alexa Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Cytotoxicity of the Starfish Extracts on Cancer Cells in Culture | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2161-0444
Medicinal Chemistry
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Cytotoxicity of the Starfish Extracts on Cancer Cells in Culture

Jumeri Mangun Wikarta1,2 and Sang Moo Kim2*

1Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

2Department of Marine Food Science and Technology, Gangneung, Wonju National University, Gangneung 210-702, Republic of Korea

*Corresponding Author:
Sang Moo Kim
Department of Marine Food Science and Technology
Gangneung, Wonju National University
Gangneung 25457, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82336402343
Fax: +82336402850
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: May 03, 2016; Accepted date: May 13, 2016; Published date: May 18, 2016

Citation: Wikarta JM, Kim SM (2016) Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Cytotoxicity of the Starfish Extracts on Cancer Cells in Culture. Med chem (Los Angeles) 6: 331- 338. doi:10.4172/2161-0444.1000366

Copyright: © 2016 Wikarta JM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Background: The starfishes were shown to containe the bioactive compounds which exhibit various biological activities including cytotoxicity, antiinflammatory, hemolytic, antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal effects.

Objective: To determine the anti-inflammatory activity and cytotoxicity of the extracts of four different starfishes.

Materials and methods: The homogenized fresh body component of starfishes were extracted and concentrated. The EtOH extract of A. pectinifera with high extraction yield and total phenol was partitioned using different extraction solvents. The CHCl3 fraction was further fractionated using thin-layer chromatography, silica-gel chromatography, gel filtration, and recycling preparative HPLC, in that order.

Results: Fraction SAP4.2.5 exhibited strong anti-inflammatory activity without cytotoxic effect up to a concentration of 25 μg/mL, and high cytotoxicity, with IC50 values of 19.4, 34.8, and 32.7 μg/mL against AGS, DLD-1, and HeLa cells, respectively. These biological activities could be due to the presence of lathosterol, 13-tetradecen-1-ol acetate, and stigmast-7-en-3-ol (3ß,5α,24S)-like compounds.

Conclusion: Starfish has a great potential as a resource for natural health products because of its strong antiinflammatory and anticancer activities.

Keywords

Anti-inflammation; Cytotoxicity; Extract; Starfish; Steroid

Introduction

Many new drugs derived from secondary metabolites have been applied in the treatment and/or prevention of various diseases. However, these drugs have various and severe adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, edema, and diarrhea. Therefore, naturally occurring agents with high effectiveness and no side-effects are desirable chemical therapeutics.

Inflammation is a complex pathophysiological process that is mediated by a variety of signaling molecules produced by leukocytes, macrophages, mast cells, and platelets, among other cells. Macrophages play an important role in inflammatory disease through releasing factors, such as the free radical nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin mediators, and cytokines, which are involved in the immune response [1]. Excessive production of the inflammatory mediators is associated with many diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, chronic hepatitis, and pulmonary fibrosis [2]. Hence, inhibiting the production of inflammatory mediators in response to inflammatory stimuli might be a useful therapeutic strategy in inflammatory diseases.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a diatomic free radical produced from L-arginine by constitutive (cNOS) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in numerous mammalian cells and tissues. Nitric oxide (NO), superoxide (O2 -) and their reaction product peroxynitrite (ONOO- ) may be generated in excess during the host response against viral and antibacterial infections and may contribute to pathogenesis by promoting oxidative stress, tissue injury and even cancer [3].

Marine organisms are excellent sources of structurally diverse molecules that are potentially valuable as drugs. Many natural marine products have been designated as sources of new anti-inflammatory factors and cancer chemopreventive agents [4]. In particular, the starfishes was considered as one of the most promising sources of such agents due to the variety of species and applications of its products.

Starfish (sea star) is an invertebrate belonging to the class Asteroidea, phylum Echinodermata, of which over 1500 species are widely distributed in most of the oceans of the world. In recent years, starfish have attracted much attention due to their large scale outbreaks in coastal areas, which led to severe economic damage to the fishery and aquacultural grounds of benthic shellfishes, including mussels, oysters and scallops. Moreover, the industrial applications of the secondary metabolites of starfish have received attention worldwide. Steroidal glycosides, which are composed of a polyhydroxylated steroidal aglycone and a carbohydrate portion containing only one or two monosaccharide units, are a growing subgroup of the active glycoside compounds that have been isolated from starfishes [5]. Starfishes have also been reported to have antibacterial [6], antiviral [7], cytotoxic [8] and apoptotic [9], neuritogenic [10], antifungal [11], antityrosinase [12], anti-inflammatory [13], and anticancer [14,15] activities.

The objective of this study was to determine and compare the anti-inflammatory activity and cytotoxicity against cancer cells of four starfishes, Asterina pectinifera, Asterina amurensis (the purple and yellow types) and Distolasterias nipon. Because A. pectinifera starfish is abundant and ubiquitous and has high levels of polyphenol and saponin, the anti-inflammatory and anticancer compounds of its species were purified, isolated, and identified.

Materials and Methods

Animal material

Specimens of Asterina pectinifera, purple-type Asterina amurensis, yellow-type Asterina amurensis, and Distolasterias nipon were collected of the easterncoast off the Korean peninsula. The animals were brought to the laboratory in a fresh condition and were rapidly dissected and rinsed using tap water to eliminate contaminants, and were then stored at -40°C until use. Immediately before use, the starfishes were thawed at 4°C overnight and then were sliced into small pieces using a knife. The starfish samples were placed in a stainless-steel container, frozen using liquid nitrogen, and then ground using a blender.

Reagents

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli 0127:B8, NΨ-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME), Griess reagent (0.1% napthylethylenediamine and 1% sulfanilamide in 5% H3PO4), and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT) were purchased from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). RPMI 1640 medium and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA). All of the other commercially available chemicals and reagents that were used were of analytical grade.

Cell lines and culture

The macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 (Korean Cell Line Bank, Seoul, Korea) was grown in plastic culture flasks in RPMI-1640 medium containing L-glutamine and supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin under 5% CO2 at 37°C. After 3 days, the cells were removed from the culture flask by scraping and centrifuging for 3 min at 6,574×g. The medium was removed and the cells were then resuspended using fresh RPMI-1640 medium. Three cancer cell lines, a human gastric carcinoma line (AGS), a human colon cancer line (DLD-1), and a human cervical cancer line (HeLa) (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. The concentration of RAW 264.7 cells was adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/mL and that of the AGS cells, DLD-1 cells, and HeLa cells was adjusted to 1 × 105 cells/mL using the same medium.

Preparation and purification of starfish extract

The flow chart for the purification of starfish bioactive compounds is shown in Figure 1. The homogenized fresh body component of the starfishes was extracted using 95% EtOH and H2O in cold room for 6 h, which was repeated three times. The extracts were combined and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo at 40°C to the point of dryness, yielding the crude extract. Because A. pectinifera is abundant and resulted in high extraction yield as well as high amount of total phenol (Table 1), this species was chosen for further analysis. The EtOH-extracted material of A. pectinifera was suspended in H2O. This solution was partitioned using C6H14 to yield a C6H14 fraction. Next, the aqueous layer was successively partitioned using CHCl3, EtOAc, and BuOH, in that order. After removing each solvent by vacuum evaporation, five fractions were obtained and were hereafter referred to as the C6H14, CHCl3, EtOAc, BuOH, and H2O fractions.

Figure

Figure 1: The flow chart for the purification of starfish bioactive compounds

  Starfish Extraction yield
(%)
Total phenol
(mg GAE*/g)
Crude saponin
(%)
EtOH H2O EtOH H2O EtOH H2O
A. pectinifera
A. amurensis (purple)
A. amurensis (yellow)
D. nipon
6.5
5.5
4.7
3.9
10.6
10.7
9.2
6.4
47.6
30.2
29.3
30.9
64.3
53.7
48.2
55.4
17.2
20.7
17.8
15.6
13.4
10.8
14.1
17.5

Table 1: The chemical composition of the starfish extracts.

Because the CHCl3 fraction exhibited the strongest antiinflammatory and anticancer activities (Table 2), this fraction was coarsely fractionated using silica-gel (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) column (3.0 × 50.0 cm) chromatography, using stepgradient elution with a CHCl3:EtOH solvent system of increasing polarity (100:0 to 0:100, v/v, 400 mL) to yield 9 fractions (SAP1- SAP9). Each CHCl3:EtOH fraction was concentrated using a vacuum evaporator (BUCHI Labortechnik AG, Postfach, Switzerland) and was finally vacuum-dried in a vacuum drying oven (Hanil, Gongju, Korea). The fraction with the highest yield, SAP4, was further fractionated using LH-20 (3.5 × 36 cm) gel filtration chromatography using MeOH as the eluent to yield two fractions, SAP4.1 and SAP4.2. Fraction SAP4.2 was further fractionated using a recycling preparative HPLC (ModelLC-9104; Japan Analytical Industry Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a JAIGEL-GS310 column (21.5 × 500 mm). Elution was performed using CHCl3:MeOH:H2O (5:1:0.1) (v/v/v) with monitoring at 254 nm yielding five fractions (SAP4.2.1- SAP4.2.5). The solvent in each fraction was removed using a vacuum evaporator and the samples were finally vacuum-dried in a vacuum drying oven. The fractions were then utilized in anti-inflammatory and anticancer assays.

Fraction Yield (%, w/w) Anti-inflammatory
(IC50, µg/mL)
Anticancer(IC50, µg/mL)
AGS DLD HeLa
EtOH
C6H14
CHCl3
EtOAc
BuOH
H2O
L-NAME*
5 Fluorouracyl**
Paclitaxel**
6.5a
33.8b
11.3b
0.1b
2.1b
31.4b
292.4
101.8
57.3
84.1
115.0
75.4
50.0
-
-
269.4
174.3
71.8
128.0
129.0
>400
-
5.5
3.2
333.0
150.0
71.8
128.0
129.0
>400
-
34.5
24.6
306.9
301.5
77.8
205.6
159.4
>400
-
3.4
2.2

Table 2: The anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities of starfish extracts.

Identification of the purified compounds

The purified compounds were identified through GC/MS analysis using a GC 7890A system equipped with a quadrupole MS 5975C detector and an HP-35 column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness) (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The injection volume and port temperature were 2 µL and 250°C, respectively. The temperature of the column was started at 100°C for 2 min, raised to 300°C at 20°C/min and held for 6 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas, delivered at a linear flow rate of 1 mL/min. All of the spectra were scanned within the range of 33-600 m/z. The structures of the metabolites were deduced by comparing their spectroscopic data with those reported in the library.

Total phenolic and crude saponin contents

The total phenolic content was determined using the Folin– Ciocalteu method [16]. The extract was appropriately diluted using the extraction solvents. One hundred µL of each diluted extract was transferred into a test tube and brought to a volume of 500 µL using deionized water, after which 250 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 1.25 mL of a 12.5% aqueous sodium carbonate solution were added. The mixture was vortexed and then allowed to stand for 40 min at room temperature. Thereafter, the absorbance of each sample at 750 nm was measured against that of the control (500 µL of deionized water plus 1.5 mL of reagent mixture) and the blank (100 µL of sample dilutent plus 1.9 mL of deionized water). A calibration curve was prepared using 10-50 µg/mL of gallic acid (Sigma Chemical Co.) dissolved in deionized water as the standard. The total phenolic content was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalent per gram of dry extract.

The crude saponin fraction was isolated according to the modified method of Ref. [17]. One gram of the starfish extract was dissolved in 125 mL of deionized water and the aqueous solution was transferred to a separating funnel. The solution was then treated twice using 125 mL of diethyl ether to remove the lipid components, and then was extracted three times using 125 mL of water-saturated butanol. The BuOH fraction was treated twice using 75 mL of deionized water to remove impurities. The crude saponin fraction was obtained by evaporating the BuOH under a reduced vacuum at 55°C and drying the sample at 105°C for 6 h; the sample was weighed after cooling in a desiccator. The yield of crude saponin was calculated as follows:

Yield (%)=[Wcs/Ws] × 100

where Wcs was the weight of the crude saponin sample and Ws was the weight of the powder sample used for extraction (1 g).

Anti-inflammatory activity

The anti-inflammatory activity was assayed according to the modified method of Choi and Hwang [18]. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well tissue culture plates (1 × 105 cells/100 µL) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h in 5% CO2. The extract sample was placed in phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) and was serially diluted. Cells were then stimulated with 200 µL solution containing the extract, 100 µLof LPS, and RPMI 1640 medium lacking phenol red for 24 h. One hundred microliters of the cell-culture supernatant was mixed with 100 µL of Griess reagent in the well of a 96-well plate, and the absorbance at 540 nm was measured 10 min later using a microplate spectrophotometer (EL-800; BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The percentage of nitric oxide inhibition was calculated based on the ability of the extract sample to inhibit nitric oxide formation by the cells compared with that of the control. The results were expressed as the percentage of inhibition of NO production compared with that of the control as follows:

% inhibition=[(NO2-)c–(NO2-)s]/(NO2-)c × 100

where (NO2-)c was the concentration of nitrite released by the cells in the absence of the extract and (NO2-)s was the concentration of nitrite released by the cells in the presence of the extract.

Cytotoxicity (cell viability) assay

To ensure that the observed inhibition of nitric oxide production of a sample was not false positive due to its cytotoxic effects, a cytotoxicity assay [19] was also performed following culture by measuring the extent of the mitochondrial-dependent reduction of MTT to formazan. To each well, 100 µL of MTT (2 mg/mL) in PBS was added and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 4 h with 5% CO2. The medium was then carefully discarded and the formed formazan salt was dissolved in 120 µL of DMSO. The plates were placed at room temperature for 5 min by gently hand shaking to dissolve the formazan completely. A 100 µL aliquot of the MTT formazan solution was transferred to a new 96-well tissue culture plate and then the absorbance at 540 nm was determined using a microplate reader (EL-800; BioTek Instruments). The absorbance of the control (untreated cells, without the extract) was taken as 100% viability. Viability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of absorbance of the treated cells to that of the untreated cells.

Cytotoxicity against cancer cells

The cytotoxicity against cancer cells of the starfish extracts or fractions were assayed according to the modified method of Lee et al. [20]. Cells were cultured inRPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS, 2mM glutamine, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin at 37°C in 5% CO2. For the assays, the cells were plated in 96-well plates (104 cells/well in 100 µL of medium). After 4 h, the extract or fraction, which was dissolved in 1 × PBS, was added to each well and the plates were incubated for 72 h. Afterward, PBS (100 µL) containing 2 mg/mL of MTT was added to the culture medium. Three hours later, the formazan product resulting from the reduction of MTT was dissolved in DMSO, and the absorbance at 540 nm was measured using a microplate reader.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate, and the results were expressed as the mean values±SD. The differences among bioactivities of the fractions observed in the different assays were analyzed using an ANOVA, followed by least significance difference (LSD) test, with a p-value of <0.05 set as the level of significance.

Results and Discussion

Extract yield, total phenolic and crude saponin contents

The EtOH and H2O extraction yields of the four different starfishes are shown in Table 1. The extraction yield and total phenol content of the H2O extract of all of the starfishes were higher than those of the EtOH extracts. The higher level of yield of the H2O extract might be due to starfishes containing more water-soluble substances, such as water-soluble lipids (ganglioside molecular species and a homogeneous ganglioside) and peptides [21]. Phenolics as well as non-phenolic compounds (sugars, organic acids, proteins and pigments) can be present in the extracts. The total phenolic concentration of the H2O extracts of all of the starfishes was also higher than that of the EtOH extract (Table 1). This result is contrary to the finding of Nagai et el. [22], who reported that the total phenolic content of the EtOH extract of the horsetail plant Equisetum arvense L. was higher than that of the H2O extract.

In contrast to the results regarding the content of total phenolics, the content of crude saponins of the EtOH extracts of the starfishes except for that of D. nipon was higher than that of the H2O extracts (Table 1). The secondary metabolites of starfish include a remarkable diversity of various steroids, including sterols, polyhydroxysteroids, mono- and biosides of polyhydroxysteroid, and steroid oligoglycosides called asterosaponins [23]. There are many reports of the anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities of bioactive compounds obtained from starfish, such as the anti-inflammatory activity of starfish steroids [13], and anticancer activity of polyhydroxylated steroids [24], cerebroside [8], and polysaccharides on human breast cancer [14] and colorectal adenocarcinoma cells [15]. Therefore, the starfish A. pectinifera, a carnivorous pirate invertebrate, was chosen for the extraction of antiinflammatory and anticancer compounds using different organic solvents and for their subsequent purification.

Fractionation of the starfish extract

Because A. pectinifera is an abundant raw material and its EtOH extract had strong anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities, this extract was consecutively fractionated using organic solvents of increasing polarity (Figure 1). Extracting fresh starfish samples using EtOH resulted in a 6.5% (w/w) extraction yield (Table 2). It was found that partitioning the EtOH extract using C6H14 and H2O led to relatively high yields (33.8 and 31.4%, respectively), whereas the CHCl3, EtOAc, and BuOH fractions resulted in relatively low yields (11.3, 0.1, and 2.1%, respectively). Therefore, the compounds extracted from the starfish were distributed between polar and non-polar categories. This result is in good agreement with the findings of Higuchi et al. [10], in which ganglioside molecular species and a homogeneous ganglioside that were purified from the water-soluble lipid fractions of the chloroform/ methanol extract of A. pectinifera starfish were characterized.

Anti-inflammatory activity

As shown in Figure 2A, incubating RAW 264.7 cells with the starfish extract had a significant inhibitory effect on LPS-induced NO production. The CHCl3 fraction most effectively inhibited the LPSinduced NO production, with an IC50 value of 57.3 µg/mL, whereas the EtOH extract was the least effective, with an IC50 value of 292.4 µg/mL (Table 2). At 100 µg/mL, the CHCl3 fraction inhibited NO production by 98.4%, which was a much higher rate than those of the other fractions. These results agreed well with the results of Thao et al. [13], who reported that the CH2Cl2 extract of starfish Astropecten polyacanthus exerted anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-stimulated bone-marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs), with IC50 values of 1.27, 8.82, and 11.48 µg/mL for the inhibition of the production of IL- 12 p40, IL-6, and TNF-a, respectively. Furthermore, 7 steroids with anti-inflammatory activity were purified from its CH2Cl2 extract and were identified. The decline in NO production may be attributed to the decrease in inducible NO synthase (iNOS) at the mRNA or protein level and the respective alterations of iNOS gene transcription [25]. The overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and TNF-a, is associated with the progression of inflammatory diseases. Hence, blocking the production of these cytokines and their signaling pathways is very important in preventing and treating inflammatory diseases [13].

Cell viability

The cytotoxic effects of the starfish extracts and the fractions on RAW 264.7 macrophages were evaluated using the MTT assay (Figure 2B). At 100 µg/mL, the EtOH extract of starfish and the fractions except for CHCl3 fraction, did not significantly alter cell viability over 24 h period. The viability rate of cells treated with the EtOH extract and the C6H14, EtOAc, BuOH, and H2O fractions ranged from 81.3-98.2%, whereas that of the cells treated with the CHCl3 fraction was 64.9%. The cytotoxicity rate of the starfish extract and the fractions was less than 93.7% that of L-NAME, thepositive control, at same concentration. Steroids isolated from the EtOH extract of A. pectinifera exhibited cytostatic activity [26]. Therefore, the lower vialbility rate of the cells treated with the CHCl3 fraction of A. pectinifera compared with that of the cells treated with the other fractions might be due to its content of steroid compounds.

medicinal-chemistry-Anti-inflammatory-viability

Figure 2: Anti-inflammatory activity (A) and cell viability (B) of the starfish extracts in RAW 264.7 cell at different concentrations. Values with different symbols indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Cytotoxicity against cancer cells

As shown in Figure 3, the EtOH extract of starfish arrested the cell cycle progression of the AGS, DLD-1, and HeLa cancer cells in a concentration-dependent manner. At 400 µg/mL, the EtOH extract inhibited the growth of the AGS, DLD-1, and HeLa cells by 96.7, 96.5, and 92.5%, respectively. The cytotoxicity of the EtOH extract against HeLa cells was higher than the 0.7-7.8% rate of the EtOH extract of various edible seaweeds including L. setchellii, M. integrifolia, and N. leutkeana against the same cells at 1,000 µg/mL [27], but was lower than the 78.8 and 95.5% rate of the EtOH extract of C. pilulifera against HeLa cells at 200 µg/mL after treatment for 3 and 7 days, respectively [28]. The EtOH extract was then partitioned successively using C6H14, CHCl3, EtOAc, and BuOH. The CHCl3 fraction inhibited the growth of cancer cells significantly more strongly than did the EtOH extract or other fractions. This fraction may alter the cell-cycle regulation, thereby reducing the proliferation rate of cancer cells. The IC50 values of the CHCl3 fraction against the AGS, DLD-1, and Hela cells were 47.2, 71.8, and 77.8 µg/mL, respectively (Table 3). This result is consisted with the findings of Ref. [29], in which the CHCl3 fraction of the herb C. grandis Osbeck (Dangyuja) had the highest anticancer activity. Because the CHCl3 fraction had potent anti-inflammatory activity and cytotoxicity against cancer cells, it was conjectured that the active compounds responsible for both anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities of this fraction might be similar. Epidemiological studies have suggested that several human cancers are associated with chronically elevated levels of NO during infections [30]. Nitric oxide reacts rapidly with superoxide to form peroxynitrite, a powerful oxidant, which reacts with many biological molecules, possibly causing tissue damage. Therefore, chronic peroxynitrite exposure has been postulated as being associated with carcinogenesis due to its DNA damaging activities. Hence, DNA damage and inefficient DNA repair may initiate carcinogenesis [30]. Three polyhydroxysteroids among the 11 steroids that were isolated from three Pacific starfishes were fould to be weakly cytotoxic against HeLa cells, with EC50 values ranging from 53.0-174.4 µM, whereas the other steroids were inactive at up to 200 µM [24]. Cerebrocides purified from A. pectinifera starfish were also cytotoxic against two human cancer cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner up to 400 µg/mL [8]. A polysaccharide of A. pectinifera starfish also inhibited the growth of human breast [14] and colorectal [15] cancer cells. Therefore, steroids, spingolipids or polysaccharides obtained from starfish might act as anticancer compounds.

medicinal-chemistry-Cytotoxicity-starfish-ethanol

Figure 3: Cytotoxicity of the starfish ethanol extracts against AGS (A), DLD-1 (B) and HeLa (C) cancer cells at different concentrations. Values with different symbols indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Peak RT (min) Library Molecular Formula Molecular weight
(Dalton)
Match
(%)
Area
(%)
1 12.138 13-Tetradecen-1-ol acetate C16H30O2 254.22 96 6.8
2 12.746 Lathosterol C27H46O 386.36 96 57.9
3 13.599 Ergosta-7,22-dien-3-ol C28H46O 398.36 70 13.9
4 15.022 Androstan-11-one,3-(acetyloxy)-17-iodo-,(17a)- C21H31IO3 458.13 58 5.6
5 16.802 Stigmast-7-en-3-ol, (3ß,5a,24S) C29H50O 414.39 94 9.3

Table 3: The chemical compositions of subfraction SAP4.2.5 obtained from starfish extract.

Purification of anti-inflammatory and anticancer compounds

The CHCl3 fraction was further purified using a thin layer, silicagel, and LH-20 gel filtration chromatography, and recycling preparative HPLC, in that order (Figure 1). Nine sub-fractions (SAP1-SAP9) were obtained from the CHCl3 fraction using silica-gel chromatography. Based on the extraction yield and activity of the subfractions, subfraction SAP4 was chosen for further purification using Sephadex LH-20 gel filtration chromatography with EtOH as the eluent, which yielded two fractions, SAP4.1 and SAP4.2. The major fraction SAP4.2 was then applied to recycling preparative HPLC, which yielded 5 fractions (SAP4.2.1-SAP4.2.5) (Figure 4A). Fraction SAP4.2.5 exhibited the highest anti-inflammatory activity and a high yield. Therefore, fraction SAP4.2.5 was analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and the obtained spectra were compared with those in the Wiley7N library, thereby revealing at least 5 components (Figure 4B). The chromatogram of this fraction resulted in clear mass spectra, even for the minor peaks, with good resolution. The chemical composition of fraction SAP4.2.5 obtained from A. pectinifera starfish as determined using GC/MS is presented in Table 3. Peak 2 (Figure 4B), as the major component (57.9%), had a high (96%) amount of a compound corresponding to lathosterol (C27H46O, MW: 386.36). Lathosterol is a cholesterol-like molecule that is an example of a steroid. Peak 1 (6.8%) had a high (96%) amount of a compound corresponding to 13-tetradecen-1-ol acetate (C16H30O2, MW: 254.22). Moreover, peak 5 (9.3%) consisted of 94% of a compound that matched stigmast-7-en-3- ol (3ß,5a,24S) (C29H50O, MW: 414.39).

medicinal-chemistry-purification-identification-starfish

Figure 4: The purification and identification of the compounds in the starfish fractions. (A), the elution profile of SAP4.2applied on recycling preparative HPLC; (B), total ion chromatogram of SAP4.2.5 using GC/MS.

Fraction SAP4.2.5 exhibited strong anti-inflammatory activity and cytotoxicity against cancer cellsin a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5). At 25 µg/mL, fraction SAP4.2.5 inhibited NO release by 92.4% (IC50, 14.6 µg/mL) without causing cytotoxicity (cell viability >90%) (Figure 5A), which suggested that this fraction contained NO-inhibitory compounds. However, at 50 µg/mL, fraction SAP4.2.5 was cytotoxic (cell viability approximately 10%). Ergost-5-en-3-ol (3ß), stigmasta-5,22Edien- 3ß-ol, and stigmast-5-en-3-ol (3ß) purified from plant leaves exerted anti-inflammatory activity, while cholest-5-en-3-ol (3ß) did not [31]. Furthermore, ergosta-7,22-dien-3-ol from spiny sea-star showed stronger anti-inflammatory activity by reducing moe than 20% of NO levels than two fatty acids, cis 11-eicosenoic and cis 11,14 eicosadienoic acids, in RAW 264.7 cells. However, maximum acitivity was obtained when both compounds tested in combination, thus suggesting a potentially synergistic activity of both classes of metabolites [32].

medicinal-chemistry-Anti-inflammatory-cytotoxicity

Figure 5: Anti-inflammatory activity(A) and cytotoxicity against cancer cells (B) of the starfish fraction SAP4.2.5. Values with different symbols indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Fraction SAP4.2.5 also suppressed the proliferation of AGS, DLD- 1, and HeLa cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5B). At 50 µg/ mL, fraction SAP4.2.5 significantly inhibited the growth of AGS, DLD-1, and HeLa cells by 95.2 (IC50, 19.4 µg/mL), 82.1 (IC50, 34.8 µg/mL), and 88.5% (IC50, 32.7 µg/mL), respectively. Hence, fraction SAP4.2.5 inhibited the growth of AGS cancer cells more efficiently than it did that of DLD- 1 and HeLa cells. Many researchers have reported that starfishes contain steroids, including sterols, polyhydroxysteroids, and saponins, which appear to have anticancer activities [33,34]. Two polyhydroxysteroids of A. pectinifera starfish were also cytotoxic to the HL-60 cells, with IC50 values of 80.3 and 40.5 µM [26]. A polar steroid isolated from Evasterias genus starfish were weakly cytotoxic to HeLa cancer cells [24]. Lemon essential oil containing 13-tetradecen-1-ol acetate showed inhibit the growth of HeLa cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner [35], whereas 5a-cholest-7-en-3ß-ol purified from A. pectinifera starfish exhibited antimutagenic activity against the mutagens MNNG and NQO [36]. The polyhydroxy steroids and saponins of A. pectinifera starfish were also cytotoxic to the human liver carcinoma HepG2 cell line [34]. A ganglioside obtained from A. pectinifera starfish was neuritogenic in the rat pheochromocytoma cell line [10]. Therefore, steroids such as lathosterol and stigmast-7-en-3-ol (3ß,5a,24S), and 13-tetradecen-1-ol acetateare considered the main anti-inflammatory and anticancercompoundsof starfish A. pectinifera.

The anticancer effect of fraction SAP4.2.5 might be mediated by growth inhibition of cancer cells through dysreglulated tubulin polymerization causing cell death by disrupting the normal microtubule dynamics required for cell division and vital interphase processes [37], and the inhibition of STAT3 proteins (signal transducers and activators of transcription), which are important for cancer cell survival and proliferation [38]. The mechanism underlying the anticancer activity of bioactive compounds might the activation of the host immune response, which stimulates T-cell subsets and the production of cytokines (TNF-a and IFN-γ) that participate in anticancer effects [39]. Moreover, Ref. [40] reported that a reduction in the fraction of cells in the G1 phase and the appearance of a fraction of cells with a hypodiploid DNA content was associated with delphinidin treatment of human uterine carcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma cells. Another possible anticancer mechanism of the starfish extract is the effect of the steroidal constituents of starfish on the induction of apoptosis, in which steroids in the CH2Cl2 fraction induced apoptosis through the downregulation of Bel-2 expression, the up-regulation of Bax expression, the cleavage of caspase-9 and -3, and the cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in HL-60 cells [13].

In the present study, the starfish extract exhibited strong antiinflammatory activity and cytotoxicity against cancer cells. Overall, these findings confirmed the utility of clinical investigations of the efficacy of starfish extracts in preventing inflammation and in cancer chemotherapy. These data can be considered an important basis for proceeding to patient studies or to the formulation of drug products. However, further in vivo studies using animal models and human patients are necessary to develop and exploit this nascent promise.

Conclusions

The anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects of starfish extracts were evaluated to identify the beneficial effects of this species under conditions related to inflammation and cancer prevention. The starfish extracts exhibited strong anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities against human cancer cells. These biological activities of the starfish extract could be partially explained by the presence of lathosterol, stigmast-7-en-3-ol,(3ß,5a,24S)-like, and 13-tetradecen-1-ol acetatelike compounds. Based on the biofunctional activities of the starfish extract, A. pectinifera starfish could be utilized as a functional ingredient in foodor pharmaceutical products to promote human health.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Korea Sea Grant Program (GangWon Sea Grant) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries in Korea.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8690
  • [From(publication date):
    May-2016 - Sep 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8536
  • PDF downloads :154

Review summary

  1. Abida
    Posted on Sep 30 2016 at 2:14 pm
    In this study, the authors investigated the anti-inflammatory activity and cytotoxicity of the extracts of four different starfishes on distinct cell lines, suggesting that starfish has a great potential as a resource for natural health products because of its strong anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords