Reach Us +447482877761
Chemical Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Surface Sediments of the Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake of Northwestern Turkey.
ISSN: 2380-2391
Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Chemical Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Surface Sediments of the Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake of Northwestern Turkey.

Tansel Topal1, Lokman H. Tecer1 and Semra G. Tuncel2*

1Namik Kemal University, Department of Environmental Engineering, 59860, Corlu, Tekirdag, Turkey

2Middle East Technical University, Chemistry Department, 06531, Ankara, Turkey

*Corresponding Author:
Semra G. Tuncel
Middle East Technical University
Chemistry Department, 06531, Ankara, Turkey
Tel: +903122103195
Fax: +903122103200
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: July 16, 2014; Accepted date: September 09, 2014; Published date: September 11, 2014

Citation: Topal T, Tecer LH, Tuncel SG (2014) Chemical Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Surface Sediments of the Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake of Northwestern Turkey. J Environ Anal Chem 1:117. doi: 10.4172/2380-2391.1000117

Copyright: © 2014 Topal T, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry


The concentrations of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in surface sediments collected from 44 sites of the Ä°kizcetepeler Dam Lake, in Balıkesir province of Northwestern Turkey are determined. The soxhlet extraction procedures had been optimised and validated by using gas chromatography-Mass detector (GC_Mass). Recovery was in between 56-124%. Relative standard deviation was less than 1% and limit of detection changed from 0.0010 to 0.028 µg/g. The accuracy of the method was verified by analyzing National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference Material 1597 (NIST SRM 1597). The selectivity, accuracy and precision were quite adequate for the determination of PAHs in sediment samples. The sum PAH concentrations was 0.19 ± 0.07 mg/kg. The Factor Analysis (FA) and diagnostic analysis results indicated that pyrogenic and petrogenic sources are the important sources of PAHs. Further analysis showed that contributions of Factor 1 (mixed) and Factor 2 (pyrogenic) are 37.9% and 26.9% respectively. Factor 3 (explains 15.4 of the total variance), represents petrogenic (spills of oil products) source.


GC-MASS; PAH; Sediment; Factor analysis; Diagnostic ratios


Sediments in river, sea, lake and dams serves as a sink for a variety of pollutants including especially hydrophobic ones such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). It is important to determine sediment pollution since pollutants in sediments are transferred to water body which in turn affects organisms and living species. This fact is especially critical for dams where community drinking water is supplied as public health is directly affected as well as living species in the water. Therefore, for drinking water quality determinations levels of the pollutants should be precisely determined and necessary precautions should be taken if necessary [1].

PAHs are important pollutants among the others since they are toxic, carcinogen, mutagenic and 16 of them considered as USEPA micropollutants [2]. In order to be able to control PAH concentrations, first their source need to be fully understood. PAHs in water environment are formed mainly by three processes; pyrogenic, petrogenic and biogenic. Pyrogenic PAHs are formed by incomplete combustion of organic materials like plant and fossil fuels. Pyrene like high molecular weight PAHs are accumulated in this group. Petrogenic PAHs are part of fossil fuels and they have generally lower molecular weights. Biogenic PAHs are also formed by diagenesis of biogenic material. Retene and perylene are the examples to this type [3]. By using specific PAH ratios source of the PAHs can be identified and is known as diagnostic ratio analysis. Factor analysis (FA) is another statistical method used for source apportionment. It is a data reduction tool and examines the inter-relations between the variables. Since FA should be run with more variables it provides more detailed and valid information [4]. In this study varimax rotated FA with Kaiser Criterion were used.

The aim of this study is to determine chemical concentrations and major contributing sources of PAHs in Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake sediments. Analyses were performed using GC-MS after microextraction. Source determination was achieved by diagnostic ratio analysis and factor analysis. Evaluation against Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) addressed ecotoxicological risks of the produced PAH data. The nineteen PAHs, including 16 PAHs identified by US EPA as priority pollutants, were monitored in surface sediments. The results of this study will provide valuable information for the environmental quality of Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake.


Materials and methods

All chemicals used during the study were of analytical reagent grade. The PAH-mix 68 (100 mg/L in Cyclohexane) and internal standard-mix 25 (500 mg/L of Acenaphtene-D10, Perylene-D12, Chrysene-D12, Phenantherene-D10 in Acetone) from Dr. Ehrenstorfer, were used for the analysis of PAHs. Standards for the calibration curve were prepared by diluting them with dichloromethane (DCM, Merck, HPLC-grade). Standard reference material; SRM 1597a (complex mixture of PAHs from coal tar prepared in DCM), were bought from National Institute of Standards and Technology. High purity of helium (99.999%), glass-wool and sodium sulphate (Na2SO4, anhydrous extra pure, Merck) were used for the analyses. The sodium sulphate and glass-wool were pre-cleaned by transferring them to a large glass column (1 L capacity or larger) and washing sequentially with acetone (Ac) and DCM before use. Sodium sulphate was activated in an oven at 400°C for 4 h. Glass-wool was conditioned overnight at 225°C in an oven. The alconox detergent powder (Supelco Cat. No. 1104) was used for the cleaning of all glassware used in laboratory. All glass wares were cleaned with detergent in hot water and rinsed with deionized water. After being rinsed with DCM/Ac, they were dried in an oven overnight.

All the PAH analysis was performed with Hewlett-Packard (HP) 6890 GC system equipped with a 5973 mass selective detector. Heidolph rotary evaporator (laborota 4000 efficient) and mini-vap evaporator with 6 ports (Catalog No: 22970, Cat. No: 22971) were used for the evaporation of solvents. Bransonic ultrasonic bath (Model B-2200 E4, 205 W, 220V) was used for the sample extractions. Deionized water (ultra filtered type 1 water) was supplied by Barnstead nanopure ultrapure water system.

Sample collection and PAH analyses

Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake (Figure 1) is situated 20 km south of Balikesir province. It was constructed between the years 1986-1992 across Kille stream and is fed by Akçaköy, Tasköy and Kozludere creeks. The Dam Lake is used to irrigate Pamukçu and Aslihantepecik plains and is also used for drinking water since 2003 [5].


Figure 1: Sampling Points in ?kizcetepeler Dam Lake

The Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake has been spreaded over a broad land including a village (Selimiye), agricultural fields and the Balikesir-Izmir highway. Today, agricultural applications are carried out around it and the new Balikesir-Izmir highway passes over it [6]. The location of sampling site is given on Figure 1. The surface of the Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake is 9.6 km2 and the overall volume is 164, 56 hm3. The minimum code (water level above sea level) is 49.75 m and the maximum code is 175 m. According to the measurements taken in April 2000, the maximum depth was 47.0 m [7].

The top 0-1 cm surface layer was collected by using grab sediment sampler. Samples (100-250 g) were stored in a refrigerator at -20°C in colored nylon bags in order to prevent any damage caused by the sunlight.

Soxhlet extraction was optimized using chemometrics and optimized conditions were used for the extraction of 44 sediment samples collected from Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake. Surrogates were added to each sample before an extraction in order to observe extraction efficiency. Five gram (air dried) sediment was weighted into an extraction vessel. After spiking with surrogate standard, 1 ml of 6.5 µg/ml 2-fluorobiphenyl in methylene chloride, the sample was extracted in a 50 ml beaker for about 10 minutes with an 10 ml of DCM and hexane mixture (1:1, v/v). The same procedure was repeated with a mixture of hexane (5 ml) and DCM (5 ml) twice more for a total volume of 30 ml.

Totally four surrogates were used and each surrogate was assigned to the different set of PAHs according to number of rings. For example, Acenaphtene-D10 (Ace-D10) and Phenanthrene-D10 (Phe-D10) were used for the recovery calculations of 3 rings PAHs, Chrysene-D12 (Chr-D12) for 4 rings PAHs and Perylene-D12 (Per-D12) for the 5-6 rings PAHs. Calculated average recoveries (n=26) of surrogates in sediment samples were 41%, 60% , 85% 86% for Ace D10, Phe D10, Chr D12 and Per D12 correspondingly. By using these recovery values concentrations of the PAHs in Ikizcetepeler sediment samples were corrected as depicted in Table 1, which is showing, Certified Concentrations (mg/L) and % Recoveries of PAHs in SRM 1597a (complex mixture of PAHs from coal tar prepared in DCM) for GC-MS (n=4)

SRM 1597a Certified Conc. Found Conc. % %
(mg/L) (mg/L)(n=4)  Error Recovery
Nap 896 ± 87.0 479 ± 10.7 -46.6 53.4
Acy 229 ± 6.00 184 ± 6.85 -19.5 80.5
Ace 6.63 ± 0.230 7.90 ± 0.258 19.2 119
Fle 126 ± 3.00 104 ± 5.65 -17.8 82.2
Phe 395 ± 6.00 325 ± 7.54 -17.8 82.2
Ant 93.0 ± 2.60 76.9 ± 2.88 -17.4 82.6
Fla 284 ± 6.00 257 ± 10.1 -9.67 90.3
Pyr 209 ± 6.00 197 ± 3.16 -5.74 94.3
BaA 85.3 ± 2.00 105 ± 41.6 23.5 124
Chr 57.6 ± 4.60 76.5 ± 31.3 32.7 133
BbF 57.5 ± 3.80 54.8 ± 3.35 -4.7 95.3
BbK 35.8 ± 0.400 53.6 ± 2.86 49.7 150
BeP 43.8 ± 0.900 33.1 ± 1.75 -24.5 75.5
BaP 81.3 ± 1.20 43.2 ± 2.86 -46.9 53.1
BgP 43.9 ± 0.500 33.5 ± 3.24 -23.7 76.3
DaA 6.03 ± 0.350 5.80 ± 0.909 -3.81 96.2

Table 1: Certified Concentrations (mg/L) and % Recoveries of PAHs in SRM 1597a (complex mixture of PAHs from coal tar prepared in DCM) for GC-MS (n=4)

Since PAH concentrations should be given on a dry weight basis, water content of the sediments was determined and found as 56% in average (n=10). By the subtraction of moisture content dry weights of the samples were calculated and these weights were used for the calculations. The procedure for the extraction of sediment samples is detailed in another article [8].

As instrumental analyses GC-MS was used and its features were discussed below. Before starting analysis with GC-MS, some important parameters like injection volume, inlet temperature, carrier gas (He) flow rates, oven temperature program parameters (initial oven temperature, ramp rate and initial time) and make-up gas flow rate were optimised. Mass dectector and quadropole source temperatures were respectively. As column, HP-5 5% Phenyl Methyl Siloxane column (30 m length and 0.32 mm ID 0.25 μm film thickness) was chosen as best and used during PAH analysis. Helium was used both carrier and make up gas. Splitless mode was used. Injection volume was 2 μl and inlet temperature was . (He) flow was 1.5 ml min-1 similar to the GC-MS conditions. Hydrogen and air ratios were optimized and their values were chosen as 40 ml min-1 and 400 ml min-1 respectively. It was necessary to optimize these values to create more stable flame which provides better ionization and lower background.

The method detection limits (MDL) of the each target analytes for GC-MS were determined and the results were given in Table 2.

No Abbreviations Name GC-MS
MDL (mg L-1)
1 Nap Naphthalene 0.000098
2 Acy Acenaphtylene 0.000056
3 Ace Acenaphtene 0.000025
4 Fle Fluorene 0.000037
5 Phe Phenanthrene 0.000039
6 Ant Anthracene 0.000025
7 Fla Fluoranthene 0.000024
8 Pyr Pyrene 0.000012
9 BaA Benzo(a)anthracene 0.000049
10 Chr Chrysene 0.000215
11 BbF Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.000124
12 BkF Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.000072
13 BaP Benzo(a)pyrene 0.000074
14 BeP Indeno(1,2,3–cd)pyrene 0.000193
15 DaA Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.00039
16 BgP Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.000164

Table 2: Method Detection Limits (MDL) of PAHs for GC-MS

The standard curves were obtained 10, 50, 100, 500 and 1000 µg l-1 PAH standards and the response curves for 16 PAHs were linear with correlation coefficients around 0.99. The range of r values lies between 0.997-1.000. The method detection limits ranged from 0.000012-0.000390 mg/L as can be seen from Table 2, The method detection limits were determined based on the concentration (or amount) of an analyte which gave a signal three times the background noise.

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analysis

Total organic carbon (TOC) of sediments was analyzed using an element analyzer (LECO, CHNS-932 Elemental Analyzer). The sediments were first acidified with 10% (v/v) HCl overnight to remove carbonate, then dried at 60 and analyzed for TOC [9,10].


Effect of total organic carbon on total PAHs in sediment

Figure 2 shows very low correlation between total PAH concentrations and TOC content (r2=0.0732) Many studies indicated that similar correlation shows that TOC content is an important controlling factor for the sorption of PAHs on sediments [9]. Usually in lakes different hydraulic conditions lead to different sediment properties, e.g. TOC content. In our case it ranged from 0.280 to 4.01%, with an average of 1.96 ± 0.710%.


Figure 2: PAH Cross Plots for the % TOC vs total PAH

PAH concentrations were normalized with respect to TOC contents in order to reduce the effect of sediment property on the concentrations. Total PAH/TOC concentrations in 44 Ikizcetepeler sediment samples were calculated separately and were given in Figure 3. The normalized PAH concentrations ranged from 5.20 to 35.2 mg/kg-TOC with an average of 10.6 ± 5.55 mg/kg-TOC. As can be seen from the Figure 3 total PAH/TOC concentrations are especially higher in sediment samples; 33 (west of the dam lake), 1 (north of the dam lake), 9 (north of the dam lake), 42 (west of the dam lake), 32 (west of the dam lake) and 23 (east of the dam lake).


Figure 3: ΣPAH/TOC Concentrations (mg/kg-TOC) in ?kizcetepeler Dam Lake Sediment Samples (n=44)

PAHs in sediments

The average concentrations of 16 measured PAHs in Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake sediment samples were given in Table 3. As can be seen from the table, high concentration was observed for Nap and BeP and it was 0.020 mg/kg. The BaA and DaA both had the lowest concentration which was 0.005 mg/kg. General concentration profile was as following;

No PAHs Average Average Standardized
PAH Conc. ± Stdev PAH Conc. ± Stdev
(mg/kg) (mg/kg-TOC)
1 Nap 0.020 ± 0.011 1.13 ± 0.779
2 Acy 0.0060 ± 0.0010 0.329 ± 0.0771
3 Ace 0.0070 ± 0.0020 0.396 ± 0.224
4 Fle 0.0080 ± 0.0030 0.555 ± 0.723
5 Phe 0.018 ± 0.011 1.10 ± 0.975
6 Ant 0.018 ± 0.011 1.05 ± 0.731
7 Fla 0.010 ± 0.003 0.560 ± 0.270
8 Pyr 0.0080 ± 0.0030 0.419 ± 0.166
9 BaA 0.0050 ± 0.0020 0.286 ± 0.160
10 Chr 0.0090 ± 0.0040 0.504 ± 0.286
11 BbF 0.0090 ± 0.0030 0.480 ± 0.266
12 BkF 0.0080 ± 0.0030 0.470 ± 0.270
13 BaP 0.0080 ± 0.0030 0.470 ± 0.217
14 BeP 0.020 ± 0.023 1.03 ± 1.22
15 DaA 0.0050 ± 0.0050 0.292 ± 0.250
16 BgP 0.017 ± 0.007 0.908 ± 0.518
  ΣPAH 0.19 ± 0.07 10.6 ± 5.55

Table 3: The Average and Average Standardized PAH Concentrations (mg/kg) in ?kizcetepeler Dam Lake Sediments


The average sum PAH concentrations were 0.19 ± 0.07 mg/kg which is higher than expected.

Sediment quality determinations for Ikizcetepeler sediments

In order to determine the quality of the sediments collected the recommended sediment quality values for 16 PAHs was used. Individual concentrations given in Table 3 were used to generate Table 4.

PAH (mg/kg) TEC-MEC-PEC Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Nap 0.1760-0.3690-0.5610       1.13
Acy 0.0059-0.0670-0.1280       0.329
Ace 0.0067-0.0480-0.0890       0.396
Fle 0.0774-0.3070-0.5360       0.555
Phe 0.2040-0.6870-1.170     1.1  
Ant 0.0572-0.4510-0.8450       1.05
Fla 0.4230-1.327-2.230   0.56    
Pyr 0.1950-0.8580-1.520   0.419    
BaA 0.1080-0.5790-1.050   0.286    
Chr 0.1660-0.7280-1.290   0.504    
BbF 0.2400-6.820-13.40   0.48    
BkF 0.2400-6.820-13.40   0.47    
BaP 0.1500-0.8000-1.450   0.47    
BeP 0.1500-0.8000-1.450     1.03  
BgP 0.1700-1.685-3.200   0.908    

Table 4: Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for PAHs

According to the consensus-based sediment quality guidelines (CBSQGs) three classes (explaining toxicity level) exist; TEC, MEC and PEC. The TEC (threshold effect concentration); lower concentration at which toxicity to benthic-dwelling organisms are predicted to be unlikely. The PEC (probable effect concentration); upper concentration at which toxicity to benthic-dwelling organisms are predicted to be probable. The MEC (midpoint effect concentration); is a concentration midway between the TEC and PEC concentrations (TEC + PEC / 2=MEC). There are four levels which are; Level 1 (≤TEC), Level 2 (TEC<Level 2≤MEC) and Level 3 (MEC<Level 3≤PEC) and Level 4 (>PEC).

To compare the study site concentrations with the CBSQs concentrations on a common basis, study site concentrations should be divided by the study site % total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations to yield a dry wt. normalized value. When no site TOC information is available % TOC is assumed as 1 [11]. In this study TOC information was available therefore study site PAH concentrations were divided by % TOC values. According to the Table; BgP is in Level 1, Fla, Pyr, BaA, Chr, BbF, BkF, BaP, IcP are in Level 2, Phe, BeP are in Level 3, and Nap, Ace, Acy, Fle, Ant and DaA are in Level 4.

Statistical analyses

To interpret the obtained data, some calculations and statistical tests were applied. First diagnostic ratios were calculated to classify the PAHs in two broad source categories. To obtain detailed source categories, Factor analysis was applied.

Factor analysis (FA) was performed on normalized PAH concentrations using SPSS 17.0 package program. Factor analysis is a multivariate analysis which groups the variables with the same variance in the same factor (principal components). The factors with eigenvalues over 1 were extracted according to Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity and were rotated using the Varimax method. Extracted factors are assigned as source depending on the variables which make up the factor. The assumption is, the variables with the same variance are assumed to be originating from the same source. Factor analyses provide only qualitative information about the source type. If quantitative information is required than another approaches like ‘receptor modeling’ could be used. Diagnostic ratio analysis was achieved simply by taking the ratio of the selected analytes and explained below.

Diagnostic ratios of PAHs

In order to distinguish petrogenic sources and pyrogenic sources, molecular fingerprints of PAH isomers within the same molecular weight are used. As a result of this kind of source tracer’s studies, different PAH ratios were found. For example a 178 mass PAH ratio which is anthracene/(anthracene + phenanthrene). Assigned threshold values to each PAH ratios also helps in determination of source type. However this method has some disadvantages. Although it is a helpful tool for qualitative determinations it is not quantitative. Another limitation is the degradation of PAHs in environment, with different rates which in turn affects the ratio. Therefore diagnostic ratio by itself is not enough to comment about the sources, it must be supported by another statistical analysis like FA [12].

According to the Figure 4, PAHs in sediments with the ratio of Anthracene to Anthracene plus Phenanthrene; Ant/(Ant + Phe)>0.1 were typical of combustion sources (pyrogenic source). In addition, PAHs in sediments with the ratio of Fluoranthene to Fluoranthene plus Pyrene; Fla/(Fla + Pyr)>0.5 indicates PAHs are mainly from combustion of grass, wood and coal and 0.4<Fla/(Fla + Pyr)<0.5 from combustion of petroleum [3].


Figure 4: PAH Cross Plots for the Ratios of Ant/(Ant + Phe) vs. Fla/ (Fla + Pyr)

As depicted in Figure 4, most ratios generated in this study pointed to a source from grass/wood/coal combustion. The second major source might be petroleum combustion (automobile emission). With the data at hand, it can be concluded that pyrogenic origins might be the dominant PAH source in Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake.

Factor analysis (FA) for Ikizcetepeler samples

Factor Analysis is a statistical tool to groups the parameters with the same variance in the same factor. The similarities in variations considered as a common source for the parameters grouped in the same factor [13-15]. By considering factor loadings as the degree of correlation of ech parameter with the factor one can assign a source for each factor. FA solution for the PAH concentrations from the Ikizcetepeler sediments were presented in Table 5.

    Factor Analysis Results  
No PAH 1 2 3 Communalities
1 Nap 0.686 0.162 0.471 0.718
2 Ace 0.778 0.139 0.199 0.663
3 Fle 0.046 -0.068 0.876 0.774
4 Phe 0.660 0.307 0.626 0.922
5 Ant 0.303 0.357 0.791 0.845
6 Fla 0.615 0.586 0.454 0.928
7 Pyr 0.183 0.817 0.214 0.747
8 Cycpyr 0.905 0.161 0.075 0.851
9 Chr 0.704 0.599 0.114 0.868
10 BbF 0.731 0.625 0.162 0.951
11 BkF 0.719 0.623 0.160 0.931
12 BaP 0.597 0.661 0.139 0.812
13 IcP 0.514 0.765 0.148 0.872
14 DaA 0.057 0.704 -0.020 0.499
15 BgP 0.687 0.536 0.170 0.788
16 Att 0.762 0.242 0.173 0.670
Estimated Source Mixed Pyrogenic Petrogenic  
Variance (%) 37.9 26.9 15.4
Total Variance 37.9 64.8 80.2  
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization,  
Bold Loadings>0.70

Table 5: Factor Analysis (FA) Results

According to FA results in Table 5, there were three factors accounting for 80.2 of the total variance in the data. Among three factors; Factor 1 is responsible for 37.9 of the total variance and heavily weighted in Ace, Cycpyr, Chr, BbF, BkF, Att (mostly HPAHs; 4-6 rings). Factor 2 contributing 26.9% of total variance, and it is highly weighted by Pyr, IcP and DaA (HPAHs; 4-6 rings). Factor 3 explains 15.4 of total variance and it is highly dominated by LPAHs (2-3 rings); Fle and Ant.

Pyrogenic sources, such as the combustion-derived particles present in urban atmospheric dust, were depleted in LPAHs and enriched in HPAHs. Petrogenic sources, such as fuel oil or light refined petroleum products, were dominated by LPAH [3].

Therefore, Factor 1, corresponding to the first group, represent a mixed source (both pyrogenic and petrogenic); Factor 2, corresponding to the second group, represents also pyrogenic source PAHs (coal combustion; 4 rings PAH and traffic related pollution; 5-6 rings PAHs). Factor 3, corresponding third group, represents petrogenic source (2-3 rings PAHs).

Pollution maps

Geographical information systems (GIS) software, Mapinfo 7.5 was used for the construction of pollution maps of PAHs in Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake. The PAH distributions in Dam Lake are given in Figure 5; the points were selected all over the dam lake considering the high PAH concentrations.


Figure 5: Map of PAH Distributions (mg/kg) in ?kizcetepeler Dam Lake

In order to draw pollution profile the points at which higher concentrations of selected PAHs were observed, were chosen. These points were 33, 1, 9, 42, 32 and 23. The selected PAH concentrations at these points were in the following order; 33>1>9>42>32>23. The PAHs were not including all of 16 PAHs but the mostly observed 6 PAHs which were Nap, BeP, Phe, Ant, BgP and Att. Among the points 42, 32 and 33 were in the west of the dam lake and near to the road. Points 1 and 9 were in the north of the dam lake and 23 were in the east of the lake. The mostly polluted site was 33, west of the dam lake. Therefore it can be concluded that traffic is the important PAH source in this area. The order of the average standardized PAH concentrations were as the following; Nap>Phe>Ant>BeP>Att>BgP.


Chemical composition of PAH compounds in Ikizcetepeler Dam lake sediment samples were determined with high recoveries by using HP 6890 series GC coupled to mass detector. Detection limits and accuracy of the analyses were in accepted range.

The concentrations of 16 PAHs in Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake sediment samples were quite low. The highest concentrations were observed for Nap and Bep and they were 0.020 mg/kg. High concentrations were also observed for Phe, Ant, BgP and Att. The Cycypyr had the lowest concentration which was 0.004 mg/kg. The DaA and BaA have also low concentrations. The average sum PAH concentration was 0.19 ± 0.07 mg/kg in Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake sediments.

According to FA results; there were 3 factors account for 80.2% of the variability in the data. Factor 1 (explains 37.9% of the total variance), represents a mixed source (petrogenic; coal combustion; 4 rings PAH and traffic related pollution; 5-6 rings PAHs), Factor 2 (explains 26.9 of the total variance) represents also pyrogenic source PAHs and Factor 3 (explains 15.4 of the total variance), represents petrogenic source.

To sum up the FA and diagnostic analyses results supported each other and indicated that pyrogenic (the most common) and petrogenic sources are the important sources of PAHs in Dam Lake.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12630
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2014 - Dec 08, 2019]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8821
  • PDF downloads : 3809