Biosimilars: A Review of Published Randomized Control Trials Comparing Biosimilars with their Reference Products
Received Date: Dec 17, 2017 / Accepted Date: Dec 29, 2017 / Published Date: Jan 05, 2018
Biosimilars represent a therapeutic revolution for many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Biosimilars have different regulatory requirements than those of originators. These regulatory requirements are based on the evidence generated from bioequivalence studies, and in particular from RCTs. The goal of our review was to search for published randomized control trials that investigate biosimilars compared to their reference medicine (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab) in chronic inflammatory diseases (psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative cholitis, by using the Medline (PubMed) databases. Nineteen randomized control trials investigating biosimilars compared to their reference drug were included. As of November 2017, five anti-TNF biosimilar agents have been granted approval and are available on the market for patients with as inflammatory disease in the European Union. The Infliximab biosimilars CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra) and SB2 (Flixabi), the etanercept biosimilars SB4 (Benepali) and GP2015 (Elrezi) and adalimumb biosimilars ABP501 (Amgevita, Solymbic), SB5 (Imraldi) and BI 695501(Cyltezo). Evidence of equivalence between biosimilars and reference drugs was supported by head-to-head randomized clinical trials: two published randomized clinical trials for SB2, SB4, GP2015, ABP501, SB5, BI695501 and three published randomized control trial in the case of CT-P13 and ABP 501. Although not all randomized clinical trials comparing biosimilar to its reference product have been published, the present situation is satisfactory and provision of further clinical trials awaited.
Keywords: Biosimilar; Review; Clinical trial; Infliximab; Adalimumab; Etanercept; Inlectra
EU: European Union; RCTs: Randomized Control Trials; Pso: Psoriasis; PsA: Psoriatic Arthritis; CD: Crohn’s Disease; UC: Ulceratice Colitis; AS: Ankylosing Spondylitis; RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis; IFX: Infliximab; ETN: Etanercept; ADL: Adalimumab; ACR: American College of Rheumatology; PK: Pharmacokinetics; PD: Pharmacodynamics; AUCinf: Area Under the Concentration- Time Curve from Time Zero to Infinity; AUClast: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration; EU-INF: EU-Sourced Infliximab; US-INF: US-Sourced Infliximab; SDAI: Simple Disease Activity index; CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity index; LDAS: Low Disease Activity Score; Cmax: Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration; Tmax: Time to Reach Cmax; ADA: Antidrug Antibodies; PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI50/75/90/100: 50/75/90/100 Improvement in PASI; TEAE: Treatment-Emergent Adverese Events; PGA: Physician Global Assessment; EULAR: European League against Rheumatism; DAS28: Disease Activity Score 28; ESR: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; ASAS: Assessment of Spnondyloarhritis; ACR20/50/70: 20%/50%/70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Score
Biosimilars represent a therapeutic revolution for many immunemediated inflammatory diseases. Given the high cost of the reference biological drugs along with their recent patent expiry, biosimilars have gained ground in the therapeutic armamentarium of many immunemediated inflammatory disease, as they enable significant cost savings for the healthcare systems and at the same time increase earlier access to otherwise expensive biological therapy.
A biosimilar drug is defined by the World Health Organization as a “biotherapeutic product similar in terms of quality, safety and efficacy to an already licensed reference therapeutic product whose license has expired” .
Owing to the fact that the efficacy of the original biologic drug has already been confirmed, the development of a biosimilar should fulfill rigorous step-wise process aimed at demonstrating that the investigated biosimilar is highly similar to the reference product. In this regard, regulatory agencies have developed guidelines for proving biosimilarity which consist mainly in bioequivalence studies and in particular randomized control trials [2-4].
Development and clinical trials of biosimilars
Data requirements necessary to support regulatory approval of a biosimilar begin with nonclinical development (physicochemical, biologic), as well as preclinical development (animal studies) aimed at establishing biosimilarity with the reference drug. Additionally, clinical equivalence studies are required in order to demonstrate that the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of the proposed biosimilar are similar to the reference product and also confirming and resolving any remaining uncertainties regarding biosimilarity. These clinical studies begin with phases 1head-to-head clinical studies which demonstrate comparable pharmacokinetics to and pharmacodynamics in relevant population [5-7].
Early clinical development also involves investigations that focus on safety, including immunogenicity. After similarity of the biosimilar with the reference drug in terms of PK, PD and immunogenicity have been demonstrated in phase 1 clinical studies, at least one head-to-head phase 3 clinical comparability trial is performed aimed at confirming similar efficacy and safety in a sensitive population [7,8].
The purpose of these phase 3 clinical comparability trials is to resolve uncertainties with regard to efficacy and safety of the biosimilar compared to its reference drug that remain after competition of physicochemical, biologic and preclinical investigations, as well as, Pd, PK and immunogenicity investigations. These trials provide a headto- head comparison of biosimilar with the reference drug, aimed at demonstrating that the proposed biosimilar has neither increased nor decreased activity compared to its to the reference product [9-11].
Post-marketing monitoring is also implemented, for example through pharmacoepidemiological studies, to ensure continual monitoring of long-term safety.
Trial designs for biosimilars development have similar designs with other biologic drugs with regard to patient population selection, sample size, study duration, end points.
A systematic review of the literature was carried out in order to collect all published randomized control trials that investigate biosimilars with their reference medicine (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab) in chronic inflammatory diseases (Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis) by using the Medline (PubMed) databases.
Search key words used to identify all relevant articles included various terms used for the relevant diseases- psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis in combination with biosimilars.
Abstracts/titles of the studies were independently screened by two reviewers and full-text articles were extracted for more detailed analysis. Each study included was individually reviewed in order to retrieve available study characteristics including patient characteristics, number, phase, disease, efficacy, safety outcomes and data on immunogenicity.
A total of one hundred and two publications were identified using eligibility criteria.
Nineteen randomized control trials investigating biosimilars compared to their reference drug were included (Table 1 Included as supplementary data).
Evidence of equivalence between CT-P13 and reference infliximab was provided by 3 randomized, clinical trials: PLANETAS (a phase 1 double-blind, parallel-group study), PLANETRA (a phase 3 doubleblind, multicentre study involving 605 patients with RA) and a supportive Japanese phase 1/2 study [16-23].
The first randomized, phase 1 study (PLANETAS) was performed on 250 patients with AS. In this study, the CT-P13 pharmacokinetic was demonstrated to be similar to that of the original drug. Moreover, the 2 biosimilar drugs showed good performance in terms of efficacy and safety .
Subsequently, a phase 3, double-blind study (PLANETRA) study was performed in 604 RA patients. Two groups of patients were randomized to receive original infliximab or CT-P13 at the same dose and methotrexate. The two patients groups revealed similar response rate, drug-related adverse events and development rate of anti-drug antibodies at the end of the study .
In PLANETRA study extension, a total of 455 patients with RA from the previous study were treated up to week with the aim of assessing efficacy and safety of continuing CT-P13 or switching from reference infliximab t CT-P13 in patients who had completed 54 weeks of treatment. The results from PLANETRA study extension reported that response rates were maintained and did not significantly differ in the switch and maintenance groups .
Regarding immunogenicity, in both PLANETAS and PLANRTRA studies, anti-drug antibodies against infliximab and CT-P13 were measured and during the extension phase, anti-drug antibodies incidence was comparable between maintenance and switches groups [16-23].
Further support for the comparable efficacy of CT-P13 and reference infliximab comes from a small phase1/2 study in 101 Japanese patients with RA .
All these data further support the extrapolation of CT-P13 to all the indications for which infliximab is approved. SB2 (Flixabi) is an infliximab biosimilar that has recently received marketing authorization in the EU in May 2016 for use in the treatment of adult patients with RA, PsA, psoriasis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease .
Evidence of equivalence between and reference infliximab sourced from 2 randomized clinical trials: A phase 1, parallel, three-arm, singleblind study of 159 healthy volunteers and a phase 3, double-blind trial of 584 patients with RA [24-27].
Both studies have demonstrated similarity in terms of PK, PD, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity between the 2 drugs.
SB4 is an etanercept biosimilar that has been approved in the EU in 2016 for use in the treatment of adult patients with RA, PsA, AS, psoriasis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis .
The equivalence of SB4 and reference etanercept was determined in 2 RCT: a phase 1, single-blind, three-way study of 138 healthy volunteers and a phase 3, double-blind trial. The latter was conducted on 596 patients with RA, and consisted of 52 week main study and an additional 48 week transition (switching) study. The 2 drugs have proven similarity in terms of efficacy, tolerability profiles, adverse events, immunogenicity [30-32].
GP2015, a further etanercept biosimilar was submitted for approval in the EU in December 2015 and gained approval in April 2017 .
Evidence of equivalence between GP2015 and reference etanercept was provided by 2 randomized control trials: a phase 1, two-sequence, two-period, cross-over study in 54 healthy male subjects and a phase 3, double blind study which involved 531 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (EGALITY) [33,34].
The phase 3 study (EGALITY) was conducted in 531 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and consisted of 4 periods. This trial met its end points for equivalence of efficacy. Likewise, secondary end point, drug related adverse events and anti-drug antibodies were comparable between GP2015 and reference etanercept .
Evidence of equivalence between ABP 501 and reference adalimumab sourced from 3 RCTs: a phase 1, single-dose study in 501 healthy adults and 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies, performed in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and moderate to severe RA, respectively. Both studies have demonstrated that ABP501 is similar to adalimumab in clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity [39-42].
In the phase 1 study, after a single 40 mg SC injection, the PK of ABP 501 was similar to that of and adalimumab and the safety and tolerability profiles were also similar .
Evidence of equivalence between SB5 and reference adalimumab was demonstrated in 2 RCTs: a phase 1, single-blind single-dose study in 59 healthy subjects which demonstrated pharmacokinetic similarity, and a phase 3 randomized, double-blind study performed in patients with RA which demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity to reference adalimumab [43,44].
Evidence of equivalence between BI695501 and reference adalimumab comes from 2 randomized clinical trials: a phase 1, single dose study in 109 healthy subjects and a phase 3 randomized, double-blind studies performed in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis [45-47].
As of November 2017, five anti-TNF biosimilar agents have been granted approval and are available on the market for patients with as inflammatory disease in the European Union. The Infliximab biosimilars CT-P13 (Remsima, Inflectra) and SB2 (Flixabi), the etanercept biosimilars SB4 (Benepali) and GP2015 (Elrezi) and adalimumb biosimilars ABP501 (Amgevita, Solymbic), SB5 (Imraldi) and BI 695501 (Cyltezo). They all have shown close comparability to their reference medicinal products in terms of physical, biologic and clinical characteristics. The first biosimilar was infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 which was approved in September 2013 by the European Medicines Agency, followed by etanercept biosimilar SB4 in January 2016, infliximab biosimilar SB2 in May 2016, adalimumab biosimilar ABP501 on March 2017, etanercept biosimilar GP2015 on April 2017 and adalimumab biosimilars SB5 and BI695501 on October and November, respectively .
- (2009) World Health Organisation. Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation. Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products.
- Feldman SR (2015) Inflammatory diseases: Integrating biosimilars into clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum 44: S16-S21.
- Puig L (2016) Biosimilars in psoriasis 2015: What is next? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 30: 467-469.
- Puig L, Carretero G, Dauden E, Ferrandiz C, Marron SE, et.al. (2015) Biosimilars in dermatology: Current situation (Part 1). Actas Dermosifiliogr 106: 545-549.
- European Medicine Agency (2015) Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: Non-clinical and clinical issues.
- Alten R, Cronstein BN (2015) Clinical trial development for biosimilars. Semin Arthritis Rheum 44: S2-8.
- Strober BE, Armour K, Romiti R, Smith C, Tebbey PW, et al. (2012) Biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars in psoriasis: What the dermatologist needs to know. J Am Acad Dermatol 66: 317-322.
- Dranitsaris G, Dorward K, Hatzimichael E, Amir E (2013) Clinical trial design in biosimilar drug development. Invest New Drugs 31: 479-487.
- (2010) US Food and Drug Adiministration. Guidance for industry. Adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics.
- Bui LA, Taylor C (2014) Developing clinical trials for biosimilars. Semin Oncol 41: S15-25.
- Yoo DH, Hryvaj P, Miranda P, Ramiterre E, Piotrowski M, et.al. (2013) A randomized, double-blind, parallel-groupstudy to demosntrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared to innovator infliximab when co-administered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: The PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 72: 1613-1620.
- Yoo DH, Racewics A, Brzezicki J, Yatsyshyn R, Arteag ET, et.al. (2013) A phase 3 randomized controlled trial to compare CT-P13 with infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: 54 week results from the Planetra study. Ann Rheum Dis 72: A73.
- Yoo DH, Prodanovic N, Jaworski J, Miranda P, Ramiterre E, et al. (2017) Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study. Ann Rheum Dis 76: 355-363.
- Park W, Hrycaj P, Kovalenko V, Lysenko PM, Mikozane H, et al. (2013) A randomized, double-blind, and phase 1 study demonstrates equivalence in pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 71: 11.
- Park W, Jaworski J, Brzezicki J, Gnylorybov A, Kadinov V, et al. (2013) A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 1 study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of CT-P13 and infliximab in patients with active anky losing spondylitis: 54 week results from the PLANETAS study. Ann Rheum Dis 72: A517-A17.
- Park W, Yoo DH, Miranda P, Brzosko M, Wiland P, et al. (2017) Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102 week data from the PLANETAS extension study. Ann Rheum Dis 76: 346-354.
- Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Tanaka Y, Sakurai T, Saito K, et al. (2015) Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic equivalence and 54-week efficacy and safety of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 25: 817-824.
- Tanaka Y, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi T, Inoue M, Saito K, et al. (2017) Safety and efficacy of CT-P13 in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an extension phase or after switching from infliximab. Mod Rheumatol. 27: 237-245.
- Shin D, Kim Y, Kim YS, Kornicke T, Fuhr R (2015) A randomized, phase 1 pharmacokinetic study comparing SB2 and infliximab reference product (Remicade) in healthy subjects. BioDrugs 29: 381-388.
- Choe JY, Prodanovic N, Niebrzydowski J, Staykov I, Dokoupilova A, et al. (2017) A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing SB2, an infliximab biosimilar, to the infliximab reference product Remicade in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheym Dis 76: 58-64.
- Smolen JS, Choe JY, Prodanovic N, Niebrzydowski J, Staykov I, et al. (2017) Comparing biosimilar SB2 with reference infliximab after 54 weeks of a double-blind trial: clinical, structural and safety results. Rheumatology (Oxford). 56: 1771-1779.
- Smolen JS, Choe JY, Prodanovic N, Niebrzydowski J, Staykov I, et al. (2017) Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy after switching from reference infliximab to biosimilar SB2 compared with continuing reference infliximab and SB2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, phase III transition study. Ann Rheum Dis.
- (2017) Sandoz receives approval in Europe for Erelzi® (biosimilar etanercept) to treat multiple inflammatory diseases, Novartis.
- Lee YJ, Shin D, Kim Y, Kang J, Gauliard A, et al. (2016) A randomized phase l pharmacokinetic study comparing SB4 and etanercept reference product (Enbrel®) in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 82: 64-73.
- Emery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczynski P, et al. (2017) A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 76: 51-57.
- Emery P, Vencovský J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczynski P, Porawska W, et al. (2017) 52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56: 2093-2101.
- Von Richter O, Skerjanec A, Alfonso M, Heinrich SS, Poetzl J, et al. (2017) GP2015, A propsed biosimilar: Pharmacokinetic similarity to its reference product and comparison of itrs autoinjector deviced with prefilled syringes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83: 732-741.
- Griffiths CEM, Thaci D, Gerdes S, Arenberger P, Pulka G, et al. (2017) The EGALITY study: A confirmatory, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, vs the originator product in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 176: 928-938.
- Kaur P, Chow V, Zhang N, Moxness M, Kaliyaperumal A, et al. (2017) A randomised, single-blind, single-dose, three-arm, parallel-group study in healthy subjects to demonstrate pharmacokinetic equivalence of ABP 501 and adalimumab. Ann Rheum Dis 76: 526-533.
- Papp K, Bachelez H, Costanzo A, Foley P, Gooderham M, et al. (2017) Clinical similarity of biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study. J Am Acad Dermatol 76: 1093-1102.
- Papp K, Bachelez H, Costanzo A, Foley P, Gooderham M, et al. (2017) Clinical similarity of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab after single transition: Long-term results from a randomised, double-blind, 52 week, Phase 3 study in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients. Br J Dermatol.
- Cohen S, Genovese MC, Choy E, Perez-Ruiz F, Matsumoto A, et al. (2017) Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis 76: 1679-1687.
- Weinblatt ME, Baranauskaite A, Niebrzydowski J, Dokoupilova E, Zielinska A, et al. (2017) Phase III randomized study of SB5, an adalimumab biosimilar, versus reference adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol.
- Shin D, Lee Y, Kim H, Körnicke T, Fuhr R (2017) A randomized phase I comparative pharmacokinetic study comparing SB5 with reference adalimumab in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharm Ther 42: 672-678.
- Wynne C, Altendorfer M, Sonderegger I, Gheyle L, Ellis-Pegler R, et al. (2016) Bioequivalence, safety and immunogenicity of BI 695501, an adalimumab biosimilar candidate, compared with the reference biologic in a randomized, double-blind, active comparator phase I clinical study (VOLTAIRE®-PK) in healthy subjects. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 25: 1361-1370.
- Cohen SB, Alonso-Ruiz A, Klimiuk PA, Lee E, Peter N, et al. (2017) Biosimilar candidate BI 695501 and adalimumab reference product have similar efficacy and safety in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA): 1 year results from a phase 3 study. Arthritis Rheumatol 69: 10.
- Olteanu R, Zota A, Constantin M (2017) Biosimilars: An update on clinical trials (review of published and ongoing studies). Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 25: 57-66.
Citation: Olteanu R, Constantin M, Zota A (2018) Biosimilars: A Review of Published Randomized Control Trials Comparing Biosimilars with their Reference Products. Adv Tech Biol Med 6: 252. DOI: 10.4172/2379-1764.1000252
Copyright: © 2018 Olteanu R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
International Conference on Internal Medicine
October 24-25, 2018 Osaka, Japan
Annual Congress on Medicine
November 05-06, 2018 London, Thailand
- Total views: 867
- [From(publication date): 0-2018 - Oct 23, 2018]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 817
- PDF downloads: 50