alexa
Reach Us +441704335730
10 Reasons to Do TAPP | OMICS International
[Jurnalul de Chirurgie]
ISSN: 1584-9341
Journal of Surgery
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

10 Reasons to Do TAPP

Radu Moldovanu1,2* and Gérard Pavy3

1Department of Surgery, “St. Mary” Clinic, Cambrai, France

2Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr.T. Popa” Iasi, Romania

3Department of Surgery, Les Bonnettes Hospital, Arras, France

*Corresponding Author:
Radu Moldovanu, MD, PhD
Department of Surgery, “St. Mary” Clinic
22 rue Watteau, 59400, Cambrai, France
Tel: +33 (0) 3 27 73 56 03
Fax: +33 (0) 3 27 73 56 96
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: November 10, 2014 Accepted: November 30, 2014 Published: December 05, 2014

Citation: Moldovanu R, Pavy G. 10 Reasons to Do TAPP. Journal of Surgery [Jurnalul de chirurgie] 2015; 10(4):247-248 doi:10.7438/1584-9341-10-4-1

Copyright: © 2015 Moldovanu R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Hernia repair is the most common surgical procedure worldwide. The mesh repair is the gold standard technique for groin hernia in adults; anatomic, non-mesh repair is still indicated in contaminated wounds. The recommended techniques by the actual guidelines are: Lichtenstein and Shouldice technique for open access and TAPP (TransAbdominal PrePeritoneal) and TEP (Total ExtraPeritoneal) hernia repair for endoscopic repair. We present herein several aspects of TAPP hernia repair with highlighting its advantages. The present paper is a brief argument to do TAPP routinely in benefice of patients, residents and surgeons.

Keywords

Hernia repair; Laparoscopy; TAPP; Laparoscopic training; Surgery warm-up

Editorial

The hernia repair is the most common surgical procedure with over 2,000,000 procedures performed every year [1]. The mesh repair is the gold standard technique for groin hernia repair in adults. The exception is the risk of mesh infection in case of contaminated wounds and, the “anatomical” repair without mesh is recommended for these cases [2,3].

The actual guidelines recommend 4 techniques for groin hernia [2-4]:

- for open approach, mesh repair using Lichtestein technique and, for contaminated wounds, Shouldice technique, and

- for endoscopic hernia repair, TAPP (TransAbdominal PrePeritoneal) and TEP (Total ExtraPeritoneal)

The recent papers and guidelines didn’t reveal any advantage between TAPP and TEP from point of view of postoperative morbidity and recurrence rate and only the surgeon’s experience (and preference) remains the only valuable argument [2-4].

The “absolute” contraindications for TAPP are in fact the contraindications of general anesthesia and generally of laparoscopic approach: severe comorbidities (e.g. severe cardiac or respiratory dysfunction). It is also contraindicated in children (as all the mesh repair techniques). All the rest are “relative” contraindication, which depends of surgeon experience and local conditions: large inguinoscrotal hernia, history of radical prostatectomy or planned radical prostatectomy, peritoneal adhesions [2-4].

We presented below 10 reasons to do TAPP as usual technique for groin hernia:

1) TAPP is an outstanding hernia repair procedure because allows a good reinforcement of abdominal wall and the reinforcement of all the groin area with a low of recurrence. To have a low rate of recurrence is it mandatory to respect several technical tricks: wide dissection to allow a good mesh deployment and parietalization and avoid the mesh enrollment and the use of large mesh (ideally 12x15cm) to cover all the weak groin areas [1-8].

2) TAPP is associated with low risk of morbidity: less mesh infection, hematoma and recurrence [2-4]. However, TAPP is associated with a higher risk of postoperative seroma; however several technical tricks as fascia transversalis eversion and fixation in large direct hernia and Retzius space drainage allow the decrease of postoperative seroma [2-4,7,8].

3) The laparoscopic exploration during TAPP allows a rapid checkup of contralateral site with diagnosis and then treatment during the same procedure of occult contralateral hernias. We perform the bilateral repair sequentially, firstly the most important hernia and then the contralateral, and we use two separated meshes fixed together on the mid-line with absorbable tacks/staples [7,8].

4) The preperitoneal dissection during TAPP allows the diagnosis of occult obturator hernias (type I), source of chronic inguinal or pelvic pain. Using the open approach this hernias are overlooked; in this way it is important to note the high incidence of obturator hernia in women in necropsy: 60% [9]. In our experience the overall incidence of obturator hernia was 18% (32% in women and 15.5% in men respectively) [10]. The wide preperitoneal dissection also allows the diagnosis of small, incipient, femoral hernias. In this way, TAPP is highly recommended in women, especially in “skinny old ladies” with high risk of obturator, femoral or other occult hernia [4,11-14].

5) TAPP, contrary to TEP, can be performed in strangulated hernias [2-4]. In our opinion the laparoscopic exploration represents a great advantage in strangulated hernia and allows to explore the entire small bowel and to treat the small bowel ischemic lesions [2-4]. Afterwards, hernia repair can be performed using either semi absorbable mesh or anatomic (open/laparoscopic) non mesh repair according to the wound contamination.

6) TAPP, contrary to TEP, is easy to be learned with a learning curve of about 30 procedures. The anatomical landmarks are easy to be recognized. Usually a step-by-step approach with landmarks recognition is advisable: superficial landmarks (urachus, umbilical folds, epigastric vessels, spermatic vessels, vas deferens or uterine round ligament) and then, deep landmarks (Cooper, Gimbernat ligaments, corona mortis and external iliac vein) [7,8].

7) TAPP allows the diagnosis and treatment of concomitant ventral hernias. In this way we are the advocates of laparoscopic mesh repair which allows a better exploration and reinforcement of abdominal wall with large prosthesis which overlaps with a minimum 5 cm in all directions the parietal defect(s), to avoid postoperative mesh shrinkage and recurrence [15,16].

8) TAPP has a low risk of postoperative pain if we respect several simple rules: use of light weight mesh, use of absorbable tacks, use of less of 10 tacks, glue fixation or adhesive mesh [1-4,7,8].

9) TAPP allows a rapid recovery with a short time to return to normal activity and work. In this way it is suitable for ambulatory or one day surgery [2-4].

10) One of the most important issues is the value of TAPP as a tool for laparoscopic training. As mentioned above, TAPP is a relatively easy to be learned especially due to the easy recognition of anatomic landmarks. Then, TAPP is an excellent exercise to learn and practice laparoscopy:

• It allows a gain in exploration, 3D accommodation and camera manipulation:

to navigate and explore the entire abdomen, to recognize the superficial and then the deep anatomic landmarks; furthermore, in our opinion a 30 degree camera is mandatory to better perform the procedure, and TAPP is an excellent exercise for the training of 30 degree camera manipulation for the surgeon and his assistant, targeting the different superficial and especially deep anatomic landmarks.

• Dexterity and ambidexterity:

TAPP requires good skills of dissection and tissue exposure so is an excellent training tool for dissection and navigation in narrow spaces, dissection of “fragile” structures (e.g. testicular vessels, vas deferens). It is also a valuable exercise to deploy and manipulate a mesh.

• Knot tying:

The peritoneal closure after TAPP is very important; the actual guidelines recommend “waterproof” closure of the peritoneum using different methods: staples, glue, suture [2-4,7,8]. We usually close the peritoneum by a running suture with extracorporeal or intracorporeal knot tying or barbed sutures [7,8]. This is a very good exercise for laparoscopic sutures and knot tying and we highly recommend it as training tool before start any other more complex procedure which implies sutures (gastro-esophageal junction surgery, colic surgery, bariatric surgery).

• Warm-up:

Warm-up concept in general surgery is relative recent. However it’s value was demonstrated in different studies [17,18]. In our opinion, TAPP is useful as “warm-up” procedure before to start other more complex techniques (e.g. laparoscopic colectomy, gastric bypass) due to its complex role to train all the gestures used in minimally-invasive surgery, from 3D accommodation and camera navigation until dissection and suturing.

In conclusion, we consider TAPP an excellent procedure and in our opinion, it has to be generalized as common routine hernia repair procedure for the benefice of patients, residents and surgeons.

Conflict of interests

Authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

References

  1. Leroy J (2001) Transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP). WeBSurg 1.
  2. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, et al. (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13: 343-403.
  3. Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, et al. (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)] Surg Endosc 25: 2773-2843.
  4. Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, Bansal V, Bingener J, et al (2015) Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc 29: 289-321.
  5. Litwin DE, Pham QN, Oleniuk FH, Kluftinger AM, Rossi L (1997) Laparoscopic groin hernia surgery: the TAPP procedure. Transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. Can J Surg 40: 192-198.
  6. Wingenbach O, Waleczek H, Kozianka J (2004) Laparoscopic hernioplasty by transabdominal preperitoneal approach. Zentralbl Chir 129: 369-373.
  7. Moldovanu R, Pavy G (2014) Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) procedure - step-by-step tips and tricks. Chirurgia (Bucur) 109: 407-415.
  8. Moldovanu R (2013) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal procedure (TAPP) for groin hernia. How to do it for better outcomes. Jurnalul de chirurgie (Iasi) 9: 193-196.
  9. Hubka P, Spacková J, Nanka O, Masata J (2010) Existence of the preperitoneal fatty plug and hernia in obturator canal. Ceska Gynekol 75: 208-211.
  10. Moldovanu R, Pavy G, Vlad N (2015) Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Approach in the Management of Obturator Hernia. EuroAmerican Multispeciality Summit VII, Orlando, February 11-14,; Abstract book.
  11. Perry CP, Hantes JM (2005) Diagnosis and laparoscopic repair of type I obturator hernia in women with chronic neuralgic pain. JSLS 9: 138–141.
  12. Skandalakis LJ, Skandalakis PN, Gray SW, Skandalakis JE et al. (1995) Obturator hernia. Lippincott Co 1995: 4.
  13. Gray SW, Skandalakis JE, Soria RE, Rowe JS Jr (1974) Strangulated obturator hernia. Surgery 75: 20–27.
  14. Nakayama T, Kobayashi S, Shiraishi K, Nishiumi T, Mori S, et al. (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of obturator hernia. Keio J Med 51: 129-132.
  15. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev16: CD007781.
  16. Moldovanu R (2014) Ventral hernia repair by laparoscopic approach, how to do it. Journal of Surgery [Jurnalul de Chirurgie] 10: 97-99.
  17. Abdalla G, Moran-Atkin E, Chen G, Schweitzer MA, Magnuson TH, et al. (2014) The effect of warm-up on surgical performance: a systematic review. Surg Endosc.
  18. Moldovanu R, Târcoveanu E, Dimofte G, Lupascu C, Bradea C (2011) Preoperative warm-up using a virtual reality simulator. JSLS 15: 533-538.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 13315
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2015 - Sep 19, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 9379
  • PDF downloads : 3936
Top