alexa Boron Isotope Fractionation in Bell Pepper | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2469-9861
Mass Spectrometry & Purification Techniques
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Boron Isotope Fractionation in Bell Pepper

Sonja Geilert1,2, Jochen Vogl1*, Martin Rosner3, Susanne Voerkelius4 and Thomas Eichert5

1Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und-prüfung (BAM), Richard-Willstätter-Str.11, Berlin, Germany

2GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Wischhofstr. 1-3, Kiel, Germany

3IsoAnalysis UG, Gustav-Müller-Str.38, Berlin, Germany

4Hydroisotop GmbH, Woelkestr.9, Schweitenkirchen, Germany

5University of Bonn, Karlrobert-Kreiten-Str.13, Bonn, Germany

*Corresponding Author:
Jochen Vogl
BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing
12489 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 3081041144

Received date: August 19, 2015; Accepted date: September 02, 2015; Published date: September 07, 2015

Citation: Geilert S, Vogl J, Rosner M, Voerkelius S, Eichert T (2015) Boron Isotope Fractionation in Bell Pepper. Mass Spectrom Open Access 1:101. doi:10.4172/2469-9861.1000101

Copyright: © 2015 Geilert S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Mass Spectrometry & Purification Techniques


Various plant compartments of a single bell pepper plant were studied to verify the variability of boron isotope composition in plants and to identify possible intra-plant isotope fractionation. Boron mass fractions varied from 9.8 mg/kg in the fruits to 70.0 mg/kg in the leaves. Boron (B) isotope ratios reported as δ11B ranged from -11.0‰ to +16.0‰ (U ≤ 1.9‰, k=2) and showed a distinct trend to heavier δ11B values the higher the plant compartments were located in the plant. A fractionation of Δ11Bleaf-roots = 27‰ existed in the studied bell pepper plant, which represents about about 1/3 of the overall natural boron isotope variation (ca. 80‰). Two simultaneous operating processes are a possible explanation for the observed systematic intra-plant δ11B variation: 1) B is fixed in cell walls in its tetrahedral form (borate), which preferentially incorporates the light B isotope and the remaining xylem sap gets enriched in the heavy B isotope and 2) certain transporter preferentially transport the trigonal 11B-enriched boric acid molecule and thereby the heavy 11B towards young plant compartments which were situated distal of the roots and typically high in the plant. Consequently, an enrichment of the heavy 11B isotope in the upper young plant parts located at the top of the plant could explain the observed isotope systematic. The identification and understanding of the processes generating systematic intra-plant δ11B variations will potentially enable the use of B isotope for plant metabolism studies.


Boron isotopes, Bell pepper, Boron transport, Boron isotope fractionation, Intra-plant isotope variability


Stable isotope systems of major nutrients like oxygen or carbon have been successfully used to trace the provenance of plants and food products [1]. The boron (B) isotope system is of great interest in plants because B was found to be an essential micronutrient in plants occurring predominantly in the cell walls and acts as a strengthening component [2].

Boron has two stable isotopes, 11B (~80% abundance) and 10B (~20% abundance) and its isotope amount ratio n(11B)/n(10B) is reported as delta (δ)-values (eqn. 1), referring to the Standard Reference Material (SRM®) 951 from the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST; Gaithersburg, USA). In aqueous solutions, B exists as uncharged trigonal boric acid B(OH)3 in acidic media or as tetrahedral borate ion B(OH)4 - in alkaline media. The lower vibrational energy of the trigonal coordinated boric acid species causes a preferential incorporation of the heavier B isotope compared to the tetrahedral species [e.g. 3] leading to boron isotope fractionation in nature.

image (1)

To date, only few studies exist regarding B isotope compositions of plants. Published date: δ11B values in crop plants and fruits range from about -12‰ to +40‰ [4-6] covering more than half of the natural B isotope variability. It was already suggested that depending on the involvement of natural and/or anthropogenic boron sources site specific δ11B signatures occur in plants and food products [7]. However, provenance studies using boron isotopes as a tracer might be hampered by a potential isotope fractionation at the plant-soil interface and/or in the plant itself.

To date, no systematic study exists looking at natural intra-plant B isotope fractionation, which might be caused by transport mechanisms or compartmentalization. Ref. [8] presented B isotope data of wheat, corn and broccoli growing experiments using artificial 10B-rich nutrient solution and observed a preferential uptake of the heavy 11B isotope for wheat and corn and variable B isotope fractionations for broccoli. The isotope signatures were interpreted as being potentially caused by varying adsorption mechanisms at the root plasmalemma or during B transport. However, the determined isotopic differences between the nutrition solution and the plant as well as the intraplant isotope variability seems to be unrealistically high and might not be caused by isotope fractionation induced solely by the plants. Contamination during sample preparation or a high procedure blank might additionally add to the extreme isotopic differences observed by ref. [8].

Here we present a full validation for δ11B measurements applying multi-collector (MC) inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) including a new approach to calculate realistic uncertainties for δ-values by standard bracketing. The δ11B method was applied to study the boron isotope systematics in different plant compartments of one single bell pepper plant.

Bell pepper was chosen as a study object because B isotope compositions of bell pepper fruits have been investigated before for provenance studies and systematic variations have been identified [7].

Potential fractionation mechanisms will be discussed and an approach to explain the observed δ11B systematic is given. Moreover, we present a full validation for MC-ICPMS based δ11B data including an uncertainty calculation for δ11B values of isotope reference materials, plant quality control materials and bell pepper samples.

Materials and Methods

Sample materials, standards and reagents

A bell pepper plant (Capsicum annuum var. annuum) from Gewächshauslaborzentrum Dürnast (GHL), TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan was examined to study intraplant B mass fractions and isotope variations. The bell pepper was grown using a constant nutrient supply throughout the growing period. Bell pepper compartments including roots, stem parts, leaves and fruits (separated into outer and inner pulp as well as seeds) were selected for B analysis. Similar plant parts were sampled at various plant heights in order to assess intraplant B isotope variations. Plant samples were frozen and freeze-dried before decomposition. Certified isotope reference materials from NIST and the European Reference Material (ERM®) cooperation (NIST SRM 951, ERM-AE120, -AE121, -AE122; Ref. [9] were used as δ11B = 0 standard and quality control materials, respectively. Plant reference materials (RM) with published δ11B values. [6] like Corn Bran (NIST RM 8433) and Peach Leaves (NIST RM 1547) from NIST, White Cabbage (Bureau Communautaire de Référence, BCR®, BCR-679) from the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) and Maize (International Plant-Analytical Exchange, IPE, IPE 126) from Wageningen Evaluating Programmes for Analytical Laboratories (WEPAL) were used to investigate potential isotope fractionation and contamination during sample preparation and mass spectrometric measurements.

Sample preparation

Sample decomposition and B-matrix separation of plant compartments were conducted following a modified method described in ref. [6] and ref. [10]. To minimize B contamination sample preparation was carried out in High Efficiency Particulate Arrestance (HEPA)-filtered laminar flow work benches using ultrapure water (H2O, 18.2 MΩ·cm), double-distilled hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium chloride (NaCl) of highest commercially available purity (99.9999%). All crucibles and tubes were pre-cleaned with HCl and H2O.

Decomposition of plant compartments was achieved by dry ashing using a microwave-assisted ashing system (MILESTONE PYRO). The possibility of B fractionation induced during freeze drying was tested by four differently processed aliquots of a homogeneous bell pepper pulp sample: freshly cut pulp (type 1), frozen pulp (type 2), frozen and freeze-dried pulp (type 3) as well as frozen, freeze-dried and successively ashed pulp (type 4). All test pulp aliquots were digested in a high-pressure asher (HPA) after adding 4 mL nitric acid (HNO3) and 1 mL hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the B mass fraction was subsequently determined by ICPMS (Thermo® Element 2). Resulting B mass fractions, calculated on dry mass basis, of the 4 separately processed fruit pulp samples are 56 mg/kg (type 1), 69 mg/kg (type 2), 64 mg/kg (type 3) and 70 mg/kg (type 4) and thus agree well within the expanded uncertainty (k=2) of 9 mg/kg. Based on the presented data, B isotope fractionation induced by B loss during freeze-drying seems to be unlikely.

The first of the two B-matrix ion-chromatographic separation steps is cation separation using 0.02 mol/L HCl in columns loaded with 0.5 mL of the anion exchange resin AG 50W-X8 (see [6] for details). The remaining sample matrix was separated using the boron specific resin Amberlite IRA-743. The resin was cleaned and conditioned in batch mode using 10 ml of resin in total, which was sufficient for 20 samples, each supplied with ~0.5 ml resin. The resin was cleaned with 5 times 1 ml of 6 mol/L HCl and subsequently conditioned using 35 mL H2O and 3 mL NaOH (0.5 mol/L) in an alternating mode. NaOH was added in a batch mode and left for about 30 minutes. After conditioning 0.5 mL of resin were added to the sample solution which was beforehand conditioned to an alkaline media using 2 mol/L NaOH. B is thus present in a tetrahedral form B(OH)4-, which binds to the resin while shaking for 24 h. Afterwards, the sample solution and resin were transferred to columns, and the matrix was consecutively washed from the resin using 3 mL H2O, 1.5 mL of 0.6 mol/L NaCl and 3 mL H2O. Finally, B was eluted using 7 mL of 0.5 mol/L HCl and was further diluted for B mass fraction and isotope ratio measurements.

B mass fraction and isotope measurements: B mass fractions were analyzed with a Thermo® Element 2 ICPMS at Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) in standard configuration mode using 2% (w/w) HCl. The multi-element standard no. IV from Merck was used for external calibration. Matrix effects were evaluated separately by comparing standard addition and external calibration for digested bell pepper samples. Matrix was found to lead to a signal increase of 8.5% in average, which results in a correction factor of 0.929 for the external calibration with an expanded uncertainty of 0.085. The expanded uncertainty of the calibration and sample measurements was estimated to be 10%. When combining both contributions an overall relative expanded uncertainty of 14% for the mass fraction determination results.

Boron isotope ratios were determined using a Thermo® Neptune Plus MC-ICPMS at BAM, where the sample introduction was optimized similar as described in ref. [11]. Boron was analyzed in 2% (w/w) HCl in low resolution mode, where the 10Ar4+ interference is already completely separated. 11B intensities of about 1.7 V were achieved for B mass fractions of 200 ng/g, while acid blank values varied between 5 and 10 mV, yielding a sample to blank intensity ratio of >100. A washout time of 240 s was sufficient to reduce the B signal to less than 1% of the signal achieved for 200 ng/g standards and samples. The samples were measured using the standard bracketing technique. NIST SRM 951 was used as bracketing standard and isotope variations were reported in the δ-notation in per mill following eqn. 1, where the R(11B/10B)NIST SRM 951 represents the mean value of the standard before and after the sample.

Method validation and uncertainty budget

In order to assess the total sample recovery after dry ashing and after B-matrix separation 4 crop plant reference materials (NIST RM 8433 and 1547, BCR-679 and IPE 126) have been processed. The total sample recovery was ≥ 86%, with an average value of (87 ± 1)% (1x standard deviation sd). The procedure blank was ≤ 15 ng B, thus sufficiently low considering a sample load of 4 μg B (<0.4%). To identify any B isotope fractionation induced by sample decomposition and B-matrix separation the certified B isotope reference material ERM-AE120 [9] and the plant quality control materials NIST SRM 8433 and 1547, BCR- 679 and IPE 126 were processed through the whole procedure. Neither for ERM-AE120 nor for the plant reference materials a difference of the determined δ11B values compared to the certified and published δ11B values outside the expanded uncertainties could be observed (Table 1). The mean offset in δ11B between the determined and the certified and published δ11B values of the five materials of 0.1‰ shows the validity of the used procedure (Table 1).

      Measured Reference
Material n1b n2c δ11B s.d. U (k=2) δ11B(S)RM U (k=2)
      (‰) (‰) (‰) (‰) (‰)
ERM® - AE 120 1 22 -20.3 0.4 0.8 -20.2 0.6
ERM® - AE 120a 3 9 -19.5 0.2 0.8 -20.2 0.6
ERM® - AE 121 1 35 19.5 0.3 0.8 19.9 0.6
ERM® - AE 122 1 29 39.5 0.3 0.8 39.7 0.6
BCR-679 Cabbage 4 28 -23.6 0.7 1.3 -23.8 1.2
NIST Peach leaves (RM 1547) 2 11 40.5 0.3 1.2 41.1 1.1
NIST Corn Bran (RM 8433) 2 11 7.9 0.7 1.3 8.3 1.7
IPE Maize (WEPALIPE126) 2 7 1.0 0.2 1.2 0.4 1.2

Table 1: δ11B values with their expanded uncertainties as determined for certified reference materials (ERM®-AE120, -AE121, -AE122) and plant reference materials (White Cabbage BCR-679, Peach Leaves NIST SRM 1547, Corn Bran NIST RM 8433 and Maize WEPAL IPE 126) are shown. Calculation of the expanded uncertainties is explained in the text and performed after a method by ref. [6] The certified reference material ERM®-AE 120a is processed through the matrix separation procedure to test for fractionation effects or B loss (see text for details).

The expanded measurement uncertainty for δ11B determinations by MC-ICPMS in monoelemental solutions was calculated as 0.8‰ based on repeated measurements of the certified B isotope reference materials [9].

ERM-AE120 (n=22; average δ11B=-20.3 ± 0.8‰), ERM-AE121 (n=35; average δ11B=-19.6 ± 0.8‰) and ERM-AE122 (n=29; average δ11B=39.6 ± 0.8‰). δ11B values obtained on plant reference materials agree well within the stated uncertainties (1.2 ‰ to 1.3 ‰) with previously measured δ11B values by ref. [6] (Table 1).

The calculated uncertainty budget for the plant reference materials and for the bell pepper samples is based on ref. [12] and contains uncertainty contributions from sample decomposition (κ1=0.41‰), B-matrix separation (κ2=0.25‰), procedure blank (κ3=0.16‰), isotopic heterogeneity of the reference material NIST SRM 951 (κ4=0.2‰). For MC-ICPMS measurements it is expanded by fluctuation or drift of the instrumental mass bias (κ5=0.2‰) and matrix effects on the instrumental mass discrimination (κ6=0.2‰). Uncertainty contributions of the determined sample and bracketing standard isotope ratios (Rsample and RNIST SRM 951) are treated after equation 2:

image (2)

The expanded uncertainties for the bell pepper samples range between 1.3‰ and 1.9‰ with an average value of 1.5‰ (Table 2). The uncertainty budget is mainly influenced by contributions derived from the sample preparation prior the MC-ICPMS. The sample decomposition (κ1), B-matrix separation (κ2) and the procedure blank (κ3) typically account for about two thirds of the uncertainty and the MC-ICPMS related contributions (κ5, κ6,, Rsample and RNIST SRM 951) are responsible for only one third of the uncertainty. The expanded uncertainties of ≤ 1.9‰ calculated in this study represent the limit of interpretation of the bell pepper δ11B values determined here. This limit is completely sufficient as the δ11B values observed in this study range from -11.0‰ to+16.0‰ (Table 2).

Sample Height above soil Aliquot No. B mass fractiona δ11B s.d.b Average δ11B s.d.c U (k=2)
  (cm)   (mg/kg) (‰) (‰) (‰) (‰) (‰)
Roots / 1 16 (2) -10.7 0.8 -11.0 0.7 1.3
    2   -11.3 0.5
Stem 1 8 1 14 (2) -10.5 0.7 -10.2 0.7 1.3
    2   -9.7 0.5
Stem 2 92 1 15 (2) -5.4 0.3 -5.8 0.6 1.4
    2   -6.1 0.7
Stem 3 147 1 14 (2) -0.1 0.6 -2.1 1.9 1.9
    2   -3.6 0.3
Bell pepper fruit 1 Pulp (yellow) 108 1 9 (1) 10.8 0.5 11.7 1.1 1.5
    2   12.7 0.3
Bell pepper fruit 1 Pulp (white) 108 1 22 (3) 5.6 0.5 6.5 1.1 1.5
    2   7.5 0.3
Bell pepper fruit 1 seeds 108 1 28 (4) 4.0 0.6 4.3 0.6 1.3
    2   4.7 0.3
Bell pepper fruit 2 Pulp (green) 125 1 12 (2) 11.4 1.0 11.9 0.9 1.4
    2   12.5 0.3
Bell pepper fruit 2 Pulp (white) 125 1 19 (3) 6.3 0.4 6.1 0.4 1.3
    2   5.9 0.4
Bell pepper fruit 2 seeds 125 1 20 (3) 5.6 0.6 6.4 0.5 1.3
    2   6.7 0.2
Fruit stem 125 1 17 (2) 6.9 0.9 5.5 1.6 1.8
    2   4.1 0.1
Leaf 1 108 1 65 (9) 8.0 0.3 9.0 1.1 1.5
    2   10.0 0.3
Leaf 2 125 1 49 (7) 15.1 0.8 16.0 1.2 1.6
    2   17.0 0.6
Leaf 3 147 1 60 (8) 15.5 0.4 15.7 0.4 1.3
    2   16.0 0.3

Table 2: B mass fraction and δ11B values of the bell pepper plant. Standard deviation of the measurements and expanded uncertainties are reported. The uncertainty for the δ11B values was calculated after ref. [6], see text for explanation. All aliquots were measured 3 times, beside aliquot 1 of sample stem 1 and aliquot 2 of sample stem 3, which were measured 4 times and aliquot 1 of sample leaf 1 which was measured 2 times.

Results and Discussion

Boron mass fraction and isotope composition of plant compartments

The B mass fraction (dry weight) varied significantly between different plant compartments, but was consistent within the same compartment type (Table 2) (Figure 1a). Roots showed a B mass fraction of 16 mg/kg. Stem 1 (8 cm above soil), stem 2 (92 cm above soil) and stem 3 (147 cm above soil) had B mass fractions of 14 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg and 14 mg/kg, respectively. Leaf 1 (108 cm above soil), leaf 2 (125 cm above soil) and leaf 3 (147 cm above soil) showed B mass fractions of 65 mg/kg, 49 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg, respectively. Bell pepper fruit 1 (108 cm above soil) consisted of yellow pulp and had a B mass fraction of 9 mg/kg. The white inner pulp showed a B mass fraction of 22 mg/kg and the seeds 28 mg/kg. The green bell pepper fruit 2 (125 cm above soil) showed a B mass fraction of 12 mg/kg, corresponding white pulp 19 mg/kg and seeds 20 mg/kg. The fruit stem of the green bell pepper had a B mass fraction of 17 mg/kg and was thus just minimally lower than the white pulp and seeds. Highest B mass fractions were found in the leaves and lowest in the green and yellow bell pepper pulp.


Figure 1: Intraplant B mass fractions (a) and δ11B values (b) plotted against the growth height (cm).

In contrast to the B mass fraction, δ11B values showed a distinct variation dominated by an increase the higher the plant compartments were located in the plant, or the greater the distances were to the roots (Table 2) (Figure 1b). The δ11B value of the roots was -11.0 ± 1.3‰. Stem 1 showed a δ11B value of -(10.2 ± 1.3)‰ and equals thereby the δ11B values of the roots. Stem 2 and 3 had δ11B values of -(5.8 ± 1.4)‰ and -(2.1 ± 1.9)‰, respectively. Thus, an increase of about Δ11Bstem3-stem1=8.1‰ over a distance of 139 cm was observed, with Δ11Bstem3-stem1 being defined by eqn. 3. The leaves showed a similar increase from δ11B= +(9.0 ± 1.5)‰ (leaf 1) to +(16.0 ± 1.6)‰ (leaf 2) and +(15.7 ± 1.3)‰ (leaf 3) over a distance of 39 cm resulting in a Δ11Bleaf3-leaf1M=6.7‰.

Δ11Bx-y = δ11B(x) - δ11B(y) (3)

With x equal to higher located pant parts (e.g. stem 3, leaf 3) and y equal to lower located plant parts (e.g. stem 1, leaf 1).

The outer yellow and green pulp of the bell pepper fruits 1 and 2 equaled each other in their δ11B signature with values of +(11.7 ± 1.5)‰ and +(11.9 ± 1.4)‰, respectively. The δ11B values of the here investigated bell pepper outer pulp samples fell in the range of -7 to +37‰ determined for European and Mediterranean bell pepper fruits [7]. The white pulp with δ11B values of +(6.5 ± 1.5)‰ (fruit 1) and +(6.1 ± 1.3)‰ (fruit 2) compared well with each other. Seeds with δ11B of +(4.3 ± 1.3)‰ (fruit 1) and δ11B of +(6.4 ± 1.3)‰ (fruit 2) also equaled each other within uncertainty. The fruit stem of fruit 2 was with δ11B of +(5.5 ± 1.8)‰ similar to the white pulp and seeds. In summary, an increase in δ11B from -11.0‰ (roots) to +16.0‰ (leaf 2) could be observed (Figures 1 and 2). A fractionation of about Δ11Bleaf-roots =27‰ within a single plant was thus present (Table 2) (Figures 1 and 2). In general, no correlation between B mass fraction and boron isotope distribution could be observed (Figure 2). Just the leaves showed the highest B mass fractions (on average 58 mg/kg) which coincided also with the highest δ11B values (on average +13.6‰). The outer pulp of the bell pepper fruits showed lowest B mass fractions and highest δ11B values compared to the inner fruit parts (inner pulp, seeds and fruit stem). Despite different growth heights of the bell pepper fruits (108 cm yellow fruit, 125 cm green fruit) their δ11B values, were equal within uncertainty. This contrasted to the δ11B values of stems and leaves, which showed a distinct dependency on the growth height (Table 2) (Figure 1). This difference between fruits and other plant compartments could indicate a certain threshold in the fruits regulating B uptake and B isotope fractionation. Additionally, a fractionation of about Δ11BOuterPulp-InnerParts=7‰ was observed between fruit outer pulp and inner white pulp, seeds and fruit stem. A negative correlation between δ11B values and B mass fractions was found in which the outer bell pepper pulp showed the lowest B mass fraction and the highest δ11B values (Figure 2).


Figure 2: Bell pepper δ11B values (‰) plotted against the corresponding B mass fraction. A correlation between B isotope values and mass fraction cannot be obtained. The only positive trend is existent in the leaves, which show the highest B mass fraction as well as the highest δ11B values.

Intra-plant B isotope fractionation

The continuous increase in δ11B from the roots to the top of the bell pepper can be the result of different isotope fractionation steps during B transport and incorporation into the plant cells. Boron loss via transpiration is unlikely. Among various possible B fractionation scenarios the preferential incorporation of the light 10B isotope into the cell or integration into the cell walls leading to an upward transportation of boron being enriched in the heavy 11B isotope is discussed in the following.

B uptake and transport through plant-membranes is channelmediated via aquaporines, which direct boric acid into the xylem [13]. Due to thermodynamic reasons boric acid preferentially incorporates the heavy isotope in contrast to borate. Therefore, a preferred transport of 11B into the xylem and via transporters to higher located plant parts can be assumed. B transporters were found not only to facilitate B uptake into the xylem but also to regulate B uptake and transport in the shoots. The efflux B transporter (BOR1, borate exporter) and the nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein 6;1 (NIP6;1, boric acid transporter) were held responsible for a preferential B transport to growing young leaves and shoot compartments through carrier- or channelmediated transport [14,15]. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms and dominance of these transporters and channels are not yet fully understood [15]. In ref. [15], it was found that the transporter NIP6;1 facilitates the transport of boric acid through the xylem to newly growing plant compartments and thus agrees well with a preferential transport of 11B towards the top of the plant as observed in the studied bell pepper plant.

The preferred transport of boric acid to younger plant parts at the top of the plant might additionally be verified by the B mass fractions. For this consideration, however, it has to be differentiated between the classes of plant parts. The leaves for instance show similar B mass fractions independent of height and therefore age. Typically B in plants is enriched in older plant parts compared to younger plant parts; with growing time B also gets accumulated in the younger plant parts and B mass fractions increase. However, given that in rapidly growing plants B is preferentially transported to young, newly growing plant parts no discrepancies exist between B mass fractions in old and young plant parts. Given that in the studied bell pepper, B mass fractions equal each other for instance in the leaves (Table 2), a rapid growth can be assumed and a preferred transport of boric acid and thereby the heavy 11B isotope to younger plant parts can be explained.

The presented B isotope data do not exclude an additional fractionation during B incorporation into plant cells. The systematic increase in δ11B from roots to leaves implies that fractionation related to B transport is the dominant fractionation mechanism. However, a constant fractionation between xylem sap and cells is likely as B undergoes a speciation change (from trigonal coordinated boric acid to tetrahedral borate) during fixation in the cells [2]. Given that cell-fixed borate preferentially incorporates the light B isotope the remaining xylem sap will get enriched in 11B(OH)3 and 11B will consequently be transported to higher located plant parts. This might be an additional process which might explain the lighter δ11B values in the lower and the heavier values in the upper plant parts (Figures 1 and 2). This goes along with the age of the plant parts. Older plant parts show lower δ11B values than younger plant parts, because more time was available for this fractionation process and the boron delivered to the younger plant parts is already depleted in 10B: stem 1 to stem 2 to stem 3 show increasing δ11B values (Figure 1), with increasing height and decreasing age; slightly less pronounced this effect is visible for leave 1 compared to leave 2 and 3 (Figure 1).

Further, the highest δ11B enrichment is not exclusively found in the uppermost plant parts (e.g., leaves 2 compared to fruit 2). This observation implies that not the growth height alone is responsible for the observed δ11B values but that the length of the transport way could be an additional crucial factor. Certainly, plant parts located higher in the plant have a longer transport way than plant parts in lower plant sections, but horizontally stretching stems add essentially to the total transport way. However, this hypothesis needs further investigation to verify the importance of the transport way.

The lower B concentrations and δ11B values in the fruits compared to the leaves can further be explained by the fact that nutrient supply in the fruits is mostly conducted via the phloem. Therefore, unlike B in leaves, B in fruits was not directly imported from roots via the xylem but from other organs like leaves. In low-polyol plants, like bell peppers, phloem mobility of B is very low [16] and this might explain the lower B concentration in the fruits. A preferred relocation of one isotope over the other cannot unequivocally be determined as fruit 1 is slightly heavier (+ 2.7‰) than the leaf at the same height and fruit two is slightly lighter compared to the corresponding leaf (- 4.1‰) (Table 2).


The δ11B values of different compartments of a bell pepper plant were determined using a fully validated procedure and a systematic increase in δ11B from roots to leaves with a fractionation of Δ11Bleaf-roots =27‰ was identified. A process which preferentially transports 11B in the form of the boric acid molecule upwards to newly growing plant parts is able to explain the observed systematic B isotope variability. Certain transporters can be held responsible for a discrimination between the transported B species (boric acid versus borate), which might explain the B isotope systematic.

Given the here determined large intra-plant B isotope variability the use of B isotopes for plant/food provenance studies may be limited as geographical differences in B isotope signatures are additionally controlled by plant internal fractionation processes. However, as long as whole plants or same plant compartments were compared B isotopes might be used to identify natural reservoirs or anthropogenic processes (like fertilization).

Nevertheless, the large Δ11B fractionation observed here in a single bell pepper plant can help to improve the knowledge about plant metabolism. B isotopes could be used as tracers to study B transport and speciation.

Open questions remain concerning plant internal B isotope fractionation. It needs to be clarified if the shift of Δ11Bleaf-roots=27‰ in full grown bell pepper plants is constant or if it varies depending on external conditions like irrigation water, B uptake time or transport way. Further, it needs to be understood how B isotopes are fractionated during B uptake when high or low B supply occurs.


We would like to thank the Gewächshauslaborzentrum Dürnast (GHL), TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan for the supply of the bell pepper plant. Further the support for sample digestion and chemical procedures by Dorit Becker is greatly appreciated. We would also like to thank Maren Koenig for the assistance with the B mass fraction measurements.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11770
  • [From(publication date):
    October-2015 - Aug 23, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7963
  • PDF downloads :3807

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version