alexa Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells Influence Gene Expression in Donor Cardiomyocytes and the Recipient Heart | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7633
Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells Influence Gene Expression in Donor Cardiomyocytes and the Recipient Heart

Mary Kearns-Jonker1,4*, Wangde Dai2, Mirja Gunthart1, Tania Fuentes4, Hsiao-Yun Yeh4, Paul Gerczuk2, Martin Pera3, Christine Mummery5 and Robert A Kloner2,3

1Dept of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2Heart Institute of Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, USA

3Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of Southern CA Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

4Dept of Pathology and Human Anatomy, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA

5Dept of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Corresponding Author:
Mary Kearns-Jonker
Dept of Pathology and Human Anatomy
Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Loma Linda, CA, USA
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 30, 2012; Accepted Date: June 05, 2012; Published Date: June 07, 2012

Citation: Kearns-Jonker M, Dai W, Gunthart M, Fuentes T, Yeh HY, et al. (2012) Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells Influence Gene Expression in Donor Cardiomyocytes and the Recipient Heart. J Stem Cell Res Ther S1:005. doi:10.4172/2157-7633.S1-005

Copyright: © 2012 Kearns-Jonker M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy


Aims: Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) facilitate post-infarct recovery, but the potential benefit of combination therapy using MSCs and hESC-CMs has not been examined. Our objective was to define the gene expression changes in donor and host-derived cells that are induced in vivo after co-transplantation of cardiomyocytes with and without mesenchymal stem cells expressing the prosurvival gene heme oxygenase 1. Methods and results: Human MSCs were engineered to over-express heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) following lentiviral vector-mediated transduction. Athymic nude rats were subjected to myocardial infarction and received hESC-CMs alone, hESC-CMs plus human MSCs, hESC-CMs plus MSCs overexpressing HO-1, or saline. Real time PCR identified gene expression changes. Cardiac function was assessed by angiography. Co-transplantation of unmodified MSCs plus hESC-CMs elevated CXCR4, HGF, and IGF expression over levels induced by injection of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes alone. In animals co-transplanted with MSC over-expressing HO-1, the expression of these genes was further elevated. Gene expression levels of VEGF, TGF-β, CCL2, SMAD7, STAT3 and cardiomyocyte transcription factors were highest in the HO-1 MSC plus hESC-CM group at 30 days. Human CD31+, CD34+, isl-1+, NXK2.5 and c-kit+ transcripts were elevated. Rodent genes encoding NKX2.5, troponin T and CD31 were elevated and cell cycle genes were induced. Ejection fraction improved by six to seven percent. Conclusions: Co-administration of HO-1 MSCs plus hESC-CMs increased expression of pro-survival and angiogenesis-promoting genes in human cells and transcripts of cardiac and endothelial cell markers in rodent cells, consistent with activation of tissue repair in both transplanted hESC-CMs and the host heart.


Cardiomyocyte; Human embryonic stem cells; Myocardial infarction; Mesenchymal stem cells; Heme oxygenase 1


Heme oxygenase 1: HO-1; Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: hESC-CM; Mesenchymal stem cells: MSC; Heme oxygenase 1 over-expressing mesenchymal stem cells: HO-1 MSC; Producer cell lines: pCLS


Stem cell- based therapies for the treatment of heart failure are continually under modification to address the problems of insufficient stem cell retention and limited recruitment and/or activation of endogenous progenitors [1-3]. Early cardiovascular progenitors that differentiate into cardiac myocytes, endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, when administered alone are insufficient for long-term regeneration of damaged cardiac tissue. Genetic engineering has been used as an approach to facilitate cell survival by over-expressing cytoprotective genes such as AKT4 or hemeoxygenase 1 in mesenchymal stem cells [5-7]. This procedure improves cardiac function, but benefits derived from administration of genetically modified cells alone, or treatment with stem cells in combination with exogenous cytokines and/or anti-apoptotic cocktails [8-10] fall short when examined carefully for long-term reversal of cardiac remodeling accompanied by cardiac regeneration. Recently, promising results have been obtained using combination cell therapy [11]. Cardiovascular progenitors and epicardium derived cells, delivered together, were more beneficial than treatment with either cell type alone [11]. Our experimental objective, therefore, was to test the hypothesis that combined stem cell therapy using mesenchymal stem cells over-expressing HO-1 and cardiovascular stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells could induce gene expression changes that promote paracrine and regenerative functions that may benefit stem cell therapy.

The role of mesenchymal stem cells in cell-based treatment strategies is generally agreed to be the secretion of factors including HGF, SDF-1, or VEGF that function to promote neovascularization in the damaged heart [12-14]. Endogenous circulating endothelial progenitor cells are further mobilized by over-expression of hemeoxygenase 1 [15]. The beneficial effects can also be manifest by administration of HO-1 over-expressing adenoviral vectors [6,13,16-18]. HO-1 initially gained recognition for its cytoprotective function in the allotransplant setting [19] and later for its beneficial anti-apoptotic effects in the ischemic environment of the heart post- infarct. The beneficial effects of HO-1 have largely been attributed to carbon monoxide [14], a by-product produced when HO-1 catalyzes the breakdown of heme into biliverdin, carbon monoxide and free iron. It has now been shown that the benefits of HO-1 for cardiovascular stem cell transplantation include a well-documented effect on angiogenesis [16,20]. SDF-1 promotes endothelial cell recruitment by a hemeoxygenase-1 dependent mechanism [17].

Although upregulation of hemeoxygenase-1 has been a component of several strategies designed to facilitate cardiovascular repair, our study is unique in that we examined the functional effect of cotransplantation of mesenchymal stem cells over-expressing HO-1 in combination with early cardiovascular progenitors derived from human embryonic stem cells. This report defines the sequential gene expression changes that contribute to a paracrine effect in vivo that can be enhanced and modulated by gene transfer of a cytoprotective molecule co-administered with a cell type capable of regeneration.


Human embyonic stem cell culture and differentiation

The human embryonic stem cell line hES-3 was maintained in our laboratory. The cells were differentiated into cardiomyocytes after co-culture on END-2 cells [21-22] or after differentiation from embryoid bodies [23]. Beating cells were dissected, dissociated and injected directly into the heart of athymic nude rats one week following myocardial infarction. This study was approved by the Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles.

Cloning of the hemeoxygenase 1 gene and lentiviral vector – mediated expression

The human heme oxygenase 1 gene was PCR amplified using primers hmox fwd CTC TCG AGC GTC CTC A and hmox rev ACT ATC AGA CAA TGT TGT, and sequenced. A BamHI linker was added to the 1.7kb HO-1 gene which was cloned into the pCLS lentiviral vector backbone, kindly provided by Dr. Gregor von Levetzow at Children's Hospital Los Angeles. The pCLS lentiviral vector is a derivative of pCL1, and included an FMDV-derived 2A self-cleaving peptide sequence in place of the internal ribosomal entry site upstream of an EGFP reporter gene [24]. Viral supernatant was generated by transfecting 293FT cells with pCLS-HO-1, the packaging plasmid and pMD2.G (VSV-G). Human MSC were kindly provided by Texas A&M Health Science Center Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Transduction efficiencies of the MSC were reproducibly 40-60% as identified by FACS.

Myocardial infarction and cardiovascular stem cell transplantation

Female athymic nude rats (Harlan, Placentia, CA) at 5 weeks of age were anaesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (75mg/Kg) and xylazine (5mg/Kg), intubated and mechanically ventilated. The left coronary artery was ligated permanently. The rats were given buprenex (0.001mg/100g body weight, twice daily) as an analgesic. One week later, four groups of 19 animals each received the following: Group 1 received two million hESC-derived, GFP labeled cardiomyocytes injected directly into the scar, Group 2: One million hESC-derived GFP labeled cardiomyocytes plus one million unmodified human mesenchymal stem cells derived from the bone marrow and labeled with Mito-red, Group 3: one million hESC-derived cardiomyocytes labeled with GFP plus one million mesenchymal stem cells transduced to over-express the human hemeoxygenase 1 gene using a lentiviral vector and Group 4: saline control. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiogram and angiogram [25,26], cell retention was examined by histology, and gene expression changes occurring in vivo were analyzed by real time PCR. Fifteen animals per group were analyzed after 30 days; four animals per group were assessed at seven days after cell transplantation. The animals were euthanized by potassium chloride under general anesthesia. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved this study. Standards set by the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals were followed.

Gene expression analysis

The infarct zone was dissected out and RNA was prepared using RNeasy minikits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) or Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). cDNA was synthesized using kits from SABiosciences or Applied BioSciences (Qiagen, Valencia, CA and Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA respectively). Human array plates or TaqMan custom plates containing human and rat-specific primers pre-selected to identify our genes of interest were purchased from SABiosciences and Applied Biosciences. Individual PCR primers confirmed the expression of specific rat or human genes in cells isolated from the heart using laser capture microdissection. These samples were captured directly into tubes containing RT buffer and cDNA was prepared in the same tube. Real time PCR was performed on an ABI 7900 Fast Real time PCR machine [27,28]. Relative mRNA expression was normalized to GAPDH. Data was analyzed using SDSv2.4 software. Fold changes in gene expression were determined by comparing the Ct for each gene (in triplicate). A minimum of three biological replicates were run in each group before and after transplantation. Data was analyzed using the formula 2ΔΔCt where ΔCt =Ct of our gene of interest- Ct of GAPDH. The results are shown +/- SEM.

LV angiography

At one and four weeks after stem cell transplantation, a catheter was inserted into the left jugular vein, under anaesthesia, and a nonionic contrast agent was administered to perform LV contrast angiography using a XiScan 1000 C-arm X ray system (XiTec, Inc., East Windsor, CT) [25]. Ejection fraction was determined using the formula [100 x volume in diastole-volume in systole]/volume in diastole]. Stroke volumes and regional wall motion were also assessed.

Regional wall motion

The size of the paradoxical systolic bulging (dyskinesis) or akinetic motion was calculated by measuring the length of the total LV diastolic circumference, and circumferential length of the bulging or akinetic segment with computerized planimetry, expressed as a percent of total LV diastolic circumference [25].


A 2F high-fidelity, catheter-tipped micromanometer (model SPR- 869, Millar Instruments, Inc, Houston, Texas) was used to record heart rate, aortic pressure (systolic, diastolic, mean), left ventricular systolic pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and pressure volume loops [25]. Left ventricular dP/dT (the change in ventricular pressure as a function of time) was also determined.

Histological analysis

Five micron sections were stained, scanned and digitized. The total LV circumference, infarct (scar) circumference, and non-infarcted wall circumference were measured. Infarct size was calculated as the percentage of the left ventricular circumference occupied by the scar.Wall thickness was measured. Myocardial infarct expansion index [29] was calculated by the formula: (LV cavity area/LV external area) x (septal thickness/infarct thickness).

Statistical analysis

The data are reported as the mean +/- standard error and a Student's t test was performed for the gene expression studies. The LV fractional shortening, ejection fraction, hemodynamic data and histological data were compared by one-way ANOVA with subsequent Tukey's post hoc testing if appropriate. Statistically significant differences were P < 0.05.


Transcripts of genes promoting cardiovascular regeneration and stem cell survival are enhanced by co-transplantation of human cardiovascular stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells over-expressing heme oxygenase 1

We cloned the human hemeoxygenase-1 gene into the bicistronic lentiviral vector pCLS and transduced the human mesenchymal stem cells prior to transplantation. At 72 hours after transduction, flow cytometry demonstrated that 40-60% of the cells were transduced (Figure 1A). Heme oxygenase-1 levels were elevated 52 fold relative to HO-1 levels in non-transduced MSC in vitro and remained elevated in vivo at thirty days after transplantation. Transduced cells also demonstrated a 140 fold increase in transcripts for IL-10 and a 40 fold increase in transcripts for IL1-A (Figure 1B).


Figure 1: Transduction of mesenchymal stem cells with a lentiviral vector construct expressing hemeoxygenase 1. Transduction efficiencies were examined by flow cytometry after every transduction, prior to cell transplantation, and ranged between 40-60% The clear tracing outlined in grey indicates the isotype control. The shaded black area represents GFP labeled cells expressing the HO-1 construct after transduction with this bicistronic vector (A). Changes in cytokine expression were also identified by real time PCR. The graph shows the relative change in interleukin expression before and after mesenchymal stem cells were transduced to express hemeoxygenase 1. IL-10 and IL-1A levels were elevated when HO-1 was over-expressed in mesenchymal stem cells (B). Data shown represent three independent experiments +/- standard errors. Asterisks indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05.

We used real time PCR to identify gene expression changes in the infarct zone of the heart at seven days after cotransplanting unmodified mesenchymal stem cells or HO-1 over-expressing MSC in combination with hESC-derived cardiomyocytes and compared the gene expression changes to those identified after transplantation of hES-derived cardiomyocytes alone (Figure 2). The addition of unmodified MSC was associated with a 4 fold increase in IGF1, a cytokine known to activate the PI3K/AKT pathway that leads to improved stem cell survival [30,31]. HO-1 over-expression provided additional benefit as shown by an 8 fold increase in IGF1 expression over cardiomyocytes alone (Figure 2). The PI3K/AKT pathway can also be activated by HGF [12] which was elevated 1.5 fold over levels induced by cardiomyocytes alone. The SDF-1/ CXCR4 axis was activated in this model (11 -15 fold elevation of CXCR4), potentially contributing to improved recipient stem cell homing to the heart, improved human stem cell engraftment and better survival [31-36]. The addition of HO-1 further elevates the expression of these genes (Figure 2).


Figure 2: Gene expression changes in the heart in vivo at day 7 after transplantation of MSC plus human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (MSC+ hESC-CM), with and without heme oxygenase 1(HO-1), shown as fold changes relative to the in vivo group transplanted with hESC-CM alone. Real time PCR was used to identify changes in gene expression. Data are shown +/- standard errors.

Considering the impact of HO-1 on the paracrine milieu of the heart, we then examined the progression of these changes between days 7 and 30 after transplantation of hES-derived cardiomyocytes plus transduced MSC over-expressing HO-1. As shown in Figure 3, the beneficial effects of HO-1 were significant at p < 0.05 by day 30. Elevated levels of cardiac transcription factors such NKX2.5 were noted at this time. Induced chemokines and cytokines included a 5.4 fold increase in HGF, a four-fold increase in VEGF, a 3.7 fold increase in TGFB1, and a 5.3 fold elevation in the levels of CSF1. STAT3 levels were also significantly elevated. CCL2, CCL5, MYH6 and HO-1 transcripts were highly induced at day 30 (Figure 3). Gene expression levels are shown when compared across each of our experimental groups, relative to pre-transplant gene expression levels, in Table 1. Gene expression changes in the combined treatment group without HO-1 no longer provided added benefit, relative to cardiomyocytes alone, at day 30. In contrast, gene expression changes in the HO-1 group in vivo included highly elevated levels of thirty two different genes (Figures 3,4 and Table 1), some shown by others to independently benefit cardiovascular stem cell-mediated cardiovascular repair, some newly identified. Transcript levels for early cardiovascular stem cells (isl-1) [37] and elevated levels of CD34 [38-39] c-kit, Mesp-1 and NKX2.5 (Figure 4) suggest the potential for cardiovascular regeneration beyond the 30 day timepoint at which we concluded this study. Elevated VEGF levels may contribute to the well-characterized changes in angiogenesis that have been reported when HO-1 is over-expressed in the heart after myocardial infarction [13,40-41]. The prosurvival gene BCL2 is highly elevated in this model (Table 1) [42-43], and transcripts for elevated levels of the prosurvival genes HO-1 and TNFAIP3 [44] continued to be expressed at 30 days after transplantation in vivo.

  Gene Fold change cardiomyocytes alone ** Fold change cardiomyocytes +MSC** Fold change cardiomyocytes HO-1+MSC**
B cell lymphoma 2 BCL2 4642 3759 15,592
Bcl-2-like protein 1 BCL2L1 12 9 39
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 CCL2 6 0.4 94
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 CCL5 391,549 1,334,310 3,097,523
Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 CD34 3.9 0.2 18
CD68 molecule CD68 7 0.4 31
Collagen, type IV, alpha 5 COL4A5 7 0.02 5
Colony stimulating factor 1 CSF1 1 0.1 5
Endothelin converting enzyme 1 ECE1 545 550 906
Endothelin 1 EDN1 529 640 2030
Fas (TNF receptor superfamily member 6) FAS 8 0.5 63
Fibronectin 1 FN1 1 0.1 9
Heme oxygenase 1 HMOX1 8 13 145
Mothers against DPP homolog 8 SMAD7 9 8 16
Transforming growth factor, beta 1 TGFB1 1 0.6 4
Vascular endothelial growth factor A VEGF 7 0.02 14

Table 1: Gene Expression Changes at day 30 after Transplantation of hESCderived Cardiomyocytes, MSC + Cardiomyocytes or HO-1 MSC +Cardiomyocytes Post Infarction.


Figure 3: Gene expression changes in the heart within the HO-1-MSC + hESC-CM transplanted group were more pronounced at day 30 when compared with day 7. Real time PCR was used to identify changes in gene expression. Fold changes are shown when calculated relative to gene expression after transplantation of hESC-CM alone at the corresponding timepoint. Data are shown +/- standard errors, asterisks identify gene expression changes that are significant at p < 0.05.


Figure 4: Transcripts of genes expressed in human cardiovascular progenitors were elevated at day 30 when compared with day 7 in the HO-1 MSC+ hESC-CM group. Gene expression changes shown were identified using real time PCR in the group of animals transplanted with human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes plus hemeoxygenase 1 overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells. Fold changes were calculated relative to gene expression in the animals receiving cardiomyocytes alone at the corresponding timepoint in vivo. Data are shown +/- standard errors. Asterisks indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05.

HO-1 over-expression in mesenchymal stem cells introduced for cardiovascular repair promotes activation of host-derived trancripts in the heart

Primers designed to identify rodent CD31 and rodent Troponin T expressing cells were used in a real time PCR assay to identify recruitment of rodent cells into the heart. Rodent CD31 expression, identified within the infarct area of the heart at 30 days after transplantation and normalized to rat GAPDH, was four fold higher after co-transplantation of MSC over-expressing HO-1 and hESderived cardiomyocytes compared with animals transplanted with cardiomyocytes alone (p=0.007) (Figure 5). Transcripts for rodent cardiomyocytes expressing TropT were elevated 12 fold over levels achieved by human ES-derived cardiomyocyte stem cell transplantation alone.


Figure 5: Gene expression changes identified in the recipient heart using rodent specific primers after stem cell transplantation. Laser capture microdissection was used to isolate cells from the infarct zone at 30 days after myocardial infarction. Real time PCR performed on the captured cells using rodent specific primers identified higher levels of rat CD31 andrat Troponin expressing cells in the human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte plus HO-1 MSC treated animals relative to animals treated with cardiomyocytes alone (A). Rodent specific primers were used to demonstrate elevated expression of rodent cell cycle associated genes (B) and the rodent cardiovascular progenitors were identified with rodent-specific primers in the infarct zone at 30 days after transplantation (C). Data are shown +/- standard errors, * values indicate significance at p < 0.05.

Transcripts for rodent cell cycle regulatory genes CCND1, cyclins E, A2, Cdk2 and Cdk4 were elevated 2-16 fold compared to their expression level after treatment with cardiomyocytes alone (Figure 5).The cardiovascular transcription factor NKX2.5 was elevated in both donor and host-derived cells (p=0.019) (Figures 4 and 5). Transcripts for genes encoding bcl2, IGF-1 and IL-1β, known to promote cell cycle activity, were elevated in the HO-1 co-transplant group. The ability to promote cell cycle activity may prove to be a beneficial effect achieved by combination cell therapy. These results support the concept that changes in receptors such as CCL2, CCL5, and CXCR4 combined with the changes in the cytokine/chemokine milieu associated with oxygenase 1 levels enhance recruitment/activation of host-derived cells in the heart.

Stem cell treatment reduces infarct size and increases scar thickness

Scars were thicker after stem cell treatment in all groups examined, compared with controls, however the favorable trends in infarct size and scar thickness were not statistically significant (Figure 6, Table 2). The expansion index was significantly higher in controls compared with stem cell treated groups (p=0.0039). Left ventricular akinesis and dyskinesis, assessed by left ventriculogram, was more pronounced in controls (p=0.056) (Table 2). The finding that stem cell treatment significantly reduced left ventricular expansion index suggests that cell therapy may reduce left ventricular remodeling after permanent coronary artery occlusion. Other trends (infarct size, scar thickness, akinesis and dyskinesis, and fractional shortening) suggested that the treatment was beneficial.


Figure 6: Histological analysis of the infarcted hearts after stem cell transplantation compared with controls. Rat hearts stained with picrosirius red after myocardial infarction (A) hESC-CMs (B) hESC-CMs + MSCs (C) hESC-CMs + MSCs over-expressing HO-1 and (D) saline. The scar (picrosirius red area which is positive for collagen) in the control group (D) is thin and appears stretched while the scars in the three cell-treated groups (A,B,C) were thicker and less stretched.

Histological parameters
Group Infarct size (percent) Scar thickness (mm) Expansion index* Akinesis &  dyskinesis (%)
hESC-CM 28.7 ± 5.5 1.3 ± 0.21 0.27 ± 0.11 8.96 ± 1.9
MSC+CM 35.7 ± 4.1 1.52 ± 0.28 0.31 ± 0.08 8.37 ± 1.67
HO-1 MSC+CM 30.8 ± 4.2 1.25 ± 0.14 0.36 ± 0.07 4.57 ± 1.00
saline 42.5 ± 2.8 0.71 ± 0.04 0.71 ± 0.05 10.73 ± 1.76
p value 0.166 0.091 0.0039 0.056

Table 2: Infarct Size and Cardiac Function Four Weeks After Stem Cell-Based Therapy.

Stem cell treatment improves ejection fraction at four weeks

The ejection fraction was significantly improved after stem cell treatment in all experimental groups compared to controls after 4 weeks (Figure 7). By contrast left ventriculogram, the ejection fraction in sham, non-infarcted rat hearts was 78.1±1.8% (n=5). The LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after treatment with stem cells was significantly higher than controls (hESC-CMs: 67.6 +/- 1.4%; hESC-CMs + MSCs: 67.2 +/- 1.6%; hESC-CMs + HO-1 MSCs: 66.3 +/- 1.7% vs. 60.6 +/- 1.2% in controls, p=0.0022). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, positive dp/dt, negative dp/dt, and LV end systolic pressure were comparable in all groups (supplemental data). Irrespective of the nature of the cell therapy, stem cell treatment was found to benefit left ventricular function.


Figure 7: Ejection fraction was improved by stem cell transplantation. Left ventricular ejection fraction in the cell-treated groups was significantly higher than that of the saline treated control group. * A significant difference was noted between the saline group vs. human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CM), the saline group vs. hESC-CM plus MSC, and between saline injected controls and animals injected with hESC+HO-1 MSC. Significance by ANOVA was p=0.0022, p < 0.05 by Tukey’s test.


Our study has demonstrated that co-administration of HO-1 MSCs plus hESC-CMs increased expression of pro-survival and angiogenesispromoting genes in human cells, transcripts of cardiac and endothelial cell markers in rodent cells, and transcripts for cell cycle regulatory genes in the rodent heart. These results are consistent with activation of tissue repair in both transplanted hESC-CMs and the host heart. We further defined several factors and chemokines released in vivo during this process.

Hemeoxygenase 1 has well-documented anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective functions. HO-1 catalyzes the degradation of heme into biliverdin, carbon monoxide and free iron, by-products with anti-oxidant and cytoprotective effects. Additional benefits of HO-1 over-expression in the heart, as reported by others, include enhanced neovascularization, a reduction in myocardial wall thinning, collagen deposition and decreased inflammatory cell infiltration [12-20]. These beneficial effects were demonstrated after direct administration of HO-1 into the myocardium or over-expression of HO-1 in mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into the heart [6,7]. HO-1 reduces superoxidase dismutase levels and elevates the expression of genes with pro-survival functions such as Bcl2 [42,43] and IL-10 [6,12]. These findings were confirmed in our model. Neovascularization is enhanced when HO-1 is over-expressed and is associated with endothelial cell progenitor mobilization [20]. Carbon monoxide, a byproduct of HO-1, is responsible for many but not all, of the benefits of HO-1 treatment [14]. CO can attenuate apoptosis and alleviate LV remodeling [16]. Lakkisto et al. [14] have shown that CO increases c-kit+ progenitors in the infarct zone. Elevated levels of HIF-1α, SDF-1α, and VEGF-B were noted in the infarct area after CO treatment. In the heart, VEGF and SDF-1 induced after HO-1 treatment promote recruitment of circulating progenitor c-kit + and CD34+ cells [13,34]. The SDF- 1:CXCR4 axis may be one mechanism by which cardiovascular progenitors are recruited into the heart [35,36]. SDF-1 is produced by mesenchymal stem cells and HO-1 over-expression prolongs their survival. At present, we cannot determine whether the host-derived cardiovascular progenitors originate from endogenous stem cells in the heart or are recruited from other sites such as the bone marrow.

Lineage mapping has recently shown that exogenously delivered, bone marrow derived c-kit+ cells can stimulate endogenous cardiac progenitor's post-infarction [46]. The extent to which progenitor cells can be activated by various mechanisms and their contribution to repair has yet to be determined. This issue is significant due to the limited survival of cells introduced into the ischemic environment of the heart. In large animals such as pigs, transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells stimulates c-kit+ cardiac stem cell recruitment and proliferation, an effect not seen after injection of MSC-conditioned media [38]. Cell-cell coupling between transplanted MSCs and endogenous CSCs occurs in the pig, promoting the transport of factors that enhance stem cell survival. The number of NKX2.5 positive cells is elevated by co-culturing CSC and MSC in vitro and the number of c-kit positive cells was elevated in vivo in the pig. Elevated levels of NKX2.5 and c-kit transcripts were noted after co-transplantation in vivo in our model. Higher levels of gene expression for CD34 and isl-1 were detected after HO-1 over-expression in our study. This is perhaps due to co-localization or cell to cell communication between newly-introduced cells. The close proximity of pro-survival factors and chemokines may benefit stem cell survival, stem cell recruitment and regeneration.

In our model, co-transplantation of unmodified MSC plus cardiovascular progenitors was more beneficial than transplantation of cardiovascular progenitor cells alone. Co-transplantation elevated expression of factors promoting cardiac repair such as HGF and IGF1. Co-transplantation of MSC over-expressing HO-1 with cardiovascular progenitors enhanced the levels of NKX2.5 and CD34. SMAD7, a gene required for cardiac development and function [47], CCL5, a gene whose product plays a role in chemokine-mediated migration of stem cells [48] and IL-10, a gene whose product reduces left ventricular remodeling by activation of STAT3 were all elevated in the HO-1MSC plus hESC-CM group [49-50]. Induced gene expression levels of both donor and host-derived cardiovascular cells were higher at 30 days after HO-1MSC plus hESC-CM transplantation. The potential benefit to cardiovascular recovery over the long term when cardiovascular progenitors are actively differentiating from both donor and recipient sources is highly significant due to the known limitations in the numbers of cardiovascular stem cells that can be delivered.

The concept that complementary cell populations provide an added benefit over transplantation of a single cell population alone is not unprecedented. In a recent report by Winter et al. [11], a combination of adult human epicardium-derived cells and cardiomyocyte progenitors was more beneficial than single cell treatment in an ischemic heart model. The adult human epicardium-derived cells were intended to protect the myocardium and stimulate migration of resident cardiac progenitors by a paracrine effect when combined with progenitor cells. The factors secreted were not defined, however, the ejection fraction

and stroke volume were significantly improved by combination cell therapy six weeks after transplantation. Based on our finding that changes in gene expression identifying both donor and host progenitors were activated at 30 days but not at 7 days after transplantation, it is conceivable that we may have detected a more pronounced functional benefit at a later time point. By histology, our qualitative and quantitative analysis showed that the average scar thickness was greater after cell treatment when compared to the saline group. The benefit of scar thickening as a positive phenomenon is reflected in the strong trend toward less akinesis and dyskinesis in the cell treated groups versus controls and was particularly prominent in the HO-1 treated group. Further experimentation will provide additional insight into the long term functional effects of combination cell therapy and the mechanism by which donor and host-derived cardiovascular stem cells are activated in this model.


This work was supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (grant number K18 HL092288-01) to MKJ.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 6th International Conference on Integrative Biology May 21-23, 2018 Barcelona, Spain
    May 21-23, 2018 Barcelona, Spain
  • 10th International Conference on Genomics and Molecular Biology May 21-23, 2018 Barcelona, Spain
    May 21-23, 2018 Barcelona, Spain
  • 12th Annual Conference on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine June 04-06, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic
    June 04-06, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic
  • 4th International Conference on Bioscience July 2-3, 2018 Vienna, Austria
    July 2-3, 2018 Vienna, Austria
  • 22nd World Congress on Biotechnology July 10-11, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand
    April 16-18, 2018 Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 9th International Conference on Tissue Science and Regenerative Medicine July 13-14, 2018 Sydney, Australia
    April 23-24, 2018 Las Vegas, USA
  • 10th Annual Conference on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine August 13-14, 2018 London, UK
    August 13-14, 2018 London, UK
  • World Congress on Stem Cell Biology and Biobanking September 3-4, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
    September 3-4, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
  • 2nd Annual summit on Cell Metabolism and Cytopathology September 19 - 20, 2018 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
    September 19 - 20, 2018 Philadelphia, USA
  • 2nd Annual summit on Cell Signaling and Cancer Therapy September 19 - 20, 2018 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
    September 19 - 20, 2018 Philadelphia, USA
  • 6th Annual Congress on Biology and Medicine of Molecules September 20-21,2018 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    September 20-21,2018 Kualalumpur, Malaysia
  • 5th International Conference on Human Genetics and Genetic Disorders September 21-22,2018 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
    September 21-22,2018 Philadelphia, USA
  • 11th International Conference on Genomics and Pharmacogenomics September 21-22, 2018 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
    September 21-22, 2018 Philadelphia, USA
  • 5th World Congress on HUMAN GENETICS SEPTEMBER 24-25, 2018 BERLIN, GERMANY
    SEPTEMBER 24-25, 2018 Berlin, Germany
  • 21st Euro Biotechnology Congress October 11-12, 2018 Moscow, Russia
    October 11-12, 2018 Moscow, Russia
  • 11th International Conference on Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine October 18-20, 2018 Rome, Italy
    October 18-20, 2018 Rome, Italy
  • 24th Biotechnology Congress: Research & Innovations October 24-25, 2018 Boston, USA
    October 24-25, 2018 Boston, USA
  • International Conference on Human Genome Meeting October 25-26, 2018 Istanbul, Turkey
    October 25-26, 2018 Istanbul, Turkey
  • International Congress & Expo on Genomics and Bioinformatics November 2-3, 2018 Columbus, Ohio, USA
    November 2-3, 2018 Columbus, USA
  • 12th International Conference & Exhibition on Tissue Preservation and Biobanking November 9-10, 2018 Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    November 9-10, 2018 Atlanta, USA
  • 2nd Annual Summit on Cell Therapy and Stem Cell Research November 9-10, 2018 Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    November 9-10, 2018 Atlanta, USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11938
  • [From(publication date):
    specialissue-2012 - May 21, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8160
  • PDF downloads : 3778

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7