alexa Isosteric Heats of Water Vapor Sorption in Two Castor Varieties | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7048
Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Isosteric Heats of Water Vapor Sorption in Two Castor Varieties

J. Ojediran1*, A.O Raji2 and H.I Owamah3
1Agricultural Engineering Department, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
2Agricultural and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
3Civil Engineering Department, Landmark University, Kwara State, Nigeria
Corresponding Author : J. Ojediran
Agricultural Engineering Department
Landmark University, Omu-Aran
Kwara State, Nigeria
E-mail: [email protected]
Received October 17, 2012; Accepted December 28, 2012; Published December 31, 2012
Citation: Ojediran J, Raji AO, Owamah HI (2013) Isosteric Heats of Water Vapor Sorption in Two Castor Varieties. J Chem Eng Process Technol 4:146. doi:10.4172/2157-7048.1000146
Copyright: © 2013 Ojediran J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology

Abstract

Equilibrium moisture content-water activity data for two varieties of castor (GSS and WBS) at temperatures 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70°C and water activity range of 0.07-0.98 were determined using the static gravimetric method. A nonlinear regression programme was used to fit four sorption isotherm models (modified Halsey, modified Henderson, modified Oswin and modified Guggenheim-Anderson-de Boer (GAB)) to the experimental data. These models were then compared using standard error of estimate and randomness of residuals. The sorption isosteric heats were determined by the application of Clausius-Clapeyron equation. The modified Oswin and modified Halsey proved the best for predicting equilibrium moisture content of castor with standard error of estimate of 0.238 and 0.242 for GSS and WBS respectively. The isosteric heats decreased exponentially with increase in moisture content and approached the latent heat of pure water at a free water point of between 13 and 16% moisture content (d.b). The difference in isosteric heats of both varieties was not significant.

Keywords
Castor; Isosteric heat; Water Activity; Equilibrium Moisture Content
Introduction
Castor (Ricinus communis L) is an under-exploited tropical crop. The products derivable from it range from synthetic resins and fibres, lubricants, embalming fluids, soap manufacture, opal wax in polishes, cosmetics and brake fluids [1]. The leaves have insecticidal properties, while the stalks are a source of pulp and cellulose [2]. The seeds are ovoid, compressed dorsally, tick-like shining, pale grey (hereafter referred to as Grey Small Size, GSS) predominant in the north-eastern part of Nigeria, or yellowish white and big size (hereafter known as White Big Size, WBS) common in the eastern part of Nigeria.
Drying operations are involved after harvest in the processing of this crop as reported in earlier studies [3-5]. The design of more efficient drying systems and storage systems for crops require knowledge of energy requirements, state and mode of moisture sorption within them [6]. This could be achieved by stating the correct mathematical models to estimate the heat and mass transfer mechanisms. It is also essential to determine the energy required to remove moisture from agricultural crops (isosteric sorption heat) to complete the drying simulation model [7].
Isosteric heat of sorption (KJ.mol-1) defined as the heat of sorption at constant specific volume hence a measure of moisture-solid site binding strength [8]. It is the total energy required to transfer water molecules from vapor state to a solid surface and vice-versa, as well as a measure of work done by a system to accomplish adsorption or desorption process. It is therefore used as an indicator of the state of adsorbed water by solid particles [6]. Isosteric heat is useful in predicting drying models, calculating energy consumption during the drying or wetting of agricultural materials, the design of drying equipment and describing any heat and mass transfer related processes [6,9-11].
The most widely used method for evaluation of isosteric heat is the application of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation which relates water activity and temperature at constant moisture content [12,13]. The other methods of estimation of sorption isosteric heat are calorimetric technique and Riedel equation [7,14,15]. It is noted that there is a good agreement between the isosteric sorption heats obtained by the calorimetric techniques and the Clausius-Clapeyron equation [15,16]. Several authors have reported and studied the isosteric heats of agricultural products [6,7,15-23].
The purpose of the present work is to examine the application of Clausius-Clapeyron equation to sorption isotherms of two varieties of castor and to compare the calculated isosteric sorption heats using the adsorption isotherms. This is with a view to providing information useful in the drying process of the less explored castor varieties. Whole castor seeds are extremely poisonous they however become fit for human consumption when properly processed.
Materials and Methods
Sample preparation
Two castor varieties namely GSS and WBS obtained from castor farms in Borno and Anambra States, Nigeria, were used in this study. Triplicate samples, each weighing 10 g were used to determine the moisture content of whole seeds using the oven drying method as recommended in the ASABE standard. This involved drying in an oven at 103 ± 2 oC until constant weight was obtained [24]. The initial moisture contents were found to be 4.80 and 5.24 ± 0.2% (db) respectively for the two varieties. The bulk quantity of seeds was cleaned and divided into two portions. One portion was prepared for use in determining the desorption equilibrium moisture content by rewetting it to a higher moisture content. A calculated amount of water was added to this portion and the grains were then sealed in polyethylene bags and stored for 24 hours. This enabled the moisture content to be raised to stable and uniform levels of 17.00 and 18.00% (db) for GSS and WBS respectively. The polyethylene bags were marked and transferred into a refrigerator at 4°C and when needed for experiments, the grains were allowed to equilibrate in the ambient condition for six hours. The other portion was prepared for use for experiments on adsorption. The sample was dried at 80°C for two days to obtain a lower moisture content of about 3.23 and 3.95% (db) GSS and WBS respectively. The seeds from this portion were also sealed in marked polyethylene bags and kept in a refrigerator. They were equally allowed to equilibrate in the ambient conditions for six hours, when needed for experiments.
Equilibrium moisture content-equilibrium relative humidity determination
The desorption equilibrium moisture contents (EMC) of the two castor varieties were determined at temperatures of 40, 50, 60 and 70°C over a water activity (aw) range of 0.07-0.98 using the static gravimetric method. This method involves the use of saturated salt solutions to maintain constant relative humidity (r.h.) in enclosed still moist air at a certain temperature to obtain the complete sorption isotherms. The triplicate samples of GSS and WBS weighing about 15 g were put into specimen baskets and placed inside glass desiccators. Saturated solutions of salts as used by Brooker et al. [25] and Rizvi [12] were used to maintain constant relative humidity levels in the desiccators [26,27]. Excess salt was maintained in each solution.
The samples were placed in an open flat container and arranged in each desiccator bottle so that they will not be in contact with the salt solution. The desiccators containing the salt solutions and castor seed samples were marked and placed inside temperature-controlled Gallenkamp DV 400 ovens (Weiss Gallenkamp, UK) which were set at 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70°C. The oven temperatures were monitored to within ± 1.0°C to maintain constant temperature for each setting. The samples were weighed daily using an analytical balance (Mettler PC2200 DeltaRange, Mettler-Toledo Inc., USA) with an accuracy of 0.001 g. Equilibrium was considered to have been attained when three identical consecutive measurements were obtained. This took between 7 and 12 days.
The dry matter content was then determined by oven drying the sample at 103 ± 2 °C until constant weight was attained [24]. The EMC was calculated on a dry basis from the weight change and dry matter weight, and the average values at each temperature and water activity were determined. At higher water activity above 0.85, microbial growth may occur in sample and may ruin it. Two methods are often used to control this: (1) Using antimicrobial agents but these could change the aw and moisture profile; (2) Vacuum method, which was used in this study to create an anaerobic environment in the desiccator. Where the occurrence of mould was noticed, during the experiment such specimen pan was discarded.
Analysis of data
The experimental EMC-aw data of GSS and WBS castor seeds were fitted to four moisture sorption isotherm models namely the Modified Halsey [19,28], Modified Henderson [29,30], Modified Oswin model [31,32] and the GAB model [33,34] as modified by Jayas and Mazza [35]. These models are:
The Modified Halsey aw model
          (1)
The Modified Henderson aw model
          (2)
The Modified Oswin aw model
         (3)
The Modified GAB aw model
        (4)
Symbols are defined in Notation section.
Model fitting
The desorption and adsorption equilibrium moisture content data of castor seeds were fitted to moisture sorption models using the non-linear regression procedure in SPSS 16.0 for Windows, which minimizes the sum of squares of deviations between experiment and theory in a series of iterative steps. All the models are three parameter equations, which can be solved explicitly for aw as a function of temperature and moisture content. The non-linear regression procedure required that initial parameter estimates be chosen close to the true values. The initial parameter estimates were obtained by linearization of the models through logarithmic transformation and application of linear regression analysis, or solving a quadratic form of the equation in the case of modified GAB model. The least-squares estimates or coefficients of the terms were used as the coefficients of the terms of the sorption models tested for the initial parameter estimates in the non-linear regression procedure. Model parameters were estimated by taking the water activity (aw) to be the dependent variable.
Heat of vaporization
Igathinathane et al. [8] have reported the procedure for calculating isosteric sorption heat. The Clausius-Clapeyron equation as applied to vapor from free water is given by [11,12,36]:
         (5)
If in Equation (5), the Ps is replaced by the actual vapor pressure (Po) in the material and the right hand side of the equation remains the same for both vapor from free water and vapor from moisture in material [6], then the following equation can be obtained:
         (6)
Integrating Equation (6) at constant moisture content yields
        (7)
Where c1 is a constant. The saturation vapor pressure (Ps) at different temperatures can be obtained from Rogers and Mayhew (1981) and subsequently, vapor pressure in the material determined as:
        (8)
The values of aw were obtained from the moisture sorption isotherm models which best describes the equilibrium moisture relations of GSS and WBS castor varieties respectively.
The slope of the logarithmic plot of Po against Ps gives the ratio of heat of vaporization of moisture in a material to the latent heat of saturated vapor. The non-linear regression procedure in SPSS 16.0 for Windows was used to fit the Gallaher (1951) model (Equation 9) to the data obtained and to relate the latent heat ratio to the material moisture content. Other researchers too have used this equation to relate the free energy or latent heat of vaporization of agricultural crops to moisture content [6,11,37]. The model can be stated thus:
        (9)
The values of coefficients ‘a’ and ‘b’ were obtained through the process of logarithmic transformation and non-linear regression and the values of L/hfg were computed and plotted against moisture content.
Results and Discussion
Equilibrium moisture content and water activity relationships
The experimental values of equilibrium moisture content-water activity at different temperatures are as presented in table 1. It was observed that the moisture content of castor seeds measured after each emc-aw determination was lower than the moisture content before the determination. Ajibola [27] observed same and opined that this difference could be due to loss of moisture that accompanied the evacuation process.
EMC increased with increase in aw and were lower at higher temperatures in both castor seed varieties. Similar trends for many seeds have been reported in the literature [28,38-42]. At low water activity values, the equilibrium moisture contents for both crop varieties were higher at low temperatures. These results are in agreement with the general characteristics of food isotherms, and the theory of physical adsorption which predicts that the quantity of sorbed water at a given water activity increases as the temperature decreases [43,44].
The experimental values of EMC-aw for castor seeds at the different temperatures considered were taken as the average of two readings for each. These were used to estimate the best aw model. The EMC models were obtained by logarithmic transformations of the aw models and in the non-linear regression analysis, the errors were assumed to be normally and independently distributed. The Modified Oswin and Modified Halsey were found to be the best aw models for GSS and WBS castor respectively with Standard Error of Estimate (SEE) of 0.238 and 0.242 (Table 2) and the residual plots showed high degree of randomness (The random plot for GSS adsorption and WBS desorption are presented in Figures 1a and 1b. The modified Henderson model which has been published for many agricultural seeds did not fit well. These two models (Modified Oswin and Modified Halsey), therefore, became the models with which the aw values as presented in Equations (1) and (3) were determined for use in the analysis of isosteric heats and are represented as:
GSS castor `
        (10)
WBScastor      (11)
The log plots of the vapour pressures (actual, ln (Po) and saturated, ln(Ps)) for both castor varieties at various moisture levels are presented in figures 2 and 3 as discussed in Equation (7). The natural log of actual vapor pressure ln (Po) increased linearly with increase in the natural log of saturated water vapor pressure ln (Ps) and moisture content in both cases. Other authors reported similar findings for winged bean seed and gari [6], unripe and ripe plantain [23], melon seed and cassava [45], cowpea and plantain. Therefore the relationship existing between ln (Po) and ln (Ps) at the four moisture contents 4, 8, 12 and 16% d.b. respectively can be expressed by the regression equations (Equations 12-19 with their corresponding R2 as indicated):
GSS
ln(Po) = 4.6706 ln(Ps) – 39.57        (R2 = 0.99)           (12)
ln(Po) = 1.7499 ln(Ps) – 7.50          (R2 = 0.96)            (13)
ln(Po) = 1.0235 ln(Ps) – 0.23          (R2 = 0.99)            (14)
ln(Po) = 1.0010 ln(Ps) – 0.01          (R2 =1.00)            (15)
WBS
ln(Po) = 1.0004 ln(Ps) – 1.01          (R2 = 1.00)            (16)
ln(Po) = 0.7749 ln(Ps) – 1.36          (R2 = 0.97)            (17)
ln(Po) = 1.0187 ln(Ps) – 0.19          (R2 = 0.99)            (18)
ln(Po) = 1.0010 ln(Ps) – 0.01          (R2 = 1.00)            (19)
The ratios of heat of vaporization of saturated water at each of the moisture content were obtained from the slopes of the plots in figure 2 and 3. Using non-linear regression procedure (SPSS 16.0 for windows), Equation (9) was used to relate L to material moisture content. The values of the coefficients ‘a’ and ‘b’ in Equation (9) presented in Equations (20 and 21) were 19.173 and 41.298 for GSS and 70.916 and 102.994 for WBS castor seeds. The standard errors of estimate for L/hfg were 0.650 and 0.702 for GSS and WBS castor respectively. The ratios of the heat of vaporization of moisture in the castor seed varieties to the latent heat of free water in Equation (9) are then obtained as:
GSS
        (20)
        (21)
The effect of moisture content on L/hfg is shown in figure 4. The figure shows that L decreased with increasing moisture content in both castor varieties. This confirms the fact that at higher moisture levels, the strength of water binding decreases. The heat of sorption of both GSS and WBS castor varieties approached that of pure water at moisture contents of between 13 and 16 % dry basis. Fasina and Sokhansanj [46], explained that beyond this moisture range, water existing in the seeds may not be in a bound form but existing as mono or multi-layer. There was no significant difference between the isosteric sorption heat of both castor varieties. Iglesias and Chirife [19], explained that the level of moisture content at which the heat of sorption approaches the heat of vaporization of water can be a sign of water existing in free form in a food product and Aviara et al. [37], denoted this point as the free water point, explaining further that the presence of dissolved soluble components can cause the actual point to be masked.
Conclusions
1.   The equilibrium moisture content of GSS and WBS castor varieties determined using the static gravimetric method increased with increase in aw but decreased with increasing temperature.
2.   The Modified Oswin and the Modified Halsey which gave the least standard error of estimate and randomness of residuals proved the best aw models for predicting adsorption aw of GSS and WBS castor seeds respectively
3.   For both varieties of castor seeds isosteric heats decreased exponentially with increase in moisture content and approached the latent heat of vaporization of pure water at a moisture content between 13 and 16 % (dry basis), an energy equivalent to that for free water may be adequate to dislodge moisture from castor seeds. There was no significant difference between the isosteric heats of the castor varieties.
Nomenclature
aw water activity (mass fraction)
A, B, C constants of sorption models
T absolute temperature (K)
emc equilibrium moisture content (% dry basis)
Po actual water vapor pressure (Pa)
Ps saturated water vapor pressure (Pa)
R gas constant for water vapor (0.462kJ/kg K)
hfg latent heat of vaporization of free water in material (J/kg water)
L heat of vaporization of moisture in the product (J/kg water)
a,b,c1 constants
M moisture content in decimal, dry basis
References














































Tables and Figures at a glance

image   image
Table 1   Table 2

 

Figures at a glance

image   image   image   image   image
Figure 1a   Figure 1b   Figure 2   Figure 3   Figure 4
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11646
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2013 - Nov 24, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7869
  • PDF downloads : 3777
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords