alexa BAFF Promoter Polymorphisms and Serum levels in Tunisian Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2161-1149
Rheumatology: Current Research
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

BAFF Promoter Polymorphisms and Serum levels in Tunisian Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Imen Sfar1, Tarak Dhaouadi1, Sami Turki2, Lamia Ben Hassine3, Adel Khedher2, Narjess Khalfallah3, Taieb Ben Abdallah1, Yousr Gorgi1*

1Laboratory of Research in Immunology of Renal Transplantation and Immunopathology (LR03SP01), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia

2Internal medicine department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia

3Internal medicine department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia

*Corresponding Author:
Yousr Gorgi
Laboratory of Research in Immunology of Renal Transplantation and Immunopathology (LR03SP01)
University Tunis El Manar,Charles Nicolle Hospital
Bd 9 Avril, 1006 Bab Saadoun, Tunis, Tunisia
Tel: 21698341791
Fax: 216 71561156
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: September 22, 2014; Accepted Date: October 29, 2014; Published Date: November 7, 2014

Citation: Sfar I, Dhaouadi T, Turki S, Hassine LB, Khedher A, et al. (2014) BAFF Promoter Polymorphisms and Serum levels in Tunisian patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale) S4:003. doi:10.4172/2161-1149.S4-003

Copyright: © 2014 Sfar I, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use,distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Rheumatology: Current Research

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate any associations between regulatory genetic polymorphisms of the B-lymphocyte activating factor (BAFF) gene, disease susceptibility and serum soluble BAFF (s-BAFF) levels in Tunisian systemic lupus (SLE) patients. Patients and methods: This case-control study included 124 SLE patients and 152 healthy controls. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (-2841 T>C, -2701 A>T and -871 C>T) in the 5’ regulatory region of the BAFF gene were explored by PCR-RFLP. Serum BAFF levels were measured by ELISA (R&D Systems®). Results: s-BAFF levels were elevated in SLE patients (1717.08 pg/ml) and in anti-dsDNA positive antibodies patients (1948.28 pg/ml) compared to both controls (665.82 pg/ml, p<10-8) and patients without anti-dsDNA antibodies (1281.51 pg/ml, p=0.007). In contrast, no correlation was found between global disease activity registered in SLEDAI and s-BAFF levels (p=0.7). The -2841*C mutated allele was associated to SLE predisposition and anti-dsDNA antibody occurrence, p=0.03 and p=0.021 respectively. Single allele, genotype and haplotype association analyses showed no significant association with s-BAFF values, clinical features or SLEDAI score. Conclusion: In Tunisian, the rs9514827 (T>C -2841) SNP in the BAFF gene promoter seems to be related to SLE susceptibility and anti-dsDNA antibodies occurrence. Even if serum s-BAFF levels were significantly higher in SLE patients and in anti-dsDNA antibody positive sera, it did not seem to be correlated with disease activity or the occurrence of lupus nephritis. Again, studied genetic markers failed to predict the serum s-BAFF levels as there was no correlation between the two parameters.

Keywords

BAFF; Polymorphism; Promoter; Serum; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Genetics; SLE disease activity index; Anti-double-stranded DNA

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder in which loss of tolerance to nucleic antigens especially dsDNA is associated with the development of pathogenic antibodies that damage target organs. This aberrant synthesis of auto-antibodies is due to a hyper-activation of self-reactive B-cells. B-cells originate from bone marrow, but must undergo further maturation in periphery. In fact, those B-cells pass through transitional, immature stages in the spleen: first, a transitional type 1 (T1) stage (IgMhighIgD-), followed by the T2 stage (IgDhigh) [1]. Only a small proportion of B-cells reach maturity, indicating a vigorous selection process. Signaling through the B-cell receptor (BCR) is important in this selection process, but a lonely BCR signals cell death [2], suggesting the involvement of additional factors such as B-cell activating factor (BAFF). BAFF is a 285-amino-acid glycoprotein originally expressed as a type II membrane-bound protein, which can be released as a soluble trimeric ligand (s-BAFF) upon proteolytic processing at a furin consensus site [3].

The sources of BAFF are primarily innate immune cells such as monocytes, dendritic cells, neutrophils, and stromal cells, including central nervous system (CNS) astrocytes and airway epithelia [4]. These innate immune cells, peculiarly neutrophils, were generally found in most of damaged tissues in SLE [5], but their exact contribution to disease pathogenesis and the mechanisms that affect their amassing are poorly understood. In SLE-mice spleens, neutrophils localized in T-cell zones enhanced CD4+ T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ production through BAFF release [5]. In addition, neutrophils depletion led to reduced BAFF and IFN-γ serum levels, extinction of B-cell germinal centers and decreased autoantibody production [5]. Thus, it suggests that targeting neutrophils could be a one of the therapeutic strategies in SLE treatment.

Recent data suggest that BAFF signaling facilitates T2 survival and all above its over-expression resulted in hugely increased numbers of mature, but not immature B-cells [6]. Furthermore, BAFF transgenic mice develop autoimmunity resembling SLE, including hyperplasia of mature B-cells, autoantibodies production and deposition in kidney [7]. In fact, BAFF over-expression rescues self-reactive B-cells from peripheral deletion allowing maturation and colonization in the follicular and marginal zone, which then enhances autoantibody production [8]. In mice with SLE-like syndrome selective blockade of BAFF, which resulted in B-cells depletion and splenic collapse, was sufficient to prevent the lupus nephritis occurrence [9].

Besides, BAFF co-stimulation drives T-Cell proliferation and up-regulates Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic factor, in activated T-cells [7]. Over-expression of BAFF promotes the generation of the pro-inflammatory Th17 subset in vivo and in vitro and aggravates the experimental autoimmune encephalitis in mice [10]. Likewise, Intra-articular injection of lentivirus expressing shRNA for BAFF gene silencing provided long-term suppression of autoimmune arthritis development, suppressed Th17 cells generation, and significantly improved joint pathology [11].

Recently and interestingly, many cytokines such as BAFF have been shown to be antibody targets in SLE [4]. Surprisingly, autoantibodies to BAFF were correlated to a more severe SLE profile [12]. This unique result needs to be replicated in larger and independent SLE cohorts. If this association between disease severity and the presence of anti-BAFF antibodies is validated, then the question would be: how a neutralizing autoantibody against a pathogenic cytokine worsens SLE outcome? The reasons would be: first, the BAFF immune complexes induces a positive feedback loop that further increases the cytokine expression; second, the anti-BAFF antibody preferentially binds to dominant-negative form of BAFF, called ?-BAFF, then the pathogenic effect of this cytokine could be unleashed; third, like any other immune complex, BAFF/anti-BAFF complex may activate the classical pathway of the complement system.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 5’ regulatory region the BAFF gene have been identified in patients with SLE [13]. The rs9514828 (C>T -871) SNP was associated to a higher expression of BAFF mRNA in SLE [13] and elevated s-BAFF in Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) [14]. The rs9514828 SNP was also found to be in a strong linkage disequilibrium with other promoter SNPs such as the rs9514827 (T>C -2841) and the rs1041569 (T/A -2701) [14,15]. On the other hand, even lacking correlation with SLE activity, BAFF levels were significantly increased in SLE-patients with either renal or CNS involvement [16]. Hence, we performed a case-control study to assess the impact of these 3 SNPs on s-BAFF level and both SLE-susceptibility and SLE-related features in a Tunisian cohort.

Materials and Methods

Patients and controls

This study included 124 SLE patients and 152 healthy voluntary blood donors from the same geographic origin. Patients were visiting both internal medicine departments A and B of the Charles Nicolle Hospital in Tunis and were diagnosed according to the Criteria Committee of the American College of Rheumatology [17]. Clinical and biological features of patients are recorded in Table 1.

SLE patients n=124
Mean onset age ± SD (years) 31.93 ± 13.86
Median of evolution ± SD (years) 5 ± 4,96
Sex ratio (male/female) 0.17 (18/106)
Cutaneous lesions n (%) 103 (83%)
Arthritis n (%) 102 (82.2%)
Nephritis n (%) 75 (60.4%)
Neurolupus n (%) 15 (12%)
Autoimmune Cytopenias n (%) 83 (66.9%)
Thrombosis n (%) 5 (4%)
Elevated titer of ANA > 1/320 n (%) 93 (75%)
Anti-dsDNA antibodies n (%) 81 (65.3%)
Anti-Ribosome antibodies n (%) 16 (12.9%)
Anti-SS-A/Ro-52 antibodies n (%) 47 (37.9%)
Anti-SS-A/Ro-60 antibodies n (%) 37 (29.8%)
Anti-SS-B/La antibodies n (%) 41 (33.1%)
Decreased complement activity (DCA) n (%) 105 (84.7%)
SLEDAI* mean ± SD 11.73 ± 6.05
SLEDAI ≥ 8 n (%) 94 (75.8%)

Table1: Clinical and biological features of SLE patients.

Controls were healthy subjects matched for age, gender and ethnicity. None of the healthy subjects had any evidence of personal or family history of autoimmune disease.

All patients and controls gave written informed consent to participate in the study, and patient anonymity was preserved using documents and methods approved by the local Ethics committee of Charles Nicolle Hospital.

Methods

Serum s-BAFF measurement: In both SLE patients and controls sera the s-BAFF was measured by a quantitative sandwich ELISA according to the recommended protocol by the manufacturer (Quantikine® Human BAFF Immunoassay, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Levels of s-BAFF are expressed in pg/ml. The threshold of elevated s-BAFF was estimated by calculating a cut-off value:

Mean s-BAFF (in controls: 665.82 ± 171.472 pg/ml) + 2 SD=1008.764 pg/ml.

BAFF genotyping: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using salting-out procedure [18]. Identification of BAFF (T>C -2841), (T>A -2701) and (C>T -871) SNPs was performed by PCR using specific primers [(-2841*F: 5-ATTCCCTGTCTTCAGAATTTTCTCT-3 and -2841*R: 5-CCTATAACTCCCACAATAAGGTGAC-3), (-2701*F: 5-ATTCCCTGTCTTCAGAATTTTCTCT-3 and -2701*R: 5-CCTATAACTCCCACAATAAGGTGAC-3) and (-871*F: 5-TTGTACACCGACCTGTTAGGC-3 and -871*R: 5’-TGGAAGTAAGTCCACTGGGAAT-3’) (metabion® international AG, Lena-Christ-strasse 44I, D-82152 Martinsried, Deutshland)], followed by a digestion of amplification products using SsiI (AciI) for (T>C -2841) and (C>T -871) SNPs and DpnII For (T>A -2701) SNP (Restriction fragment length polymorphism: RFLP). Direct sequencing was made for 10 DNA samples in order to validate the genotyping by PCR-RFLP and reference samples of each genotype were included in each assay.

Statistical analysis

The results of continuous variables (Age, Onset Age and s-BAFF level) are expressed as means ± SD, and the means of groups were compared by ANOVA-test (SPSS 11 Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA). For qualitative variables, univariate analysis was performed using chi-square test or fisher’s exact test for small numbers (Epi-info Stat 6.04 program CDC, Atlanta). Probability (p) values were corrected for the number of tested alleles (pc). Values<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Frequencies of genotypes and alleles were analyzed by chi-square test. In order to evaluate the strength of associations, the odds ratios (OR) together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Logistic regression models were built according to age, gender to estimate adjusted ORs. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was verified for the three studied SNPs via internet (http://ihg2.helmholtz-muenchen.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl).

BAFF haplotypes, defined by the 3 SNPs, were analyzed using the freely available SNPStats software (http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/snpstats/start.htm).

Results

Determination of serum s-BAFF levels

Mean s-BAFF concentrations were significantly higher in SLE patients (1717.08 ± 1322.716 pg/ml) comparatively to controls (665.82 ± 171.472 pg/ml); F=94.223, p<10-18 (Figure 1). Using the cut-off value (1008.764 pg/ml), 78 (62.9%) patients had an elevated level of serum s-BAFF while in only 3 (1.9%) controls it exceeded the threshold; p<10-27, OR (95% CI) = 84.22 [24.09-351.4].

rheumatology-current-Serum-patients

Figure 1: Serum s-BAFF in SLE patients and controls.

Analysis of s-BAFF according to clinical and biological features showed: first, the mean s-BAFF level was significantly higher in men (2561.33 pg/ml) than in women (1573.33 pg/ml), p=0.003, while in controls there was no correlation with gender; second, the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies was associated to a higher s-BAFF concentration (1948.28 pg/ml vs 1281.51 pg/ml), p=0.007 (Figure 2). Multivariate analysis by logistic regression confirmed the univariate results. Inversely, there were no correlations between s-BAFF levels and SLEDAI, any of SLE clinical manifestations (cutaneous lesions, arthritis, lupus nephritis and neurolupus), elevated titer of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and decreased complement activity (DCA). Moreover, SS-related autoantibodies (Ro/La) occurrence was not correlated to elevated serum s-BAFF.

rheumatology-current-gender-antibodies

Figure 2: Correlations between s-BAFF and both gender and positivity of anti-dsDNA antibodies.

BAFF SNPs results

If genotypic and allelic frequencies for (T>A -2701) and (C>T -871) SNPs were similar between patients and controls, the -2841*C allele was significantly more prevalent in SLE patients (0.379) than in controls (0.293); p=0.013, OR (95% CI) = 1.57 [1.08-2.29] (Table 2).

BAFF T>C -2841 Controls n=152 SLE n=124 p OR (95% CI)
Genotypes T/T 78 (50%) 44 (35.5%) 0.053   _
T/C 63 (41.4%) 66 (53.2%)
C/C 13 (8.6%) 14 (11.3%)
Alleles T 0.707 0.621 0.013 1.57 [1.08-2.29]
C 0.293 0.379
BAFF T>A-2701  
Genotypes T/T 3 (2%) 5 (4%) 0.581 _
T/A 48 (31.6%) 37 (29.9%)
A/A 101 (66.4%) 82 (66.1%)
Alleles T 0.178 0.189 0.431 _
A 0.822 0.811
BAFF C>T -871  
Genotypes C/C 3 (2%) 3 (2.4%) 0.86 _
C/T 131 (86.2%) 104 (83.9%)
T/T 18 (11.8%) 17 (13.7%)
Alleles C 0.451 0.444 0.922 _
T 0.549 0.556

Table 2: Genotypic and allelic frequencies of the 3 SNPs in SLE patients and controls.

Moreover, the -2841*C mutated allele was consistently associated with an earlier onset of SLE (25.14 vs 30.67, p=0.038), and with the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies (73.75% vs 50%, p=0.021). Inversely, the 2 other SNPs (T>A -2701) and (C>T -871) exhibited no correlations with clinical and biological features of SLE. None of the 3 SNPs had any influence on the disease activity. In the same way, there was no evidence of any associations of the 3 BAFF SNPs with the s-BAFF levels in either SLE patients or controls; (T>C -2841, p=0.168), (T>A -2701, p=0.515) and (C>T -871, p=0.349) (Figure 3).

rheumatology-current-Analysis-levels

Figure 3: Analysis of s-BAFF levels according to BAFF SNPs.

The three BAFF SNPs were in strong linkage disequilibrium, p=0.007, and shaped eight different combined haplotypes and among them 4 common haplotypes (frequency>5% in controls) (Table 3). These common haplotypes were similar in frequencies to those found in the HapMap analysis, and the additional SNP included in this study, rs1041569 (T>A -2701), did not further discriminate between haplotypes. The threefold mutated haplotype, -2841*C/-2701*A/-871*T, which would have theoretically a cumulative high risk was not associated to SLE susceptibility. Indeed, the BAFF haplotype’s frequencies distribution was quite comparable between SLE patients and controls (Table 3, global p-value=0.866). Again, haplotype analysis did not reveal any effect on disease presentation or on autoantibodies production and DCA. Equally, BAFF haplotype distributions did not influence the serum s-BAFF concentrations.

Haplotype* Controls n=152 SLE n=124 p
T/A/C 0.39 0.35 0.32
C/A/T 0.21 0.25 0.44
T/A/T 0.16 0.14 0.49
T/T/T 0.13 0.09 0.44
C/A/C 0.04 0.05 0.97
C/T/T 0.02 0.05 0.16
T/T/C 0.009 0.01 0.51
C/T/C 0.003 0.01 0.24

Table 3: Combined haplotype (-2841 T>C / -2701 T>A / -871 C>T) frequencies in SLE patients and controls.

Discussion

Recent evidence has ignited the interest of a central role that B-cell holds in autoimmunity, not only by producing autoantibodies but also by the fact that B-cells intervene upstream in the pathophysiology of systemic autoimmune conditions [19], mainly SLE. This emphasizes the magnitude of the discovery of BAFF as a key player in B-cell survival and activation. Nevertheless, polymorphisms in BAFF gene were rarely investigated in SLE.

In the present study we investigated genetically and quantitatively the impact of BAFF on SLE disease-susceptibility, activity (SLEDAI), several clinical manifestations and SLE-related biological features. The rs1041569 (T>A -2701) and rs9514828 (C>T -871) SNPs were not associated to SLE predisposition in our patients. This result corroborates those found in prior studies realized in Japanese [13] and Caucasian [20] populations. However, in a recent study performed in Egyptian SLE patients both -2701*C and -871*T mutated alleles were significantly associated with disease susceptibility, both p-values<10-3 [21]. This inedited unique association has to be considered with caution. In fact the Egyptian cohort involved only 50 patients and 30 controls, which is few for a common disease like SLE. Likewise, even if our study included a larger sample (124 patients and 152 controls) the association of the -2841*C allele with SLE predisposition hadn’t been reported before in previous studies [13,20,21], hence it has to be confirmed in independent cohorts and with family-studies. The low OR (1.47) indicates that even if the -2847*C allele could confer an increase in relative risk to SLE, its part within the whole genetic background would be too weak and can be missed in association studies. Besides, the significant correlation between the -2841*C allele and the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies gives a clue about how this SNP would contribute into SLE pathophysiology. Indeed, by promoting this autoantibody production, the rs9514827 (T>C -2841) can initiate and/or aggravate the SLE-related tissue lesions through a possible increase in BAFF’s expression.

A small meta-analysis for the three SNPs in the BAFF gene (T>C -2841, T>A -2701 and C>T -871) was performed with the Mantel-Haenszel method as a fixed-effects model test using the data of the three available studies [13,20,21] (Table 4). There were no significant associations for the T>C -2841 and the C>T -871 SNPs. Inversely, the combined model showed a significant correlation between the -2701*A mutated allele and SLE occurrence; p=0.0000032 OR (95% CI)=1.81 [1.41-2.38]. The weight of this association is mostly carried by the Egyptian cohort [21]. Indeed, the difference in frequencies of the -2701*A allele between patients and controls (0.66 vs 0.18, OR=9.91) is suspiciously and very strangely too much big for one SNP taken alone, and it even surpassed HLA estimated weight in SLE predisposition. Eventually, Egyptian and Tunisian populations share mostly the same genetic background, therefore such discrepancies in the observed results between the two studies is strange. Consequently, as the Egyptian cohort was too small (50 patients and 30 controls), the significant differences found has to be confirmed in a larger sample.

Author Year Population Controls Patients p OR (95% CI)
-2841 T>C            
Eilertsen [20] 2011 Norwegian 110 100 0.71 1.08 [0.71-1.63]
Zayed [21] 2013 Egyptian 30 50 0.46 1.33 [0.58-3.12]
Present study 2014 Tunisian 152 124 0.013 1.57 [1.08-2.29]
Combined fixed-effects model 292 274 0.058 1.27 [0.98-1.64]
-2701 T>A            
Eilertsen [20] 2011 Norwegian 110 100 0.076 1.62 [0.91-2.87]
Zayed [21] 2013 Egyptian 30 50 >10-7 9.91 [4.28-23.43]
Present study 2014 Tunisian 152 124 0.71 0.92 [0.59-1.46]
Combined fixed-effects model 292 274 0.0000032 1.83 [1.41-2.38]
-871 C>T            
Kawazaki [13] 2002 Japanese 227 156 0.99 1 [0.74-1.35]
Eilertsen [20] 2011 Norwegian 110 100 0.27 0.81 [0.54-1.21]
Zayed [21] 2013 Egyptian 30 50 10-7 7.83 [3.27-19.23]
Present study 2014 Tunisian 152 124 0.86 1.03 [0.72-1.46]
Combined fixed-effects model 519 430 0.29 1.1 [0.92-1.33]

Table 4: Meta-analysis of the three published studies of BAFF SNPs and SLE susceptibility.

Just like it had been previously related in other studies [14,20,22], we found a strong linkage disequilibrium between the three BAFF promoter SNPs. But, none of the observed common haplotypes was correlated to either disease-susceptibility, or activity, or SLE-related clinical and biological features. That was similarly the case in Norwegian SLE patients [20], while in the Egyptian study [21] haplotype analysis was not available. As mentioned before the BAFF*C/A/T (-2841/-2701/-871) was predictive for Ro/La autoantibody production in Norwegian primary SS patients [11], whereas in the present study we were not able to replicate this finding. In fact, the non-association of BAFF SNPs with SS specific antibodies can be explained by the fact that SLE-secondary SS is rather a different entity from the primary SS in both pathophysiological and serological meanings.

In order to evaluate BAFF promoter SNPs impact on serum s-BAFF levels we performed an ELISA test using anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody. As expected serum s-BAFF levels were drastically and hugely higher in patients than in controls, thus corroborating the overwhelming majority of published findings [23-25]. Moreover, s-BAFF level was significantly related to anti-dsDNA antibodies occurrence, therefore agreeing with data in literature [26]. This close correlation was established within a prospective investigation in which during the relapse, following the anti-CD20 B-cell depletion, subsequent B-cell repopulation was marked by a significant increase in BAFF levels and anti-dsDNA antibodies positivity [26]. BAFF transgenic mice develop SLE-like condition with production of anti-dsDNA antibodies [27], and the blockade of its specific receptor BAFF-R was enough to reduce significantly those autoantibodies incidence [28]. All these findings taken together lead to an ineluctable conclusion: BAFF is directly involved in anti-dsDNA antibody synthesis through maintenance and activation of DNA-self-reactive B-cells. Interestingly, in the present cohort, BAFF levels were significantly higher in males than in females, which suggest that by lacking hormonal risk to develop autoimmunity, SLE occurrence in men might require more BAFF secretion to activate self-reactive B-cells.

Two studies performed in Egyptian SLE patients reported significant associations of serum s-BAFF levels with SLAM (Systemic Lupus Activity Measure) [24] and SLEDAI [25]. While, and strangely, in the present study the serum s-BAFF level did not match with SLE disease-activity which had been reported in several case-report studies [16,20,23,29,30]. Inversely, functional studies of BAFF mRNA levels confirmed the close correlation with SLE activity [30,31]. This discrepancy between serum s-BAFF and BAFF mRNA in predicting SLE activity may be due to a relative lack of correlation between these two parameters: first, the serum s-BAFF was not associated either to BAFF expression locally in damaged tissues or to the stage of B-Cell infiltration [32]. Second, as there are several s-BAFF isoforms (homotrimer, Heterotrimer with APRIL, Δ3-BAFF, Δ4-BAFF) the monoclonal antibody used to trap s-BAFF in ELISA may not recognize all of them, mostly the truncated isoforms (Δ3-BAFF and Δ4-BAFF). Third, some SLE patients develop anti-BAFF autoantibodies in vivo [30] which block sterically the epitopes recognized by detecting antibodies in the in vitro ELISA. In this case, there will be a bias in measurement of s-BAFF levels that would be spuriously reduced leading to a masking of BAFF over-expression, and by corollary, to hiding correlations with SLE activity.

In the current study, assessment of genetic impact on serum s-BAFF levels failed to find any associations with the whole three investigated promoter SNPs (T>C -2841, T>A -2701 and C>T -871) whether taken alone or combined in haplotypes. This was evenly the case in Caucasoid [20], Japanese [13] and American [23] populations. Actually, if the serum s-BAFF level was not informative of BAFF’s over-expression (elevated BAFF mRNA), it could not be correlated to BAFF genetic variants especially those who are potentially increasing its promoter activity. Thus, in order to estimate the real impact of promoter SNPs on BAFF, genetic studies should focus on local BAFF expression in damaged tissues such as kidney in case of lupus nephritis or in skin biopsies.

Conclusion

In Tunisian, the rs9514827 (T>C -2841) SNP in the BAFF gene promoter seems to be related to SLE susceptibility and anti-dsDNA antibodies occurrence. Even if serum s-BAFF levels were significantly higher in SLE patients and in anti-dsDNA antibody positive sera, it did not seem to be correlated with disease activity or the occurrence of lupus nephritis. Again, regulatory genetic polymorphisms were not correlated to s-BAFF which is in agreement with the reported discrepancies between BAFF mRNA and s-BAFF levels. Therefore, we are intending to study the impact of the BAFF promoter SNPs on its local expression in the damaged tissues, particularly in kidney biopsies in case of lupus nephritis and skin biopsies.

Acknowledgement

This work was granted and supported by the Laboratory of Research in Immunology of Renal Transplantation and Immunopathology (LR03SP01), University Tunis El Manar, Charles Nicolle Hospital Tunis, TUNISIA.

Competing Interests

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Authors’ Contribution

Pr Gorgi Yousr proposed the study and wrote the first draft. Tarak Dhaouadi and Imen Sfar analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. Pr Gorgi Yousr is the guarantor of the integrity of this study.

References

  1. Loder F, Mutschler B, Ray RJ, Paige CJ, Sideras P, et al. (1999) B cell development in the spleen takes place in discrete steps and is determined by the quality of B cell receptor-derived signals. J Exp Med 190: 75-89.
  2. King LB, Monroe JG (2000) Immunobiology of the immature B cell: plasticity in the B-cell antigen receptor-induced response fine tunes negative selection. Immunol Rev 176: 86-104.
  3. Bossen C, Schneider P (2006) BAFF, APRIL and their receptors: structure, function and signaling. Semin Immunol 18: 263-275.
  4. Sarantopoulos S, Su MA (2013) BAFF-ling autoantibodies. J Clin Invest 123: 5006-5008.
  5. Coquery CM, Wade NS2, Loo WM2, Kinchen JM3, Cox KM1, et al. (2014) Neutrophils contribute to excess serum BAFF levels and promote CD4+ T cell and B cell responses in lupus-prone mice. PLoS One 9: e102284.
  6. Pound J (2001) A key role for BAFF in maintaining peripheral B cells. Trends Immunol 22: 659.
  7. Chen M, Lin X2, Liu Y3, Li Q4, Deng Y3, et al. (2014) The function of BAFF on T helper cells in autoimmunity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 25: 301-305.
  8. Thien M, Phan TG, Gardam S, Amesbury M, Basten A, et al. (2004) Excess BAFF rescues self-reactive B cells from peripheral deletion and allows them to enter forbidden follicular and marginal zone niches. Immunity 20: 785-798.
  9. Ramanujam M, Bethunaickan R, Huang W, Tao H, Madaio MP, et al. (2010) Selective blockade of BAFF for the prevention and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis in NZM2410 mice. Arthritis Rheum 62: 1457-1468.
  10. Zhou X, Xia Z, Lan Q, Wang J, Su W, et al. (2011) BAFF promotes Th17 cells and aggravates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. PLoS One 6: e23629.
  11. Lai Kwan Lam Q, King Hung Ko O, Zheng BJ, Lu L (2008) Local BAFF gene silencing suppresses Th17-cell generation and ameliorates autoimmune arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 14993-14998.
  12. Price JV, Haddon DJ, Kemmer D, Delepine G, Mandelbaum G, et al. (2013) Protein microarray analysis reveals BAFF-binding autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest 123: 5135-5145.
  13. Kawasaki A, Tsuchiya N, Fukazawa T, Hashimoto H, Tokunaga K (2002) Analysis on the association of human BLYS (BAFF, TNFSF13B) polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Genes Immun 3: 424-429.
  14. Nossent JC, Lester S, Zahra D, Mackay R, Rischmueller M (2008) Polymorphism in the 5’ regulatory region of the B-lymphocyte activating factor gene is associated with the Ro/La autoantibody response and serum BAFF levels in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Rheumatology 47: 1311-1316.
  15. Nezos A, Papageorgiou A2, Fragoulis G2, Ioakeimidis D3, Koutsilieris M1, et al. (2014) B-cell activating factor genetic variants in lymphomagenesis associated with primary Sjogren's syndrome. J Autoimmun 51: 89-98.
  16. Vincent FB, Northcott M, Hoi A, Mackay F, Morand EF. (2013) Association of serum B cell activating factor from the tumour necrosis factor family (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) with central nervous system and renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 22: 873-884
  17. Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40: 1725.
  18. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 1215.
  19. Lipsky PE (2001) Systemic lupus erythematosus: an autoimmune disease of B cell hyperactivity. Nat Immunol 2: 764-766.
  20. Eilertsen GO, Van Ghelue M, Strand H, Nossent JC (2011) Increased levels of BAFF in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus are associated with acute-phase reactants, independent of BAFF genetics: a case-control study. Rheumatology 50: 2197-2205.
  21. Zayed RA, Sheba HF, Abo Elazaem MA, Elsaadany ZA, Elmessery LO, et al. (2013) B-cell activating factor promoter polymorphisms in egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Clin Lab Sci 43: 289-294.
  22. Gottenberg JE, Sellam J, Ittah M, Lavie F, Proust A, et al. (2006) No evidence for an association between the -871 T/C promoter polymorphism in the B-cell-activating factor gene and primary Sjögren's syndrome. Arthritis Res Ther 8: R30
  23. Stohl W, Metyas S, Tan SM, Cheema GS, Oamar B, et al. (2003) B lymphocyte stimulator overexpression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: longitudinal observations. Arthritis Rheum 48: 3475-3486.
  24. Fawzy SM, Gheita TA, El-Nabarawy E, El-Demellawy H, Shaker OG (2011) Serum BAFF level and its correlations with various disease parameters in patients with systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Egypt Rheumatol 33: 45-51.
  25. Elolemy GG, Baraka EA, Gendy SA, Abdelgwad ER, Aboelazm AA (2014) Serum BLyS and APRIL as possible indicators of disease activity in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Egypt Rheumatol 36: 93-99
  26. Carter LM, Isenberg DA, Ehrenstein MR (2013) Elevated serum BAFF levels are associated with rising anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels and disease flare following B cell depletion therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 65: 2672-2679.
  27. Mackay F, Woodcock SA, Lawton P, Ambrose C, Baetscher M, et al. (1999) Mice transgenic for BAFF develop lymphocytic disorders along with autoimmune manifestations. J Exp Med 190: 1697-1710.
  28. Baker KP (2004) BLyS--an essential survival factor for B cells: basic biology, links to pathology and therapeutic target. Autoimmun Rev 3: 368-375.
  29. Zhang J, Roschke V, Baker KP, Wang Z, Alarcón GS, et al. (2001) Cutting edge: a role for B lymphocyte stimulator in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol 166: 6-10.
  30. Collins CE, Gavin AL, Migone TS, Hilbert DM, Nemazee D, et al. (2006) B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) isoforms in systemic lupus erythematosus: disease activity correlates better with blood leukocyte BLyS mRNA levels than with plasma BLyS protein levels. Arthritis Res Ther 8: R6.
  31. Ju S, Zhang D, Wang Y, Ni H, Kong X, et al. (2006) Correlation of the expression levels of BLyS and its receptors mRNA in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Biochem 39: 1131-1137.
  32. Sun CY, Shen Y, Chen XW, Yan YC, Wu FX, et al. (2013) The Characteristics and Significance of Locally Infiltrating B Cells in Lupus Nephritis and Their Association with Local BAFF Expression. Int J Rheumatol 2013: 954292.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11785
  • [From(publication date):
    specialissue-2014 - Nov 21, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8000
  • PDF downloads : 3785
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords