alexa Adsorption Isotherm of Dibenzyl Toluene and its Partially Hydrogenated Forms Over Phenyl Hexyl Silica | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2329-6798
Modern Chemistry & Applications
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Adsorption Isotherm of Dibenzyl Toluene and its Partially Hydrogenated Forms Over Phenyl Hexyl Silica

Rabya Aslam1,2*and Karsten Muller1

1Institute of Separation Science and Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany

2Institute of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author:
Rabya Aslam
Institute of Separation Science and Technology
Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen- Nurnberg
Institute of Chemical Engineering and Technology
University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
Tel: 92429230462
E mail: [email protected]

Received Date: May 31, 2016 Accepted Date: June 19, 2016 Published Date: June 22, 2017

Citation: Aslam R, Muller K (2017) Adsorption Isotherm of Dibenzyl Toluene and its Partially Hydrogenated Forms Over Phenyl Hexyl Silica. Mod Chem appl 5: 221. doi: 10.4172/2329-6798.1000221

Copyright: © 2017 Aslam R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Modern Chemistry & Applications


Liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC) are an interesting option for chemical energy storage and hydrogen transportation. Dibenzyltoluene (H0-DBT), heat transfer oil, is capable of reversibly storing hydrogen emerged as a feasible LOHC system. However, it is not available as a pure compound but consists of an isomeric mixture of 6 to 8 compounds. During the hydrogen storage process a high number of stable intermediate species is formed. These compounds can be categorized into four main classes according to their degree of hydrogenation. To implement H0- DBT as a LOHC system, thermophysical data of these intermediate compounds are required. In our previous work, a reversed phase HPLC method was developed using phenylhexyl silica stationary phase and acetone/water as eluent to separate these partially hydrogenated fractions with a purity >98%. For further designing a batch or continuous HPLC process, adsorption isotherm data are required. In this work, adsorption isotherms for dibenzyltoluene and its partial and fully hydrogenated forms namely hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene, dodecahydro-dibenzyltoluene, and octadecahydrodibenzyltoluene are measured over phenylhexyl silica in acetone/water solvent using the static method. Sip’s equation (Combined Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm) fits the data better as compared to simple Freundlich, Langmuir or competitive Langmuir adsorption isotherms.


Adsorption isotherms; LOHC; RP-HPLC


Liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC) are a promising approach for hydrogen storage and transportation. This concept is based on the reversible cycle of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation for uptake and release of hydrogen [1-5]. The LOHC system consists of a pair of dehydrogenated and hydrogenated compounds representing the hydrogen lean and rich forms, respectively. Due to the chemical bonding of the hydrogen in the hydrogenated LOHC compound, the latter can store H2 at ambient conditions over longer periods. Recent studies shows the potential of dibenzyltoluene (H0‑DBT) as a competitive LOHC system due to its reasonable hydrogen storage capacity and thermal stability [5,6]. Each H0‑DBT molecule can store 9 molecules of hydrogen in the form of octadecahydrodibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT). However, to implement it as LOHC system, its thermophysical data are required. Since it is not available as pure compound and partial hydrogenation further produces a number of stable intermediate species. More than 24 compounds are observed in a partially hydrogenated reaction mixture which can be classified into four main fractions on the basis of their degree of hydrogenation namely dibenzyltoluene (H0-DBT), hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene (H6- DBT), dodecahydro-dibenzyltoluene (H12-DBT), and octadecahydrodibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT). In our previous work, a reversed phase high pressure liquid chromatography method was developed and successfully scaled up to semi preparative scale for the separation of these partially hydrogenated derivatives of dibenzyltoluene with phenylhexyl silica as stationary phase and a acetone water mixture as mobile phase (96/4, v/v%) [7]. In order to simulate and design a linear or non-linear chromatographic processes, adsorption isotherm data over mobile and stationary phase are required which describe the distribution behavior of the DBT fractions in the chromatographic system [8-10]. Adsorption isotherms can experimentally be determined using static (shake-flask and adsorption-desorption methods) or dynamic methods (frontal analysis method, elution curve methods and minor perturbation methods) [8,11,12]. Moreover, for a mixture, competitive isotherms can be predicted using single solute adsorption isotherm but it often comes with limited applicability range and accuracy [8]. In this work, adsorption isotherm data of single isomers of dibenzyltoluene derivatives such as dibenzyltoluene, hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene, dodecahydro-dibenzyltoluene, and octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene are determined using static method over phenylhexyl silica from a acetone/water solution (96/4, v/v%) within a concentration range of 0-25 mg/ml at 22 ± 1°C.

Materials and Methods


The stationary phase phenylhexyl silica (Luna 15 μm, 100°A) was purchased from Phenomenex, Germany. The specifications of the adsorbent provided by the supplier are summarized in Table 1. The single isomers of dibenzyltoluene, hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene, dodecahydro-dibenzyltoluene and octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene were separated and purified via vacuum distillation and reversed phase high pressure liquid chromatography with >99% purity. The details of the separation process are described in section 2.2.1. The HPLC grade acetone was purchased from VWR Germany and 18 MΩ water produced by a Milli Q integral-3 system (Merck Millipore) was used in the experimental work. The details of the chemicals used are given in Table 2.

Chemicals Purity (mass%) Degree of hydrogenation (%) Analysis method
Dibenzyltoulene (H0-DBT)+ >99 0 GC-MSa
Hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene (H6-DBT)+ >99 33 GC-MSa
Dodecahydro-dibenzyltoluene (H12-DBT)+ >99 67 GC-MSa
Octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT)+ >99 100 GC-MSa
Acetone >99 - -

Table 1: Specifications of phenyl hexyl Silica provided by manufacturer.

Parameter Value
Particle size 11-15 μm
Particle size distribution 1.8 (dp 90/10)
Pore diameter 100°A
Surface diameter 390 m2/g
Bulk density 0.58 g/cm3
Total carbon 16%
Metal contents 11 ppm

Table 2: Purity information of chemicals used.


Separation of dibenzyltoluene derivatives: Single isomers of dibenzyltoluene derivatives representing each fraction of dibenzyltoluene were separated in two steps. Firstly, vacuum distillation was used to separate a partially hydrogenated reaction mixture. The distillation was performed in packed distillation column (Normag GmbH, Germany) equipped with Sulzer structured packing (L=2 m, DXP, SS 1.4404). Due to the overlapping range of boiling points, pure compounds were not obtained via distillation but fractions consisting of compounds with similar boiling points were obtained. The batch plot for vacuum distillation experiment and boiling point range of DBT-fractions is provided in the supporting information. Then in the second step, using those fractions as feed, single isomers representing each fraction of dibenzyltoluene were separated on semi-preparative scale column (250 mm (L) × 50 mm (I.D.)) using reversed phase liquid chromatography. The detailed procedure can be found somewhere else [7]. The GC analysis and NMR analysis of each isomer used in this work is given in the supporting information.

Measurement of adsorption isotherm: The adsorption isotherms were measured using a static method (shake-flask method) [13]. Solutions in acetone/water (96.4%, v/v) containing equal concentration of dibenzyltoluene (H0-DBT), hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene (H6-DBT), dodecahydro-dibenzyltoluene (H12-DBT), and octadecahydrodibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT) were prepared in 10 ml bottles for the concentration range of 0.1-25 mg/ml. The upper threshold of concentration was determined on the basis of the least soluble compound, i.e., H18-DBT in acetone/water solvent. The uncertainty of the initial concentration was ± 0.01 mg/ml. Then a fixed amount (0.5 ±0.003 g) of phenylhexyl silica was added to each bottle and the tightly closed bottles were kept for 24 hours under stirring. Preliminary experimental studies indicate that the adsorption equilibrium was reached after 18 hours for all components. The same procedure was repeated for the determination of the isotherms of dibenzyltoluene and octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene fractions. It should be noted that fraction represents the isomeric mixture of components with same degree of hydrogenation. The initial and final concentrations were measured using Gas Chromatography (Agilent technology 7890 A system). The amount of solutes adsorbed on phenylhexyl silica were determined with initial and equilibrium concentrations using eq. (1).

equation (1)

where Ci and Ce are initial and equilibrium concentrations of solutes, respectively; m is the mass of the phenylhexyl silica phase in gram and v is the volume of solution. Each measurement was repeated three times and the standard deviation was found to be less than 5%.


The experimental data for the adsorption isotherm for fraction of dibenzyltoluene and octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene and single components of dibenzyltoluene, hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene, dodecahydro-dibenzyltoluene, and octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene over phenylhexyl silica in acetone/water solvent (96/4, v/v%) at 22 ± 1°C are presented in Table 3 and 4. It was observed that adsorption to stationary phase increased with degree of hydrogenation of compounds i.e., phenylhexyl silica has three times more adsorption capacity for fully hydrogenated octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene in comparison to fully dehydrogenated dibenzyltoluene at the same concentration. Moreover, the results show that within the studied concentration range (0 to 25 mg/ml), the adsorption isotherm for H0-DBT and H18-DBT were not influenced by other species as single component data were comparable with the competitive adsorption isotherms within deviation of only 1% as shown in Figure 1.


Figure 1: Comparison of single component isotherm with competitive isotherm for H0-DBT and H18-DBT.

Ce qe Ce qe Ce qe Ce qe
mg·ml-1 mg.g-1 mg·ml-1 mg·g-1 mg·ml-1 mg·g-1 mg·ml-1 mg·g-1
0.25 17.9 0.25 36.5 0.24 41.8 0.24 47.9
0.38 27.2 0.39 59.7 0.37 69.7 0.38 84.9
0.56 39.7 0.57 92.2 0.54 109.1 0.57 143.1
1.00 70.5 0.98 169.6 0.93 206.9 0.98 283.2
1.92 133.3 1.92 357.9 1.84 450.3 1.92 656.0
2.87 195.8 2.89 553.6 2.77 704.8 2.86 1055.4
3.64 244.2 4.61 928.0 4.86 1264.8 4.52 1760.9
4.98 325.1 5.27 1025.8 6.88 1754.4 4.92 1927.4
8.81 533.4 7.52 1435.4 9.24 2260.5 7.04 2749.7
10.61 620.5 10.08 1856.8 11.73 2721.7 9.55 3602.3
14.58 793.2 14.45 2470.3 14.40 2960.0 14.06 4814.8
26.55 1190.4 25.38 3564.0 23.42 4160.4 23.98 6484.8

Table 3: Experimental competitive adsorption isotherm data for dibenzyl toluene derivatives from acetone/water (96/4, v/v) solution over phenylhexyl silica.

Ce qe Ce qe
mg·ml-1 mg.g-1 mg·ml-1 mg.g-1
0.24 17.7 0.24 48.0
0.36 27.1 0.37 84.7
0.54 39.5 0.58 143.0
0.95 70.5 0.99 283.0
1.88 133.0 1.95 656.3
2.85 195.8 2.80 1054.0
3.6 244.2 4.50 1760.2
4.92 325.3 4.88 1925.4
8.9 533.4 7.10 2749.7
10.58 620.5 9.56 3602.3
14.55 793.3 14.10 4814.8
25.98 1190.2 24.05 6487.8

Table 4: Single component adsorption isotherm data for dibenzyltoluene and octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene from acetone/water (96/4, v/v) solution over phenylhexyl silica.

Correlation of experimental data

Due to the negligible difference between the single and competitive adsorption isotherms (Figure 1), it was assumed that components do not influence each other during adsorption within concentration range studied. Several equations for correlating single component adsorption data such as Freundlich, Langmuir and combined Langmuir-Freundlich (also known as Sip’s equation) were evaluated for the correlation of the experimental data. The Freundlich isotherm with two parameters is given by eq (2) [14,15].

equation (2)

Where qe is the amount of solute adsorbed on the stationary phase, k and n are Freundlich parameters. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm with two parameters is described by eq (3) [14,15].

equation (3)

Where qsat is the saturation capacity of monolayer and b is second Langmuir parameter which quantifies the adsorption energy Hads using eq (4) [14].

equation (4)

The parameters for the Freundlich equation, Langmuir equation, and Sip’s equation are presented in Table 4. The Freundlich correlation did not fit the experimental data satisfactorily (with 13 data points for each compound), especially at low concentrations. The average relative error for the Freundlich model was 11.6% with a maximum deviation of 18.4% observed at low concentrations. For the Langmuir model, the fitting results were better in comparison to the Freundlich correlations. However, the Langmuir model fits the H0-DBT and H6-DBT data satisfactorily but gives poor fitting for H12-DBT and H18-DBT data. The average relative error for the Langmuir isotherm was 6.2% with a maximum error of 13%. The relative error was high at low concentrations while the fit was observed to be better at high concentrations. A comparison of the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms with experimental data is presented in Figure 2.


Figure 2: Comparison of experimental and modelled data using Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms.

The Sip’s equation with three parameters (eq (5)) correlates the experimental data within the working concentration range better compared to the other correlations.

equation (5)

Although the number of parameters (three instead of two) increases, higher values of adj. R2 (adjusted determination coefficient) and Q2 (cross validated determination coefficient) show the better fit quality (compare Table 5). Additionally, the calculated average relative deviation was only 0.5% with a maximum value of 0.6%. The comparison of the Sip’s equation data with the experimental data is presented in Figure 3.


Figure 3: Comparison of experimental and modelled data using Sip’s equation.

Parameters H18-DBT H12-DBT H6-DBT H0-DBT
Langmuir equation
qsat 14.215 10.207 9.883 3.068
b 0.034 0.029 0.023 0.024
Adj. R2 0.996 0.998 0.999 0.999
Q2 0.995 0.977 0.995 0.999
ARD/% 13.5 6.21 3.89 1.01
Freundlich equation
k 0.55 0.37 0.293 0.099
n 0.79 0.78 0.779 0.752
Adj. R2 0.979 0.988 0.961 0.996
Q2 0.945 0.920 0.942 0.991
ARD/% 14.5 16.4 9.8 5.8
Sip’s equation
qsat 9.92 7.042 6.915 2.991
b 0.068 0.058 0.042 0.025
n 1.32 1.2 1.15 1.01
Adj. R2 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Q2 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
ARD/% 0.0023 0.0078 0.0003 0.0001

Table 5: Model parameters for adsorption isotherms with statistical parameters.

Additionally, the bi-Langmuir adsorption isotherm (eq (6)) was used to correlate the experimental data by assuming the maximum loadability equal for all components in the system [14,15].

equation (6)

As expected, the model based on this assumption did not fit the data well because the loadability for various hydrogenated fractions is fairly different for the different compounds. If maximum loadability is considered to be different for all compounds, 8 parameters would be needed to fit eq (6) to 13 experimental data points. Such a high number of parameters do not seem to be reasonable. Thus, within the studied concentration range, Sip’s equation was found to be the best suited correlation for the adsorption isotherms of all partially hydrogenated derivatives of dibenzyltoluene.


In this work, adsorption isotherm data for single isomers of dibenzyltoluene, hexahydro-dibenzyltoluene, dodecahydrodibenzyltoluene and octadecahydro-dibenzyltoluene are presented. The distribution of these components has been investigated between a acetone/water (96/4, v/v) liquid phase and a phenylhexyl silica (stationary phase) at 22 ± 1°C within the concentration range from 0 to 25 mg/ml. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms with 2 parameters and Sip’s equation (combined Langmuir-Freundlich equation) with 3 parameters and multicomponent isotherm based on the Langmuir model (with 8 parameters) were used to correlate the experimental data. Good agreement with experimental data was found for Sip’s equation as compared to the other models. Moreover, adsorption isotherms data for single components of dibenzyltoluene and octadecahydrodibenzyltoluene were comparable with their competitive adsorption isotherms. Thus, influence of the individual components on each other were found to be negligible within the studied concentration range.


This work has been done within the framework of the Bavarian Hydrogen Center and has been funded by the state of Bavaria. The authors wish to thank Prof. Peter Wasserscheid, Dr. Andreas Bösmann, and Michael Müller for the provision of partially hydrogenated dibenzyltoluene mixture and Prof. Wolfgang Arlt as well as Prof. Malte Kaspereit for valuable discussion.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 147
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2017 - Oct 22, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 117
  • PDF downloads :30

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version