alexa Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Voluntary Blood Donation among Physicians in a Tertiary Health Facility of a Developing Country | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2155-9864
Journal of Blood Disorders & Transfusion
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Voluntary Blood Donation among Physicians in a Tertiary Health Facility of a Developing Country

Nwogoh Benedict1*, Aigberadion Usimenahon1, Nwannadi Ikenna Alexander2 and Aigbe Isi3

1Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, P.M.B 1111, Benin City, Nigeria

2Department of Haematology, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria

3Department of Chemical Pathology, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author:
Nwogoh Benedict
Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion
University of Benin Teaching Hospital
P.M.B 1111, Benin City, Nigeria
Tel: 08038955265
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: November 23, 2011; Accepted date: March 07, 2012; Published date: March 13, 2012

Citation: Benedict N, Usimenahon A, Alexander NI, Isi A (2012) Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Voluntary Blood Donation among Physicians in a Tertiary Health Facility of a Developing Country. J Blood Disord Transfus 3:117. doi: 10.4172/2155-9864.1000117

Copyright: © 2012 Benedict N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Blood Disorders & Transfusion

Abstract

Introduction: There is shortage of active blood donorsto meet the increased demand. Precisely aimed promotion and information, targeted motivation and selection of non-remunerated healthy volunteer donors are needed for an adequate and safe blood and blood products supply.

Objectives: The objectives of this study are to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of voluntary blood donation among physician, to identify and recruit potential voluntary blood donors amongst them and to determine the association between blood donation and gender, duration of practice and sub specialty of the physicians.

Methodology: This was a cross sectional qualitative study conducted at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City. A pre tested questionnaires was administered to 140 physicians in the tertiary health facility.

Statistical analysis: The responses were collated and analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 16. The results are presented in frequency tables. The association between blood donation practice and gender of respondents, duration of practice and specialty of the responding physicians were tested using Chi-square and Fisher’s test where appropriate. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results: Only 58 (41.4%) physicians have donated with 33 (56.9%) donating less than once a year, 18 (31%) between 1-3 times a year and 5 (8.6%) more than thrice a year. Most (53.4%) donated voluntarily, 39.7% for a friend or relative, 3.4% for remuneration and 5.2% to know their screening status.

Conclusion: Physicians have good knowledge of voluntary donation and have a positive attitude towards donation but there is a disparity in their practice of blood donation.

Keywords

Blood donation; Physicians; Developing country

Introduction

Blood is scarce; its demand far outweighs the supply. There is shortage of active blood donors to meet the increased demands of blood [1], in addition to limited supply, the issue of safety especially with regard to the risk of transfusion transmissible infection is also an issue of utmost concern especially in the developing countries. Donor blood procurement from voluntary non remunerated donor has been adjudged the safest source of blood. Hence the World Health Organization (WHO) has adopted a policy aimed at 100% voluntary non-remunerated donor blood procurement by the year 2020 [2].

Precisely aimed promotion and information, targeted motivation and selection of non-remunerated, healthy volunteer repeat donors form the foundation of safe blood products supply in highly developed countries [3]. In most developing and transitional countries, by contrast, family replacement and paid blood donors are still a significant source of blood components for transfusion [4].

The constant concern in the efforts to meet the demands for blood is the fact that only a small percentage of the eligible population actually chooses to donate blood on a regular basis and that a significant percentage of eligible donors are deferred temporarily or permanently because of strict deferral criteria being continuously added in the name of blood safety [5]. At the same time, the demand for blood and blood products in most countries continues to increase because of the rise in human life expectancy and the implementation of new and aggressive surgical and therapeutic methods requiring large quantities of blood and blood products [6].

Physicians by virtue of their training and medical practices are expected to be highly informed on the processes of donor blood procurement and the challenges of supply as well as the potential hazards of transfusion. They also constitute a potential pool of eligible but yet under explored donors. The objectives of this study are to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of voluntary blood donation among physician, to identify and recruit potential voluntary blood donors amongst them and to determine the association between blood donation and gender, duration of practice and sub specialty of the physicians.

Methodology

This is a cross sectional qualitative study conducted at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH) as part of the 2011 World Blood Donor Day Programme. The hospital is a major referral, training center for both undergraduate and postgraduate doctors in various specialties and a research institute in south south Nigeria. It has over 600 physicians, a bulk of which comprise of house officers and resident doctors undergoing postgraduate training. The center operates a hospital-based blood banking system which is highly dependent on blood procurement from vendors who operate paid donor outlets. Their supply is augmented by supply from National Blood Transfusion Service (NBTS), family replacement and very few voluntary donors. Pretested questionnaire were self administered to 140 physicians from various clinical sub specialties. An informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Statistical Analysis

The responses were collated and analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 16. The results are presented in frequency tables. The association between blood donation practice and gender of respondents, duration of practice and specialty of the responding physicians were tested using Chi-square and Fisher’s test where appropriate. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

There were 140 respondents in the age range of 25-52years (median age was 32 years) with an M: F of 3:1. Fifty eight percent (82) were married and 56 (40%) single. Most of the respondents were resident doctors in various specialties of training. They accounted for 82.1% of respondent. Majority of the physicians have been practicing in the facility for 1-5 years. Physicians from 11 departments including dentistry (10.7%), surgery (7.1%), internal medicine (15%), obstetrics and gynaecology (10%), family medicine (6.4%), anaesthesia (17.9%), psychiatry (2.9%), paediatrics (3.6%), community medicine (1.4%), pathology (10.7%) and accident and emergency (4.3%) responded. Most of the respondents were Christians accounting for 93.6%. Table 1 show details of the demographics of respondent.

1. Age Range (median age) 25 -52 (32)yrs
2. Gender N = 140 Percentage (%)
Males 102 72.9
Females 33 23.6
No Response 5 3.6
3. Marital Status
Single 56 40.0
Married 82 58.6
No Response 2 1.4
4. Professional Status
House Officers 18 12.9
Residents 115 82.1
Medical Officers 4 2.9
No Response 3 2.1
5. Duration of Practice in the facility
< 1 year 27 19.3
1– 5 years 85 60.7
>5 years 26 18.6
No response 2 1.4
6. Specialty
Dentistry 15 10.7
Surgery 10 7.1
Internal Medicine 21 15
Obstetrics and Gynaecology 14 10
Family Medicine 9 6.4
Anaesthesia 25 17.9
Psychiatry 4 2.9
Paediatrics 5 3.6
Community Medicine 2 1.4
Pathology 15 10.7
Accident and Emergency 6 4.3
No Response 14 10.0
7. Religion
Christianity 131 93.6
Moslem 1 0.7
Traditionalist 1 0.7
No Response 7 5.0
Total 140 100

Table 1: Sociodemographic Parameters of Respondents.

On knowledge, the respondents expressed a good knowledge of the common blood group types and of their own blood group. The blood group of respondent are A Rhesus(Rh) negative (1.4%), A Rh positive (13.6%), AB Rh positive (3.6%), B Rh negative (0.7%), O Rh negative (3.8%) and O Rh positive (34.3%). Forty six (32.9%) did not respond to question on knowledge of their blood group (Table 2).

Blood Group N (%)
A 21 (22.8)
B 13 (14.1)
AB   5 (5.4)
O 53 (57.6)
Rhesus D Positive 84 (91.3)
Rhesus Negative 8 (8.7)

Table 2: Summary of Blood Group of Respondents.

Most respondent (95.7%) are aware of the risk of transmission of infection by transfusion. The risk of transmission of HIV, HBV, HCV and Syphilis was affirmed by 99.3%, 97.9%, 73.6% and 42.9% while 19.3% and 2.9% affirmed those of malaria and CMV respectively. Thirty five percent stated that the minimum donation frequency was 6 months, 35.7% tri-monthly, 11.4% monthly while 9.3% had no knowledge of this. About 8% and 3.6% stated that people should not donate for religious and cultural beliefs respectively. On knowledge of volume of blood collected in each process 60.7% stated less than 500 mls, 34.3% ticked 500-1000 mls while 21.4% express no knowledge of it. Table 3 shows the details of the knowledge of blood donation expressed by respondents.

Do you know the common blood groups?   Who should donate blood?  
     Yes 138(98.6%) Men 136 (97.1%)
     No 1 (0.7%) Women 125 (89.3%)
     No Response 1 (0.7%) Young (< 18yrs) 8 (5.7%)
Do you know your blood group?   Old (> 60yrs) 5 (3.6%)
     Yes 139(99.3%) Vulnerable group 11 (7.9%)
No Response 1 (0.7%) Healthy 102 (72.9%)
Blood group of Respondent?   Diseased 1 (0.7%)
     A Negative 2 (1.4%) Who should not donate blood?  
     A Positive 19 (13.6%) Men 6 (4.3%)
     AB Positive 5 (3.6%) Woman 8 (5.7%)
     B Negative 1 (0.7%) Young (< 18yrs) 61 (43.6%)
     B Positive 12 (8.6%) Old (> 60yrs) 92 (65.7%)
     O Negative 5 (3.8%) Vulnerable group 106 (75.7%)
     O Positive 48 (34.3%) Healthy 4 (2.9%)
     Invalid 2 (1.4%) Diseased 97 (69.3%)
     No Response 46 (32.9%) Culture belief 5 (3.6%)
Can a person be infected by receiving blood transfusion?   Religious belief 11 (7.9%)
     Yes 134(95.7%) No Response 2 (1.4%)
     No 5 (3.6%) What volume of blood is collected during each donation?  
     No Response 1 (0.7%) ≤500mls 85 (60.7%)
What diseases are transmissible by blood transfusion?   500 - 1000mls 48 (34.3%)
     HIV 139(99.3%) Don’t  know 30 (21.4%)
     HBV 137(97.9%) Invalid 1 (0.7%)
     HCV 103(73.6%) No Response 2 (1.4%)
     Syphilis 60 (42.9%) What is the duration of a donation process?  
     Malaria 27 (19.3%) <20 minutes 42 (30%)
     CMV 4 (2.9%) 20 - 60 minutes 67 (47.9%)
     Others 3 (2.1%) Don’t know 30 (21.4%)
How often can an individual donate?   No Response 1 (0.7%)
     Weekly 5 (3.6%)    
     Monthly 16 (11.4%)    
     3 Monthly 50 (35.7%)    
     6 Monthly 49 (35%)    
     Annually 2 (1.4%)    
     Don’t  know 13 (9.3%)    
     Invalid 1 (0.7%)    
     No Response 4 (2.9%)    

Table 3: Knowledge on blood donation.

A hundred and twenty five (89.3%) respondents said blood donation is good. Voluntary donation was accepted as the best source of donor blood by 80.7%, replacement donors by 7.1%, remunerated by 0.7% and self donation by 2.1%. One hundred and seventeen (83.6%) said something can happen to a donor, 11.1%, 92.3% and 7.6% stated that a donor might contract infection, become temporary weak and suffer loss of health respectively.

Only 58 (41.4%) physicians have donated with 33 (56.9%) donating less than once a year, 18 (31%) between 1-3 times a year and 5 (8.6%) more than thrice a year. Most (53.4%) donated voluntarily, 39.7% for a friend or relative, 3.4% for remuneration and 5.2% to know their screening status. Eighty (57.1%) accepted to be reminded or called upon to donate but only 40% of them left their contacts.

Eighty two (58.6%) had never donated. Reasons for non donation included 26 (31.7%) not approached to donate, 18 (22%) need to donate for friends or relatives in the future, 14 (17.1%) not fit to donate, 10 (12.2%) fear of needles, 4 (2.9%) blood may be sold by the blood bank, 2 (2.4%) fear of knowing their status. One hundred and twenty seven (90.7%) thought that patient relatives should be encouraged to donate and (126) 90% actually encouraged relatives to donate. Table 4 Section D show details of blood donation practices among physicians.

SECTION C: Attitude towards blood donation   SECTION D: Practice of blood donation  
What do think about blood donation? N (%) Have you donated before? N (%)
Good 125 (89.3) Yes 58 (41.4)
Bad 2 (1.4) No 82 (58.6)
Neutral 10 (7.1) How often do you donate?  
No Response 3 (2.1) < 1 time a year 33 (56.9)
What do you think is the best source of donor blood?   1 - 3 times a year 18 (31.0)
Voluntary donor 113 (80.7) >3 times a year 5 (8.6)
Replacement donor 10 (7.1) No response 2 (3.4)
Remunerated donor 1 (0.7) Why did you donate?  
Self donor 3 (2.1) A friend or relative needed blood 23 (39.7)
Invalid 11 (7.9) Voluntary 31 (53.4)
No Response 2 (1.4) Remuneration 2 (3.4)
Can something happen to a blood donor during or after donation?   To know my screening status 3 (5.2)
Yes 117 (83.6) Will you donate if called upon or reminded to do so?  
No 14 (10) Yes 80 (57.1)
I don’t know 7 (5.0) No 35 (25.0)
No Response 2 (1.4) No Response 25 (17.9)
What can happen to a blood donor during or after donation?   Number of those who stated their contact 32 (40.0)
Contract Infection 13 (11.1) Reasons for non donation by non-donors  
Temporary Weakness 108 (92.3) Not approached to donate 26 (31.7)
Fall Sick 9 (7.7) Unfit to donate 14 (17.1)
Should patient relatives be asked to donate?   Need to donate for friends or relatives in future 18 (22)
Yes 127 (90.7) Fear of needles 10(12.2)
No 5 (3.6) Fear of knowing my status 2 (2.4)
I don’t know 1 (0.7) Donated blood may be sold 4 (4.9)
No Response 7 (5.0) No Response 17 (20.7)
    Do you encourage relatives to donate?  
    Yes 126 (90.0)
    No 8 (5.7)
    No Response 6 (4.3)

Table 4: Attitude and Practice of Blood Donation.

There was no significant association between donation practices and gender, duration of practice in the facility and specialty of physicians as P values were 0.227, 0.613 and 0.844 respectively (Table 5 and 6).

Gender Donors Non-donors Total
Males 43 59 102
Females 10 23 33
Total 53 82 135

Table 5: The association between gender and blood donation.

Duration of Practice Donors Non-donors Total
<1 years 10 17 27
1 – 5 years 35 50 85
> 5 years 13 13 26
Total 58 80 138

Table 6: The association between duration of practice and blood donation.

X2=0.980 P=0.613

Discussion

There are limited studies on voluntary blood donation practices among physicians. By training they have been taught and are continually exposed to current articles on transfusion practices. They are the ones who request, utilize and manage problems arising from use of blood and blood products. The extent these knowledge influence their practice of blood donation is yet to be fully ascertained. All respondents were within the eligible age group for blood donation hence they constitute a pool of potential donors [7]. The blood group ABO and Rhesus phenotypic patterns of respondent were similar to reports of previous work done in the geographic location [8]. Blood group O was the commonest (57.6%) while AB was the least (5.4%). The frequency of Rh D negative phenotype was 8.7% similar to the findings by Enosolease and Bazuaye [8]. As expected the respondent displayed a high knowledge with regard to common blood group, common transfusion transmissible infections though less than average recognized syphilis, CMV and other rare infectious agent transmissible by blood. This may be attributed to a decline in the screening for syphilis by the local blood bank and non inclusion of malaria and CMV screening for donors. Effect of culture and religion was recognized as a limitation to donation. Some Christian sects still object strongly to blood and blood product usage despite the absence of a perfect substitute. There was limited knowledge on frequency of donation and duration of a donation process. This may be due to the fact that less than 50% have donated blood.

Physicians usually request for blood and blood components for their patients and it is expected that they should be conversant with the challenges of blood procurement. Hence it is surprising therefore that “not been approached for blood donation” is the commonest reason for non-donation.

A study from the Blood Centre of Umea University Hospital in Sweden showed that among motives for donating blood, healthcare occupation represented only 7.7% of the donors [9]. Misje et al. [10] from the Blood Bank of Oslo, Norway, found that 12.4% of their donors worked in health and social sciences, a percentage smaller than that of the total work force (17.6%). These authors expressed surprise that healthcare professionals were under-represented.

In a similar study conducted in an academic based hospital in Virginia USA, of 687 survey respondents, only 21 (3.1%) were physicians [11]. The returning physician donors (16) came back a median of 12 months after a prior donation, a lapse 9 months longer than for all returning donors (median 3 months). One-third (33.3%) of physician donors presented as walk-in donors, two times that of the total survey respondents (16.2%) in the Virginia study.

Gilani et al. [12] in a comparative study on blood donation by medical and paramedical workers reported 49.2% of doctors as donors and only 3.4% of these regular donors.

In this study, we recorded 41.4% blood donation by physicians, 39.6% were regular donors and 53.4% of these were voluntary. Eighty (57.1%) accepted to be recruited and reminded to donate only 40% of them wrote their contacts. This was a far cry from the knowledge and attitude indicated by the questionnaire. Voluntary blood donation among physicians though low generally, doctors in this study performed higher than their colleagues in the developed countries as documented in the studies by Gilani et al. [12] and Kanner et al. [11]. There is need to properly harness this potential pool of donors if the drive for 100% voluntary donor targeted by the WHO will be achieved. For a sustainable blood banking system aimed at providing adequate and safe blood to all in need, a proper sensitization, and massive donor recruitment from all potential donors must be implemented.

Conclusion

Physicians in the study centre have good knowledge of voluntary donation and have a positive attitude towards donation but there is a disparity in their practice of blood donation.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11993
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2012 - Sep 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8190
  • PDF downloads :3803
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords