alexa Fibrin Sealant and Femtosecond Laser Assisted Keratoplasty: Initial Results | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0991
Journal of Transplantation Technologies & Research
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Fibrin Sealant and Femtosecond Laser Assisted Keratoplasty: Initial Results

Tatiana MB Prazeres1*, Elissandro MS Lindoso1, Leon Grupenmacher2 and Luciene B Sousa3

1Clinical Fellow, Cornea and External Diseases Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Sorocaba Eye Bank, Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil

2Attending Physician, Department of Ophthalmology, Sorocaba Eye Bank, Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil

3Head Professor of the Department of Ophthalmology, Sorocaba Eye Bank, Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Tatiana Prazeres MB
Rua Conselheiro Correa de Menezes, n266
Apt 701, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
Tel: 55-71-3334-3084/ 55-71-8799-3084
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: January 26, 2012; Accepted Date: July 12, 2012; Published Date: July 14, 2012

Citation: Prazeres TMB, Lindoso EMS, Grupenmacher L, Sousa LB (2012) Fibrin Sealant and Femtosecond Laser Assisted Keratoplasty: Initial Results. J Transplant Technol Res 2: 112. doi: 10.4172/2161-0991.1000112

Copyright: © 2012 Prazeres TMB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Transplantation Technologies & Research


Purpose: To evaluate whether the use of a sealant combined with interrupted suture would provide better visual outcomes and better post-operative recovery to keratoconic patients compared to interrupt and running sutures without the use of sealants using femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty.
Methods: A prospective, randomized study of 12 patients (12 eyes) with keratoconus was conducted, randomized into two treatment groups. The no glue group (6 eyes) underwent penetrated keratoplasty (PK) with femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty shaped (mushroom) and combined suture (8 interrupted suture and 8 running sutures) while the glue group (6 eyes) underwent the same procedure but their incisions were closed with 8 interrupted sutures and sealant.
Results: The no glue group had a mean BCVA of 0.2 (LogMar). The glue group had a mean BCVA of 0. (LogMar). p=0.028 Transplants with glue were well positioned showing good healing but presented more inflammation in the first week post-surgery. Regarding refractive outcomes, there was no difference between the groups.
Conclusions: There were no statistical difference between the two groups regarding BCVA and refractive errors. The use of sealants produced more inflammation. Further studies with a larger number of patients and longer follow up would be needed to confirm these findings.


Fibrin sealant; Penetrating keratoplasty; Femtosecond laser; Interrupted sutures; Running sutures


Traditional PK provides excellent results for patients with significant visual loss due to corneal disease but visual rehabilitation is often prolonged [1]. Post-keratoplasty astigmatism is one of the major problems caused by PK that may compromise the patient’s visual rehabilitation after surgery [2]. The astigmatism that occurs following PK may be caused by several reasons, including previous pathologies present in the donor or in the recipient, imprecise trephination, donor recipient wound disparity, improper suture placement, unequal suture tension, and irregular wound healing [3].

In the past decades, PK surgery has undergone continuous improvements. A number of instruments have been developed to improve the quality of trephination in both donor and recipient corneas, and countless suturing techniques have been used to reduce tissue distortion and minimize postoperative refractive errors [4].

Suturing techniques such as single continuous suture, interrupted suture or combined continuous and interrupted suture have been used. Erosions, infiltrates, infectious keratitis related to sutures, loose sutures, wound leak, broken sutures and wound dehiscence following suture removal are some of the suture-related complications that frequently occur after PK, as described by many authors [5-7]. Thus, a procedure for corneal transplantation that minimizes the complications related with sutures is needed.

Fibrin sealants are surgical haemostatic and adhesive agents derived from blood plasma. These agents are designed to reproduce the final steps of the physiological coagulation cascade and to form a stable fibrin clot. Once formed, the fibrin clot stops the bleeding and aids normal wound healing [8].

Beriplast® P (Aventis Behring, Marburg, Germany) is a sealant that has been available in Japan and Europe for many years. Its use in a broad range of surgeries is well documented and the sealant has an excellent safety profile [9].

In ocular surgery, Beriplast® P can be used to seal perforations, to treat conjunctival wounds and fistulas, to adapt free skin transplants in lid surgery, to repair injured canaliculi and to seal the wound in cataract surgery, pterygium, and strabismus surgeries [10,11]. Recently, the use of fibrin glue was applied to automated lamellar therapeutic keratectomy concluding it can provide safe and effective attachment needed in automated lamellar therapeutic keratectomy and obviates the need for suturing. [12] The use of fibrin sealants has been described in an ex-vivo eye model for opposing wound edges in Top Hat PKP [13] but no description of its use in vivo in PK has been done.

In this study we evaluated whether the use of a sealant combined with interrupted suture would provide better visual outcomes and postoperative recovery to keratoconic patients compared to interrupted and running sutures without the use of sealants.


This study was performed in the Sorocaba Eye Bank, in Sao Paulo, Brazil. We performed a randomized, prospective, case control clinical trial that involved 12 patients (12 eyes) who presented the diagnosis of keratoconus. Patients in both groups had keratoconus grade three and four according to the topographic image based classification of Rabinowitz [14]. All patients were informed about the procedure and provided informed consent. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Sorocaba Eye Hospital.

A total of 12 patients were randomized into two treatment groups. The first group (no glue group) was comprised of 6 patients (6 eyes) and underwent PK with femtosecond laser (IEK) shaped (mushroom) incisions that were closed with 8 interrupted and 8 running sutures. The second group (glue group) also included 6 patients (6 eyes) who underwent the same surgery as the no glue group but their incisions were closed with 8 interrupted sutures and sealant.

Peribulbar anesthesia was performed in all patients. The recipient intralase cut size was 8.0 mm and the donor intralase cut size was 8.25 mm. In the glue group, the sealant was applied using the pantajet® syringe over the lamellar tissue (dual way) after the anterior chamber was filled a 06 mm air bubble. When the procedure was finished, a bandage contact lens was applied along with a subconjuntival injection of dexamethasone 0.1% and gentamicin 20 mg in both groups. Patients were followed-up at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery.

The sealant used was approximately 1 mL of Beriplast (Behring). All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. For the postsurgery, patients were prescribed monofloxacin eye drops four times a day for 7 days and eye drops of prednisolone acetate 1%, 8 times per day for a week and then tapered.

The outcomes measured included the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, slit lamp examination to measure the degree of inflammation by the flare in the anterior chamber, intraocular pressure, corneal topography, pachymetry, optical coherence tomography, and specular microscopy.

The statistical analysis was performed with the Software Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 11.0. P<0.05 was considered statistic significant.


Patients were evaluated six months after surgery. Regarding the BCVA, the two groups presented no difference during the first month post-surgery (p=0,730) but the no glue group presented better BCVA than the second group (p=0.005) in the sixth month after surgery (Chart 1).


Chart 1: Mean Best Correct visual acuity in IEK with glue and IEK without glue in 1 month and 6 months (LogMar)

As for refractive outcomes, the two groups presented no difference for spherical correction and cylinder (Chart 2).


Chart 2: Refraction average values in IEK with glue and IEK without glue (p= 0,419/ p= 0,463).

No statistical differences between groups were observed for specular microscopy (p=0,572) and cornea thickness (p=0,043) (Chart 3 and 4).


Chart 3: Pachmetry Boxplot.


Chart 4: Speculate microscopy boxplot.

The OCT (optical coherence tomography) visant could be performed in both groups; with the glue group showing well-positioned button and good healing (Figure 1).


Figure 1: Anterior Segment Imaging of the wound incision after placement of 8 sutures and fibrin glue at six months.

We also observed some complications. One patient from the glue group presented seidel after one week and another patient presented peripheral edema associated with a persistent epithelium defect, but with no elevation of the graft at the graft-host junction or surface irregularities. The completed epithelialization of the cornea in this case occurred after fourteen days of post operative with no additional treatment. Also, patients from the glue group presented more inflammation in the first day following the surgery. We could observe the presence of flare (16-25 cells in field–2+) [15] in the anterior chamber only in the glue group. And we did not observe the presence of the glue in the anterior chamber.


A number of novel transplant techniques, including the descemet strip keratoplasty and posterior lamellar keratoplasty procedures, may offer significant advantages over traditional PK. Nevertheless, they cannot address the full range of corneal pathologic features. Additionally, they also present their own unique limitations [1,16,17]. Thus, improving the PK technique, especially in terms of visual rehabilitation, is needed to obtain better visual results and a shorter postoperative recovery.

A frequent major limitation of visual rehabilitation associated to PK is the high levels of post-operative astigmatism, which often requires selective suture removal or that secondary procedures are performed (after all sutures are removed). The mean refractive astigmatism observed six months after surgery was 3.2 in the no-glue group and 3.7 in the glue group. No suture was removed or adjusted until the sixth month post operatory. After this period, selective sutures were removed depending on the refraction.

Buratto et al. [1], found the mean refractive astigmatism of 2.9 D three months after surgery using either interrupted suture or a mixture of interrupted and continuous running suture.

The Femtosecond laser technology enables that single and unique sizes and shapes of corneal cuts are performed, according to surgical needs. PK can be safely and precisely performed [18]. The sutures needed for the mushroom technique may not be as tight as that for the traditional PK because the sutures are placed aiming to hold the donor button in place and not necessarily to prevent wound leakage. We found that femtosecond laser with interrupted suture and running suture leads to better visual acuity in the first six months, as compared to application of interrupted suture plus glue.

Bahar et al. [13], in a laboratory study in ex-vivo eyes compared among traditional PKP, Top Hat PKP+sutures, and Top Hat PKP+glue and found that similar rates of astigmatism were induced by either technique. The group also showed that the Top Hat + glue used with 8 sutures is more watertight and stable than traditional PKP and Top Hat PKP+16 sutures. In our model we didn’t analyze the wound bursting pressure.

In the present study, we were able to observe more inflammation in the early post operative of the glue group. The anterior chamber was filled with air in both groups, so do not attribute this to the increased inflammation in the glue group.

Other studies using fibrin sealant in ocular surface surgery and strabismus showed a reduction in inflammation in the post-operatory. Causes of inflammation such as surgical trauma can be responsible for this [19,20].

In this study we found that the use of fibrin sealant associated with interrupted sutures, instead of running sutures associated with interrupted sutures, produced more inflammation on the early postoperative and also produced worse corrected visual acuity. Thus, improved suturing techniques are needed to optimize visual outcomes and to control induced astigmatism.


We found that the association of fibrin sealant with interrupt sutures, instead of running sutures associated with interrupt sutures caused more inflammation on the early post-operative and also produced a worse corrected visual acuity. Although the procedure required shorter surgery times, it produced refractive errors similar to those observed with PK with the advantage of not presenting endothelial cell loss.

Further studies with a larger number of patients and longer follow up would be needed to confirm these findings.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11655
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2012 - Mar 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7876
  • PDF downloads : 3779

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version