alexa Attenuation of CCl4 Induced Oxidative Stress, Immunosuppressive, Hepatorenal Damage by Fucoidan in Rats | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2161-0495
Journal of Clinical Toxicology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Attenuation of CCl4 Induced Oxidative Stress, Immunosuppressive, Hepatorenal Damage by Fucoidan in Rats

Mohamed E. El-Boshy1,2*, Fatma Abdelhamidb1, Engy Richab1, Ahmad Ashshia1, Mazen Gaitha2 and Naeem Qustya2

1Laboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

2Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University Mansoura, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:
Mohamed E. El-Boshy
Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
Mansoura University Mansoura, Egypt
Tel: 00201005284795
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: April 28, 2017; Accepted date: May 09, 2017; Published date: May 16, 2017

Citation: Boshy ME, Abdelhamidb F, Richab E, Ashshia A, Gaitha M, et al. (2017) Attenuation of CCl4 Induced Oxidative Stress, Immunosuppressive, Hepatorenal Damage by Fucoidan in Rats. J Clin Toxicol 7:348. doi: 10.4172/2161-0495.1000348

Copyright: © 2017 El-Boshy ME, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical Toxicology


The protective and therapeutic effects of fucoidan extract from Laminaria species against liver damage induced by CCl4 in rats was investigated by monitoring the serum level and hepatic m-RNA expression of TGFβ-1, liver and renal markers, as well as oxidative stress and antioxidant biomarker. Thirty six adult male albino rats were divided into 4 equal groups; one was used as a negative control while groups II, III, and IV administrated 0.1 mL/100 g body weight twice a week for 8 weeks with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), fucoidan (400 mg/kgbw orally/day), and CCl4 plus fucoidan, respectively. Blood samples were collected at the end of experiment and sera were separated to evaluate serum levels and the hepatic m-RNA expression of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ.), interleukin (IL), Il-1β, IL-6 and IL-10, antioxidant markers, reduced glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and lipid peroxidation malondialdehyde (MDA) as well as selective biochemical markers of liver and kidney functions were estimated. The results of this investigation revealed that treatment with fucoidan improved elevated expression of liver TGF β-1, Il-1β, IL-6, TNF α and serum level of malnoaldehyde (MDA), total bilirubin (T. Bil), induced by CCl4 at 8th week post treatment. In addition to enhancing the antioxidant enzyme activities, GSH, GPx, CAT and SOD. Also, liver trransaminase (ALT, AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), reduced in fucoidan and CCl4 treated group. These results show that crude fucoidan has potential immunomodulatory, antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects against the hepatic damage induced by CCl4.


Fucoidan; CCl4; Hepatoprotective; Oxidative stress; Cytokine; Rats


Liver diseases are among some of the fatal diseases in the world today, they pose a serious challenge to international public health. Hepatic fibrosis is a wound healing response to chronic liver injury which is characterized by a net accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) including collagen, glycoproteins, and protoglycan [1-3]. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), previously known as Ito cell that under physiological conditions stores 80% of retinoids (vitamin A), are the cytological base of hepatic fibrosis. The quiescent HSC is transformed with progressive injury into myofibroblast like cells that are characterized by the appearance of cytoskeleton protein α smooth muscle actin (α SMA) and collagen-I considered as a biomarker for HSCs activation. TGFβ-1 is a key molecule and an important fibrogenic cytokine that facilitates the activation of HSCs and converts it from static HSCs to the phenotype of myofibroblast to express α SMA and possess the character of contraction [4-6].

Carbon tetrachloride, CCl4 has been a frequently used chemical to experimentally induced hepatic fibrosis. Depending on the dose and duration, the effect of CCl4 on hepatocytes is manifested histologically as hepatic statues, fibrosis, hepatocellular death and carcinogenici. The hepatotoxic effect of CCl4 is attributed to its immediate cleavage by cytochrome P450 (CYP2E1) in hepatocytes, which generates trichloromethyl radicals leading to lipid peroxidation and subsequently to membrane damage. The activated Kupffer cell produces toxic metabolites (inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen intermediates which results in the injury of hepatic parenchymal cells [7-11].

Fucoidans, is a sulfated polysaccharide extracted from the cell wall of brown algae and some marine invertebrates. It contains substantial percentages of L-fucose and sulfate ester groups, thus called Vulcan, fucosan or sulfated fucan. Recently, fucoidan has been extensively studied due to its numerous biological activities including anticoagulant, antithrombotic, antitumor, antiviral, anti-parasitic, anti-complement, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities. In addition, it is used as immunomodulatory and blood lipid reducing agent, and has acted against hepatorenalpathy and possesses gastric protective effect. Moreover, Fucoidan extracted from the brown seaweed Laminaria japonica had a hepatoprotective effect [11-14].

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the hepatoprotective effect of fucoidan on liver fibrosis induced by CCl4 in rats, through detection of gene expression and serum cytokines of TGFβ-1, IL1β, IL-6, TNF α, IFN-γ and IL-10, in addition to oxidative stress reactions and biochemical hepatorenal markers.

Material and methods

Experimental animals

Thirty two, 1-2 month old male albino rats were involved in the present study. The rats were kept in galvanized zinc-plate cages under strict hygienic conditions and were ensured free from any infection. The rats were maintained for one week on a pelleted diet and water ad Libitam before starting the experiment for acclimatization. The experiment was approved according to the ethical committee of our college.


CCl4 was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Co, USA), Primer sequences for PCR amplification The primer of selected pro-inflammatory cytokines were obtained from (Thermo scientific Co. USA) as displayed in Table 1. Fucoidan extract of Laminaria species received as a powder from Sigma Aldrich was used as a freshly prepared solution dissolved in normal saline.

Primer Name Primer Sequence (5′–3′) Base pairs

Table 1: Primers used for Real- time PCR Amplification.

Fibrosis induction and treatment

Rats were divided into 4 groups (with 8 rats in each group) and treated for 8 weeks as follows: Group I served as a normal control received only 0.1 mL/100 g BW of olive oil. Group II, on the other hand, was treated with fucoidan at a dose of 400 mg/kg BW/day and olive oil all over the duration of the experiment according to, while the rats in Group III were intraperitoneal (IP) injected with a mixture of CCl4 (0.1 mL/100 g body weight) and olive oil [1: 1 (v/v)] every other day for 8 weeks as described by Fue et al., and Group IV was treated with fucoidan and CCl4. Blood samples were collected individually from heart puncture for serum chemistry, rats were then sacrificed and specimen from liver were cut in pieces and kept in liquid nitrogen for reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses.

RT-PCR analysis

Expressions of mRNAs for the proinflammatory cytokines, TGF- β1, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10 and TNF-α, were quantified by real-time RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated from liver specimens using the RNA Easy kit (QIAamp Blood Kit; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), according to the stander technique. The extracted RNA was dissolved in 30 μL nuclease-free distilled water and stored at -30°C until used. The concentration and purity of RNA were determined by Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). Preparation of the RNA / primer mixture was achieved by adding an RNA template. Real-time PCR was performed using 2 μL templates in a 20-μL reaction containing 0.25 μM of each primer and 12.5 μL Sybr Green. The mixture was incubated at 70-75°C for 5-10 min and then placed at room temperature for 5-10 min for denaturation and primer annealing. The RT-PCR mixture was prepared and completed by adding 10 μL of RNA/primer mixture. The thermal profiles that were used consisted of denaturation at 95°C, for 15 s, 60°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 60 s followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15s, and a final elongation at 72°C, in a real-time PCR machine (Applied Bio-system Thermo Fisher, USA). The quantitative mRNA expression level of targeted pro-inflammatory cytokines were estimated by determining the cycle threshold (CT), which is the number of PCR cycles required for the fluorescence to exceed a value significantly higher than the background fluorescence. The reference gene, glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), was used as a control. The selective cytokine gene expression was calculated using the 2-CT according to Livak and Schmittgen (2001).

Serum cytokine analysis

Elective humoral immunological parameters, such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), tumor necrosis factor – α (TNF α), interleukin -6, (IL-6), IL-1 β, IL-10, and gamma interferon (IFN-γ.) were determined by Enzyme Amplified Sensitivity Immunoassay (EASIA, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) using microplates according to enclosed pamphlets (Human Quateo- ELICYS, Germany).

Liver antioxidant analysis

Liver specimens were rapidly detached, rinsed in ice cold saline buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, 0.14 M NaCl buffer, pH 7.4) and homogenized in the saline buffer (10%, w/v). The homogenate aliquots were kept at -30 °C for MDA and antioxidant markers estimation. The oxidative stress marker, MDA and antioxidant system SOD, CAT, GPx, and GSH were determined enzyme linked immunoassay (ELISA), using ready-made kits (Cayman. Co. USA) according to the enclosed pamphlets.

Serum biochemical analysis

Ready frozen serum samples were analyzed for ALT, AST, gamma glutamyl-transferase (GGT), ALP, total bilirubin, direct blirubin, glucose, total protein, albumin, urea, createnine were determined with a semi-automatic spectrophotometer (BM-Germany 5010) using commercial test kits (Randox Co. UK) according to stander laboratory method.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by means of one way ANOVA using the SPSS software statistical program with post-hoc LSD multiple comparison test using SPSS software (SPSS for Windows ver. 21.00, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± SE, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Cytokines parameters

The gene expression and serum cytokines TGF- β1, L-1β, TNF α and IL-6 were significantly higher in the CCl4-treated group at 8th week post treatment as compared with the control rats (Table 2 and Figure 1). On the other hand, no significant changes were observed in the aforementioned cytokine expression and serum levels in fucoidan treated groups when compared with the control group.


Figure 1: Hepatic mRNA expression of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ.), interleukin (IL), IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10, in the experimental groups.

Parameters (Pg/mL) Experiment Groups
  Control CCl4 F F+CCl4
TGF- β1-(Pg/mL) 14.1c ± 3.42 35.2a ± 2.01 13.2c ± 1.26 19.5b ± 1.18
IL-1β(Pg/mL) 38.7c ± 2.52 59.5a ± 3.62 38.7c ± 2.52 49.9b ± 3.82
TNF-α (Pg/mL) 21.5b ± 2.41 65.2a ± 1.71 22.4b ± 0.45 36.6c ± 0.48
IL-6 (Pg/mL) 19.4b ± 1.84 35.3a ± 0.62 18.5b ± 0.78 20.3b ± .64
IFN-γ (Pg/mL) 36.8a ± 2.82 22.4b ± 1.86 38.12a ± 3.99 34.9a ± 3.49
IL-10 (Pg/mL) 12.2a ± 0.32 8.1b ± 0.62 13.1a ± 1.58 10.1a ± 0.32

Table 2: Liver Expression and Serum Cytokines Markers (Mean ± S.E) at 8th week Post Treatment with CCl4, and Fucoidan.

Additionally, TGF-β1, L-1β, TNF α and IL-6 expression and serum levels were lower in the fucoidan and CCl4 treated group than CCl4 treated group. Also, IFN-γ, was reduced in fucoidan and CCl4 treated group as compared with CCl4 group, while IL-10 was non-significant differ between all treated groups, as shown in Table 2.

Antioxidant and lipid peroxidation parameters

Results obtained showed a significant decrease (P<0.05) in antioxidant markers, GSH, CAT, SOD and GPx in the CCl4-treated group when compared with the control rats. In addition, lipid peroxidation MDA was significantly higher in CCl4-treated group when compared with the other experimental group. On the other hand, treatment with fucoidan alone caused a significant increase in GSH, and CAT as compared with the control group. The antioxidant markers, GSH, CAT, GPx and lipid peroxidation (MDA), did not significantly differ in fucoidan and CCl4 treated group from those of the control group as displayed in Table 3.

Parameters Experiment Groups
  Control CCl4 F F+CCl4
MDA 65.1b ± 3.09 87.4a ± 4.01 68.25b ± 4.36 70.5b ± 5.08
GSH 71.5b ± 3.54 38.8c ± 3.51 82.25a ± 3.66 66.6b ± 4.96
GPx 9.5a ± 0.94 6.45b ± 0.82 0.45a ± 0.98 8.15a ± 1.54
CAT 3.5b ± 0.62 1.88c ± 0.08 6.65a ± 0.68 3.01b ± 0.23
SOD 221.9a ± 5.10 195.2b ± 4.06 216.2a ± 3.09 200.8c ± 2.06

Table 3: Hepatic Antioxidant and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers (Mean ± S.E) at 8th week post Treatment with CCl4, and Fucoidan.

Biochemical Parameters

Results presented in Table 4 show a significant increase in the ALT, AST, ALP and GGT serum activities and total bilirubin, as well as urea and creatinin, while there was a significant decrease in albumin and glucose and a non-significant change in total protein in CCl4-treated group when compared with the control group. All of the aforementioned biochemical markers, did not significantly change in the fucoidan treated group alone, as compared with the control group. Furthermore, the hepatic markers only were improved in fucoidan and CCl4 treated group when compared with CCl4 treated group alone, as displayed in Table 4.

Parameters Experiment Groups
  Control CCl4 F F+CCl4
ALT (U/L) 20.5a ± 1.24 34.1b ± 1.23 19.5a ± 1.81 30.3b ± 2.19
AST (U/L) 28.1a ± 1.42 38.9b ± 1.26 29.2a ± 1.34 35.3b ± 2.14
GGT (U/L) 18.5a ± 1.05 65.2c ± 4.25 17.6a ± 1.95 41.3b ± 3.18
ALP (U/L) 10.9a ± 0.54 18.4b ± 0.50 9.8a ± 0.41 16.2b ± 0.42
T. Bili. (mg/dl) 0.48a ± 0.03 0.71b ± 0.04 0.52a ± 0.05 0.65b ± 0.06
Dir. Bili (mg/dl) 0.22a ± 0.02 0.46b ± 0.09 0.24a ± 0.04 0.42b ± 0.06
Glucose (mg/dl) 112.8b ± 2.20 87.2a ± 4.53 109.6b ± 2.52 86.6a ± 4.54
T Protein (gm/dl) 4.45a ± 0.21 4.59 a ± 0.30 5.53b ± 0.34 5.24b ± 0.36
Albumin (mg/dl) 3.25a ± 0.18 2.98b ± 0.22 3.16a ± 0.25 3.25a ± 0.21
Urea (mg/dl) 55.8a ± 1.28 69.5b ± 1.45 54.2a ± 1.02 66.6b ± 3.23
Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.51a ± 0.01 0.69b ± 0.02 0.54a ± 0.04 0.68b ± 0.03

Table 4: Hepatorenal Biomarker Profiles (Mean ± S.E) at 8th week Post Treatment with CCl4, and Fucoidan.


The liver plays a central role in metabolic homeostasis, as it is responsible for the metabolism, synthesis, storage and redistribution of nutrients, carbohydrates, fats and vitamins. Importantly, it is the main detoxifying organ of the body, which removes wastes and xenobiotics by metabolic conversion and biliary excretion [13].

CCl4 metabolism is an established model of liver necrosis and fibrosis. The liver damage caused by this metabolism is free radical dependent as CCl4 is oxidized by cytochrome P450 to the highly reactive trichloromethyl (CCl3) radicals that are generated by the reductive cleavage of CCl4 bond and generated oxygen radicals and phospholipid peroxides. These generated trichloromethyl free radicals cause liver necrosis, destruction of ECM and lipid peroxidation of membranes. Results from this investigation revealed that TGF-β1 mRNA expression increased as fibrosis developed in CCl4 induced liver fibrosis in treated rats. As TGF-β1 activity is enhanced by proteolytic release and activation of latent TGF-β1 from HSC. Other cells, such as kupffer cells, invading mononuclear cells, myofibroblast cells, and endothelial cells can also synthesize and release TGF-β1. A several studies have confirmed that the stimulation and proliferation of HSCs are the crucial points in the production of ECM, resulted in the differential of HSCs into yofibroblasts with production of α-SMA lead to stable liver fibrosis. Moreover, the results show that serum TGF-β1, TNF, and IL-6 were significantly increased in CCl4 treated group as compared with the control. Tan et al. recorded significant elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β with hepatic fibrosis in mice treated with CCl4. In the same line, Ahn et al. observed elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-1β, mRNA expression with hepatic damage in rats treated with CCl4. At the molecular level, CCl4 activates TNF-α, TGF-β1, and IL-6 production that appear to direct the cell toward destruction or fibrosis, while IL-10 counteract the liver fibrogensis. In this context, Fue et al. and Tan et al. concluded the elevation the inflammatory cytokines have a key role in pathogenesis of liver fibrosis and activation of HSCs [14-22].

Fucoidan, a family of sulphated polyfucose polysaccharides, exhibit a variety of biological properties, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, immunostimulant and antitumor. The biological effects of fucoidan relate to their polysaccharide backbones and sulfate content. Recently, the antifibrotic activity of fucoidan was reported in an animal model of hepatic fibrosis. The serum’s TGF-β1, TNF α and IL-6, in addition to m RNA liver expression, were reduced in rats treated with fucoidan and CCl4 at 8th week post treatment when compared with CCl4 rats. This is in agreement with results obtained by Shinji and colleagues who discovered that fucoidan treatment attenuates HSCs activation by inhibiting TGF-β1. Also, Jingjing et al. concluded the fucoidan down regulation of TGF-β1 and reduce the HSCs activation and the formation of ECM. In addition, researchers reported that elevation of reactive oxygen species, is the key to HSC activation and release of inflammatory cytokines. In the same aspect, Park et al. concluded that fucoidan applies anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro and in vivo, together with a restricted antibacterial effect in vivo. Furthermore, fucoidan enhanced the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α in human neutrophil and delay neutrophil apoptosis [17-26].

Malondialdehyde is a reactive aldehyde, used as an indicator of the amount of lipid peroxidation. This can be ascribed to the polyunsaturated fatty acids’ damage caused by ROS; this damage results in different products, including MDA. In the present study, there was a significant increase in serum MDA concentration in the CCl4 treated group; this agrees with the findings reported by other researchers. Lipid peroxidation (LPO), is one of the principal causes of CCl4 induced liver and renal injury. Attack by free radical oxygen species (ROS) on the polyunsaturated fatty acids generates different products, including aldehydic products, resulting eventually in a loss in the membrane’s integrity. Antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, GPx and GSH constitute a helpful team of defense against ROS, hydroperoxide and environmental toxicity. Likewise, glutathione is a first line of defense and scavenges ROS. Additionally, GSH-dependent enzymes offer an important line of protection as they detoxify noxious byproducts generated by ROS. The depletion concentration of GSH in the liver may be due to enhanced GSH utilization in the elimination of peroxides or NADPH reduction activity. Several studies showed that GSH plays a key role in detoxifying the toxic metabolites of CCl4 and that liver injury begins when GSH stores are markedly depleted. Tan et al. and Ahn et al. observed a significant reduction of the antioxidant system, GSH, CAT, GPx and GR, while marked elevation of lipidperoxidation, MDA in mice and rats treated with CCl4 respectively. In the present study, marked reduction in the antioxidant system (SOD, CAT, GPx and GSH) in CCl4 treated groups was observed when compared with the control group. Depletion of the antioxidant system in CCl4 treated group could be attributed to CCl4 generated cellular ROS production and the subsequent depletion of the antioxidant cellular system [27-35].

In fucoidan treated group, GSH and CAT were higher than that of the control group; this is due to the antioxidant activities of fucoidan which have been documented by Wang et al. Moreover, fucoidan reduced the lipid peroxidation, MDA elevation in CCl4 treated groups. This is in line with results obtained by other researchers who found that I/P administration of fucoidan extract resulted in reduced high MDA level induced by CCl4 treatment in rats. On the other hand, Lie et al. reported that fucoidan from L. japonica had no effect on lipid peroxidation induced by FeSO4 in vitro, and Nakazato et al. have indicated that the crude fucoidan extract did not reduce the high MDA level in liver injury induced by N-nitroso-diethylamine. Our results, however, found an elevation in GSH, CAT and Gpx in rats treated with fucoidan and CCl4 as compared with CCl4 group. The increase in these enzyme activities was probably a response towards the increase in ROS generation since fucoidan has strong scavenging free radical activity, especially against superoxide radicals. This is in agreement with the findings of Jing et al. who reported that fucoidan exhibit radical scavenging activity, in vitro and antioxidative activity against oxidative stress in cellular model. Moreover, fucoidan has been reported to have a great potential in preventing free radical synthesis that mediates diseases and can prevent the increase of lipid peroxide in the serum, liver and spleen of rats and mice (Lie; Omar et al.,). Furthermore, Phull et al. demonstrated the fucoidan is a potent antioxidant that can effectively repeal oxidative stress and arthritis-mediated inflammation. In addition to, the fucoidan inhibit expression of nitric oxide (NO), and exhibited antioxidant activity by reducing the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in microglia cells (Nguyen et al.). In the same line, Subash et al. recorded the levels of oxidative stress markers SOD, GPx, GSH, were reduced in inflammatory hepatocytes of rats treated orally with dexamethasone and fucoidan (300 mg/kg) [33-40].

CCl4 administration causes severe liver damage demonstrated by a significant elevation of serum AST and ALT levels till the end of the experiment. This elevation may be attributed to the cellular leakage and damage of structural integrity of the liver cells. Similarly, CCl4 treatment induced elevation of serum GGT and ALP with high level of total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin, which are considered indicators of cholestasis and pathological alterations of the biliary flow. The highest concentration of direct bilirubin in the serum is an indication of liver injury caused by CCl4. Similar to results, other research groups reported elevation of liver marker enzymes and bilirubin in rats intoxicated with CCl4. Additionally, nephrotoxicity of CCl4 in the present study was manifested by elevation of urea and creatinine serum levels at 8th week post treatment (Table 3) in CCl4 treated groups, as compared with the control group. This is similar to results obtained by others. In the present study, administration of CCl4 to normal rats induced hepatic and renal toxicity, as CCl4 mediated peroxidation of lipid structures, enhances reactive oxygen species (ROS) and depletion of protein content of tissues; this results in sub cellular damage. Total blood protein level insignificantly changed in CCl4 treatment, while albumin was lower than the control group (Table 3). CCl4 intoxication leads to hypomethylation of cellular components; in the case of RNA the outcome is thought to be inhibition of protein synthesis. Hypoproteinemia and hypoalbuminemia in rats intoxicated with CCl4 for 6 weeks have been reported by Al-Yahya et al. In the present study, serum glucose was reduced in CCl4 a treated animal as hepatic glycogen content was decreased, reflecting decreased gluconeogenesis by the liver. Similar results were obtained by Rui et al., who reported that gluconeogenesis and Krebs cycle fluxes are altered in rat livers following CCl4 intoxication. The elevation of hepatic biochemical marker enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT) was reduced in fucoidan and CCl4 treated groups reveled improve liver function. The hepatoprotective of the fucoidan against CCl4 toxicity could be due to down regulation of inflammatory mediators and antioxidant activity of the fucoidan [33-43].

Finally, we concluded that crude fucoidan inhibit TGF-β, suppresses hepatic inflammation and attenuates hepatic oxidative stress in rats intoxicated with CCl4. Fucoidan could be a promising potential agent as a hepatoprotective and treatment of hepatic fibrosis.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 329
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2017 - Sep 25, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 290
  • PDF downloads :39

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

ph[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version