Journal of Materials Science and Nanomaterials
Open Access

3D nanofabrication; Two-photon polymerization; Biomedical microdevices; Microfabrication; Nanostructures; Photopolymerization; High-resolution printing; Tissue engineering; Biocompatible materials; Microscaffolds; Drug delivery systems; Microfluidic devices; Nanofabrication techniques; Additive manufacturing; Bioelectronics; In vitro models; Microelectromechanical systems; Polymerization processes; Microscale resolution; Medical device manufacturing

The demand for highly precise, customizable, and functional biomedical microdevices has driven significant advancements in nanofabrication techniques. Among the various methods available, two-photon polymerization (2PP) has emerged as a powerful technique for 3D nanofabrication, particularly for applications in the biomedical field. Two-photon polymerization is a laser-based technique that enables the creation of three-dimensional structures with nanometer resolution. By using focused laser light to induce polymerization at the focal point of the laser, 2PP allows for the precise fabrication of complex microstructures, which is particularly advantageous for creating intricate biomedical devices such as microfluidic chips, scaffolds for tissue engineering, and drug delivery systems [1-5].

Unlike traditional photolithography, 2PP allows for the direct writing of 3D structures in photosensitive resins, offering significant advantages in terms of resolution, design flexibility, and the ability to fabricate microstructures that were previously difficult or impossible to achieve. This makes 2PP ideal for fabricating microscale biomedical devices that require high precision and customization. Additionally, the versatility of the technique allows for the use of a wide range of biocompatible materials, which are essential for ensuring the safety and efficacy of medical devices in biological applications. This paper explores the capabilities of two-photon polymerization in 3D nanofabrication for biomedical microdevices, discussing the potential applications, challenges, and future directions for this technique in medical device development [6-10].

Discussion

Two-photon polymerization (2PP) offers several unique advantages for the fabrication of biomedical microdevices. One of the primary strengths of 2PP lies in its ability to produce structures with incredibly fine resolution, down to the nanometer scale. This high resolution is critical in biomedical applications where precise control over structure and size is necessary. For example, in tissue engineering, 2PP can be used to create scaffolds with complex geometries that mimic the extracellular matrix, providing a 3D environment that promotes cell growth and tissue regeneration. The ability to create such intricate structures is crucial for developing functional tissue models, where the correct architecture can influence cell behavior and tissue development.

Another key benefit of 2PP is its versatility in terms of materials. The technique is compatible with a wide range of biocompatible polymers, including both synthetic and natural materials. For instance, hydrogels and other biodegradable materials can be used to create scaffolds for tissue engineering, ensuring that the structures are both functional and safe for implantation. Furthermore, 2PP enables the creation of multi-material structures, which is valuable for developing drug delivery systems. By printing different materials in layers or selectively incorporating drug-loaded particles, it is possible to design devices that can deliver controlled doses of therapeutics over time, enhancing the effectiveness of treatments.

2PP also excels in the fabrication of microfluidic devices, which are essential tools in biomedical research for studying cellular behavior, drug interactions, and biochemical processes. The high resolution of 2PP allows for the creation of microfluidic channels with precise control over their dimensions and connectivity, which is critical for designing systems that can accurately model biological processes. Moreover, the ability to create microfluidic devices in 3D offers a significant advantage over traditional 2D devices, enabling the development of more complex and realistic in vitro models of organs and tissues.

The precision of 2PP also makes it ideal for manufacturing microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), which are increasingly used in biomedical applications for diagnostics, sensing, and drug delivery. MEMS devices, which can integrate mechanical and electrical components on a microscale, are well-suited for use in point-of-care diagnostics and wearable medical devices. 2PP enables the fabrication of MEMS devices with highly detailed features, such as micro-sensors or actuators, that are essential for the development of next-generation biomedical microdevices.

Despite these advantages, there are several challenges associated with the use of 2PP for biomedical microdevice fabrication. One of the primary challenges is the limited material selection. While 2PP is compatible with many polymers, there are still relatively few materials that possess both the necessary mechanical properties and biocompatibility required for long-term implantation in the human body. Researchers are working on developing new materials that can be printed with 2PP and that will degrade safely and predictably in vivo.

Conclusion

Two-photon polymerization (2PP) has emerged as a powerful tool for the 3D nanofabrication of biomedical microdevices, offering unparalleled resolution and design flexibility. The ability to fabricate complex structures with nanometer precision makes it ideal for applications in tissue engineering, drug delivery, and microfluidics, where the architecture and material properties of the devices are critical to their function. Additionally, the versatility of 2PP in terms of materials and its compatibility with biocompatible polymers have paved the way for the development of next-generation medical devices that are safe and effective for use in biological applications.

Despite its significant advantages, several challenges remain in fully realizing the potential of 2PP for biomedical applications. These include limitations in material selection, the slow throughput of the technique, and the difficulty of integrating multiple functionalities into a single device. Nevertheless, ongoing research in materials science, process optimization, and multi-functional integration holds promise for overcoming these challenges and expanding the range of applications for 2PP-based microdevices.

As 2PP technology continues to evolve, it is likely to play a central role in the development of innovative biomedical devices that can provide improved diagnostics, personalized treatments, and enhanced tissue regeneration. The ability to create highly customized, patient-specific devices will open up new opportunities in precision medicine and contribute to the advancement of healthcare technologies.

References

• Kamau JM, Mbui DN, Mwaniki JM, Mwaura FB (2018) Utilization of rumen fluid in production of bio- energy from market waste using microbial fuel cells technology. J Appl Biotechnol Bioeng 5: 227‒231.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Kamau JM, Mbui DN, Mwaniki JM, Mwaura FB (2020) Proximate analysis of fruits and vegetables wastes from Nairobi County, Kenya. J Food Nutr Res 5: 1-8.

Indexed at, Crossref

• Kinyua A, Mbugua JK, Mbui DN, Kithure J, Michira I, et al. (2022) Voltage Recovery from Pesticides Doped Tomatoes, Cabbages and Loam Soil Inoculated with Rumen Waste: Microbial Fuel Cells. IJSRSET 9: 172-180.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Kiyasudeen SK, Ibrahim MK, Ismail SA (2015) Characterization of Fresh Cattle Wastes Using Proximate, Microbial and Spectroscopic Principles. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 15: 1700-1709.

Google Scholar, Crossref

• Li Y, Jin Y, Borrion A, Li H, Li J (2017) Effects of organic composition on the anaerobic biodegradability of food waste. Bioresour Technol 243: 836-845.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Mbugua JK, Mbui DN, Waswa AG, Mwaniki JM (2022) Kinetic Studies and Simulation of Microbial Fuel Cells Voltage from Clostridium Spp. and Proteus. J Microb Biochem Technol 14: 483.

Indexed at, Crossref

• Mbugua JK, Mbui DN, Mwaniki J, Mwaura F, Sheriff S (2020) Influence of Substrate Proximate Properties on Voltage Production in Microbial Fuel Cells. J Sustain Bioenergy Syst 10: 43-51.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Neves L, Oliveira R, Alves M (2003) Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem 39: 2019-2024.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

• Verma N, Khosa RL, Pathak AK (2008) Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of fruits of Ficus bengalensis linn. Pharmacology online 3: 206-215.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

• Chelikani P, Fita I, Loewen PC (2004) Diversity of structures and properties among catalases. Cell Mol Life Sci 61: 192-208.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref