alexa Label-Free Shape-Based Selection of Cardiomyocytes with on-Chip Imaging Cell Sorting System | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9821
Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Label-Free Shape-Based Selection of Cardiomyocytes with on-Chip Imaging Cell Sorting System

Fumimasa Nomura, Tomoyuki Kaneko, Akihiro Hattori and Kenji Yasuda*
Department of Biomedical Information, Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 2-3-10 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan
Corresponding Author : Kenji Yasuda
Department of Biomedical Information
Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering
Tokyo Medical and Dental University
2-3-10 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]
Received September 14, 2011; Accepted December 05, 2011; Published December 07, 2011
Citation: Nomura F, Kaneko T, Hattori A, Yasuda K (2011) Label-Free Shape-Based Selection of Cardiomyocytes with on-Chip Imaging Cell Sorting System. J Bioprocess Biotechniq S3:003. doi: 10.4172/2155-9821.S3-003
Copyright: © 2011 Nomura F, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques

Abstract

We have examined the method for the label-free optical microscopic image-based selection of cardiomyocytes from the mixture of collagenase-digested embryonic mouse heart cells using the on-chip imaging cell sorter system, in which 1/2000 s real-time high-speed camera-based phase-contrast cell image recognition was performed. To separate the cardiomyocytes from other cells including fibroblasts, we distinguished the roughness of the cell surface quantitatively as the index of sorting. The selected cells with smooth surface (roughness index not more than 1.1) for cardiomyocytes, and confirmed that the more than 80% of the collected and recultivated cells were self-beating and the 99.2% of them were identified as cardiomyocytes by immunostaining. The results indicates the potential of the label-free cell purification using imaging cell sorting system, especially for cardiomyocytes by the index of their cell surface roughness, which might be applicable for purification of cardiomyocytes for regenerative medicine.

Keywords
On-chip imaging cell sorting system, Cardiomyocyte, In- dex of roughness, Agarose microchamber
Introduction
The non-invasive purification technique of the particular target cells from tissues, organs or cultivated cells is the essential and fundamental for cell-based research and even for regenerative medicine. For example, for the purification of cardiomyocytes, we need to remove more than half of the noncardiomyocytes from whole heart cells [1].
At present, the most commonly used method for cardiomyocyte purification is the pre-cultivation method exploiting the difference of the adhesion of cardiomyocytes and other cells including fibroblasts to the surface of cultivation dish [2]. However, the method was probabilistic way and is still regarded to be a rough purification. Another more precise purification method is the fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) [3] with fluorescent cardiomyocyte marker labeling, whereas it involves the potential problems of cell damages caused by antibody labeling. To overcome this labeling problem, we have proposed and developed the on-chip imaging cell sorting system for the label-free phase-contrast imaging-based identification of cell types using the index of cell surface shapes. Different shapes with 1/2000s real time processing [4,5]. In this paper, as a practical application of imaging cell sorting, we have examined the purification efficacy of cardiomyocytes cells with using of the index of cell surface roughness and reported.
Materials and Methods
Imaging cell sorter system
The on-chip phase-contrast imaging cell sorter system was consisted of the following five modules; [4,5] a cell sorting chip, an optical microscope equipped with a phase-contrast image processing module, a 1/2000 s high-speed charge-coupled devise (CCD) camera (HAS-220; DITECT, Japan), image processing unit, and a computer- controlled switching DC power supply for cell separation (Figure 1a). The cell sorting chip was made of poly dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) attached on a 0.9 mm thin glass slide, in which two inlets and flow channels for sample solution and buffer solution were symmetrically arranged. The generated two laminar flow in the two channels were connected at the cell separation area in center of the chip, and the two laminar flows were divided to the symmetrical two flow channels again, one is for waste drain and the other is for target cell collection. A pair of 1.5 % agarose gel electrodes containing 0.5 M NaCl (carrier of ionic current) was also arranged at the connecting point of two laminar flows for cell separation to shift target cells from the sample laminar flow to the buffer laminar flow through their boundary by electrophoretic force.
First for separation of target cells from the mixture of cells, the samples were applied to the sample inlet (Figure 1b) and put the air pressure both to the sample inlet and the buffer inlet to introduce the cells into the central separation area with keeping the boundary of two laminar flows by maintaining the same flow velocities of medium buffers (Figure 1c). The phase-contrast real-time images of the cells flew in the sample flow channel were directly monitored with 2000 pictures/s intervals, and were analyzed to acquire specific indexes (cell size, cross-sectional area, cell surface roughness) of cells using the field- programmable gate array (FPGA) real time image processing unit. The system can record both of the cell image pictures and FPGA analysis data simultaneously for the further checking and evaluation.
Then, when the target cells which satisfy the required values of the indexes were recognized, they were sorted by shifting them from left laminar flow to right laminar flow by the computer-controlled electrostatic force generation between two gel electrodes, which arranged perpendicular to the flow direction at the separation area, by the switching DC power supply.
Finally, only the recognized and shifted target cells were moved from the waste drain channel flow to the target sample collection channel flow, and the target cells were acquired at the target cell reservoir arranged at the end of the target sample collection channel (Figure 1b and 1c).
Sample preparation
The cardiomyocytes were isolated from 12- to 13-day-old mouse embryos (ICR) (Saitama Experimental Animals Supply, Japan) [6]. A mouse was anesthetized with diethyl ether and embryos were rapidly removed. The hearts of the embryos were removed and then washed with phosphatebuffered saline (PBS, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) containing 0.9 mM CaCl2 and 0.5 mM MgCl2 to induce heart contraction and remove corpuscles. The hearts were then transferred to PBS without CaCl2 and MgCl2 and minced into 1-mm3 pieces with fine scissors, and incubated in PBS containing 0.25% collagenase (Wako, Osaka, Japan) for 30 min at 37°C to digest the ventricular tissue. After this procedure was repeated twice, the cell suspension was transferred to a cell culture medium (DMEM [Invitrogen Corp, Carlsbad, SC, USA] supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin) at 4°C. The cells were filtered through a 40-µm-nylon mesh and were centrifuged at 180 g for 5 min at room temperature. Then, the cell pellet was resuspended in a cell culture medium and incubated at least 20 min in room temperature.
Immunostaining of cardiomyocytes
The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 and exposed for 2 hours to the mouse monoclonal antibody to heavy chain of cardiac myosin (abcam, Japan) dissolved in blocking buffer (PBS containing 1% BSA) and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 546, goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular probes, Eugene, USA). To visualize the nuclei, cells were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 for 30 min at room temperature. The cell images were recorded using an inverted microscope equipped for epifluorescence (IX-70, Olympus, Japan) using cooled CCD camera (ORCA-ER, Hamamatsu photonics, Japan).
Results and Discussion
Index for distinguish the surface roughness
For the imaging cell sorting, the particular index of cell images is essential for their separation. Regarding separation of cardiomyocytes from the mixture, we have already examined and found that the most of the smooth round shaped cells should cardiomyocytes). Hence, we have defined the index of roughness of cell surface R, which compare the real perimeter of cell surface and the estimated perimeter of cell surface by approximation of sphere model, to distinguish the surface roughness of cardiomyocytes and other cells quantitatively as,
                                                                                                     (1)
Where l is the perimeter of cell surface, S is the cross-sectional area of cell (both of l and S were acquired from pixel-based digitized image analysis of cells).
For example, a sphere with radius r should have R =[2p r / (4p ×p r2)1/ 2] equal to 1, and when the roughness increased, R should be increased in proportion to the increase of the real perimeter. Using the above index R, we can quantify the smoothness/ roughness of cell surfaces. For example, as shown in Figure 2 and Table 1, the typical smooth cells have the index of roughness R less than 1.1 (Figures 2a, 2b and 2c), and the typical rough cells have R larger than 1.1 (Figure 2d, 2e, and 2f). Table 1 also shows the acquired values of each cell calculated by the FPGA unit calculation from the captured cell images.
Cardiomyocyte separation using the index of roughness R
There are two major points for accomplishing the non-labeled separation of cardiomyocytes from the mixture of enzyme-treated heart extracts. One is the development of the proper quantified index of surface roughness of cells for judging the target cells and others as described above, and the other is the proper enzymatical treatment for appearance of surface shape differences to be able to distinguish different cells. Regarding the cardiomyocyte purification, based on our experience, [11] the collagenase-digestion treatment was effective to appear the difference of smooth/rough surface shapes depending on their difference of cell types. Hence, in this experiment, the sample mixture of cells were acquired from collagenase-digested heart isolated from 13-day-old mouse embryos (ICR). It should be noted for this procedure that the collagenase-digestion procedure and following incubation before cell sorting is essential for appearing the difference of smooth/rough surface of cells. Otherwise, if we use the conventional trypsinization procedure for cell preparation, cells do not show apparent smooth/rough surface shape differences. And the incubation after the collagenase-treatment at least 20 min was also essential for appearing their shape differences. Without this incubation, the shape difference was not sufficiently appeared on the surface of cells.
The functional sorting procedure of cardiomyocytes using above on-chip imaging cell sorter system with this imaging index R was as follows; (1) when the target smooth cells (R ≤ 1.1) flew into the sorting area, the target cell was recognized by high-speed camera and a pulse DC voltage was applied between a pair of agarose gel electrodes to shift the target cells from the sample flow channel to the buffer channel to introduce to the target sample collection channel (Figure 1d); (2) on the other hand, when other rough cells (R > 1.1) comes into this area, no electrostatic force was applied and the rough cells were introduced into the waste drain channel (Figure 1e).
Each of the collected smooth surface cell in the target cell reservoir was transferred into the 5-µm-thick 2 % (w/v) agarose (GenePure LowMelt ISC BioExpress) microchamber [7,8] laid on the collagen coated polystyrene cultivation dish at one by one manner [9,10] using micropipette (Figures 3, 4 and 5), and cultivated in a cell culture medium (Invitrogen DMEM supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin) at 37 °C with a humidified atmosphere of 95 % air and 5 % CO2.
Figure 3 shows the 24 samples of the typical target smooth cells acquired from cell sorting system. As shown in Figure 3a, each cell was put into the microchamber to isolate and identification of cell for identification of their characteristics after cultivation. Figure 3b shows the micrographs and the FPGA acquired indexes of the collected smooth cells. The index R of all the smooth cells except for the two coagulated smooth cells (see no. 3 and 16) showed less than 1.08. The samples of coagulated smooth cells (No. 3 and 16) were manually acquired from the rough sample cell reservoir to indicate the potential error of the index R for appropriate smooth cells. The results indicate that the visualized micrograph-based identification of smooth cells is suitable match to the index R<1.1.
Figure 4 also shows the 24 samples of the typical rough surface cells acquired from cell sorting system. Just same as Figure 3, each cell was put into the microchamber (Figure 4a) and indicated the index R larger than 1.1 except for the samples no. 1 and no. 15, which were manually collected from the smooth sample reservoir to indicate the potential error of the index R for appropriate rough cells, too. In the results, some rough surface cells were judged R<1.1 using FPGA procedure. One of the possible reasons and possible improvement for overcoming this problem is using of higher magnitude of objective lens for acquiring more precise perimeters.
Evaluation of the index of surface roughness for characterizing cardiomyocytes
After two days cultivation of the smooth surface cells (Figure 5b) and the rough surface cells (Figure 5e) laid in the agarose microchambers, we first categorized the cultivated cells by their ability of beating, and also by their adhesion abilities such as shrinking and stable expansion. For example, as shown in Figure 5b, a cell at the white arrowhead was shrinking, and a cell at the white arrow was disappeared. Moreover, as shown in Figure 5c, after the staining of myosin heavy chain of cells as the index of cardiomyocyte protein, a cell at the white double arrowheads was not stained, whereas all the remaining 21 cells in the 24 microchambers were well cultivated and showed their beating. In contrast, as shown in Figures 5d, 5e and 5f, most of rough surface cells were not attached on the surface of cultivation dish and disappeared (white arrows). Even the attached cells did not stained by myosin heavy chain probes (white double arrowheads) except for the rough surface sample no. 1, having the index R = 1.07.
In the experiment, from all of the 242 smooth cells, beating cells were 178 (73.6%), no-beating cells were 19 (7.9%), shrunk cells were 12 (5.0%), unattached cells were 33 (13.6%), respectively (Table 2).
As shown in Figure 5c, cardiac myosin positive-staining cells were 195 (99.99% of healthy cultivated cells; 80.6% of whole collected smooth cells), and the negative-staining cells were 2 cells (0.01% of healthy cultivated cells; 0.8% of whole cells) (Table 2). That means, even the cells which were not beating were cardiomyocytes except for two cells from 197 cells.
Hence, the results indicated that at least more than 80% of the collected cells were beating cardiomyocytes, and more than 99.99% of healthy cultivated cells were cardiomyocytes. The shrinkage and unattachment in our re-cultivation procedure might be caused by the insufficient removal of agarose coating of cultivation microchamber array from collagen layer. It should be noted that, although we did not count into the myosin-positive cells, even the shrinked cells in microchambers showed the positive-staining (see the white single arrowhead in Figure 5c).
In conclusion, we have succeeded in separating cardiomyocytes with label-free on-chip imaging cell sorting procedures with using of the index of their surface roughness, and the results indicated that the more than 80% of the smooth cells were beating cardiomyocyte cells, and also more than 99% of healthy re-cultivated cells were cardiac myosin positive cells. The results suggested that the non-labeling simple phase-contrast image-based cell sorting has a potential to separate cardiomyocytes precisely from the mixture of heart cells by the index of cell surface roughness with less than 1 % error rate.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by New Energy Development Organization (NEDO).
References

Tables and Figures at a glance

 

Table icon Table icon
Table 1 Table 2

 

Figures at a glance

 

Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12036
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2013 - Jun 18, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8243
  • PDF downloads : 3793
Top