alexa Active Ingredient Estimation of Clopyralid Formulation by Reversed Phase HPLC | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7064
Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Active Ingredient Estimation of Clopyralid Formulation by Reversed Phase HPLC

Singh A, Tandon S* and Sand NK

Department of Chemistry (Division of Agricultural Chemicals), College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar 263145, U.S. Nagar, Uttarakhand, India

*Corresponding Author:
Tandon S
Department of Chemistry (Division of Agricultural Chemicals)
College of Basic Sciences and Humanities
G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology
Pantnagar 263145, U.S. Nagar, Uttarakhand, India
Tel: +91-5944-233350 extn 4503
E-mail: shishir_ [email protected]

Received date: November 03, 2014; Accepted date: December 10, 2014; Published date: December 15, 2014

Citation: Singh A, Tandon S, Sand NK. (2014) Active Ingredient Estimation of Clopyralid Formulation by Reversed Phase HPLC. J Chromatogr Sep Tech 6:257. doi:10.4172/2157-7064.1000257

Copyright: © 2014 Singh A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques

Abstract

A simple, accurate, and reliable high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed for determination, separation and estimation of clopyralid active ingredient in its formulation. The active ingredient in formulation was estimated by two methods and cleanup was performed using C18 SPE. Estimation was done by HPLC using 5 μm, C18 column, and mobile phase 0.02 % acetic acid in methanol: acetonitrile (90:10 v/v) and detection at 229 nm. The efficiency of clean up for standard clopyralid was found to be 98.02-98.66% at different concentrations. Overall recoveries for different methods ranged from 98.3-100.1 %. The LOD and LOQ were 0.1 and 0.3 ng respectively. The detector response was linear within concentrations range 0.25-10.0 ng at RSD 1.87%.

Keywords

Clopyralid; Soluble liquid; Solid phase extraction; Formulation; HPLC

Introduction

Pesticides are indispensable for sustained agricultural production. The successful employment of any pesticide depends upon stabilities of its formulation. Every formulation contains a toxicants mixed with an inert diluents or carrier. The active ingredient in a formulation sometime does not contain the reported concentration for various reasons. Indian farmers spend about US $2.6 billion on unregistered or counterfeit chemicals. The untested and unregulated products in turn cause about $1.3 billion in crop damage, according to a new report by the Agrochemicals Policy Group (APG) [1]. In order to check passage of spurious/sub-standard formulation to the consumer to save him from avoidable losses from pests, it is necessary to develop a convenient and reliable method of estimation of active ingredient in a formulation.

Clopyralid (3, 6-dichloropicolinic acid) is a selective, auxins type herbicide of pyridine carboxylic acid group used to control broad leaf weeds of the family polygonaceae, compositae, leguminosae and umbelliferae in sugar beet, fodder beet, oilseed rape, brassicas, onions, strawberries, flax and grassland (lawn and turf also) and commercially available as Soluble liquid (SL), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) and Water Dispersible Granules (WDG) formulations [2]. About 8,91,662 lbs active ingredient of clopyralid was used in the US for controlling weeds in various crops [3] .

Persistence/dissipation studies of clopyralid in soil/water/crops has been reported by various workers [4-9]. As per our literature search, no method has been reported for the estimation of clopyralid in its formulation using SPE method and determination by RP-HPLC. The registration of clopyralid is proposed for use is under consideration by Central Insecticide Board, India. Thus, the present investigation was undertaken to optimized method that would be rapid, efficient, precise, accurate, specific, economic and green method for estimation of active ingredient (a.i.) in formulation (10 SL) by reversed phase HPLC.

Experimental

Chemicals and glasswares

The formulation clopyralid, 10 SL and technical (95% pure) were obtained from M/S Willowood Ltd, Hong Kong. The technical sample was recrystallized prior to use. All the glasswares used were of Corning or Borosil make. All the solvents used were of analytical (AR) or HPLC grade. Triple distilled water was prepared in the laboratory by double distillation of single metal distilled water in all quartz double distillation assembly.

Instruments

Beckman model 322 Gradient HPLC systems equipped with 100 A pump 420 gradient microprocessor controller, 7725i rheodyne injector, 160 selectable wavelengths UV detector, 5 μL loop and HP 3395 series integrator recorder. Systronics P.C. Controlled Double Beam (PMT detector) UV-Visible Spectrophotometer Model 2101. Buchii rotavapour, Analytichem International SPE VAC ELUT Model AI 6000, SPE miniplastic C-18 columns (6.0 × 0.75 cm id) packed with 500 mg C-18 packing material (Varian/Supelco, USA) were used for estimation.

Calibration curve

Different concentrations i.e. 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 ppm concentration of clopyralid were used for preparation of calibration curve. Five μL of each concentration in duplicate was injected in HPLC by full loop injection method. The average detector response in terms of peak area of each concentration was used for plotting the graph.

HPLC optimization

The Beckman Gradient HPLC system was used for estimation. The operating parameters were Discovery C-18, 5 μm, (150 × 4.6 mm) column, mobile phase 0.02 % acetic acid in 9:1 v/v methanol:acetonitrile with isocratic mode at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and UV detection at 229 nm, aufs 0.02. Five microliter volume of sample was injected each time in HPLC by full loop injection method and chromatograms were recorded by HP (model 3395) integrator.

Formulation analysis

Liquid-liquid extraction (Indirect method): Formulation of clopyralid (0.1 mL) was mixed with water (50 mL) and liquid-liquid extraction was repeated three times with ethyl acetate (30 + 20 + 10 mL). Organic layer was collected, dried and dissolved in 2 mL mobile phase and one part was used for analysis by HPLC while other was subjected to cleanup.

Clean-up of sample was done using SPE C-18 cartridge. The SPE C-18 cartridge was prewashed and conditioned with 3 mL each of acetonitrile and methanol. One mL of sample was loaded on cartridge and washed with 2 mL water followed by 1 mL methanol and washings was discarded then finally eluted with 2 mL methanol. Eluent was collected, dried under the stream of nitrogen and re-dissolved in 2 mL mobile phase and used for HPLC analysis. The samples were filtered through 0.22 μm PTFE disc filter prior to HPLC.

Solid phase extraction (Direct methods): For formulation analysis two methods were used. First method involved preparation of 100 ppm stock solution by dissolving 0.1 mL of formulation (clopyralid 10% SL) in 100 mL of distilled water. From this solution serial dilution of 10, 5, 2, 1, and 0.5 ppm were made. In another method methanol was used instead of water. Lower concentrations (2, 1 and 0.5 ppm) were taken for cleanup and analysis. The concentration of formulation reported by the company i.e. 10% was assumed to be correct. The percent a.i. obtained from formulation was compared with pure standard compound of clopyralid and percentage of a.i. in formulation was calculated. All the experiment was done in triplicate. Since pure formulation contains lot of impurities which may cause damage to the column hence, diluted formulation was not injected and cleanup was done prior to analysis.

Cleanup: Clean-up of formulation is necessary before analysis as it may have non-polar impurities which may interfere with the object peak of interest. Clean-up of formulation of both methods were done using SPE C-18 cartridges. The SPE C-18 cartridge was prewashed and conditioned with 3 mL each of acetonitrile and methanol. Diluted solution (2, 1 and 0.5 ppm) of formulation was loaded (0.5 mL) on cartridge and washed with 2 mL water followed by 1 mL methanol and washings was discarded then finally eluted with 2 mL methanol. Eluent was collected, dried under the stream of nitrogen and re-dissolved in 2 mL mobile phase and used for HPLC analysis. The samples were filtered through 0.22 μm PTFE disc filter prior to HPLC.

Recovery: For recovery of clopyralid from its formulation between two batches of 1ml each were taken in graduated stopper test tubes. In one batch 1 ml of 1 ppm standard solution in methanol was added while in other only methanol was added which was treated as control. Extraction and cleanup procedure were followed as described above. Difference between peak areas of both batches was taken for recovery calculation. All samples were taken in triplicate.

Validation: The method was validated by evaluating it in terms of specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ).

Results and Discussion

The chromatograms obtained using mobile phase, 0.02 % acetic acid in methanol: acetonitrile (90:10 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min-1, showed retention time 9.8 minute for clopyralid. The Indirect method of formulation analysis which was without cleanup showed many interfering peaks at retention time of clopyralid which were removed after cleanup but overall recovery was poor (around 80%) (Figure 1). The efficiency (recovery) of cleanup by SPE for standard clopyralid was 98.02-98.66% at different concentrations Table 1. Hence direct method was adapted using methanol and water as diluting solvent. The recoveries using water and methanol as diluents were almost same and ranged from 98.3-100.1%. The chromatogram revealed that there was no interference or co elution of any peak at the time of clopyralid elution peak. Among all methods for the analysis of active ingredient in formulation the method using water seems best in terms of recovery and cost effectiveness. The average active ingredient in the formulation using methnol/water as diluting agent (direct method) was found to be about 9.91%.

chromatography-separation-techniques-Chromatogram-formulation-cleanup

Figure 1: Chromatogram of formulation before cleanup (A) and after cleanup (B)

Method used Concentration (ppm) SPE Efficiency % Recovery Average Recovery (%) % a.i. in formulation Average a.i. in formulation
Standard pure compound 2 98.66 ± 0.03 - - - -
1 98.30 ± 0.2
0.5 98.02 ± 0.09
Ethyl acetate* 2 - 86.37 ± 2.13 80.04 9.67 ± 1.43 9.353 ± 1.43
1 79.24 ± 4.33 9.36 ± 1.05
0.5 74.53 ± 4.56 9.03 ± 0.91
Methanol# 2 - 96.98 ± 0.21 94.03 10.01 ± 0.03 9.966 ± 0.072
1 94.10 ± 0.01 9.98 ± 0.15
0.5 91.00 ± 0.12 9.83 ± 0.19
Water# 2 - 96.56 ± 0.34 93.05 9.95 ± 0.2 9.883 ± 0.094
1 93.51 ± 0.30 9.87 ± 0.31
0.5 89.08 ± 0.46 9.82 ± 0.22

Table 1: Recovery of clopyralid from standard and different methods

Method validation

Specificity: Specificity of the assay was demonstrated by obtaining chromatograms for blank and observing the lack of interfering peaks at the retention time for the clopyralid. Since there was no interfering matrix peak showing good specificity of the method

Linearity: Linearity of the HPLC assay was evaluated in triplicate at five concentration levels consisting of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 μg mL-1 clopyralid. Average detector response in terms of integrator counts was used for preparation of calibration curve. Detector response was linear to the concentration as the value of coefficient of determination (R2) 0.9995.

Precision and accuracy: The intra-day and inter-day precision of the HPLC analytical method were evaluated at different concentration and estimated variation was between 4 percent. The accuracy of an analytical method is defined as the closeness of measured values to their known nominal values. Accuracy of the method was deemed acceptable if the value of percent RSD value is lower than 2. In our study the value percent RSD was 1.87 which is acceptable.

LOD and LOQ: LOD and LOQ were the concentrations of a compound at which its signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) were detected as 3:1 and 10:1 respectively. They were obtained by diluting the reference standard in a stepwise manner using the established LC conditions. The LOD and LOQ of clopyralid were 0.1 and 0.3 ng respectively.

Conclusion

The proposed method was developed and validated and shows method is simple, rapid, accurate, precise, sensitive, and eco-friendly. The detection of clopyralid by the HPLC method can be performed rapidly as there is noteworthy less retention time with less or no interference of matrix. Therefore, the method would be useful for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of clopyralid

Application of the proposed method

Green, rapid and sensitive method developed may be used for determination of active ingredient in the formulation of clopyralid for the purpose of quality control of the commercial product and routine analysis by Agrochemical and research laboratories.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to M/s Willowood Ltd., Honk Kong for providing the technical material of clopyralid and its formulation 10 SL for the research purpose.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12224
  • [From(publication date):
    January-2015 - Jun 25, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8394
  • PDF downloads : 3830
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7