alexa An Anti-Thought about Neurobiological Approach in Psychiatry | OMICS International
ISSN: 2378-5756
Journal of Psychiatry
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

An Anti-Thought about Neurobiological Approach in Psychiatry

Mansoor Ahmad Dar*, Rayees Ahmad Wani and Yasir Hassan Rather

Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

*Corresponding Author:
Mansoor Ahmad Dar
Senior Resident , Department Of Psychiatry
Government Medical College, Srinagar
Jammu and Kashmir, India
Tel: 919596010111
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: May 22, 2014; Accepted Date: October 8, 2014; Published Date: October 15, 2014

Citation: Dar MA, Wani RA, and Rather YH (2014) An Anti-Thought about Neurobiological Approach in Psychiatry. J Psychiatry 18:183. doi: 10.4172/Psychiatry.1000183

Copyright: © 2014, Mansoor Ahmad Dar et al., This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Psychiatry

Short Communication

According to the World Health Organization, neuropsychiatric disorders account for at least 20% of the global burden of illness-related disability, and all represent complex disorders of brain function [1]. The development of neurobiological research is giving another dimension to the understanding and execution in psychiatry.

Psychiatry has been continuously evolving and changing. Given the continued ambiguity of the brain-mind relationship, unresolved questions remain of 1) how can, and perhaps should psychiatry proceed to formulate a viable system of characterizing mental normality and abnormality, and 2) how might such formulation affect the scope and tenor of psychiatric practice? Such questions are not esoteric or merely academic. Rather, in light of ongoing progress in genetics and neurobiology these questions reveal genuine challenges, and form the groundwork upon which a new diagnostic schema for, and definition of psychiatric profession and approach might be constructed [2].

Psychiatry, like neurology, rests on a foundation of clinical neuroscience. It also encompasses and is informed by a broad range of basic biological and social sciences and has at its disposal many tools (e.g., brain imaging, genetics, neuro-psychopharmacology, neurophysiology, epidemiological models of risk and protective factors, and neuropsychology) for developing new assessment and treatment approaches, grounded in understanding of aetiology and pathophysiology and there is a lot of focus on these approaches [3].

These neurobiological approaches in psychiatry are on the track of giving a simplistic view of mind, structuralizing the mental illnesses, giving the concreteness to the thoughts and making molecules of the emotions. These approaches are helping to develop psychiatry akin to other medical fields and giving a better understanding of etiopathology. Although the research in the neurobiological field is highly warranted and promising but it gives birth to a few questions in the mind of a common clinician. viz-

Is not this approach ‘Over Simplistic’?

This approach places too much emphasis on biology when clearly humans are influenced by many other factors.

Is not it giving birth of ‘Reductionism’?

This approach explains complex emotions, behaviors and thoughts in terms of simple biology although there may be a more complex explanation.

Or simply saying, won’t it be a ‘Mindless’ understanding of brain, although in the past the understanding of psychiatry was said to be ‘Brainless’?

A potential result of such biological reductionism would be the fragmentation of psychiatric care to a point that the psychiatrist would solely diagnose illnesses and prescribe medications, with a concomitant de-emphasis on the psychological and social aspects of causation and remediation of mental illnesses [4].

But this is not the only face of biological psychiatry, since it is and has been helping in the better understanding of psychological dimensions of human behavior and illness. It has also been helping to explain and predict the inter-individual variations in treatment responses. If and hopefully yes , the psychiatric professionals keep their feet on the basic soil of human touch, emotion, empathy and spirituality, then touching the skies of neurobiology and genetic research will be a boon for the field, although the ground may be slippery for a few - the time will tell. So till the time gives its statement a cohesive approach of basic human touch with neurobiological and other advances is the key where no one surpasses other and both go together.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11901
  • [From(publication date):
    January-2015 - Apr 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8128
  • PDF downloads : 3773

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version