Reach Us +44-1202068036
Mechanical Fragility as a Potential Time-Independent Measure of Membrane Integrity among Stored RBC Units | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9864
Journal of Blood Disorders & Transfusion

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Mechanical Fragility as a Potential Time-Independent Measure of Membrane Integrity among Stored RBC Units

Tarasev M1, Alfano K1, Chakraborty S1, Bertholf M2 and Zubair A3*

1Blaze Medical Devices, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2The Blood Alliance, Inc., Jacksonville, FL, USA

3Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Abba C. Zubair
Transfusion Medicine and Stem Cell Therapy
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology
Mayo Clinic, FL, USA
Tel: 904-956-3318
Fax: 904-956-3356
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: April 16, 2013; Accepted date: May 28, 2013; Published date: June 05, 2013

Citation: Tarasev M, Alfano K, Chakraborty S, Bertholf M, Zubair A (2013) Mechanical Fragility as a Potential Time-Independent Measure of Membrane Integrity among Stored RBC Units. J Blood Disord Transfus 4:139. doi: 10.4172/2155-9864.1000139

Copyright: © 2013 Tarasev M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Blood Disorders & Transfusion


Background and Objectives: Previous studies have shown that storage causes RBC membrane damage and subsequent potassium leakage to extracellular environment, with the effects exacerbated by RBC irradiation. While damage to RBC appears to worsen with storage time (ST), ST alone has not been shown to fully account for this phenomenon. It is therefore important to study the extent to which other time-independent factors can affect RBC membrane integrity. RBC mechanical fragility (MF) is evaluated as a surrogate measure of RBC membrane integrity due to its potential to reflect aggregate biochemical and biomechanical changes associated with storage.

Materials and methods: Samples from 45 units non-irradiated and 58 units of irradiated leuko reduced RBC units were subjected to shear stress using a bead mill at different durations at a fixed intensity (50 Hz); induced hemolysis was ascertained via spectral analysis. Profile curves characterized the relationship between stress duration and induced hemolysis, from which specific parameter values were interpolated.

Results: There was high variability among RBC MF parameters. MF profiles were significantly variable among both irradiated and non-irradiated stored RBC units, and in some, within the same units which resulted in distinguishable subpopulations. RBC base-line hemolysis (hemolysis before stress application) MF variation was largely independent of ST. Donor blood type appeared to influence MF parameters and base-line levels.

Conclusion: RBC membrane properties, as defined by MF, vary markedly across RBC units. This variability is largely independent of ST. MF could potentially be used clinically to assess RBC membrane.


Red blood cells; Transfusion; Storage lesion; Fragility


RBC storage in general results in progressive biochemical and morphological changes collectively known as storage lesion [1,2]. Morphologically, prolonged ex vivo storage results in crenation and spicule formation in RBC, with the consequent development of spheroechinocytes. The spicules are shed as lipid vesicles, leading to spherocytosis and loss of surface-to-volume ratio [3]. Prolonged storage of RBC units also results in progressive depletion of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) levels and subsequent increase in oxygen affinity [4], and depletion of ATP [5] that is linked to energydependent cell membrane functions [6,7]. Mechanical properties of the RBC membrane have been shown to be significantly affected in storage lesion, possibly through a loss of endogenous RBC antioxidants that result in oxidative damage to cytoskeletal proteins and membrane phospholipids; this is one manifestation of the plethora of storageinduced changes in RBC membranes which also include membrane phospholipid fasciculation and loss, changes in membrane-bound carbohydrates, and loss of sialic acid related to changes in electrochemical RBC properties ([8,9] for reviews). These storage-related processes translate into macro effects which – beside changes in cell shape, volume, and density – manifest themselves in increased rigidity of RBC membrane, increased cell agreeability which may contribute to changes in RBC-endothelial interactions, and increased levels of endotoxins and inflammatory cytokines also associated with prolonged blood storage [10,11]. Even though it is well documented in-vitro, the clinical relevance of storage lesion remains controversial. Current debates predominantly focus on whether or not “older” blood may provide lower transfusion efficacy and/or safety [1,12-14]. Similarly, the focus of current clinical research on this topic, as exemplified by the ABLE [15], RECESS [16] and ARIPI [17,18] studies, remains on the use of storage time (ST) as the sole metric of anticipated RBC performance.

However, focusing on ST as the sole measure of storage lesion ignores the variability in RBC properties that depend on factors other than a blood product’s age. Mean RBC age at donation can span from 38 to 60 days [19] and can influence the nature and magnitude of storage lesion [20,21]. Also notable is that inter-donor variability was shown to be the most significant contributing factor for in-bag (base-line) auto-hemolysis of stored packed RBC [22] and had been identified as one of the major determinants in variability of RBC post-transfusion 51Cr 24 hour in-vivo recovery [23,24]. And variably donor-specific metabolomic changes in pRBC in storage had been highlighted in a recent presentation by Dumont et al. [25]. Hence, the disparity of the results of studies looking to compare “old” versus “new” blood product units may not be so surprising; a true test of storage effects would likely require metrics directly related to physiological properties of RBC. It remains to be shown which if any such in vitro parameter(s) can be reliably correlated with transfusion efficacy and outcomes.

These effects may be further exacerbated when RBC are irradiated to prevent the risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD). In the Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville FL) facility, a large number of transfusions are performed to organ transplant and other immune-compromised patients, and as a result all transfused units are irradiated. Longitudinal studies are typically based on a small sample size, and are useful to track changes over time but make it challenging to asses any potential unit-tounit variability. Because of the above-noted limitations of longitudinal studies, we elected to implement a different approach by assessing multiple diverse units at the point of transfusion. Such an approach makes ST just one potential variable among others. Understanding such cross-inventory variability is particularly important, as this is the variability that will be present at the point of care. It is noteworthy to mention that a recent study reported based on 136 observations an weak (r = -0.18, R2 ~ 0.03) inverse relationship between the age of blood and the increment in hematocrit post transfusion [26]. At the same time presented data show a great variability in the changes in hematocrit even when transfused units were of the same of similar age. With storage time responsible for ~ 3 percent of outcome variability it remains to be determined what the factors responsible for the remaining 97 percent are. It seems that this variability in transfusion outcomes in likely to be better understood through potential variability in stored cells’ physiological properties; with RBC membrane presenting an attractive target for investigation.

RBC mechanical fragility (MF) [27,28] and related flow properties [29] have been suggested as potential candidates to supplement ST as an aggregate metric of RBC storage lesion. In the present study, we investigated the utility of MF as a measure of RBC membrane integrity among RBC units, including irradiated, in Hospital Blood Bank inventories and how this is independent of ST.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection: The RBC test segments used to assess RBC MF were obtained from leukoreduced units released for transfusion at the University of Michigan Hospital Blood Bank of, in case of irradiated units, used for transfusion during liver transplants at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Units were collected by either whole blood (WB) or apheresis (AP) collection. Both WB and AP non-irradiated units as well as irradiated AP units were stored in AS3, while irradiated WB units were stored in AS5 reflecting the differences in manufacturing practices of different blood supplies. The test segments from the Mayo Clinic were shipped overnight to Dr. Tarasev’s laboratory in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The content of four segments from the same RBC unit was combined for testing to mitigate any potential variability between individual segments. These were diluted to 1.7 g/dl total Hb concentration (as measured by Hemoglobin B system from HemoCue, CA), corresponding to about 4% hematocrit, with AS-3 buffer containing 40 g/L albumin (Sigma). Resultant RBC suspension was gently agitated and a liquotted into 2 ml low-retention centrifuge tubes (Denville, NJ) at 330 μl per tube.

Fragility Test: Mechanical stress was applied to RBC samples with the use of a Tissue Lyser LT (Quiagen, Hilden, Germany) bead mill (at an oscillation frequency of 50 Hz) in the presence of one 7mm diameter stainless steel ball at 22±2°C. Samples from each RBC unit were subjected to such stress at 10 different durations (ranging from 30 sec to 60 min for non-irradiated and 45 min for irradiated samples) to ensure a wide range of achieved hemolysis levels. Un-lysed cells were precipitated by centrifuging the samples for 5 minutes at 1,300 RPM and aliquots of supernatant were used for spectral analysis.

Hemolysis Assessment: Base-line hemolysis (hemolysis prior to the application of mechanical stress) and mechanically induced hemolysis (Hem, with sub-index indicating applied stress duration) were determined based on the difference in absorbance at 576 nm, a wavelength of oxygenated Hb maximum, and a baseline absorbance at 700 nm. It was expressed as a fraction of cell-free hemoglobin (HBF) relative to total hemoglobin concentration (HbT) according to Formula 1 which included the correction for sample hematocrit as detailed by Sowemino-Coker [30]. Total haemoglobin concentration for each diluted RBC sample was determined by subjecting a small (30-40 μL) aliquot to repeated (5x) rapid freeze-thaw using liquid nitrogen. In control experiments, such treatment was shown to fully lyse RBC.

Spectroscopic measurements were performed with NanoDrop N100 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MI). Average standard deviation of raw spectrophotometric data points with three independent measurements per each data point, was about six percent.

RBC Fragility profiles were described by the hemolysis parameters (Hem-parameters) representing amount of hemolysis achieved as a result of small (0.5-2 min), medium (5-15 min) and large (30-60 min) stress durations at a set stress intensity, corresponding to overall small, medium and large total applied stress magnitude – with each magnitude represented by a corresponding MF metric (i.e., relevant Hem-parameter). Unlike single-point measurements that use single stress duration at a single stress intensity, as implemented e.g. by Raval et al. [28], MF profiles allow to record sample RBC propensity to hemolyse over the range of applied stress magnitudes, from that resulting in minimal to that resulting in nearly total hemolysis of cells in the tested sample, thereby allowing multiple fragility-based indexes to be interpolated for separate analyses [27]. Fragility parameters at particular stress durations were obtained from best fit secondorder polynomial regression to the experimental data. For curves exhibiting significant deviations from a simple polynomial, raw data was subdivided into low and high hemolysis sub-sets and the fits were obtained independently for each subset of the data.

Statistical Analysis

Data is presented in the form of mean ± standard deviation, or median and range where appropriate. Correlations among parameters were determined using linear regression analysis with ANOVA model (Excel, Microsoft, WA) with significance defined at α=0.05 with Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and significance (p) values reported. Categorical variables were included the models where appropriate. Student t-test with a two-tailed p-value of 0.05 was used to test for statistical significance.


1. RBC units showed significant inter and intra-unit variation of RBC MF profiles and parameters: Both irradiated and non-irradiated Red Blood Cells (RBC) exhibited significant variability in the observed MF profiles, which were grouped into three general categories based on their overall shapes as shown in figure 1. For a small fraction of RBC (profile α) the maximum applied stress was sufficient to achieve close to full hemolysis. For other units (profiles β and δ) 1 hour of applied stress resulted in less than 80% cell being lysed with the RBC of profile β reaching a plateau at about 70-80% of hemolysis (Figure 1). Irradiated and non-irradiated RBC exhibited about equal distribution among these three profile types. A fraction of the RBC exhibited features which indicated the presence of at least two well-defined “subpopulations” of RBC within the unit – each defined by having its own discernible profile or a potential hemolysis threshold value (profile γ, Figure 1). Furthermore, existence of highly stress-resistant subpopulations should be assumed for all RBCs excluding profile, as significant fraction of cells (20-30 percent in case of profile γ) seem to be able to withstand the maximum applied duration of stress. RBCs showing high resistance to mechanical stress were still able to be lysed via rapid freeze-thaw using liquid nitrogen, or by chemical means as employed by a Hb-meter (HemoCue), which confirms that the observed plateaus were indeed due to unlysed cells. No significant correlation was observed between the ST and the profile categories.


Figure 1: Examples of RBC MF profiles. Each curve is from a single representative unit; each data point is the average of 3 independent measurements (CV=0.06). Percentage values below represent a relative amount of units out of total that had a profile similar to that represented on the figure. Non-Irradiated units (n=45): α: 0%; β: 42%%; and δ: 58%; Irradiated units (n=58): α: 3%; β: 45%; and δ: 52%. Fraction of all RBC attributable to γ profile: 16% for un-irradiated and 17% for irradiated RBC. Conditions are described in Materials and Methods

Levels of base-line hemolysis (Hem0) and MF profilederived induced hemolysis parameters (Hem) also varied significantly among the RBC. Notably the base-line hemolysis values for irradiated RBC were significantly elevated compared to that of non-irradiated (Table 1). However observed differences in MF between irradiated and non-irradiated segments were largely not statistically significant. Overall variability in fragility, as described by Hem parameters, was higher for irradiated RBC: up to 6 fold, compared to 3-4 fold differences for non-irradiated RBC (Table 1).

  Non-Irradiated Blood Segments (n = 45) Irradiated Blood Segments (n = 59)
Stress Hemolysis (%) MF correlation with   MF correlation with
ST 19±11 days; range 3 to 41 days Blood type B n=12* Hemolysis (%) ST 24±7 days; range: 7 to 36 days Blood type B n=13**
Median (range) r (p) r (p) Median (range) r (p) r (p)
Hem0 0.27 (0.03-1.3) n/a (0.15) - 0.32 (0.02) 1.0 (0.2-3.9) n/a (0.58) n/a (0.08)
Hem1 9.0 (4.3-12.8) n/a (0.99) n/a (0.24) 8.3 (2-13) n/a (0.78) - 0.40 (0.002)
Hem15 53 (23-68) n/a (0.06) - 0.35 (0.01) 49 (16-86) - 0.26 (0.05) - 0.33 (0.01)
Hem30 62 (34-77) n/a (0.45) - 0.39 (0.01) 59 (21-96) - 0.37 (0.004) - 0.33 (0.01)

Table 1: Selected MF Hem parameters and correlation for non- irradiated and irradiated RBC.

2. Non-irradiated RBC MF parameters were independent of storage time: For both irradiated and non-irradiated RBC storage time ranges from “new” to “old” with age distribution that was close to normal (Table 1). Hem-parameters obtained for non-irradiated RBC exhibited no correlation with the storage time duration (ST) (p>0.05). For irradiated RBC regression analysis indicates a weak negative correlation between ST and Hem-parameters related to larger applied stress, with the maximum dependence observed for H30 at ~10 percent (Table 1). Consistent with the noted poor correlation between RBC MF and ST, units of the same age often responded significantly differently to applied mechanical stress. Conversely, units with very different STs can have substantially similar MF profiles (Figure 2). For irradiated units, storage time after irradiation (STI) can be an additional parameter reflecting quality as previous studies reported faster RBC degradation post-irradiation [31,32]. Surprisingly, we did not observe a statistically significant correlation between STI and in-bag (base-line) hemolysis. STI in this study was a weak predictor of RBC MF at larger stress magnitudes (increase in Person correlation coefficient for Hem30 from -0.37 to -0.44), but not of induced hemolysis at small or medium stress. It is possible that the correlations would be more pronounced but for a relatively short (9.5 ± 3 days at testing) STI in this study. Multiple factors, beside storage time, can affect the properties of RBC at the time of transfusion. Such factors may potentially include manufacturing methods, storage conditions and donorspecific attributes.


Figure 2: Similar RBC MF profiles observed both in “fresh” and “old” units. Presented are representative profiles of six units (all irradiated); three units at a ST of 12-13 days (open symbols) and three units at 29-34 days (filled symbols).

3. Blood type B was associated with lower propensity to hemolysis: For both irradiated and non-irradiated cells, ABO were found to be correlated to RBC membrane MF with blood type B better able to withstand mechanical stress compared to types A and O blood (Table 1). RBC average STs for the ABO types can differ due to different usage rates. Type B units were on average older for irradiated and younger for non-irradiated units used in this study1. Thus ST and ABO are potentially dependent variables. For non-irradiated RBC, regression analyses on data subsets based on ABO exhibited no correlation between ST and MF parameters. Similar analysis performed on irradiated RBC revealed no correlation in the type B subset, with type A RBC exhibiting the dependence similar to that seen for irradiated samples overall. Regression using ST and type B (as a categorical variable) as independent variables in irradiated RBC show negative correlation to ABO for smaller stress parameters with both ST and ABO being significant independent variables for larger MF parameters (r ~ -0.45, p<0.05). These observations confirm that ABO, specifically type B 1ST for blood type B vs. blood types A and O for nonirradiated: 14 ± 6 vs. 22 ± 12 and 20 ± 13 days; irradiated: 27 ± 9 vs. 17± 5 and 18 ± 6 days compared to types A and O is indeed a storage time-independent predictor of RBC MF. This conclusion does not preclude ABO being an extraneous variable correlated to some unaccounted for parameter(s).


It is known that RBC units from different donors differ in their biochemical and biomechanical properties, in part due to in vivo age upon collection which can affect cell’s membrane properties [21], with differences ranging from cell size to membrane composition. It is also known that red cell senescence brings about a decrease in plasticity of the cell membrane [33,34], which may likewise be a donor- specific phenomenon [35]. However, it has not yet been shown how extensive such differences can be, nor that such intrinsic variability in cell properties could be detectable not only across different units but also within a single donated unit. In particular, these issues are especially noteworthy with regard to irradiated units due to their higher propensity for damage; hence, they are compared here at their respective points of transfusion.

Although sub-populations of RBC had been reported and investigated before, most commonly they are discussed in terms of RBC younger/older fractions (representing cells of different metabolic age). While such fractions may indeed differ in cell’s size, volume, Hb concentration and notably ability to deform [36], a smooth MF distribution would be expected in healthy donors. Appearance of RBC sub- populations which differ in membrane mechanical properties can be expected and indeed had been reported for subjects with pathological conditions like sickle cell anemia, elliptocytosis or sepsis [37,38], although Dobbe [37] noted an existence of fractions, variable from zero to 20 percent, of both hypo- and hyper-deformable cells even in normal donors. The existence of RBC subpopulations with significantly different abilities to withstand applied mechanical stress is clearly demonstrated by the profile curve representing category γ in figure 2. To a lesser extent, it is also exhibited by profile δ, figure 2. Additionally, as noted above, the plateau of profile β suggests that in this category there exists a small (approx. 20%) but well-defined fraction of cells with a much lower propensity for lysis than the rest. Moreover, it is possible that at least all units may also have RBC subpopulations with varying stress resistances, which are not well resolved with the employed granularity of this study.

MF of RBC membranes is commonly described by a Mechanical Fragility Index (MFI) which represents the amount of hemolysis resulting from a predetermined stress [28,39]. Those would be analogous to one of the multiple HEM parameters used in the present study. Data presented here indicate that, by themselves, such single-point metrics may not fully characterize RBC ability to withstand mechanical stress. Wide differences in profile slope and shape, including the existence of distinct sub-populations within particular units, demonstrates the value in evaluating RBC properties over a range of applied stresses. Further study is necessary to determine which single or combination of stress magnitudes correlate with clinical performance. In this study, regression analysis indicate potentially different impact of ABO groups on RBC storability with type B blood on average being less fragile, than that of types A and O. Further studies, specifically designed to confirm this observation would be necessary; however as the mechanisms for such correlation, if indeed present, are not immediately apparent, it is possible that ABO itself is in part a proxy for as-yet undetermined donor or manufacturing-specific factors. It is well-documented that irradiation results in increased base-line hemolysis of RBC [40,41]. Base-line hemolysis was also shown to gradually increase with ST while also being significantly dependent on the type of storage solution used and method of leukoreduction, while being poorly correlated with unit hematocrit [22,42]. The values for base-line hemolysis observed in the present study were on average comparable with those reported previously however, especially in case of irradiated samples, there were outliers which exhibited exceptionally high hemolysis levels. Similar to low-stress Hem- parameters, base-line hemolysis was found to be independent of storage time (Table 1). It could thus be that a correlation between base-line hemolysis and longer STs was not detected due to the background of high unit-to-unit variability.

The main limitation of the current study was a logisticallynecessitated reliance upon test segments. That leaves open the question of equivalency between cells’ properties in a unit versus in its test segments even though segments in this study were equivalent to their units in storage solution composition. Potential differences in physiological properties and storability of RBC between units and segments had not been adequately addressed in peer-reviewed literature to date and are limited to analysis of auto-hemolysis. Published data, based on very limited sample sizes, indicate that segments may potentially differ from the units and from each other in auto-hemolysis levels [43]. Present study alleviated any potential segment-to-segment variability by using a mixture of four segments for the testing. It should also be noted that it remains to be shown whether base-line hemolysis, especially at low levels, is significantly indicative of the physiological state of RBC. While it remains to be understood how RBC physiological properties in units may differ from that in the unit segments, we believe that segments can still provide an initial “snapshot” of the variability in RBC properties of different units. We submit that the uniformity of processing allows for a meaningful comparison among units and allows drawing some preliminary conclusions on unit-to-unit variability.

It was previously proposed [27,28] that MF can potentially provide a standard for quantifying RBC membrane integrity during storage. Rapid and inexpensive tests for MF parameters, presently under development, could become a useful tool in clinical practice. For example, individualized unit data regarding levels and rates of RBC lesion could enable a quality-based approach to inventory management (similar to that used for perishable foods [44]) instead of relying upon ST alone as exemplified by the use of First-In-First-Out method. For example, a unit whose prospective efficacy is declining more rapidly than others may get used sooner, to minimize any quality loss. In summary, we describe and compare here various MF-based parameters for characterizing stored irradiated RBC units. Our main focus was on MF profiles constructed by varying one stress parameter and tracking the resultant effect upon percentage hemolysis, and select MF parameters derived from these profiles. This study demonstrated the existence of distinct cell subpopulations in blood from healthy donors, which is characterized by distinguishable MF profiles within individual RBC units. It also presents evidence for substantial independence of stored RBC unit-to-unit MF variability from ST. Subsequent work will further investigate factors potentially affecting MF and its variability in blood bank inventories, as well as correlations of in vitro MF parameters to in vivo cell performance and clinical outcomes.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12488
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2013 - Jan 19, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8674
  • PDF downloads : 3814

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2019-20
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri and Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

ankara escort

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

pendik escort

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2019 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version