Adjustment Problem among First Year University Students in Ethiopia: Across Sectional Survey
Received Date: Jun 26, 2018 / Accepted Date: Aug 17, 2018 / Published Date: Aug 24, 2018
Background: Adjustment problems are the most common problems among first year students who are going through an active adjustment phase when they join the University.
Objective: To assess the prevalence and associated factors of adjustment problem among first year Madawalabu University students.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among first year students in Madawalabu University. A total of 422first year students selected by simple random sampling were participated in the study. Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ) was used to measure the Adjustment problem. Multivariable binary logistic regression was applied to find out the explanatory variables associated with student maladjustment. Significance was declared at p-value <0.05.
Results: Out of the total 30.1% respondents had adjustment problem. Female students were more likely to have adjustment problem with [AOR=4.36, 95% CI (1.96, 9.68)] than male. Social, academic, personal and change factors tested for adjustment problem of the students had showed statistically significant association.
Conclusions: The study confirms that first year students joining university do face problems in adjusting themselves at the university. Efficient advisory mechanisms and extracurricular activities, psychological and academic counseling and guidance have to be geared to the needs of the students.
Keywords: Adjustment problem; Students; College/university; Student mental health
Joining the university for the first time is a stressful experience for many new University students [1-3]. Though many successfully make a good transition, some experiences long-term emotional maladjustment and depression . Students who do not adjust well most of them time not to perform well academically and have less overall satisfaction with the college experience [5,6]. A successful adjustment strongly predicts students' academic success, mental health and personal development [7,8].
A study in Malaysia University reported that 26% found to be in the low category for their overall adjustment; had adjustment problem, 42.8% of the respondents were found to be at the low level for the Personal-Emotional Scale which indicated that many subjects in this study were exposed to psychological and somatic problems in adjusting themselves to campus life[9,10]. In United State students are likely to experience the following difficulties: academic pressures, financial problems, poor health, loneliness, interpersonal conflicts, difficulty in adjusting to change, and problems with developing personal autonomy [2,11]. A study in Zambia student identified fortyfive-fortyfive different kinds of problems were mentioned in all, 26 of which were academic in nature and 19 social and it was also suggested that Zambian students do experience a large number and wide variety of adjustment problems when they transfer from high school to university . The study conducted recently at Hawassa University, Ethiopia, reported high prevalence of mental distress among first year students when compared to others .
Common associated factors of adjustment problem were; being away from home, family, and friends and adjusting to college classes and the accompanying workload difficulties with time management. Difficulty making friends 12% and roommate issues 12% were the next most commonly reported problems. Others factors include completely new and different social network and environment, difficulty in managing time and study skill, financial adjustments difficulty, making friends and general adjustment to new situations [1,9,14].
Even though many studies and interventions are under way to identify the adjustment problem which lead in to decreased dropout rate and help in improving personal and mental development of students in higher institutions around the world there are a few studies if any; to identify these problem, associated factors and attempted interventions in higher institutions in Ethiopia. Thus this study was conducted with the aim to assess prevalence and associated factors with adjustment problem among first year Madawalabu University students.
Materials and Methods
This cross sectional institution based study was conducted among first year Madawalabu University students/enrolled by 2010 academic year/for regular program, South East Ethiopia
Sample size and sampling techniques
Sample size, calculated using single population formula with 95% CI, w=5% and p=0.5, was 384 subjects. To compensate for possible non respondents, 10% i.e. 38 subjects were added to give a sample size of 422. Study subjects were selected proportionally using stratified sampling technique, schools were taken as strata. The contribution of each school to the university student population was preserved in the composition of the sample taken. Male to female ratio of the University students was also preserved in the sample.
A self-administered structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. The questionnaire was distributed to the selected students after collected in four classrooms and facilitated by employed and trained data collection facilitators with close supervision.
The main dependent variable was adjustment problem. The following operational definitions are appropriate to this study: Adjustment problem is students with low score (67 to 360) for over all adjustment on SACQ. Academic adjustment problem is students with low score (24-121) for academic subscale. Social adjustment problem is students with low score (19-103) for social subscale. Personal Emotional adjustment problem students with low score (14-70) score for Personal-Emotional subscale. Institutional adjustment problem is students with low score (8-45) for Institutional adjustment subscale. Over all adjustment are the sum scores of all four subscales.
A pre-tested self-administered questionnaire Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ) developed by Baker and Siryk 1999, standardized and published by Western Psychological Service (WPS) consists of 67 self-rating responses used to assess students’ adjustment to college and containing four subscales [15,16] which translated to Amharic, was used for data collection.
Data entry was done using EPI Info 2002 software and then exported for analysis to the SPSS (statistical package of social science) software version 16. To find out the individual effect of explanatory variables and suppress confounding effect of variables binary logistic regression was used. Finally the results were interpreted as statistically significant association if p<0.05 and 95% of CI.
A total of 422 questionnaires were distributed and 392 were available for analysis giving a response rate 96%. Out of the 392 respondents 67.9% were male and 89.3% were single. Majority of the respondents were at younger age with 72.7% were at the age range of 18-22, mean age of 21.42. Majority of the respondents 44.4% were Orthodox religion sect followers and 51.0% were from Oromo ethnicity. Regarding respondents’ parental marital condition majority 77.3% parents of the respondents were living together while the rest 22.3% were in other marital condition like divorced, separated in conflict or widowed. Substantial number of the respondents, 41.6% came from a distance of about less than 450km compared to the distance between 451 to 900km and 901km and more (Table 1).
|Socio-demographic characteristics||F (%)||(n=392)|
|Health Science College||35||8.9|
|School of Agriculture and Natural Resource||24||6.1|
|School of Behavioral Science||20||5.1|
|School of Biodiversity and Conservation||29||7.4|
|School of Business and Economics||73||18.6|
|School of Engineering and Technology||120||30.6|
|School of Language||16||4.1|
|School of Mathematical science||16||4.1|
|School of Natural Science||36||9.2|
|School of Pedagogy||10||2.6|
|School of Social Science||13||3.3|
|Parental marital condition|
|Separated in conflict||24||6.1|
|Once/ just for advice||211||53.8|
|Once/just for advice||165||42.1|
|Distance respondents’ home town from MWU in km|
|Less than 450||163||41.6|
|451 – 900||133||33.9|
|More than 901||96||24.5|
Psychological and Academic assistance/study counseling
service; majority 53.1% respondents were received psychological
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (n=392), MWU May 2011.
Regarding Psychological and Academic assistance/study counseling service; majority 53.1% respondents were received psychological counseling once. Almost equal numbers of students 42.6% and 42.1% of respondents were never received and received at least once/just for advice/for academic assistance or study counseling respectively, after they join the university. Only small numbers of respondents were received psychological and academic assistance/study counseling several times 3.1% and 15.3% respectively. Out of the all study subjects 118 (30.1%) had adjustment problem for overall adjustment/ low adjustment level score/(Figue1). Among the study subjects substantial number of respondents 156 (39.8%) and 116(29.6%) scored low for academic adjustment and social adjustment respectively. Table 2 below shows the detail of overall and subscale adjustment level of the respondents. Sixty (47.6%) female students were students with low score/adjustment problem/ while the remains 58 were male students.
|OA||488 and above||31||7.9||361 – 487||243||62||67 – 360||118||30.1|
|AA||173 and above||18||4.6||122 – 172||218||55.8||24 - 121||156||39.8|
|SA||156 and above||16||4.1||104 – 155||260||66.3||19 - 103||116||29.6|
|PEA||111 and above||96||24.5||71 – 110||188||48||14 - 70||108||27.6|
|IA||61 and above||97||24.7||46 – 60||213||54.3||8 - 45||82||21|
Notes: OA: Overall Adjustment AA: Academic Adjustment SA: Social Adjustment PEA: Personal-Emotional Adjustment IA: Institutional Attachment f= frequency NB: *- p<0.05 ** - referent category
Table 2: The Distribution of respondents’ (n=392) Overall and Subscale Adjustment
Among the all study subjects 228(58.2%), respondents had varying degree of difficulty from “Difficulty in managing time and study skill” followed by “Difficulties in adjusting to university classes and the accompanying workload”, which was found to be 212(55.5%). Comparatively, reported difficulty for “Health problems” and “Confused career direction” comprises less percentage of difficulty reported by respondents; 150(38.3%) and 119(30.4%), respectively (Table 3).
|Associated factors||Degree of difficulty|
|No difficulty||Some difficulty||Great difficulty|
|F (%)||F (%)||F (%)|
|Being away from home, family, and friends for the first time and homesickness||203 (51.8)||133 (33.9)||56 (14.3)|
|Change in living arrangements or living in dormitory||202 (51.5)||153 (39.0)||37 (9.5)|
|Difficulties with socializing or making friends||207 (52.8)||139 (35.5)||46 (11.7)|
|Completely new and different social network and environment||203 (51.8)||147 (37.5)||42 (10.7)|
|Difficulty in managing time and study skill||161(41.1)||178(45.4)||53 (13.5)|
|Difficulties in adjusting to university classes and the accompanying workload||180 (45.9)||161 (41.1)||51 (13.0)|
|Health problems||238 (60.7)||105 (26.8)||49 (12.5)|
|Confused career direction||273 (69.9)||108 (27.6)||11 (2.8)|
Table 3: Difficulties from potential associated factors with their severity among respondents (n=392), Madawalabu University, March 2011.
There was significant difference in adjustment problem between different psychological counseling service of the respondents and reported difficulty from health problem, however, after adjusted for certain variables mentioned below their significance has failed to resist. Moreover, there was no association between adjustment problem and religion, ethnicity, marital status, age group, school, distance of home town of the respondents from Madawalabu University and marital condition of the respondents’ family. Sex categories of the students have statistically significant association with adjustment problem. The likely hood of female students having adjustment problem is higher compared to male students [AOR=4.36, 95% CI (1.96, 9.68)].
Academic factors “Managing time and study skill” and “Adjusting to university classes and the accompanying workload” also observed to have strong statistically significant association with students’ adjustment problem. The likely hood of having adjustment problem of students having difficulty from this factor is higher compared to students not having difficulty from this factor with [AOR=9.30, 95% CI (3.80, 22.73)] and [AOR=10.34, 95% CI (4.36, 24.54)] for “Managing time and study skill” and “Adjusting to university classes and the accompanying workload” respectively (Table 4).
|Explanatory variables||Frequency Adjustment problem||COR ( 95% CI)||AOR ( 95% CI)|
|Female||126(32.14)||60||66||3.26 (2.07, 5.14)*||4.36 (1.96, 9.68)*|
|Never||169(43.1)||79||90||4.14 (2.62, 6.55)*||2.18 (0.97, 4.91)|
|Never||167(42.6)||81||86||4.79 (3.01, 7.62)*||3.64 (1.60, 8.31)*|
|Being away from home, family, and Friends for the 1st time and Home-sickness (change)|
|Yes||189(48.2)||87||102||4.73 (2.94, 7.63)*||5.83(2.65, 12.84)*|
|Change in living arrangements or Living in dormitory (change)|
|Yes||190(48.5)||93||97||6.79(4.10,11.26)*||4.76 (2.14, 10.60)*|
|Difficulties with socializing or Making friends (social)|
|Yes||185(47.2)||86||99||4.75 (2.96, 7.64)*||3.46 (1.62, 7.37)*|
|Completely new and different social Network and environment (Social)|
|Yes||189(48.2)||93||96||6.90(4.16, 11.45)*||6.95(3.12, 15.47)*|
|Difficulty in managing time and study Skill (Academic)|
|Yes||228(58.2)||101||127||6.88 (3.90, 12.11)*||9.30(3.80, 22.73)*|
|Difficulties in adjusting to university classes and the accompanying workload( Academics)|
|Yes||212(55.5)||94||118||5.18 (3.12, 8.61)*||10.34(4.36, 24.54)*|
|Health problems (Personal)|
|Yes||150(38.3)||63||87||2.46 (1.56, 3.83)*||1.93(0.91, 4.09)|
|Confused career direction (Personal)|
|Yes||119(30.4)||49||70||2.07 (1.31, 3.27)*||2.45(1.13, 5.32)*|
NB: *- p<0.05 ** - referent category
Table 4: Adjustment problem in relation to explanatory variables of respondents (n=392), MWU March, 20011.
The prevalence of adjustment problem is 118 (30.1%), which is little bit higher than the prevalence study using the same instrument conducted in Malaysia which is 26% . Could be as a result of comparatively less conducive living and learning environment as well as less available psychological and academic counseling services in our study settings.
Regarding subscale 156(39.8%) respondents had adjustment problem for academic adjustment. This is also high compared to study finding in Malaysia which is 26% . This difference might be from fragmented provision of advisory mechanisms, psychological and academic counseling at our study setting. In line with others  this study showed that common adjustment problems were academic adjustment and social adjustment problems in nature. Personaemotional adjustment problem was 108(27.6%) which is small report compared to the study finding in Malaysia that is 42.8% . This difference may be from unlearned and cultural influence in expressing personal-emotional feelings in our study setting. Institutional adjustment problem 82(21%) is also high compared to report finding in Malaysia 14.8% . This might be from being new University with great emphasis is given constructions and varies developmental activities with less emphasis on institutional attachment of students for our study setting compared to later setting.
Finding of this study shows that female students were found to be affected by adjustment problem about 4 folds than male which consistent with the finding in other study [9,4,3]. This might be from less likely to express their difficulties or feelings with their peers as well as less participation at social activities compared to male.
The students’ background characteristics like distance of the University and socio-demographic characteristics such as religion, ethnicity and parental marital condition of the respondents are not significantly related to university adjustment similar to study conducted on Latino students [17,18]. It permitted us to conclude that the variation in University adjustment had less to do with preexisting or socio-demographic characteristics than with the nature of the environments in which these students found themselves.
Difficulty from “Being away from home, family, and friends” in this study w/c was 189(48.2%); found to be higher compared to that report among Malaysian students which is 20% . It might be from discrepancy in communication and transportation mechanisms of two setting. “Confused career direction”, which is personal factor was also statistically associated with adjustment problem. Similarly other study also reported confused career direction, as common sources of adjustment problems for new college students .
In general based on our research report, the adjustment difficulties faced by first year students were found to be academic problems, institutional, as well as social and personal problems in consistent to a research conducted in a local public university in Malaysia .
About one third of the students had found to have adjustment problem. The likelihood of having adjustment problem was higher among female students, those who never get academic counseling and being away from home, family, and friends. Academic adjustment problem followed by social adjustment problem was found higher among the adjustment subscales scores. Generally academic problem, away from home, social and personal factors were observed to have significant association with adjustment problem. In this study, there was no significant difference observed in adjustment problem between different age group, religion, marital status, ethnicity, distance of home town from the University and marital condition of the respondents’ family.
The authors would like to acknowledge Amanuel Specialized Mental Hospital for financial support. We also would like to thank the study subjects who volunteered to participate and take their time to fill the questionnaire. Further, the officials of Madawalabu University are greatly acknowledged for their cooperation in the process of the data collection.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that we have no conflict of interests.
- Dyson R, Renk K (2006) Freshmen Adaptation to University Life: Depressive Symptoms, Stress, and Coping. J Clin Psychol 62: 1231-1244.
- Baker RW, Siryk B (1984) Measuring adjustment to college. J Couns Psychol 31: 179-189.
- Martin Jr WE, Swartz-Kulstad JL, Madson M (2011) Psychosocial factors that predict the college adjustment of first-year undergraduate students: implications for college counselors. J Coll Couns 2: 121-133.
- Wintre MG, Yaffe M (2000) First-year students’ adjustment to university life as a function of relationships with parents. J Adoles Res 15: 9-37.
- Kitzrow MA (2003) The Mental Health Needs of Today's College Students: Challenges and Recommendations. NASPA Journal 41: 323.
- Rice KG, FitzGerald DP, Whaley TJ, Gibbs CL (1995) Cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of attachment, separation-individualism, and college social adjustment. J Couns Develop 73: 463-474.
- Yi-Wei C, Cheng-Mei M (2008) Adjustment of Freshman College Students: A longitudinal Study using Longitudinal Rasch Model. Acta Psychologica Sinica 40: 427-438.
- Gall TL, Evans DR, Bellerose S (2000) Transition to first-year University: Patterns of change in adjustment across life domains and time. J Soci Clin Psychol 19: 544-567.
- Habibah E, Mahyuddin R, Uli J (2009) Adjustment Amongst First Year Students in a Malaysian University. Eur J Soci Sci 8: 498-505.
- Ahmad (2002) Adjustment to college life and academic performance among Universiti Utara Malaysiastudents. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.
- Karp D, Holmstrom LL, Gray PS (2011) Leaving home for college: Expectations for selective reconstruction of self. Symbolic Interaction 2: 253-276.
- Wilson B (1984) problems of university adjustment experienced by undergraduates in a developing country. Higher education 13: 1-22.
- Tesfaye A (2009) Prevalence and correlates of Mental distress among Regular Undergraguate students of Hawassa Univeersity: A cross-sectional survey. East Afr J Pub Health 6: 9-12.
- Gerdes H, Mallinckrodt B (1994) Emotional, social, and academic adjustment of college students: a longitudinal study of retention. J Couns Develop 72: 281-288.
- Baker RW (1999) The Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ), Western Psychological Services.
- Beyers W, Goossens L (2002) Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire in a Sample of European Freshman Students. Edu Psychol Measur 62: 527.
- Hurtado S, Carter DF, Spuler A (1996) Latino student transition to Assessing Difficulties and Factors in Successful College Adjustment. Res Higher Edu 37: 140-145.
- Rodgers LS, Tennison LR (2009) A Preliminary Assessment of Adjustment Disorder Among First-Year College Students. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 23: 220-230.
Citation: Esmael A, Ebrahim J, Misganew E (2018) Adjustment Problem among First Year University Students in Ethiopia: Across Sectional Survey. J Psychiatry 21: 455. DOI: 10.4172/2378-5756.1000455
Copyright: © 2018 Esmael A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
December 5-7, 2018 Dubai, UAE
March 25-26, 2019 Yokohama, Japan
October 21-22, 2019 Tokyo, Japan
- Total views: 100
- [From(publication date): 0-0 - Nov 13, 2018]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 74
- PDF downloads: 26