alexa An Assessment Tool for Babies Requiring Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or High Flow | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2090-7214
Clinics in Mother and Child Health
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

An Assessment Tool for Babies Requiring Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or High Flow

Susan Lamburne*

NICU, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK

Corresponding Author:
Susan Lamburne
NICU, Southmead Hospital
Bristol, UK
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: January 28, 2016; Accepted Date: February 19, 2016; Published Date: March 14, 2016

Citation: Lamburne S (2016) An Assessment Tool for Babies Requiring Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or High Flow. Clinics Mother Child Health 13:228. doi: 10.4172/2090-7214.1000228

Copyright: © 2016 Lamburne S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Clinics in Mother and Child Health

Assessment Tool for Babies

A trend towards an increased use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has arisen from several studies that have provided evidence of decreased lung damage and reduced incidence of chronic lung disease in neonates [1,2]. Nasal CPAP is an effective treatment modality for neonates with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and respiratory disease [3]. External or internal complications of nCPAP and High Flow can be relatively frequent and close surveillance for potential complications must be considered during nCPAP and High flow use.

One study reports an overall internal or external complication rate of 13.2%, including tissue necrosis, intranasal ulceration, granulation, and vestibular stenosis [4]. Care givers providing close observations, i.e. hourly assessment of the infant’s nares have the unique opportunity to identify and assess these possible complications.

It is therefore of vital importance that bedside care givers understand the nCPAP and high flow system they are using to prevent tissue break down. Nurses caring for infants receiving nasal CPAP or Nasal high flow work through a CPAP competency and a high flow competency. The Practice Development and Respiratory teams at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK devised a set of guidelines that include a CPAP competency and a CPAP care plan and a High Flow competency. In accordance with the Department of Health’s Toolkit for High Quality Neonatal Services, staff to undergo training to achieve these competencies [5].

To try to prevent nasal scarring and excoriation the nCPAP and High Flow assessment tool was introduced with the neonatal Intensive care Unit at Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK in 2008. This chart has since been updated, please see attached chart table 1. Staffs are encouraged to use the score chart effectively together with the specific nCPAP care plan and nasal high flow and nCPAP competencies. The score chart is integrated within the NICU’s care chart and on an hourly basis the infant’s nares are assessed and scored and any evidence of skin break down is identified and quickly managed appropriately.

Signs Score Action
Nares appear healthy 0 No action required
Slight redness noted around nares, Area appears painful to touch, Some indentation noted 1 Ensure the baby is wearing the correct size hat/mask/prong as per NICU guidelines and that all are correctly positioned, Assess/discuss with Senior nurse/Registrar/Consultant if a change in mask/prongs is needed or consider a change of device (ex: Bubble-Drager-NCPAP), Document on ITU chart and in notes
Any of the following evident: Marked indentation, Painful to touch, Tissue breakdown 2 Call Senior nurse/Registrar/Consultant, Remove mask /prongs immediately ensuring baby’s breathing remains supported (Neopuff PEEP), Decide on appropriate alternative respiratory support, Document on ITU chart, in notes and complete eAIMS, Dr to refer to plastics and obtain medical imaging
© S F Lamburne August 2008, Updated by CJ 2014, North Bristol NHS Trust UK

Table 1: An assessment tool for a baby receiving CPAP via Drager/NCPAP or bubble.

Since the introduction of the nasal assessment tool there has been a marked reduction in the number of nasal injuries and the extent of damage. The assessment tool is a simple staging system that, when used together with the nCPAP competency, nasal High Flow competency and nCPAP care plans serves as a strategy for prevention and treatment to this iatrogenic and cutaneous event.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the following health care workers; Sue Prosser, Dr David Evans, Michelle Jackson, Anna Colwill Kirsty Wright Claire Johnson.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8146
  • [From(publication date):
    March-2016 - Aug 23, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8026
  • PDF downloads :120

Review summary

  1. Kathryn Bennett
    Posted on Sep 07 2016 at 6:01 pm
    The author reviewed the existing literature on the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in babies during the treatment of chronic diseases. The author highlighted that the usage of the instrument plays a substantial role in limiting the amount of lung damage in babies. The article provides insight into the recently developed intervention in paediatrics.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords