alexa Biofuels from Microalgae, A Promising Alternative | OMICS International
ISSN: 2471-2698
Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry: Open Access
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Biofuels from Microalgae, A Promising Alternative

L Pérez*

Chemical Engineering Department, EEI, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain

*Corresponding Author:
L Pérez
Chemical Engineering Department
EEI, University of Vigo
36310 Vigo, Spain
Tel: +34986812000
E-mail: [email protected] gmail.com

Received date: March 11, 2016; Accepted date: March 14, 2016; Published date: March 17, 2016

Citation: Pérez L (2016) Biofuels from Microalgae, A Promising Alternative. Pharm Anal Chem Open Access 2:e103. doi: 10.4172/2471-2698.1000e103

Copyright: © 2016 Pérez L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry: Open Access

Serious environmental problems have been caused by excessive use of fossil fuels, especially in the automotive sector. Climate change, deterioration of the ozone layer and acid rain are some of the consequences thereof. Given the need to seek new sources of energy more respectful with the environment, scientists have focused their attention on biofuels. Among them, biodiesel produced from microalgae has emerged as a promising alternative. High growth rate, high capacity for lipid accumulation, CO2 absorption capacity and ease of cultivation both outdoor tanks (raceway) as in closed reactors (photobioreactor) are some of the advantages exhibited by microalgae [1].

However, despite the excellent properties exhibited by microalgae, the price of algal biodiesel is not yet sufficiently competitive. Several consecutive stages such as culture, harvesting, dewatering, oil extraction and transesterification are necessary for obtaining this biofuel. The optimization of these stages is being investigated by researchers with the aim of achieving large-scale biodiesel production at a reasonable price. High costs are derived from biomass harvesting stage, around 20-30% of overall production costs of biodiesel [2]. Different microalgae harvesting technologies have been studied by several authors: flocculation, gravity sedimentation, flotation, filtration or pH induced. At present, the most promising method is pH induced flocculation. Barros et al. showed in their investigation that biomass recovery efficiency above 90% of Dunaliella tertiolecta microalgae was reached when the pH was brought to values of 10.5 by adding of NaOH. It can be due to neutralization of the charges present at the microalgae surface with consequent formation of large aggregates and subsequent sedimentation [3]. Furthermore, this low cost harvesting method allows reuse the culture medium by pH neutralization. After that, dehydration of microalgae is necessary. Centrifugation is postulated as one of the most efficient dewatering technique of algal biomass. By other hand, different algae oil extraction techniques can be applied to the dewatered biomass: Soxhlet, microwave (MW) or ultrasound (US) are the most prominent. The efficiency of these techniques depends largely on the solvent or solvent mixture used. Acetone, hexane, chloroform, methanol and a mixture of chloroform-methanol are most often used. Similar oil extraction yields can be obtained by microwave and ultrasound methods. Times much higher (about 8 hours) are required by the conventional Soxhlet to achieve similar yields than those obtained by MW or US in only 30 min-1 h.

Finally, biodiesel is obtained by transesterification and the process can be performed in 2 ways: the extracted algal oil is transesterified or dehydrated algal biomass is directly transesterified, avoiding the previous stage oil extraction. In both cases, a solvent or solvent mixture and a catalyst are needed. A complete study of Koberg et al. for Nannochloropsis microalgae showed that 37.1% biodiesel (% biodiesel yield based on dry biomass) was obtained by MW direct transesterification of algal biomass [4]. However, if the transesterification was performed in two steps by extraction and transesterification both MW, the yield decreased to 32.8%. If US was applied instead of MW, 20.9% of biodiesel was obtained for direct transesterification and 18.9% for the transesterification in 2 steps. A time of 5 min was employed for both direct and transesterification in 2 steps and a time of 2 min was used for oil extraction. A mixture of methanol-chloroform 1:2 v/v was employed in all cases studied and SrO was used as catalyst.

Based on published data, it can be concluded that MW could be the most effective technique for biodiesel production and the mixture of solvents chloroform-methanol is the most suitable to perform both oil extraction and transesterification.

As an added value to biodiesel production, algal waste generated in the process can be used as feedstock for pellets manufacturing, an appreciated fuel for biomass boilers. Thus, 2 valuable biofuels can be obtained from microalgae: biodiesel and pellet. With the advances being made today, the biodiesel use of large scale will be achieved in a short period of time.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8050
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2016 - Dec 13, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7950
  • PDF downloads : 100
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version