Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

**Radhakant Gouda, Himankar Baishya ^{*} and Zhao Qing**

R&D Department, Beijing Sciecure Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd, North Shi Zhen in the North Industrial Area, Shunyi District, Beijing, China

- *Corresponding Author:
- Himankar Baishya

Senior Director, R&D, Beijing

Sciecure Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd.

North Shi Zhen in the North Industrial area

Shunyi District, Beijing, China

**Tel:**+861060447688

**E-mail:**[email protected]

**Received date:** July 14, 2017; **Accepted date:** July 25, 2017; **Published date:** July 28, 2017

**Citation: **Gouda R, Baishya H, Qing Z (2017) Application of Mathematical Models in Drug Release Kinetics of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER Tablets. J Develop Drugs 6:171. doi:10.4172/2329-6631.1000171

**Copyright:** © 2017 Gouda R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Visit for more related articles at** Journal of Developing Drugs

The aim of present work is to determine and analyse the kinetics of drug release from the matrix tablet by employing various mathematical models. A study was done with Carbidopa and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg by employing wet granulation technique using Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and Hydroxypropyl cellulose as matrix forming polymer. The in-vitro drug release profile was carried out in 0.1 N HCl (900 mL) using USP dissolution apparatus II (Paddle) at 50 rpm at an extended time period of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours. The drug release data was obtained, quantitatively correlated and interpreted with various mathematical models viz. Zero order model, first order model, Higuchi model, Hixson-Crowell model and Korsmeyer-Peppas model and evaluated to understand the kinetics of drug release. The criterion for the most suitable model was based on the high degree of coefficient of correlation of drug release profile of Carbidopa Levodopa ER Tablet. Hence, finally concluded as the drug release pattern of Carbidopa Levodopa ER Tablets, 50 mg/200 mg was best fitted with Higuchi square root model and follows Higuchi drug release kinetics which is diffusion controlled.

Dissolution; Diffusion; Coefficient of correlation; Kinetics of drug release

**Dissolution**

When solid particles come in contact with the GI tract, a saturated layer of drug solution is created very quickly in the surface of particles in the liquid immediately surrounding them (called the diffusion layer). The drug molecules then diffuse through the GI content to the lipoidal membrane where diffusion across the gastro intestinal membrane and absorption into the circulation takes place [1].

There are two possible scenarios for the drug dissolution [1].

1. Absorption from solution takes place following the rapid dissolution of solid particles. In this case rate of absorption is controlled by rate of diffusion into the GI fluid.

2. Absorption from solution takes place following the slow dissolution of solid particles. In this case rate of absorption is controlled by rate of dissolution into the GI fluid.

Hence, Dissolution is a process in which a solid substance solubilises in a given solvent i.e., mass transfer from solid surface to the liquid phase [2].

**Theories of drug dissolution: **Several theories have been proposed
to explain drug dissolution. Some of the important ones are:

• Diffusion layer model/ film theory.

• Danckwert model/ penetration or surface renewal theory.

• Interfacial barrier model/ double barrier or limited salvation theory.

**Explanation of theories**

**Diffusion layer model/ film theory:** This model considers that
a layer of liquid, H cm thickness, close to the solid surface remains
stagnant as the bulk liquid passes over the surface with a particular
speed (**Figure 1**). The interaction at the solid/liquid interface is
considered to be spontaneously formation of a saturated solution, C_{S},
of the solid in the stagnant liquid layer. The rate of dissolution is carried
out by the diffusion of the solid molecules from the stagnant liquid film to the bulk liquid according to Fick’s first law:

J=- D_{f} dc/dx

where J is the amount of substance passing perpendicularly through
a unit surface area per time, D_{f} is the diffusion coefficient and dc/dx, is
the concentration gradient. After a time t, the concentration between
the limit of the stagnant liquid layer and the bulk liquid becomes Ct.
Once the solid molecules pass into the bulk liquid, it is considered that
there is rapid mixing and the concentration gradient disappears

This theory explains that a uniform rate of dissolution can be
obtained if the concentration gradient is always constant i.e., C_{S}-C_{t}
is constant as C_{S}>>C_{t} (as in “sink” conditions which generally mean
C_{S}>10 C_{t}).

**Danckwert model/ penetration or surface renewal theory:**
This model considers that there is formation of macroscopic packets
of solvent which attaches at the solid /liquid interface in adiffusion
manner (**Figure 2**). Hence at the interface, the packet is able to absorb
solute according to the laws of diffusion which is to be replaced by a
new packet of solvent. This surface renewal process is related to the rate
of transfer of solute and finally to the rate of dissolution. Though the
diffusion layer model is the most commonly used, various alterations
have been proposed. The current views of the diffusion layer model are
based on the so-called effective diffusion boundary layer, the structure
of which is heavily dependent on the hydrodynamic conditions. Aguiar
et al. represented a theory which holds that dissolution occurs only
when the drug is in small particles. Wagner altered above theory and
showed that dissolution occurs from both the intact tablet and the
aggregates and/or granules produced after disintegration.

**Interfacial barrier model/ double barrier or limited salvation
theory:** In this model, it can be considered that the interaction at
the solid/liquid interface is not spontaneous due to a high activation
free energy barrier which is to be surrounded before the solid can
dissolve (**Figure 3**). Thus, the dissolution mechanism is almost same
as in diffusion layer model, with the concentration at the limit of the
stagnant layer of liquid becoming Ct after time t. The rate of diffusion
in the stagnant layer is relatively fast in comparison with the presence
of the energy barrier, hence it becomes rate limiting in the dissolution
process.

**Basics of kinetics of drug release**

**Laws in the kinetics of drug release**

* Noyes-Whitney law* [2]: Noyes-Whitney developed the
fundamental principle of evaluation of drug release, which explains as

dC/dt=K (C_{S}-C_{t})

Where dC/dt is dissolution rate of drug,

K is dissolution rate constant,

C_{s} is the concentration of drug in the stagnant layer (also called as the saturation or maximum drug solubility),

C_{t} is the concentration of the drug in the bulk of the solution at time t.

* Ficks law of diffusion*[2]: According to this law drug molecules diffuse from a region of higher concentration to one of lower
concentration until equilibrium is attained and that the rate of
diffusion is directly proportional to concentration gradient across the
membrane.

This can be expressed mathematically as

dQ/dt=DAK_{m/w}(C_{GIT}- C)/h

Where dQ/dt is rate of drug diffusion, amount per time (rate of appreance of drug in blood),

D is the diffusion coefficient. Its dimension is area per unit time, so
typical units for expressing it would be m^{2}/s (area/time),

A is the surface area for absorbing membrane for drug diffusion (area),

K_{m/w} Partition coefficient of drug between lipoidal membrane and
aqueous GI fluid (no unit),

C_{GIT}- C is the difference in the concentration of drug in the GI fluid
and the plasma called concentration gradient (amount per volume),

h is the thickness of the membrane (length).

**Formulation of Carbidopa-Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200
mg [3]**

The Carbidopa and Levodopa combination is used to treat the symptoms of Parkinson′s disease, which is characterised by abnormally low levels of dopamine. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter which controls the skeletal muscular system. Patients suffering from Parkinson′s disease frequently have periods in which their mobility becomes difficult resulting inability to move.

Administering dopamine is not effective to treat Parkinson′s disease because dopamine dose not cross the blood brain barrier. To resolve this failure, Parkinson′s patients are administered Levodopa the metabolic precursor of dopamine. Levodopa crosses blood brain barrier and rapidly converted into dopamine and eradicating the symptoms of Parkinson′s disease caused by reduced level of dopamine. Levodopa is problematic because of its rapid decarboxylation by tissues other than the brain. Thus, when levodopa is administered alone, large doses are required because only small portion is transferred to brain unchanged.

Hence an aromatic amino-acid decarboxylase inhibitor such as Carbidopa can be used in combination with levodopa. Carbidopa inhibits the decarboxylation of Levodopa in the body tissue outside the brain. Hence, small doses of carbidopa can be administered in combination with levodopa which allow larger amount of levodopa to reach which later converted to dopamine which finally shows its efficacy. The carbidopa and levodopa combination product now available in immediate release as well as controlled release formulations. Controlled release formulations allow for the continuous release of the drug in an extended or prolonged period of time to maintain plasma levodopa concentration range.

In the present study, an attempt was made to design Carbidopa and Levodopa ER Tablet and its release profile was interpreted with various mathematical models [4].

• Zero order model

• First order model

• Higuchi model

• Korsmeyer -Peppas model

• Hixson-Crowell model

**Materials**

Carbidopa was procured from Zhejian Chiral medicine chemicals co. Ltd and Levodopa was procured from Divis laboratory Pvt. Ltd. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose was purchaged from DOW Chemical Pacific Limited. and Hydroxypropyl cellulose was purchased from Ashaland Speciality Ingredients. Ferric oxide red from Sensient colors UK Ltd., Indigo caramine aluminium lake, Colloidal silicon dioxide was from Evonik speciality chemicals (Shanghai), Talc was from Imerys Talc from Italy and Magnesium stearate was received from Peter Greven, China. All other chemicals and ingredients used in the study were of analytical grade.

**Methods**

**Preparation of Carbidopa-Levodopa ER tablets by wet
granulation method:** A prototype of formulation was designed
by gathering the information from literatures and patents. The
formulations were developed by wet granulation technique from a
initial tentative formula to improved final formula (**Table 1**).

S. No. | Name of Ingredient | F1 (%) | F2 (%) | F3 (%) | F4 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | Carbidopa | 16.67 | 16.67 | 16.67 | 16.67 |

2 | Levodopa | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.67 |

3 | Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose | 8.66 | 7.95 | 7.65 | 7.40 |

4 | Hydroxypropyl cellulose | 6.59 | 5.55 | 4.35 | 4.10 |

5 | Ferric oxide red | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |

6 | Indigo carmine aluminum lake | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 |

7 | Colloidal silicon dioxide | 0.00 | 1.50 | 2.50 | 2.25 |

8 | Talc | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |

9 | Magnesium stearate | 1.25 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.25 |

Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |

Observation | Picking sticking problem while compression | Picking sticking problem while compression | Picking sticking problem while compression | Final optimised formulation |

**Table 1: **Formulation Details of Carbidopa-Levodopa ER Tablets, 50 mg/200 mg.

All the ingredients were sifted through #40 mesh separately except Ferric oxide red, Indigo caramine Aluminium Lake which were shifted through #80 mesh. Above ingredients were mixed in rapid mixer granulator for 5 minutes at a suitable speed of impeller and chopper to achieve uniform blend. Then granulation was done by adding water at a suitable speed of impeller and chopper for 5-6 minutes to achieve suitable granules. Drying of granules was carried out by fluid bed processor 60-70°C until to achieve LOD NMT 2%. Dried granules were milled by Comill having 0.8 mm screen. Finally, dried granules were lubricated with magnesium stearate and the lubricated blend was compressed into tablets using 12.7 × 7.5 mm oval shaped standard concave punches on a Minirotary tablet compression machine. The compression force was adjusted to achieve tablets having hardness in the range of 70-100 N and average weight of 300 mg.

From the above formulation, formulation F4 was considered as final optimised formulation and was selected for further study for the drug release profile and its release kinetics by the application of mathematical models.

**Dissolution profile of Carbidopa Levodopa ER tablets:** The *invitro*
drug release profile was carried out in 0.1 N HCl (900 mL) at 37
± 0.5°C using USP dissolution apparatus II (Paddle) at 50 RPM at an
extended time period of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours. Sample
aliquots (5 mL) were withdrawn at 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 hours
and replaced with equal volumes of fresh dissolution medium. Samples
were suitably diluted, analysed by HPLC method and drug release was
estimated.

**Application of drug release data on mathematical models:**
Several mathematical equations which generally define the dissolution
profile. Once an appropriate function has been selected, the evaluation
of dissolution profile can be carried out and hence the drug release
profile can be correlated with drug release kinetic models. Various
mathematical models are employed to understand drug release kinetics
which is explained below.

**Zero order model **[5]: According to the principles of
pharmacokinetics, drug release from the dosage form can be
represented by the equation:

C_{0}-C_{t} =K_{0}t

C_{t}=C_{0} +K_{0}t

C_{t} is the amount of drug released at time t,

C_{0} is the initial concentration of drug at time t=0,

K_{0} is the zero-order rate constant.

Thus, zero order kinetics defines the process of constant drug release from a drug delivery system and drug level in the blood remains constant throughout the delivery.

Hence to study the drug release kinetics data obtained from *in-vitro*
dissolution study is plotted against time i.e., cumulative drug release
vs. time.

Hence the slope of the above plot gives the zero-order rate constant and the correlation coefficient of the above plot will give the information whether the drug release follows zero order kinetics or not.

Thus, this model was applied in the release profile of Carbidopa
and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg (**Table 2**) and evaluation was
done in the graphical presentation (**Figures 4** and **5**).

Time (Hr) | Cumulative % drug release (Carbidopa) | Cumulative % drug release (Levodopa) |
---|---|---|

0.0 | 0 | 0 |

0.5 | 30 | 28 |

0.8 | 41 | 39 |

1.0 | 44 | 48 |

1.5 | 56 | 61 |

2.0 | 67 | 70 |

2.5 | 77 | 79 |

3.0 | 84 | 87 |

4.0 | 99 | 98 |

**Table 2: **Drug release profile of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg.

Observation: The graphical representation of cumulative % of
drug release against time describes that drug release of Carbidopa and
Levodopa from the matrix does not follow perfectly the principle of
zero order release kinetics, though it is slightly approaching (r^{2}=0. 933
for Carbidopa and r^{2}=0. 0.9157 for Levodopa).

**First order model** [5]: The release of drug which follows first order
kinetics can be represented by the equation

DC/dt=-K_{1}C

K_{1} is the first order rate constant, expressed in time^{-1} or per hour.

Hence it can be defined as that first order process is the one whose rate is directly proportional to the concentration of drug undergoing reaction i.e., greater the concentration faster the reaction. Hence, it follows linear kinetics.

After rearranging and integrating the equation,

log C=log C_{0}-K_{1}t/2.303

K_{1} is the first order rate equation expressed in time^{-1} or per hour,

C_{0} is the initial concentration of the drug,

C is the percent of drug remaining at time t.

Hence to study the drug release kinetics data obtained from* in-vitro*
dissolution study is plotted against time i.e., log % of drug remaining
*vs*. time and the slope of the plot gives the first order rate constant.
The correlation coefficient of the above plot will give the information
whether the drug release follows first order kinetics or not.

Thus, this model was applied in the release profile of Carbidopa
and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg (log Cumulative % drug
remaining vs. time refer **Table 3**) and evaluation was done in the
graphical presentation (**Figures 6** and **7**).

Time (Hr) | log Cumulative % drug remaining (Carbidopa) | log Cumulative % drug remaining (Levodopa) |
---|---|---|

0.0 | 2.000 | 2.000 |

0.5 | 1.845 | 1.857 |

0.8 | 1.771 | 1.785 |

1.0 | 1.748 | 1.716 |

1.5 | 1.643 | 1.591 |

2.0 | 1.519 | 1.477 |

2.5 | 1.362 | 1.322 |

3.0 | 1.204 | 1.114 |

4.0 | 0.000 | 0.301 |

**Table 3: **Drug release profile (log Cumulative % drug remainining) of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg.

**Observation: **The graphical representation of cumulative % of drug
release against time describes that drug release of Carbidopa and Levodopa from the matrix does not
follow the principle of first order release kinetics as there is lower value
of coefficient of correlation (r^{2}=0.8322 for Carbidopa and r^{2}=0.9212 for
Levodopa).

**Higuchi model **[6]: The release of a drug from a drug delivery system
(DDS) involves both dissolution and diffusion. Several mathematical
equations models describe drug dissolution and/or release from DDS.
In the modern era of controlled-release oral formulations, ‘Higuchi
equation’ has become a prominent kinetic equation in its own right, as
evidenced by employing drug dissolution studies that are recognized
as an important element in drug delivery development. Today the
Higuchi equation is considered one of the widely used and the most
well-known controlled-release equation.

The classical basic Higuchi equation is represented by

where Q is the cumulative amount of drug released in time t per
unit area, C_{O} is the initial drug concentration, C_{S} is the drug solubility
in the matrix and D is the diffusion coefficient of the drug molecule in
the matrix.

This relation is valid until total depletion of the drug in the dosage form is achieved. To study the dissolution from a planar heterogeneous matrix system, where the drug concentration in the matrix is lower than its solubility and the release occurs through porous system, the expression can be given by equation [5].

where D is the diffusion coefficient of the drug molecule in the solvent; δ is the porosity of the matrix; τ is the tortuisity of the matrix and Q, A, Cs and t have the meaning described above.

Tortuisity is defined as the dimensions of radius and branching of the pores and canals in the matrix. After simplifying the above equation, Higuchi equation can be represented in the simplified form

where, K_{H} is the Higuchi dissolution constant.

The data obtained were plotted as cumulative percentage drug release versus square root of time. Therefore, the simple Higuchi model
will result a linear Q versus t^{1/2} plot having gradient, or slope, equal to
K_{H} and we say the matrix follows t^{1/2} kinetics.

Hence if the correlation coefficient is higher for the above plot then we can interpret that the prime mechanism of drug release is diffusion controlled release mechanism.

It is important to note that a few assumptions are made in this Higuchi model. These assumptions are:

(i) the initial drug concentration in the system is much higher than the matrix solubility

(ii) Perfect sink conditions are maintained

(iii) The diffusivity of the drug is constant and

(iv) The swelling of the polymer is negligible. The sink conditions are achieved by ensuring the concentration of the released drug in the release medium never reaches more than 10 per cent of its saturation solubility.

Thus, this model was applied in the release profile of Carbidopa
and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg (Cumulative % drug release
vs. Square root time refer **Table 4**) and evaluation was done in the
graphical presentation (**Figures 8** and **9**).

Time (Hr) | Square root time (Hr) | Cumulative% drug release (Carbidopa) | Cumulative% drug release (Levodopa) |
---|---|---|---|

0.0 | 0.000 | 0 | 0 |

0.5 | 0.707 | 30 | 28 |

0.8 | 0.866 | 41 | 39 |

1.0 | 1.000 | 44 | 48 |

1.5 | 1.225 | 56 | 61 |

2.0 | 1.414 | 67 | 70 |

2.5 | 1.581 | 77 | 79 |

3.0 | 1.732 | 84 | 87 |

4.0 | 2.000 | 99 | 98 |

**Table 4: **Drug release profile (Cumulative% drug remaining) of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg.

Observation: The graphical representation of cumulative % of
drug release against time represents that drug release of Carbidopa
and Levodopa from the matrix is perfectly following Higuchi drug
release model as the drug release profile is very closest to trend line or
regression line and there is highest value of coefficient of correlation
(r^{2}= 0.9931 for Carbidopa and r^{2}=0.9916 for Levodopa).

**Korsmeyer-peppas model** [7]: Once it has been ascertained that the
prime mechanism of drug release is diffusion controlled from Higuchi
plot then it comes the release of drug follows which type of diffusion.

To understand the dissolution mechanisms from the matrix, the release data were fitted using the well-known empirical equation proposed by Korsmeyer and Peppas.

Korsmeyer and Peppas put forth a simple relationship which described the drug release from a polymeric system follow which typeof dissolution and he represented a equation as:

Mt/M∞=K_{kp}t^{n}

Mt/M∞ is a fraction of drug released at time t,

log(Mt/M∞)=log K_{kp}+nlog t,

Mt is the amount of drug released in time t,

M∞ is the amount of drug released after time ∞,

n is the diffusional exponent or drug release exponent,

K_{kp} is the Korsmeyer release rate constant.

To study release kinetics a graph is plotted between log cummulative
% drug release log(M_{t}/M_{∞}) vs. log time (log t).

Hence, n value is used to characterize different release mechanisms
as given in tabular form (**Table 5**) for cylindrical shaped matrices. Thus,
this model was applied in the release profile of Carbidopa and Levodopa
ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg (log Cumulative % drug released vs. log
time, **Table 6**) and evaluation was done in the graphical presentation
(**Figures 10** and **11**).

Release exponent (n) | Drug transport mechanism | Rate as a function of time |
---|---|---|

0.5 | Fickian diffusion | t^{-0.5} |

0.45<n=0.89 | Non -Fickian transport | t^{n-1} |

0.89 | Case II transport | Zero order release |

Higher than 0.89 | Super case II transport | t^{n-1} |

**Table 5:** Different release mechanisms.

log time | log Cumulative% drug released (Carbidopa) | log Cumulative% drug released (Levodopa) |
---|---|---|

0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |

-0.301 | 1.477 | 1.447 |

-0.125 | 1.613 | 1.591 |

0.000 | 1.643 | 1.681 |

0.176 | 1.748 | 1.785 |

0.301 | 1.826 | 1.845 |

0.398 | 1.886 | 1.898 |

0.477 | 1.924 | 1.940 |

0.602 | 1.996 | 1.987 |

**Table 6:** Drug release profile (log Cumulative% drug released*vs.*log time) of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg.

Observation: From the above figures (**Figures 10** and **11**) the slope
of the plot was constructed which described that the release exponent
or the diffusion exponent found to be higher than 0.89 which implies
that the drug release from the system follow Super case II transport [8].

**Hixson-crowell model** [7]: The Hixson-Crowell cube root law
describes the release from systems where there is a change in surface
area and diameter of particles or tablets. Hence, particles of regular area
are proportional to the cube root of its volume. From the above concept
Hixson-Crowell established a relationship between drug release and
time which can be represented by equation as

where W_{0} is the initial amount of drug in the pharmaceutical dosage form (Amount of drug remaining at time 0)

W_{t} is the remaining amount of drug in the pharmaceutical dosage
form at time t; K_{HC} is the Hixson-Crowell constant describing surface
volume relation.

To study the release kinetics a graph is plotted between cube root of
drug percentage remaining in matrix *versus* time.

This equation is used for interpretation of dissolution data of conventional dosage form, dispersible dosage form or immediate release dosage form. Hence, if the correlation coefficient of the above equation is higher, then we can interpret that change in surface area during the process of dissolution has a significant effect on drug release.

Thus, this model was applied in the release profile of Carbidopa
and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg (cube root of drug percentage
remaining vs. time refer **Table 7**) and evaluation was done in the
graphical presentation (**Figures 12** and **13**).

Time (Hr) | Cube root of (Wo-Wt) (Carbidopa) | Cube root of (Wo-Wt) (Levodopa) |
---|---|---|

0.0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |

0.5 | 0.521 | 0.482 |

0.8 | 0.749 | 0.706 |

1.0 | 0.816 | 0.909 |

1.5 | 1.112 | 1.251 |

2.0 | 1.434 | 1.535 |

2.5 | 1.789 | 1.883 |

3.0 | 2.122 | 2.291 |

4.0 | 3.642 | 3.382 |

**Table 7: **Drug release profile (cuberootof drugpercentageremaining*vs**.*time) of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER tablets, 50 mg/200 mg.

Observation: From the above figures (**Figures 12** and **13**) it was
predicted that change in surface area and diameter of the tablets with
the progressive dissolution of matrix as a function of time [**9**].

The *in-vitro* drug release profile was applied in different
mathematical models and was interpreted in the form of graphical
presentation and evaluated by correlation coefficient (r^{2}) represented
in **Table 8**. The highest degree of correlation coefficient determines the suitable mathematical model that follows drug release kinetics [10].

Model Name | Carbidopa | Levodopa | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

r^{2} |
Slope | Intercept | r^{2} |
Slope | Intercept | |

Zero order model | 0.933 | 22.59 | 17.04 | 0.9157 | 22.942 | 17.792 |

First order model | 0.8322 | -0.4206 | 2.1673 | 0.9212 | -0.3808 | 2.1079 |

Higuchi model | 0.9931 | 47.823 | 0.000 | 0.9916 | 48.976 | 0.0000 |

Korsmeyer -Peppas model | -4.156 | 3.1562 | 0.000 | -4.09 | 3.1875 | 0.0000 |

Hixson-Crowell model | 0.9586 | 0.8122 | 0.0213 | 0.9897 | 0.7911 | 0.0416 |

**Table 8: **External Factors Evaluation (EFE) matrix analysis.

From the above comparison, it was found that Higuchi square root
model showed higher degree of correlation coefficient (r^{2}) than other
models. Hence, drug release profile of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER
Tablets, 50 mg/200 mg follows diffusion mechanism.

Also, the model Korsmeyer-Peppas power law equation states the type of diffusion, which was evaluated by value, n which is higher than 0.89 which implies that the drug release from the system follow Super case II transport [11].

Mathematical models play a vital role in the interpretation of
mechanism of drug release from a dosage form. It is an important tool
to understand the drug release kinetics of a dosage form. The matrix
tablets of Carbidopa-Levodopa 50 mg/200 mg were manufactured in
this research paper showed an extended release profile with the polymers
Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose and Hydroxy propyl cellulose. The
drug release was found to be best fitted by Higuchi square root model
(r^{2}=0.9931 for Carbidopa and r^{2}=0.9916 for Levodopa) which implies
that release of drug from matrix as a square root of time dependent
process and diffusion controlled. The dissolution data was also plotted
according to Hixson –Crowell model (r^{2}=0.958 for Carbidopa and r^{2}=0.989 for Levodopa) which describes that change in surface area
and diameter of the tablets with the progressive dissolution of matrix
as a function of time. Also, the model Korsmeyer-Peppas power law
equation states the type of diffusion, which was evaluated by value, n
(Release exponent) which is higher than 0.89 which implies that the
drug release from the system follow Super case II transport.

We are heartily thankful and extremely gratified to formulation development department and fellow colleagues of Beijing Sciecure Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., for helping us in the technical aspects of the projects and also useful scientific discussions to carry out our research work successful.

- Jambhekar S,Breen PJ(2009) Basic pharmacokinetics. Pharmaceutical Press,London, UK,p:159.
- BrahmankarDM, JaiswalSB(2009) Biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics: A treatise. Vallabh Publications, India,p: 20.
- United States of Patent Application (2006).
- Thakkar VT, Shah PA, Soni TG, Parmar MY, Gohel MC, et al. (2009) Goodness-of-fit model-dependent approach for release kinetics of levofloxacin hemihydrates floating tablet.Dissolution Technologies16: 35-39.
- Dash S, Murthy PN, Nath L, Chowdhury P (2010) Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems.Acta Pol Pharm67: 217-223.
- Subal CB (2006) Modelling of Drug release: The Higuchi equation and its application. Pharmabiz.com.
- Singhvi G, Singh M (2011) In-vitro drug release characterization models. Int J Pharm Stud Res 2: 77-84.
- Banker GS, Siepmann J, Rhodes C (2002) Modern pharmaceutics. CRC Press, Florida, USA.
- Ramakrishna S, Mihira V, Vyshnavi KR, Ranjith V (2012) Design and evaluation of drug release kinetics of meloxicam sustained release matrix tablets. Int J Curr Pharm Res 4: 90-99.
- Rescigno A (2003) Foundation of Pharmacokinetics. University of Minnesota, Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, New York, USA.
- Singh Y (2006) Martin’s physical pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences. Department of Pharmaceutics Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

- Adverse Drug Reactions
- Antigen â Antibody Reaction
- Anvisa Drug Safety Regulations
- Biochemical Metabolism
- Clinical Pharmacoepidemiological Trails
- Cytochrome 450 Drug Metabolism
- Cytotoxicity
- Detoxification
- Drug Delivery
- Drug Delivery Systems
- Drug Delivery using Nanotechnology
- Drug Designing
- Drug Development
- Drug Discovery
- Drug Interaction
- Drug Interactions
- Drug Metabolism
- Drug Safety Databases
- Drug Safety Information Maintenance
- Drug Safety Regulations
- Drug Therapy
- Drug Toxicology
- Drug drug interaction
- Drug food interaction
- Drugs metabolised by CYP2D6
- Europeon Drug Safety Regulations
- Expert Opinions on Drug Safety
- Fragment Based Drug Design
- Heat Shock Proteins
- Hepatic Metabolism of Drugs
- In Silico Methods
- Liver Drug Metabolism
- Medication Errors
- Molecular Modeling
- Nanomedicals
- Peptidomimetic
- Pharmaceutical Industry
- Pharmaceutical Toxicology
- Pharmacoepidemiological Studies
- Pharmacotherapy
- Phase I Drug Metabolism
- Phase II Drug Metabolism
- Pre-Clinical Drug Development
- Protease Substrate/Inhibitor
- Receptor Agonist/ Antagonist
- Reviews on Drug Safety
- Structure Based Drug Design
- UK Drug Safety Regulations
- US Drug Safety Regulations
- screening and Drug Design

- Annual Congress on Chemistry in
**Drug Discovery**&**Designing**

April 16-17, 2018 Dubai, UAE - International Conference on
**Pain Management**and**Pain Medicine**

May 21-22, 2018 | New York, USA - International Conference on
**Drug Discovery**,**Designing**and**Development**

June 27-28, 2018 Vancouver, Canada - International Conference And Exhibition on
**Drug Safety**&**Pharmacovigilance**

August 29-30, 2018 Toronto, Canada

- Total views:
**2656** - [From(publication date):

August-2017 - Mar 18, 2018] - Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views :
**2323** - PDF downloads :
**333**

Peer Reviewed Journals

International Conferences
2018-19