and learn techniques to assist the patient. When family members are engaged in rehabilitation with the patient, the duration of training sessions often lengthens and functionality improves. However, the types of training selected for family members to engage in with the patients must be simple and safe, and it must be possible to practice the activities continually. These activities must be simple yet important actions that can be repeated such as practicing standing up, maintaining a standing position, and walking with the aid of handrails or around tables. If patients do not spend their time in bed when they are not practicing rehabilitation, but rather engage in self-training with the help of family members, clear changes in the recovery process can be observed after 2 to 3 weeks. Most importantly, family members can easily observe that the patient is making a progress toward recovery, and an early discharge from the hospital becomes possible.

Patients and family members who receive appropriate training and guidance while the patient is still in the hospital, and who put those skills into practice as part of their daily lives, can experience improvements in functionality that can be maintained even after the patient has been discharged, without the need to visit the hospital regularly to engage in rehabilitation training. The results of our study show that family member intervention results in a notable improvement in general motion and movement from one place to another [1], improvements in hemispatial neglect [2], and a reduction in the number of days spent in the hospital and in the home return rate [3]. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared a family intervention group with a non-family intervention group found that starting a support service for family members within 6 weeks of the onset of the disease, while having little effect on the patients themselves, resulted in an increased social participation of the caregiver and improved quality of life for the patient [4]. Rehabilitation specialists must not overlook the essence of rehabilitation, i.e., “treatment for the purpose of re-integration.”

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by “Reseacrch on Measures for Intractable Diseases” Project 2013: matching fund subsidy from Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11912
  • [From(publication date):
    October-2013 - Nov 21, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8118
  • PDF downloads : 3794
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

generalscien[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords