alexa Approaches for Reduction of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella on Hide of Cattle

ISSN: 2476-2059

Journal of Food: Microbiology, Safety & Hygiene

  • Opinion Article   
  • J Food Microbiol Saf Hyg 2016, Vol 1(1): 101
  • DOI: 10.4172/2476-2059.1000101

Approaches for Reduction of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella on Hide of Cattle

Tong Zhao*
Center for Food Safety, college of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia, USA
*Corresponding Author: Tong Zhao, Center for Food Safety, college of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia, USA, Tel: 770-228-7273, Fax: 770-229-3216, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Sep 10, 2015 / Accepted Date: Jan 11, 2016 / Published Date: Jan 14, 2016


Isolates of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) were first recognized as human pathogens in 1982 when E. coli O157:H7 was identified as the source of two outbreaks of hemorrhagic colitis. Since then other outbreaks of STEC, such as O26, O45, O103, O104, O111, O121, and O145, also have been associated with cases of hemorrhagic colitis [1]. However, serotype O157:H7 still is the predominant cause of STEC-associated diseases in the United States and many other countries [2].

Epidemiological investigation and animal model studies have revealed that cattle are major reservoir for E. coli O157:H7 and other STEC [3-9]. Recent data indicated that isolation rate of E. coli O157:H7 in individual cattle were ranged from 5 to 20%, with enumeration rate in feces at 104 CFU/g [3,8]. STEC can be excreted through feces at cell numbers of 106 CFU/g in super-shedding cattle and survive on hides, in drinking troughs, in pens and bedding, on tools, and in the farm environment for several months. Animal hides are an important source of zoonotic pathogens which contaminate carcasses at beef slaughter.

Commercial beef processing plants currently employ several interventions (i.e., trimming, steam vacuuming, steam pasteurization, water washes, and organic acid washes) in combination to achieve large reductions in carcass contamination. Tremendous efforts have been performed for prevention of breaking the gastrointestinal tracts during slaughter processing to make sure that no carcasses leaving the cooler were identified as contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 and other STEC.

Epidemiological data have revealed that 76% and 67% of animal hides entering processing plants can be contaminated with E. coli O157 and non-O157 STEC; respectively [5]. However, pre-evisceration carcass prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 and other STEC serotypes varied greatly, ranging from 0 to 93% for E. coli O157:H7 on different days at different plants. Although considerable effort has been applied to reducing E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on and in cattle at preharvest, effective hide treatment for pathogen removal is still needed considering the results reported by Bosilevac et al. that the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on pre-evisceration carcasses was 33% and 58%, respectively.

Studies were done by using hides to evaluate their efficacy to kill the inoculated pathogen. Various chemicals (lactic acid 2, 4, and 6%), acetic acid (2, 4, and 6%), chlorine (100, 200, and 400 ppm), alcohol (70, 80, and 90%), paraoxyacetic acid (0.05, 0.1, and 0.4%) were evaluated for their effects to kill rifampicin-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium inoculated on fresh beef hides. Results indicated that alcohols at all concentrations were effective (≥ 5 log/cm2 reduction) and acetic and lactic acids at high concentrations (4 and 6%) were effective (≥ 3 log/cm2). However chlorine, even at 400 ppm only reduced 1.3log CFU/cm2. Cattle washing studies on determination of the impact of various pre-harvest treatments (0.5% lactic acid and 50 ppm chlorine) on microbiological integrity on living animal indicated that the counts of aerobic plate counts, coliforms, E. coli had no statistical difference (P>0.05) between water wash groups and chemical wash groups.

A method at post-harvest stage was evaluated. Under cooperation between Water Management resources and Cargill, a hide-on-carcass wash machine, as a “car wash for cattle”, in which the hides of animals are scrubbed with spinning bristles and a mild bromine solution that kills bacteriaat the beginning of the harvesting process was installed at the Fresno beef plant. This process helps better ensure removal of the dirt and debriswhile washing the animal’s exterior, thereby minimizing the potential for contamination from bacteria that potentially pose a health risk to humans. The cost for such a processing is high and it is fine at current high beef price. However it should have an alternative choice in case beef price may go down like oil price.

A food-grade and non-chlorine-based microbicide, containing just two chemicals, levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS was developed and thoroughly evaluated in our lab and other labs for effectively killing foodborne pathogens in poultry [10], meat [11], produce [10], and seeds; especially for removal of biofilms in processing plants [12]. This microbicide can also remove dental biofilm in vitro and is 10-fold better than Listerine and when applied in animal mucus for either short term or long term there were no pathological change when compared with water only [13]. Thus its safety for animal application is guaranteed.

Studies were performed to determine the efficacy of this commercial microbicide (Fit-L, HealthPro Inc.) to inactivate STEC and Salmonella Typhimurium on cattle hides as a surface spray treatment at different concentrations in vitro and in vivo. A mixture of six isolates of STEC, including serovars O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O157 (108 CFU/ml) and a mixture of 5 strains of S. Typhimurium (108 CFU/ml) were sprayed on the surface of 10 × 10 cm sections of cattle hide. The hides were treated by surface spray with this microbicide diluted at different concentrations at 45 psi for 15s. Water only was used as the negative control. For STEC-contaminated hides, 3% levulinic acid plus 0.5% SDS for 5 min reduced STEC populations by 2.3log/cm2, compared to the water only treatment. For S. Typhimuriumcontaminated hides, treatment with 2% levulinic acid plus 0.2% SDS reduced the Salmonella population by 3.2log CFU/cm2. Scrubbing hides with a brush processing for 30 s followed by the microbicide spray treatment further reduced Salmonella contamination by 0.5 log/cm2. However, for wet hides, a spray treatment with 4% levulinic acid plus 2% SDS for 5 min reduced Salmonella by only 1.3log CFU/cm2 when compared with the water-only treatment.

Based on the results obtained from hide studies, commercial “Fit-L” product diluted in tap water at 1:22 (v/v, 2% levulinic acid plus 0.2% SDS) was used for surface wash of live beef cattle. Results revealed the average E. coli count before washing (7 cattle with 26 samples) was 6.58log CFU ± 1.0/cm2. For tap water only washed cattle (7 cattle with 28 samples) the average E. coli count was 6.0log CFU ± 1.10/cm2 at 5 min and 6.06log CFU ± 1.48/cm2 at 10 min. Whereas, for “Fit-L”- washed cattle (7 cattle with 28 samples) the average E. coli count was 2.6log CFU ± 0.95/cm2 at 5 min and 2.25log CFU ± 0.89 CFU/cm2 at 10 min. Following the “Fit-L” washing with a tap water washing resulted in 2.3log CFU E. coli ± 0.83/cm2. These data revealed that a simple “Fit-L” wash could reduce E. coli population by 3.4log and 3.8log on the surface of cattle hide at 5 min and 10 min, respectively when compared with tap-water wash only. A tap water-only wash reduced E. coli by 0.5log CFU/cm2 when compared with samples collected before the wash. Following “Fit-L” washing with one more tap water wash did not further reduce E. coli on the surface of cattle hides. These results suggested a simple “Fit-L” wash just before cattle entered the slaughter facility will substantially reduce the population of E. coli on cattle hides.


Citation: Zhao T (2016) Approaches for Reduction of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella on Hide of Cattle. J Food Microbiol Saf Hyg 1:101. Doi: 10.4172/2476-2059.1000101

Copyright: © 2016 Zhao T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Relevant Topics
Recommended Conferences
Article Usage
  • Total views: 12019
  • [From(publication date): 4-2016 - Mar 22, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 8219
  • PDF downloads: 3800

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh