alexa Challenge of Using Antiplatelet Drugs in Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia and Recently Implanted Coronary Stents-Splenectomy as a Therapeutic Option

ISSN: 2167-1052

Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

  • Case Report   
  • Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2017, Vol 6(4): 4
  • DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000220

Challenge of Using Antiplatelet Drugs in Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia and Recently Implanted Coronary Stents-Splenectomy as a Therapeutic Option

Dragomir Marisavljevic1,4*, Olivera Markovic1,4, Marija Zdravković2,4, Saša Hinić2, Nada Suvajdžić-Vuković3,4 and Branka Filipović1,4
1Hematology Department, KBC Bezanijska kosa, Belgrade, Serbia
2Cardiology Department, KBC Bezanijska kosa, Belgrade, Serbia
3Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
4Medical School, University of Belgrade, Serbia
*Corresponding Author: Dragomir Marisavljevic, Hematology Department, KBC "Bezanijska kosa", Belgrade, Serbia, Tel: +381-65-3357-090, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Oct 28, 2017 / Accepted Date: Nov 10, 2017 / Published Date: Nov 18, 2017

Abstract

Background: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in the patients with implanted coronary stents is related with serious risks of haemorrhage related to dual antiplatelet therapy on the one hand and stent thrombosis if antiplatelet therapy is interrupted on the other hand. Therefore, the main objective in these patients is the correction of thrombocytopenia and continuous use of antiplatelet drugs.

Case report: We present the patient with implanted stents after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and severe ITP who was successfully treated with splenectomy. After the patient experienced AMI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with implantation of stents has been performed. Thrombocytopenia (21 × 109/L) was registered for the first time after PCI intervention when it has been noticed a massive hematoma of whole right arm at the site of radial artery puncture. Immediately after the intervention dual antiplatelet therapy and prednisone has been started. Since corticosteroids and azathioprine treatment proved unsuccessful (platelet count <10 × 109/L), the patient has been prepared for splenectomy with intravenous immunoglobulins. As the platelet count was in stable range (40-50 × 109/L) after splenectomy, antiplatelet therapy has been readministered safely.

Conclusion: As there are no definitive guidelines for treatment of patients with ITP and implanted stents, the treatment should be individualized to minimize risk of hemorrhagic as well as thrombotic complications. Our case suggests that splenectomy is an available and safe treatment for these patients. However, decision on splenectomy is a challenge; and before the surgical intervention the risk-benefit assessment should be considered.

Keywords: Immune thrombocytopenia; STEMI; Percutaneus coronary intervention; Antiplatelet drugs

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is very infrequent in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and poses serious management problem in which a good balance between prevention of thrombosis and haemorrhagic risk must be achieved [1-4]. The main objectives in these patients are correction of thrombocytopenia and continuous administration of antiplatelet drugs. There are only a few reports of AMI in ITP patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and dual antiplatelet therapy. Pretreatment with some of the modalities (corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), agonists of thrombopoietin receptors, danazol and platelet transfusions) was required in a number of those patients [1-4].

Case Report

We present here the case of a 43-year-old male with simultaneous occurrence of ITP and AIM in whom the splenectomy was successfully performed after the failure of standard medicamentous therapy. In February 2016, after AIM was diagnosed, primary PCI with implantation of two stents in Left Descending Coronary (LAD) artery was performed (drug-eluting stent-DES in mid segment of LAD, Xience 2.75 × 28 mm; bare-metal stent in the proximal segment of LAD, Integrity RX 3.5 × 18 mm). Thrombocytopenia (21 × 109/L) in our patient, confirmed by a peripheral blood smear, was registered for the first time after coronary angiography when the massive hematoma at the site of the radial artery punctures arises. After a detailed haematological work-up, a diagnosis of ITP was established. Immediately after PCI dual antiplatelet therapy and prednisone (40 mg) have been initiated. Blood counts performed throughout the hospitalization showed a gradual increase of platelet count up to 70 × 109/L. The patient was discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid-ASA and clopidrogel) and prednisone (20 mg). Three weeks after the AMI the patient was admitted to the Hematology department due to thrombocytopenia (21 × 109/L) and skin bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy was withheld. Prolonged treatment with corticosteroids and azathioprine proved unsuccessful (platelet count ˂10 × 109/L, presence of haemorrhagic syndrome) (Figure 1).

advances-pharmacoepidemiology-drug-safety-platelets-number-relation

Figure 1: Changes of platelets number in relation to applied therapies.

As thrombocytokinetic examination using in111 showed shortened platelet life span (24 h, reference range 7 to 10 days) and predominant sequestration of platelets in the spleen, the patient was prepared for splenectomy with IVIg. After splenectomy the patient achieved a stabile partial remission (platelet count 40-50 × 109/L) and dual antiplatelet therapy has been readministered safely. At the last followup (June, 2017) a mild thrombocytopenia (53 × 109/L) was registered without clinical signs of bleeding and antiplatelet therapy (ASA, 100 mg) was continued.

Discussion

Acute coronary events occurs in patients with ITP regardless of their platelet count, which could range from normal to as low as 2 × 109/L [1,3-5]. The precise mechanism of arterial thrombosis in ITP is unknown, but several explanations have been offered: Presence of large, immature, prothrombotic platelets, elevated platelet microparticles which promote coagulation, presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and anti-IIb/IIIa antibodies which target both platelets and endothelial cells due to antigenic mimicry [6].

Treatment of ITP in the patients with implanted coronary stents is a clinical conundrum, because there is no guidance or official recommendation for treatment of such patients. Besides, a number of treatment modalities for ITP increase susceptibility to thrombotic events due to either abrupt rise of the platelet count with emergence of immature prothrombotic platelets (rituximab, IVIg) or increased plasma viscosity (IVIg, platelet transfusion) or metabolic changes which promote atherosclerosis (steroids) [2]. The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) and danazol are also related to thrombotic complications [7].

It seems that antiplatelet therapy is safe and well tolerated chronically when platelet count is >30 × 109/L and should be discontinued only during the bleeding episode [6]. Withdrawal of clopidogrel and maintenance of antiplatelet therapy with aspirin alone has been described, too [1]. However, in view of the persistence of severe thrombocytopenia accompanied by haemorrhagic syndrome after the administration of conventional therapy we decided to perform splenectomy in our patient.

Some authors emphasize that special attention should be paid to the type of the stent in ITP patients, as it will influence the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy [1,8]. Namely, some experts recommend albuminal biodegradable polymer DES of new generation since dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel could be administered for a shorter period of time to allow stent endothelialisation [9].

The patients with ITP and coronary stents require a tailored medical and interventional management. The case we reported suggests that splenectomy is an available and safe treatment for ITP patients with recently implanted coronary stents, providing stabile platelet count. Decision of splenectomy is a challenge. Namely, splenectomy, a treatment often reserved for refractory ITP, can predispose to venous thromboembolism. Before the surgery, the risk-benefit assessment should be performed.

In the case of ITP reccurence after splenectomy, readministration of corticosteroids might be considered. In emergency situations, injection of IVIg may be appropriate. For a patient with symptomatic corticosteroid-dependent ITP the use of azatioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or vinca alcaloides could be appraised. Concerning TPO-RA, they are discouraged in patients with high thrombotic risk. However, a case of eltrombopag use in a patient with recent acute coronary syndrome has been published recently [1]. As there are no definitive guidelines, treatment should be individualized to minimize the risk of haemorrhagic as well as thrombotic complications.

Conclusion

We report the unique case of a patient with simultaneous occurrence of AIM and ITP. Thrombocytopenia was not registered before performing PCI with implantation of two stents to his LAD. After the initial good treatment response to corticosteroids which allowed the continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy the patient showed subsequently corticoresistance and unresponsiveness to azathioprine. Considering his "favourable" thrombocytokinetic profile (platelet premature sequestration predominantly in the spleen) splenectomy appeared a reasonable treatment approach. He was prepared with IVIg for surgery. After splenectomy, patient achieved a stabile partial remission allowing continuation of antiplatelet therapy. The patient is at high risk for in-stent restenosis and treating his thrombocytopenia may worsen thrombosis. Treatment for such patients needs to be individualized and more research is needed in this subject to make guidelines to therapy.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

Citation: Marisavljevic D, Markovic O, Zdravkovic M, Hinic S, Suvajdžic-Vukovic N, et al. (2017) Challenge of Using Antiplatelet Drugs in Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia and Recently Implanted Coronary Stents-Splenectomy as a Therapeutic Option. Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 6: 220. Doi: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000220

Copyright: © 2017 Dragomir Marisavljevic, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Post Your Comment Citaion
Share This Article
Article Usage
  • Total views: 67
  • [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Jan 17, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 50
  • PDF downloads: 17

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh