alexa A Practical Approach to Apneic Oxygenation during Endotracheal Intubation | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-6148
Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

A Practical Approach to Apneic Oxygenation during Endotracheal Intubation

Matt Pratt*

Student Registered Nurse Anesthetist, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Matt Pratt, MBA, BSN, EMT-P
Student Registered Nurse Anesthetist
Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers
Florida, USA
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: December 07, 2016; Accepted date: January 03, 2017; Published date: January 09, 2017

Citation: Pratt M (2017) A Practical Approach to Apneic Oxygenation during Endotracheal Intubation. J Anesth Clin Res 8:696. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000696

Copyright: © 2017 Pratt M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Abstract

Patients undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation are exposed to a brief apnea period that is usually well tolerated. Conventional preoxygenation techniques may not provide adequate time for safe airway management in patients at high risk for desaturation or when an unanticipated difficult airway arises. Continuous oxygen administration during the apnea period, termed apneic oxygenation, can be used in conjunction with traditional pre-oxygenation techniques to prolong the time to patient desaturation when tracheal intubation is attempted. Clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy of apneic oxygenation using multiple techniques, nasopharyngeal catheters, nasal prongs, modified laryngoscopes, and buccal oxygen administration, all proved to be effective at prolonging the duration of apnea, by delaying the onset of hypoxemia.

Keywords

Apneic oxygenation; Passive oxygen insufflation; Airway management

Introduction

Patients undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation are exposed to a brief apnea period that is usually well tolerated. Conventional preoxygenation techniques may not be adequate in providing a safe apnea period in patients at high risk for desaturation or when an unanticipated difficult airway arises [1]. Obese, obstetric, and pediatric patients are considered to be at high risk for rapid desaturation, because they have increased oxygen consumption and reduced functional residual capacity (FRC), which hastens the development of hypoxemia [2-4]. Apneic oxygenation (AO) has been researched for over a century [3].

In 1956, Holmdahl [5] first described the concept in humans, during bronchoscopies AO was used to prevent desaturation while permitting the endoscopist to work without the need for ventilations. It has since been utilized for brain death testing, otolaryngeal procedures, and laryngoscopy [3]. Clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy of AO during the induction of anesthesia using nasopharyngeal catheters, nasal prongs, modified laryngoscopes, and buccal oxygen administration. Research shows that AO in conjunction with traditional pre-oxygenation techniques can extend the safe apnea period by prolonging the time to patient desaturation [6-9]. Despite the evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of AO, there are currently no available consensus guidelines and many anesthetists may not be familiar with all of the AO techniques.

Physiology of Apneic Oxygenation

The primary objective of airway management is ensuring adequate oxygenation and ventilation, thus, prior to induction patients are preoxygenated with 100% oxygen (O2) via facemask. Denitrogenation of the lungs creates an alveolar oxygen reservoir that helps reduce the frequency and severity of desaturation. Conventional pre-oxygenation techniques provide 4-8 minutes of safe apnea in a non-obese adult patient without pulmonary disease [4]. In the adult human body weighing approximately 70 kg, metabolic O2 consumption is approximately 250 mL/min. After denitrogenation of the FRC, O2 diffuses from the alveolus into the bloodstream at a rate of about 250 mL/min [4,5]. During apnea, the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO2) is almost completely halted and diffuses into the alveolar space at a rate of approximately 10 mL/min. There is a pressure difference of 240 mL/min from the alveoli into the blood, which generates a negative pressure gradient. As O2 continues to diffuse down its gradient, the negative pressure that is created causes entrainment of ambient gases from the pharynx into the lungs, describing the phenomenon of aventilatory mass flow (AVMF). Generally, room air gases (79% nitrogen and 21% O2) are entrained from the pharynx into the lungs, when nitrogen accumulates desaturation ensues. If O2 is insufflated to the pharynx while a patent air passage is maintained from the pharynx to the lungs, this results in AVMF of O2 and extends the alveolar reservoir (Figure 1) [1,5]. The clinical application of this procedure, termed apneic oxygenation, allows for persistent oxygenation in the absence of ventilation.

anesthesia-clinical-research-Mechanics-Apneic-Oxygenation

Figure 1: Mechanics of Apneic Oxygenation. Pressure difference between oxygen (O2) diffusion from the alveoli and carbon dioxide (CO2) excretion from the capillary generates a negative pressure gradient, resulting in aventilatory mass flow (AVMF) of gases into the lungs [5]. Insufflation of O2 into the pharynx via nasopharyngeal catheter allows for AVMF of O2 into the lungs. Image reprinted from AANA Journal, 2016 [1].

Nasal Prongs

Nasal prongs necessitate upper airway patency to permit delivery of O2 to the pharynx. Induction may compromise nasopharyngeal patency in a number of patients, e.g., people who are edentulous, obese, or have obstructive sleep apnea [1,6,9]. Ramachandran et al. [6] evaluated AO utilizing nasal prongs in a simulated difficult laryngoscopy situation with obese patients. After preoxygenation and induction, O2 was administered to the study group via nasal prongs at 5 L/min vs. no O2 to the control group. Study cut off time was 6 minutes or until SpO2 decreased below 95%. Mean apnea time for the AO group was 5.29 minutes compared to 3.49 minutes in the control group. A method proposed by Weingart and Levitan [3] is insufflation of O2 at flows of 15 L/min through nasal prongs, suggesting higher flows may enhance nasopharyngeal patency.

Insufflation of O2 via nasal prongs appears to be one of the more popular routes; however, several studies have disputed its efficacy. Riyapan and Lubin10 conducted a study on AO during prehospital rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Utilizing nasal prongs, O2 was insufflated at 15 L/min vs. no O2 in the control group. Results showed no significant difference in the rate of severe hypoxemia between the control group and patients receiving AO. Upon evaluation of the demographic data, there are several possible explanations for these results. First, among the patients in the two groups, there was a high rate of severe hypoxemia (SpO2< 90%) prior to airway management (14% in the AO group vs. 17% in the control group) [10]. Severe hypoxemia is reported as an independent risk factor for severe desaturation during endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients [11].

Additionally, providers utilized two different methods for preoxygenation. In the control group 50% of patients were preoxygenated with a bag valve mask and 46% preoxygenated via nonrebreathing mask, as compared to 24% and 65% in the AO group, respectively. Furthermore, the protocol used lacked a SpO2 end point for preoxygenation, thus there was no way to evaluate the efficacy of preoxygenation [10]. The principle of AO relies heavily on adequate denitrogenation of the FRC, as this allows for greater entrainment of O2 from the pharynx to the lungs [3,5]. Clinicians should consider the potential patient populations; as AO may provide very little benefit if any in critically ill patients or those with a ventilation/perfusion mismatch [12,13].

Nasopharyngeal Catheter

The AO technique with the most research and strongest evidence is utilization of a nasopharyngeal catheter. This method allows for direct delivery of O2 to the pharynx during apnea. Achar et al. [9] conducted a study comparing the effectiveness of nasal prongs vs. nasopharyngeal catheter in a difficult intubation scenario. Following preoxygenation and induction, O2 was insufflated at 5 L/min via nasopharyngeal catheter or nasal prongs. The apneic period was maintained for 10 minutes or until SpO2 dropped below 95%, whichever came first. Among the nasopharyngeal catheter group, no patients desaturated, as opposed to 32% in the nasal prongs group. This study suggests that AO is better achieved with a nasopharyngeal catheter rather than nasal prongs [9]. A benefit of utilizing a nasopharyngeal catheter is that O2 is distributed close to the trachea, thereby circumventing potential problems associated with nasal prongs when airway patency is not maintained.

One commercially available product is the Naso-Flo nasopharyngeal airway (Medis Medical Co Ltd, Ashton-under-Lyne, United Kingdom). This catheter features an O2 port that allows for direct insufflation of O2 to the pharynx (Figure 2). Based on clinical experience and review of the research, this author recommends utilizing a nasopharyngeal catheter and insufflating O2 at 6 L/min during the apneic period. Though practitioners should be reminded that nasopharyngeal catheter insertion may be contraindicated with certain patient groups, e.g., taking anticoagulants or head trauma [7].

anesthesia-clinical-research-Naso-Flo-nasopharyngeal

Figure 2: Naso-Flo nasopharyngeal airway (Medis Medical Co Ltd) in mannequinâ??s right naris. Arrow indicates oxygen insufflation port of the Naso-Flo airway connected to auxiliary oxygen tubing. (Image courtesy of Medis Medical).

Buccal Oxygen Insufflation

Heard et al. [7] has introduced a new method for providing AO, which involves the use of a modified Ring-Adair-Elwyn (RAE) tube to provide buccal oxygenation. Utilizing a RAE tube with a 3.5 mm internal diameter, the tube was cut on the distal end above the Murphy eye. The cut end was then connected to standard oxygen tubing, the tube connector was removed and the blunt proximal end was placed in the left buccal space (Figure 3) [7]. The modified tube is easily secured to the cheek to prevent dislodgement.

anesthesia-clinical-research-Ring-Adair-Elwyn

Figure 3: Modified 3.5 mm Ring-Adair-Elwyn (RAE) tube for insufflation of buccal oxygen. Image from left to right demonstrates: intact RAE tube; connector removed from tube and distal end cut above the Murphy eye; modified RAE tube with oxygen tubing attached to cut end.

In a prolonged laryngoscopy situation with obese patients, buccal oxygenation was employed during the apneic period. Study end point time was 12.5 minutes or until the SpO2 concentration decreased to less than 95%, whichever occurred first. Following preoxygenation and induction, buccal oxygen was insufflated at 10 L/min. All patients in the control group desaturated and median apnea time was 296 seconds. In comparison, 65% of the patients in the buccal oxygenation group maintained their SpO2 above 95% for the duration of the apneic period [7]. Evaluating the efficacy of AO for 12.5 minutes marks the longest study undertaken in the obese population [7].

Positioning the RAE tube in the left buccal space allows for the use of normal oropharyngeal and laryngeal airways [7]. When comparing buccal oxygenation to the nasopharyngeal catheter, it takes longer to assemble and some anesthetists may not have RAE tubes readily available in their operating room. Additionally, the tube length may need to be altered to prevent obstruction and allow for effective O2 delivery [7]. Despite the concerns of airway patency, buccal oxygenation is a practical alternative and should be considered when the nasal route is contraindicated.

Laryngeal Oxygen Insufflation

Another technique for performing AO, combines a laryngoscope blade with an internal lumen for the insufflation of O2 during laryngoscopy [8]. Steiner et al. [8] researched the efficacy of laryngeal oxygen insufflation in 457 pediatric patients undergoing nasotracheal intubation. Children age 1-17 years were randomly assigned to one of three groups: standard direct laryngoscopy (DL); laryngoscopy with the Trueview PCD video laryngoscope (Truphatek International Ltd., Netanya, Israel), delivering O2 through the oxygen port (VLO2); or direct laryngoscopy, combined with insufflation of O2 through a catheter attached to the side of a laryngoscope blade (DLO2) [8].

Following induction, subjects were mask ventilated for 3 minutes with 70% N2O and 30% O2. In an effort to simulate a prolonged intubation scenario with limited O2 supply, a starting O2 concentration of 30% was utilized. Nasotracheal intubation was then performed with DL, VLO2, or DLO2, providing O2 at 2 L/min or 3 L/min to the study groups. The study was stopped when the trachea was intubated or SpO2 decreased to 90%. In the DL group not receiving supplemental O2, SpO2 fell below 90% in 49% of the subjects compared with 11% in the deep laryngeal O2 groups (DLO2 and VLO2). Mean time to 1% saturation reduction was twice as long for the laryngeal O2 insufflation groups, 70 seconds vs. 30 seconds in the standard DL group [8].

SunMed produces a dual-use laryngoscope blade, the Miller Port American Profile Conventional Blade (SunMed, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States), which contains an internal lumen within the blade that allows for laryngeal O2 insufflation. A cost effective alternative involves attaching a 14 fr suction catheter to the side of a laryngoscope blade. The proximal end is then connected to oxygen tubing and O2 is insufflated at 2-6 L/min (Figure 4). Use of laryngeal O2 insufflation provides similar benefits, as compared to the nasopharyngeal catheter method by allowing direct delivery of O2 to the pharynx and maintenance of oropharyngeal patency. Although laryngeal O2 insufflation is an effective AO technique, O2 is only insufflated when DL is performed and there is a potential concern for gastric distension if O2 is insufflated into the esophagus.

anesthesia-clinical-research-macintosh-laryngoscope-blade

Figure 4: Adapted macintosh laryngoscope blade for laryngeal oxygen insufflation. A 14 fr suction catheter is secured to the blade. Proximal end of the catheter is connected to secondary oxygen tubing.

Summary

Oxygen insufflation is a technically easy skill that can be performed utilizing devices that are readily available in the operating room. Empirical evidence supports the efficacy of AO in delaying desaturation and prolonging the safe apnea period in pediatric and adult patients. Although it is unlikely that pharyngeal oxygen insufflation will provide much value in the typical 15-second intubation, clinicians should consider the potential benefit in patients at high risk of desaturation or when an unanticipated difficult airway arises.

Acknowledgements

Mr. Pratt would like to thank Alison Smiley, BSN, for her editorial assistance while offering the highest level of encouragement throughout his endeavors in preparation of this article; and Rosann Spiegel, JD, DNAP, CRNA, ARNP, for her support throughout the Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist program.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 1456
  • [From(publication date):
    January-2017 - Dec 16, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 1323
  • PDF downloads : 133
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version