alexa Biosimilars: The New Era of Drug Development? | OMICS International
ISSN: 0975-0851
Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Biosimilars: The New Era of Drug Development?

Keane O Soluade and Duc P Do*

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Chicago State University, Chicago, IL, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Duc P Do
9501 S King Drive
Douglas Hall 206, Chicago
IL 60628, USA
Tel: 773-821-2597
Fax: 773-821-2595
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: August 12, 2013; Accepted Date: August 17, 2013; Published Date: August 25, 2013

Citation: Soluade KO, Do DP (2013) Biosimilars: The New Era of Drug Development? J Bioequiv Availab 5:e40. doi: 10.4172/jbb.10000e40

Copyright: © 2013 Soluade KO, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability

Introduction

The biopharmaceutical industry has come a long way since the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the first biopharmaceutical (biologic) product insulin in 1982 [1]. In 2012, five of the top ten selling prescription drugs were biopharmaceuticals [2]. Biopharmaceutical products have provided novel treatment modalities for life-threatening and rare diseases. In recent years, pharmaceutical companies are ramping up on their development of biosimilars because many patents on biological products are expiring and this enables them to earn profits from the biopharmaceutical market [3]. Biosimilars are expected to offer competition to some of the most expensive drugs on the pharmaceutical market. Biosimilars are defined as a highly similar form of innovator’s biological products and are produced after the patent protections of such innovator biological products have expired [4-7]. Biosimilars are also known as follow-on biologicals, similar biologics, and similar biotherapeutic product or subsequent-entry biologics.

Biopharmaceutical products are composed of large and complex molecules developed using varied cell lines, unique manufacturing and purification processes, which would make it impossible to create an exact copy [8]. According to the US FDA, small-molecule drugs are the only drugs that can be referred to as true “generics” [5]. Unlike small-molecule drugs which are produced through chemical processes, biologics are made using living cells derived from human or animal sources. Biopharmaceuticals may also be produced synthetically using biotechnology. A biological product is composed of significantly larger and more complex molecules than small-molecule drugs [4,5]. A small difference in the cell line used in developing a biosimilar or in the manufacturing process or approach developed for such a biosimilar can result in quantifiable changes from its referenced product [8,9]. In addition, a biosimilar must be very similar to its approved reference biological product and must not have any clinically significant differences from the reference product in relation to safety, purity and efficacy [5,6]. Another major challenge to biosimilar drug development is determining which component of the biopharmaceutical is the active ingredient. In biopharmaceuticals, the clinical efficacy may be a result of the synergistic effects of more than one component and this factor may limit the ability to demonstrate similarity [10].

Biosimilar Drug Development

The process of developing a biosimilar can be a very challenging and meticulous task. To determine similarity with an originator referenced product, comprehensive physiochemical and biological characterization studies must be performed [11]. A reproducible manufacturing process must be established for developing the biosimilar using “good manufacturing practices”. Bioequivalence of the biosimilar and innovator products must also be acquired by conducting extensive preclinical and clinical trials [4,9].

Although the biosimilar development in the United States is in its infancy, the FDA has issued draft guidances to the industry. These draft guidances are to assist in the development and approval of biosimilars in the United States [9,12,13]. The FDA suggested that sponsors use a stepwise approach in determining the similarity between a biosimilar and the referenced innovator product. This stepwise approach should consist of analyzing the similarities of the proposed biosimilar and its reference product in regards to structure, function, animal toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties as well as their chemical safety, purity and efficacy profiles [12,13]. According to the FDA draft guidances, the complexity in the nature and structure of biopharmaceuticals, using data from foreign approved products in demonstrating similarity and post marketing studies to be conducted are also factors to consider [12]. A totality-of-the-evidence submitted to the FDA in proving biosimilarity will also be considered when reviewing applications for biosimilars. The totality-of-the-evidence approach suggests that the FDA will be basing their regulatory decisions on the vast majority of evidence submitted by sponsors [9,14]. The draft guidances are only recommendations and not required for those choosing to demonstrate biosimilarity using an alternate approach as long as the strategy does not violate currently applicable regulations and statutes [13].

United States Biosimilar Regulatory Considerations

From a global perspective of approving biosimilars, the US FDA lags behind other regulatory authorities [14]. Globally, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) was a forerunner to establish a regulatory pathway for approving biosimilars. To date, 14 biosimilars (not counting monoclonal antibody biosimilars) have been approved by the EMA [6,15]. In the United States, biological originators are granted a 12-year exclusivity period to encourage research and development of newer biologics and allow recovery of research and development costs. Under this exclusivity, no application for a biosimilar may be ‘submitted’ to the FDA until 4 years after the reference product has been licensed and no biosimilar application can be ‘approved’ until 12 years after the reference product has been licensed [14].

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) actualized the future for approving biosimilars in the U.S through its subtitle, the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BCPIA). The BCPIA enabled the amendment of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), which licenses biopharmaceuticals, unlike traditional drugs which are licensed under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). The BCPIA allowed the creation of an abbreviated approval pathway for products that are “biosimilar” to already licensed biological products that are currently on the U.S market [5,9,12]. Recently, the Biosimilar User Fee Act of 2012 (BsUFA) was passed and gave the FDA the authorization to assess and collect fees for providing the necessary resources to process and evaluate biosimilar applications [14,16].

Conclusion

Biosimilar drugs are currently a major issue of discussion in the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry. Patent expirations of top selling biopharmaceuticals and economic competition for cheaper drug products have opened avenues for the development of biosimilars. Despite challenges in developing biosimilars, several major pharmaceutical companies have sought regulatory approvals. To date, 14 biosimilars (not counting monoclonal antibody biosimilars) have been approved by the EMA [6,15]. Recently, in June 2013, the EMA approved the first two monoclonal antibody biosimilars for autoimmune diseases [17,18]. This approval is a major breakthrough for the biopharmaceutical industry. In July 2013, Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim announced that their biosimilar long acting insulin product, LY2963016, was accepted for review by the EMA for type I and II diabetes [19]. An increase in biosimilars will also prove to be beneficial as it will significantly reduce cost to patients and allow for greater patient accessibility to quality healthcare [9]. However, as biosimilar products are developed, it is important that they meet quality, safety, and efficacy standards to achieve therapeutic outcomes in patients. Additionally, the development of sensitive in vitro characterization and analytical methods to establish similarity between the innovator’s drug product and the biosimilar is highly desired.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12015
  • [From(publication date):
    November-2013 - Dec 16, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8198
  • PDF downloads : 3817
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version