Reach Us +44-1753390542
A Bibliometric Analysis on Acidophilic Microorganism in Recent 30 Years | OMICS International
E-ISSN: 2252-5211
International Journal of Waste Resources
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

A Bibliometric Analysis on Acidophilic Microorganism in Recent 30 Years

LI Si yuan1,2, Hao Chun bo1,2*, Feng Chuan ping1,2, Wang Li hua1,2 and LIU Ying1,2

1Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Evolution of Ministry of Education, China

2School of Water Resources and Environment, Beijing 100083, China

Corresponding Author:
Hao Chun bo
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and
Evolution of Ministry of Education China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Tel: 13810803868
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 22, 2014; Accepted Date: May 22, 2014; Published Date: May 29, 2014

Citation: LI Si yuan, Hao Chun bo, Feng Chuan ping, Wang Li hua, LIU Ying (2014) A Bibliometric Analysis on Acidophilic Microorganism in Recent 30 Years . Int J Waste Resources 4:147. doi: 10.4172/2252-5211.1000147

Copyright: © 2014 Hao C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Waste Resources


Objective: To evaluate the global scientific research and the tendencies on acidophilic organism during the past 30 years. Studies in the acidophilic microorganism had significantly increased.

Methods: Articles related with the acidophilic organism were assessed by distribution of countries, institutes, journals using the method of bibliometric analysis.

Results: The results showed seven industrialized countries and four major developing countries were all listed in the top 20 most productive countries, which suggested economic conditions had an important effect on academic development. In addition, researchers in different institutions were more tending to cooperate. However, cooperation always occurred in the interior of the country. Through a synthetic analysis of the paper titles, author keywords and Keywords Plus, it revealed that “resistance to metal” attracted more attentions. Besides, this characteristic was also widely applied in bioleaching. At the level of research environment, “water” was the dominant position, such as acid mine drainage.

Conclusions: Study in the acidophilic microorganism had significantly increased. Cooperation had become the trend. Moreover, economic conditions had an important effect on academic development.


Acidophilic microorganism; Bibliometric anaylsis; Resistance to metal; Bioleaching; Diversity


Many microorganisms survive in the physically and geo-chemically extreme conditions, which have challenged the limits of life. These conditions include extremes of temperature, pH, pressure, desiccation and others [1-3]. These microorganisms are termed as extremophiles. In recent decades, extremophiles have aroused great interest to researchers. Among them, acidophilic microorganisms are the ones that thrive in acidic environments with pH less than 3.0 [4,5]. They widely exist in acid mine drainage, bioleaching operation, and sulfuric hot spring [6-8]. Acidophilic microorganism not only can adapt to the environment of strong acid, but also can tolerate the high concentration of metal ions. Due to these special characteristics, they have been the hotspot in life science, and lots of microorganisms have been studied deeply, such as the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidan [9]. Besides, acidophilic microorganisms have been widely applied in many respects, such as the bioremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil and water, extraction of enzyme, bio hydrometallurgy and others [10-12].

Scientific articles on acidophilic microorganism have demonstrated a rapid increase over the past several decades. A number of papers presenting the latest research achievements have been published in authoritative scientific journals such as Nature and Science [13,14]. Despite the high growth rate of publications, there have been few attempts to gather systematic data on this special microorganism. A common research tool for this analysis is the bibliometric method [15-17], which has already been widely applied in scientific production and research trends in kinds of topics, for example, global diversity [18], energy efficiency [19], agricultural technology [20], solid waste [21] biotechnology research [22,23]. The Science Citations Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), from the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science databases, is the most important and frequently used source for a broad review of scientific accomplishment in all fields. Traditional bibliometric methods focus on citation and content analysis [24,25]. In recent years, analysis of word distribution of paper titles [26], KeyWords Plus [27], author keywords [28] in different periods has been used widely to get more information related to the research itself.

In this study, a bibliometric analysis of language, source country, institute and research field was performed to describe the importance of research on acidophilic microorganism. Besides, the distributions of keyword were also analyzed to study the research trends during the recent 30 years. Our conclusions not only provided a better understanding of global hotspot for researchers, but also clarified the future research direction on acidophilic microorganism.

Data Sources and Methodology

Data used in this research were based on the online database of the SCI, retrieved from the ISI Web of Science, Philadelphia, USA. According to Journal Citation Reports (JCR), it indexed 7391 major journals with citation references across 173 scientific disciplines in 2011. Besides, the reported impact factor (IF) of each journal was acquired from the 2011 JCR. Here, five search terms, including: “acidophilic organism”, “acidophilic microorganism”, “acidophilic bacteria” “acidophilic fungi” “acidophilic archaea” were used as keywords to search titles, keywords, document types, addresses and others during 1983-2012. Articles from England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales were reclassified into the UK, and articles originating from Hong Kong and Taiwan were included in China. The collaboration type was determined by the addresses of the authors. The single-country publication was classified if the addresses of authors were in the same country. On the contrary, the internationally collaborative publication was assigned if authors were from different countries. In the same way, the single-institute publication was assigned if the addresses of researchers were from the same institute. The inter-institutionally collaborative publication was assigned if authors were from multiple institutes.

The words in titles were separated, and then conjunctions and prepositions such as “and”, “the”, “or”, “for”, “with”, “by”, and “on” were discarded, as they were meaningless in the further analysis. The ranks and frequencies of keywords between 1983 and 2012 were calculated in order to thoroughly analyze the variations of trends.

Results and Discussion

Characteristics of publication outputs

In this study, 10 document types were contained in the 2199 publications during the 30-year study period, in which article was the most frequent type. Articles contributed a significant portion, 85% or 1873 of the total production. Another two documents were less significant, including proceedings paper (6.5%) and review (4.9%). The devotion of others was rare. As the dominant type of document, articles were used for further analysis. Ninety-eight percent of the journal articles were written in English. Another 12 languages also appeared. However, the proportion was less than 1%. Obviously, English was the dominant language in acidophilic microorganism research.

The number of both of SCI documents and articles was analyzed and performed respectively in Figure 1 to understand the research trend in the 30 years. World academic publications had a notable growth after 1990, and there were two notable increases in the past three decades (1990, 2003). One important reason was that United States proposed the concept of the human genome in 1985, and in 1990 the 3-billion dollars project was formally founded. "Human Genome Project" intended to complete the entire human genome DNA sequence analysis in 15 years [29]. As a result, high-speed DNA sequencing methods came into being, which encouraged the study in microorganism on molecule level. Subsequently, high demand for low-cost sequencing had driven the development of high-throughput sequencing and several new methods for DNA sequencing were developed [30]. These techniques comprised the first of the "next-generation" sequencing methods, which was applied in many studies. Such as massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) published and marketed in 2000, 454 Life Sciences marketed in 2004 [31].


Figure 1: Trends of SCI-EXPANDED publications referring to acidophile during 1983-2012.

Based on the classification of subject categories in JCR 2011, the publication output data of acidophilic microorganism research were distributed into 109 SCI subject categories during 1983-2012. The most significant category was “Microbiology” (20%), followed by “Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology” (13%), “Biochemistry and Molecular Biology” (8.2%) and “Environmental Sciences” (3.9%). “Microbiology” and “the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology” were the two fastest growing subject categories, especially after 2001 (Figure 2), suggesting that the value of microorganism had been applied to the practice of production gradually, and molecular technology had been widely used in the study.


Figure 2: Comparison of the growth trends of the top four productive subject categories.

Articles were published in lots of journals, and the top 20 most productive journals were summarized in Table 1 shared the highest average cited reference and the supreme IF. Those manifested the significant position of the two journals in this field.

Journal TP TP (%) IF TC TC/TP NR NR/TP
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 107 5.7 3.829 3647 34.1 4218 39.4
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 62 3.3 2.268 2127 34.3 2158 34.8
Hydrometallurgy 48 2.6 2.027 511 10.6 1427 29.7
Extremophiles 47 2.5 2.941 677 14.4 1647 35
Journal of Bacteriology 35 1.9 3.825 732 20.9 1012 28.9
Microbiology 35 1.9 0.718 99 2.8 657 18.8
FEMS Microbiology Letters 35 1.9 2.044 649 18.5 643 18.4
Bioresource Technology 24 1.3 4.98 189 7.9 777 32.4
Environmental Microbiology 23 1.2 5.843 723 31.4 1210 52.6
Archives of Microbiology 20 1.1 1.431 299 15 623 31.2
Geomicrobiology Journal 20 1.1 2.017 313 15.7 839 42
World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 18 1 1.532 113 6.3 457 25.4
FEMS Microbiology Ecology 18 1 3.408 508 28.2 734 40.8
Systematic and Applied Microbiology 17 0.9 3.366 469 27.6 495 29.1
Canadian Journal of Microbiology 17 0.9 1.363 197 11.6 560 32.9
Minerals Engineering 16 0.9 1.352 227 14.2 449 28.1
Microbiology-Sgm 16 0.9 3.061 496 31 771 48.2
Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 15 0.8 1.276 312 20.8 454 30.3
Microbial Ecology 14 0.7 2.912 162 11.6 673 48.1
Biotechnology and Bioengineering 14 0.7 3.946 268 19.1 411 29.4

Table 1: The top 20 most productive journals based on the total number of articles. Note: TP: total number of articles, IF: 2011 ISI Impact factor, TC: total citation count, NR: cited reference count, TC/TP: average of citations in a paper, and NR/TP: the average cited reference count per article

Distribution of country articles

All articles with author addresses could be used to analyze the distribution of country. In 1725 articles with author addresses, 71.6% were single-country publications, and only 28.4% were international. The top 20 most productive countries were summarized in Table 2, ranking with the way of number of journal articles and total citations. Among the 20 countries, the USA was the most productive country, including both single-country articles (214) and internationally collaborative articles (135). Germany ranked second with 201 and Japan ranked third with 190. Economic condition was related to the academic achievement: the seven industrialized countries (G7 group: the USA, Germany, Japan, France, the UK, Canada, and Italy) and four major developing countries (“BRIC”: China, India, Brazil, and Russia) were all included in the top 20 countries [32]. The same phenomenon was revealed in other bibliometric analyses [33,34]. Apart from the economic condition of different countries, one typical acid mine drainage located in USA, Iron Mountain Mine. As one of America's most toxic waste sites, it had been listed as a federal Superfund site since 1983, which made it be one research hot spot [35,36]. Between position of the “G7 group” and “BRIC”, Spain was another high-producing country, because another typical acid mine drainage, Tinto River, which was notable for being very acidic (pH 2) and its deep reddish hue, was located in Spain [37,38]. Another important message from these data in Table 2 was that single-country articles were the main trend in the study of acidophilic microorganism, especially in Japan, with a percentage of 90%.

Country TP SP SP (%) TC TC/SP CP CP (%) TC TC/CP
USA 349 214 61.3 7487 35 135 38.7 2649 19.6
Germany 201 104 51.7 2141 20.6 97 48.3 2478 25.5
Japan 190 171 90 2463 14.4 19 10 279 14.7
China 158 118 74.7 676 5.7 40 25.3 459 11.5
UK 152 81 53.3 2175 26.9 71 46.7 1658 23.4
Spain 138 95 68.8 1546 16.3 43 31.2 570 13.3
Russia 97 51 52.6 253 5 46 47.4 1474 32
France 87 48 55.2 1128 23.5 39 44.8 750 19.2
Canada 81 54 66.7 942 17.4 27 33.3 402 14.9
India 81 65 80.2 855 13.2 16 19.8 68 4.3
Italy 62 41 66.1 673 16.4 21 33.9 417 19.9
Chile 54 27 50 391 14.5 27 50 391 14.5
Australia 46 21 45.7 350 16.7 25 54.3 311 12.4
Netherlands 40 20 50 509 25.5 20 50 295 14.8
South Korea 38 18 47.4 158 8.8 20 52.6 154 7.7
Sweden 35 13 37.1 284 21.8 22 62.9 313 14.2
Brazil 33 26 78.8 113 4.3 7 21.2 103 14.7
South Africa 30 19 63.3 305 16.1 11 36.7 205 18.6
Finland 25 10 40 98 9.8 15 60 112 7.5
Belgium 21 11 52.4 107 9.7 10 47.6 130 13

Table 2: Top 20 most productive countries based on the total number of articles. Note: TP: total number of articles, SP: single country articles, CP: internationally collaborative articles, TC: total citation count.

Distribution of institute analysis

The distributions of different institutes were evaluated by the affiliation of at least one author. Of all articles with author addresses, 43.2% were single-institute articles and 56.8% were inter-institutionally collaborative articles, suggesting that study of acidophilic microorganism called for teamwork among institutes. The top 20 most productive institutes were summarized in Table 3, in which the distribution was equal. Three were from China, the USA, the UK, Spain, two were from Russia, and one was from Germany, Japan, France, Sweden, India, Chile. The Russian Academy of Sciences had the most total articles (94), including 12 independent articles and 82 inter-institutionally collaborative articles, followed by Central South University, University of California, Berkeley, University of Chile and two institutes from Spain, Spanish National Research Council and the University of Murcia. It should be noted that University of California, Berkeley had the highest average citation rate, including independent articles (238) and inter-institutionally collaborative articles (35.6). It suggested that University of California, Berkeley had a fairly high status in this academic field. It should be noted that the university was close to the typical acid mine drainage, Iron Mountain Mine, which was mentioned above. Another observation could be obtained from Table 3 that only four institutes (2 UK, 1 Spain, 1 India) had more independent articles than inter-institutionally collaborative articles. There were also another two institutes, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology that only published the inter-institutionally collaborative articles. Moreover, the average citation rate was relatively high. These proved that the academic communities of acidophilic microorganisms were more tending to cooperation.

Institute TP SP SP (%) TC TC/SP CP CP (%) TC TC/CP
Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia 94 12 12.8 118 9.8 82 87.2 1551 18.9
Central South University, China 48 11 22.9 75 6.8 37 77.1 158 4.3
University of California, Berkeley, USA 42 4 9.5 952 238 38 90.5 1351 35.6
University of Chile, Chile 39 7 17.9 107 15.3 32 82.1 505 15.8
Spanish National Research Council, Spain 39 9 23.1 242 26.9 30 76.9 15 0.5
The University of Murcia, Spain 36 20 55.6 578 28.9 16 44.4 164 10.3
Chinese Academy of Sciences, China 36 7 19.4 29 4.1 29 80.6 102 3.5
Okayama University, Japan 27 13 48.1 142 10.9 14 51.9 242 17.3
Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain  26 4 15.4 46 11.5 22 84.6 313 14.2
University of Warwick, UK 25 14 56 491 35.1 11 44 425 38.6
Umea University, Sweden 24 5 20.8 144 28.8 19 79.2 212 11.2
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia 24 8 33.3 19 2.4 16 66.7 166 10.4
National Centre for Scientific Research, France 23 8 34.8 199 24.9 15 65.2 323 21.5
The University of Wales, UK 22 16 72.7 440 27.5 6 27.3 228 38
Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, India 22 20 90.9 580 29 2 9.1 16 8
Bangor University, UK 21 7 33.3 71 10.1 14 66.7 134 9.6
The Ohio State University, USA 19 2 10.5 54 27 17 89.5 161 9.5
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China 19 1 5.3 12 12 18 94.7 182 10.1
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA 18 —— —— 0 —— 18 100 398 22.1
Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Germany 16 —— —— 0 —— 16 100 1181 73.8

Table 3: Top 20 most productive institutes based on the total number of articles. Note: TP: total number of articles, SP: single institute articles, CP: inter-institutionally collaborative articles, TC: total citation count, ——: no articles.

Hot issues

The most important information, which the author expected to express to readers, was presented in the title, keywords and KeyWords Plus. In order to analyze the three separated parts synthetically, the synonymic single words and congeneric phrases were summed and grouped into categories. In this way, the analysis of historical development of science could be more complete and precise, and the new direction about this field could be found. A new method named “word cluster analysis” had been applied to analyze the research trends in risk assessment [39] and nitrate removal. All words included in Figure 3 and 4 contained their plural forms and other transformations, as well as words with the similar meanings.


Figure 3: Comparison of the trends of research hotspots, resistance to metal, diversity, enzyme, culture.


Figure 4: Comparison of the trends of research environment, water, leaching, hot spring, soil.

Research trends in acidophilic microorganism were separated into two categories: research hotspot and research environment. In terms of the research hotspot, the “resistance to metal” was the most predominant for 20 years (Figure 3). Tolerance to various kinds of heavy metal had been analyzed in recent years, such as Fe, Cu, Al, Zn. This characteristic had been widely applied to bioleaching to increase the purity of mixed ore [40-42]. In addition, “diversity” became the second research branch with a fast speed, since the application of cultivation-independent molecular techniques becoming more mature, such as FISH, PCR-DGGE [43,44]. The number of the articles using molecular biology techniques during 2005-2012 was half of the total number in 30 years. On the contrary, because of the limitation of technical means and the difficulty in controlling the micro-world, the development of “enzyme” and “culture” was relatively slow. Therefore, the study in acidophilic microorganism focused on the resistance to metal and diversity, which had more practical value and substantial benefit.

Research trend of kinds of environments had been showed in Figure 4, including “water”, “soil”, “hot spring” and “leaching heap”. The difference between four environments became obvious after 2006, because of a rapid increase in the “water” and “bioleaching heap”. First of all, “water” was the most wide study environment, such as acid mine drainage. The research in “water” reached a peak point in 2008. Referring to the increasing trend of “bioleaching heap”, the main reason was that people realized the value of acidophilic microorganism in industry. France was the earliest one, trying to leaching gold in ores by bacteria in 1964, and achieved encouraging results. Subsequently, bioleaching developed gradually, and became industrialized. The industrialization reached an obvious peak point in 2008. Although “soil” was not main living environment, acidophilic microorganism was abundant in soil which was proved in lots of articles. The field around the acid mine drainage was contaminated by the acid water, and became exclusively suitable for this special microorganism. On the contrary, “hot spring” acted as the original living environment, but articles about “hot spring” were rare.

Another result should be noted that there was a decrease after 2007, including “water”, “bioleaching heap”, “soil”, and even “resistance to metal”, “diversity”. All of this may be a direct result of economic crisis happened in 2007, which made the fund for scientific research have an obvious shrinkage in the whole world. To a large extent, the economic situation provided a solid foundation to the research.


Based on the databases of acidophilic microorganism listed in SCI-EXPANDED, some significant points on the worldwide research performance were studied using bibliometric analysis during the 30 years. The following conclusions were summarized from this study:

Study in the acidophilic microorganism had significantly increased in the last 30 years, especially in the year 2003-2012.

1873 articles have been distributed into 109 SCI subject categories. “Microbiology” and “the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology” were the two fastest growing subject categories, suggesting that the value of microorganism had been applied to the practice of production gradually.

At the country level, 71.6% were single-country publications, and 28.4% were international articles. The USA had the most dominant position including the most total articles, single-country articles and internationally collaborative articles. Besides, economic condition was related to the academic achievement. The G7 and the BRIC were listed in the top 20 most productive countries.

In the analysis of distribution of institute, 43.2% of all articles were single-institutional and 56.8% were inter-institutional. In the top 20 most productive institutes, only four institutes had more independent articles than inter-institutionally collaborative articles, and another two institutes only published the inter-institutionally collaborative articles. These proved that the academic communities of acidophilic microorganisms were more tending to cooperation.

Using a new bibliometric method - “word cluster analysis” - found that “resistance to metal” and “diversity” will continue to be the leading research hotspots. Eventually, “water” will be the main research environment.


This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (40802059), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2010ZD03, 2011YXL035).


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12171
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2014 - Dec 10, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8325
  • PDF downloads : 3846

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri and Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version