alexa Modified Valgus Osteotomy for Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture Non-Union | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0533
Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Modified Valgus Osteotomy for Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture Non-Union

Babak Siavashi*, Mohammad Reza Golbakhsh and Dariush Gouran Savadkoohi

Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

*Corresponding Author:
Babak Siavashi
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran, Emam Khomeini Ave
Phone: 0098-21-66348500
Tel: 0098-912-2471521
Fax: 0098-21-66348543
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: Novmber 15, 2011; Accepted Date: April 20, 2012; Published Date: April 22, 2012

Citation: Siavashi B, Golbakhsh MR, Savadkoohi DG (2012) Modified Valgus Osteotomy for Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture Non-Union. Orthop Muscul Syst 1: 110. doi: 10.4172/2161-0533.1000110

Copyright: © 2012 Siavashi B, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Orthopedic & Muscular System: Current Research

Keywords

Non-union; Femoral neck fracture; Valgus osteotomy

Introduction

Femoral neck fracture is one of the most important fractures and bears special problems and complications in any age [1]. Before puberty, injury to the upper growth plate of femur, malalignment and limb shortening; and in young and middle-aged patients, femoral head necrosis and non-union of the fracture site; and in the elderly, femoral head exchange and prosthesis implantation are major complications of this fracture [2]. This fracture is uncommon in childhood, though the complications can be really severe. On the other hand, with access to newer generations of prostheses for femoral head substitution and also with low activity and function of the elderly, the difficulties due to femoral neck fracture in this group may lead to less functional disorder. Most complications of this fracture are seen amongst young and middle-aged patients [3]. One of the most complications of this fracture in young and middle-aged patients is non-union. Important factors which are responsible for this complication are insufficient circulation of fracture site, inappropriate fixation, early weight bearing, and also anatomic position of the femoral neck and shearing forces at the fracture site [4]. If non-union happens, the treatment depends on the situation of the femoral head (viable or nonviable). If the femoral head is viable, the surgeon tries to preserve the femoral head and stimulate union at the fracture site. This purpose is achieved by performing valgus osteotomy in the sub trochanteric or inter trochanteric region [5]. Shearing force is changed to compression force which is a stimulant of fracture union. In classical method of this operation, the non-union site is not exposed by surgeon and only by passing fixation device through fracture site, the femoral neck angle is increased by valgus osteotomy [6,7]. Though there is less injury to circulation of the femoral head and less probability of necrosis, it has some problems. Sometimes, femoral neck fracture non-union is associated with fracture of implanted screws for primary fixation of the fracture. The retained screws inside the femoral head prevent implantation of a new fixation device, or at least prevent appropriate implantation of this device. Often non-union occurs in varus position of femoral head [8] and causes cartilaginous part of the femoral head become adjacent to osseous part of the femoral neck and decreases the probability of union [9]. In this study, the site of non-union is exposed and if the fractured screws prevent appropriate fixation, they are removed and cancellous parts of head and neck are placed near each other and are fixed together.

Materials and Methods

In this case-series study, all patients who presented with nonunion of the femoral neck fracture during a two-year period to Sina Hospital and were 20-60 years of age and had viable femoral head with no destruction, were studied. All the fractures were trans-cervical ones. Twenty-five patients met the criteria to enter into the study. Three patients did not present for further follow-ups and therefore 22 patients (18 males and 4 females) remained until the end of the study. Mean age of the subjects was 34 years (20-47 years). Age range of the cases was 20-47 years. The patients were informed regarding the method of the surgery and its advantages and disadvantages and written consent were gathered. Range of motion of hip and Harris hip score were measured and documented.

At first, using bone scan or MRI, the viability of femoral head was proved. Then, through antero-lateral approach (Watson-Jones) and capsulotomy of hip, non-union site was exposed. After removing fractured screws, precise reduction of the femoral neck fracture was done and the head and neck angle was corrected. Then, Chisel was used to implant angel blade plate (150 degrees) with 6 holes. Bone graft, either in the form of cancellous graft or pediculated graft, was not used. The patient started walking using walking aid with contact of the foot with ground and in 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and one year intervals was examined. The required time to union was documented. After one year, Harris hip score was calculated and fracture union, reduction, femoral head necrosis, arthrosis, and femoral head destruction and limb shortening were considered. If infection or entrance of implant into the joint space occurred, it was documented as well.

Results

Mean limb shortening before surgery was 2 cm (1-3.5 cm) and at the end of the study was 0-1.5 cm (mean, 1 cm). In 10 patients (46%) the previous screws had been fractured and in 4 patients (18%) the fixation was not achieved. Mean union time of non-union site was 4.5 months (3.5-7 months). Mean Harris hip score was 63 (60-70) before surgery and 89 (82-98) at the last examination. The complications were entrance of implant point into joint space (3 cases) and avascular necrosis of the femoral head and its destruction (2 cases). There was no infection, implant fracture, and non-union of osteotomy site. In all of the cases (100%) union in nonunion site were happened. (Figure 1 and 2).

orthopedic-muscular-system-nonunion-implant-fracture

Figure 1: Nonunion and implant fracture.

orthopedic-muscular-system-modified-valgus-osteotomy

Figure 2: After modified valgus osteotomy.

Discussion

One of the problems during surgery is the fracture of the previous fixation device. This may prevent placement of angle blade in appropriate site. This problem has not been reported in other studies. If it occurs, the surgeon has to expose the non-union site to remove the fractured screw. Also, if the initial reduction is inappropriate or is unsuccessful, the surgeon has to expose the non-union site. In former reports, there is no information about the cases in which non-union is exposed and the fracture edges are cleaned of fibrosis. In Marti et al. study, in 50 patients below 70 years-old 83% union happened. In Mathius study on 15 patients below 70 years-old, 80% union was reported. In another study in 2007 on 13 patients, 100% union was reported. In another study in 2007 on 10 non-union cases among children, 100% union was noted [10]. In the largest case-series on 66 non-union of the femoral neck with a mean age of 49.5 years (18-72 years), valgus osteotomy and fixation using angle blade was done and 88% (58 cases) showed union [8].

In another study, 18 cases of 20 cases with non-union who were below 60 years who were treated by angle blade and valgus osteotomy showed union [14]. There are some studies to study the effect of valgus osteotomy without manipulation of non-union site (cleaning the fibrosis) [12,13].

In the current study, the probability of union of non-union site was reported as 100% which is superior to the aforementioned studies. One of the complications of surgery with angle blade plate is the entrance of implant point into the joint space. Since in contrast to Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), there is no chance of dynamic effect of fixation device (angle blade plate), with compression of nonunion site with partial weight bearing, the tip of angle blade may enter the joint space. Fortunately, in our study, this was occurred concomitantly with the union of the femoral neck and Implant was removed immediately before joint destruction.

Although in case of using DHS, the likelihood of implant point entering into joint space is less, due to evacuation of large amounts of cancellous bone from the femoral head, there is less possibility of firm grip of nail in head and this is one of the causes of failure. In most studies, fixation has been done using angle blade and in few studies other devices have been used. Hartford et al. treated 8 patients with DHS. One patient was dropped out due to death, in 7 patients with mean follow-up time of 24 months union was achieved and Harris hip score increased from 24 to 73 [13]. In another study, 4 patients with age range of 25 to 35 years underwent valgus osteotomy and fixation using sliding hip screw and union was achieved in all cases. Mean union time was 6 months (4-8 months) [14]. Improvement and significant increase in Harris hip score from 63 to 89 is a good sign indicating effectiveness of surgery and improved function and returning patient to previous normal life. In this study patients had some shortening of limb before intervention, it was better to use open wedge method for valgus osteotomy. However, for 2 reasons proximal femur osteotomy with close wedge method was preferred, although this method can potentially shorten the limb. On one hand, with valgus of proximal femur, there is some lengthening of the femur (difference of final length of the limb was about 1 cm which is negligible) and because of compression in osteotomy site, the probability of union is increased and there is no need to use bone graft. So, there is no prolongation of operation time and less injury to the patient.

Conclusion

The results showed that opening of the hip capsule and cleaning the non-union site and removing fractured screws not only does not increase the probability of femoral head necrosis, but also causes better union rate and better reduction and higher contact between cancellous bone of the femoral head and neck. Improvement of harris hip score has a positive effect on patient life.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12060
  • [From(publication date):
    May-2012 - Feb 22, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8251
  • PDF downloads : 3809
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version