alexa Characteristics of Immigrant Abused Women Who Apply for Legal Status | OMICS International
ISSN: 2151-6200
Arts and Social Sciences Journal
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Characteristics of Immigrant Abused Women Who Apply for Legal Status

Angeles Nava1*, Judith McFarlane1, John Maddoux2, Nora Montalvo-Liendo3, Heidi Gilroy1 and Sandra Cesario1

1Nelda C Stark College of Nursing, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, Texas

2Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, Texas

3Friendship of Women, Inc. Brownsville, Texas

Corresponding Author:
Angeles Nava
Nelda C Stark College of Nursing
Texas Woman’s University
6700 Fannin Street, Houston
TX 77030, USA
Tel: 713-794-2762
Fax: 713-794-2102
E-mail: [email protected]

Received February 4, 2014; Accepted March 28, 2014; Published April 4, 2014

Citation: Nava A, McFarlane J, Maddoux J, Montalvo-Liendo N, Gilroy H, et al. (2014) Characteristics of Immigrant Abused Women Who Apply for Legal Status. Arts Social Sci J S:S1-001. doi: 10.4172/2151-6200.S1-001

Copyright: © 2014 Nava A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Arts and Social Sciences Journal

Keywords

Intimate partner violence; Abused women; Immigrant women; Legal status; Undocumented; Acculturation

Introduction

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and undocumented migration are identified as social and global health issues [1-2]. In 2010, female migrants constituted 49% of the world’s migration [3]. In the United States (US) in 2011, undocumented female immigrants accounted for approximately 45% of all immigrants [4]. Migration itself is a source of stress [5]. In addition, immigrant women are faced with challenges such as language barriers and discrimination as they arrive to a new country [5]. Violence against women is a major concern with the increased numbers of female migration [5]. In the study by Decker, Raj, and Silverman [6] it was reported that immigrant adolescent females were twice as likely to report recurring sexual abuse compared to non-immigrant girls. Both migration and partner violence have adverse effects on women’s physical and mental health [5]. Furthermore, lack of language skills, inadequate knowledge about legal rights, and poor paying jobs hinder immigrant women’s ability to protect themselves from violence [7]. Immigrant abused women’s quest for safety is further complicated by the lack of legal immigration status.

Undocumented immigrant women’s status not only increases the vulnerability for abuse, but is also often used by their abusive partners to threaten them with deportation. This is an additional barrier for women to seek help [8-9]. Moreover abused immigrant women who lack legal immigration status are less likely to report violence for fear of consequences [10]. Significant advancement within the last two decades has occurred in efforts to protect abused immigrant women. Currently in the US, immigrant women who are victims of abuse and who meet the criteria may self-petition for a special visa under the Violence Woman Act (VAWA).

Violence Against Women Act and Immigrant Women

In 1994, Congress first enacted the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) to address violence against undocumented women. Since VAWA was enacted, improvements have been made to the act to decrease the restriction on qualifying criteria. The VAWA allows eligible abused immigrants to apply for legal status in the United States if the abuser is a US citizen or legal resident [11-12]. An additional path for legal status for abused women is the “U” visa. The U visa is offered to victims of crimes including domestic violence. The applicants must prove that they suffered physical or mental abuse and they must be willing to cooperate with law enforcement in the investigation against the perpetrator [13].

While VAWA is a benefit for abused women, the qualifying criteria are strict and the process is lengthy. In spite of additional provision to improve VAWA, undocumented women face difficulties when applying for legal status. Some of the challenges include the stress of providing a personal detailed statement of the abuse, confusion about the process, amount of evidence needed to prove eligibility, and waiting time to receive documentation [14-15].

Purpose of the study

The purpose of this research is to explore the association of the characteristics of abused immigrant women who report intimate partner violence and application for legal status. The study provides data to close the gap in literature relevant to undocumented abused immigrant women who strive for a safer and healthier life. More importantly, this study offers evidence for the development of programs to enable abused immigrant women toward legal status.

Methods

Data utilized in this study comes from data collected as a part of a 7-year prospective study investigating the outcomes of women seeking partner violence support for the first time through either the justice system or the use of safe shelters. Following Internal Review Board (IRB) approval and with the cooperation of five local safe shelters and the district attorney’s office, women who were eligible to participate in this study (i.e., English or Spanish speaking women with at least one child between the ages of 18 months and 15 years old, seeking services for partner abuse for the first time) were approached within 24 hours of first entering either the safe shelter or applying for a protective order through justice services. Women who consented to participate in this study were interviewed at baseline and in four month increments. Data utilized for the present report includes baseline and 16 month follow up data. For a full review of scope, aim, and methodology of the seven year prospected study, see [16].

Instruments

At each interview, women were asked a series of questions aimed at assessing their mental health (i.e., somatization, depression, anxiety) as measured by the Brief Symptoms Inventory-18(BSI) [17], post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [18], severity of abuse (i.e., threats, physical, sexual;) [19], danger for murder[20]), self-efficacy [21], marginalization [22], social support (i.e., emotional support and tangible support); [23-24]and acculturation status [25]. Across all these measures, higher scores are associated with higher levels of the construct of interest. Specific cut offs per measure vary, and as such, interpretation and meaning will be discussed in later sections of this paper for significant findings. In addition to the aforementioned standardized measures, women were asked if they had or had not applied for immigrant legal status. Demographic information and contextual information (i.e., days at shelter, whether or not the protection orders was received) was also obtained. Time to complete the full interview was approximately 1 hour.

Participants

An equal number of women (n = 150) were recruited from either a safe shelter or the justice services for a total of 300 participants. For the purposes of this study, a subsample of 107(35.7%) women who self-identified as being immigrants to the United States were analyzed to investigate potential differences in both demographics and outcomes of women who applied for legal immigrant status during the first 16 months of the study. Women included in this subsample had ages that ranged from 18 to 51, and of these 107 women just over one third (n = 22, 36.7%) had applied for legal status at some point during the 16 months following initial contact with either the safe shelter or justice services. Demographic characteristics of the 107 women are outlined in Table 1.

  n % M SD Min Max
Age 107 - 29.44 7.35 18 51
Acculturation 101 - 4.23 .92 1.25 5.00
Group            
Shelter 57 53.3        
Justice Services 50 46.7        
Primary Language            
English 29 27.1        
Spanish 78 72.9        
Days at Shelter            
Less than 21 24 42.1        
21 or more 33 57.9        
Protection Order Received            
No 19 38.0        
Yes 31 62.0        
Applied for legal status            
Yes 38 63.3        
No 22 36.7        

Table 1: Descriptives of 107 Immigrant Women Reporting Partner Abuse

Results

In order to test for significant relationships between whether or not a woman had applied for legal status and categorical variables (i.e., group [shelter, justice services]), primary language (English or Spanish), days at shelter (less than or great than the median of 21 days and whether or not a protection order was received), a series of cross-tabulations with Pearson’s chi square were conducted. There were no significant relationships between having applied for legal status and the categorical variables. All significant levels were less than 0.05.

Due to limitations of sample size and violations of the assumption of normality, parametric analyses could not be conducted on the present data. As such, in order to test for differences in continuous demographics and outcome measures, Mann-Whitney U non-parametric analyses were conducted. Please see Table 2 for an overview of outcome variables at 16 month, follow up by legal status application status. As shown, there was a significant relationship between acculturation and whether or not a woman had applied for legal status, U = 257, z = -2.61, p = .009. Women who had applied for legal status had higher levels of acculturation, (M = 1.77, SD = .82) compared to those who did not apply for legal status (M = 1.46, SD = .91). Higher levels of acculturation indicate greater use of the English language (i.e., read and write, think, speak); therefore, women who applied for legal status tended to use English more frequently across settings. See Figure 1 for an overview of the differences in these scores. Further Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted across the remaining outcome measures at both intake and 16 month follow up yielding no significant differences as a function of having applied for legal status.

  Applied for Legal Status
  No Yes
  n M SD Min Max n M SD Min Max
Age 38 31.55 7.70 18 46 22 31.50 7.04 22 44
Acculturation 38 1.46 .91 1 4.50 22 1.77 .82 1 4.25
BSI Global 38 6.97 8.95 0 31 22 12.41 14.46 0 45
BSI Anxiety 38 2.18 3.03 0 12 22 4.27 6.30 0 24
BSI Depression 38 2.61 3.37 0 12 22 5.05 5.13 0 17
BSI Somatization 38 2.18 3.39 0 14 22 3.09 5.11 0 16
General Self-Efficacy 38 33.63 5.42 22 40 22 32.41 5.23 19 39
PTSD Symptomatology 38 2.50 2.06 0 6 22 2.86 1.96 0 7
Threats Score 38 20.87 4.15 19 35 22 20.91 7.29 19 53
Physical Abuse Score 38 21.11 .65 21 25 22 22.41 6.61 21 52
Sexual Abuse Score 38 6.16 .97 6 12 22 6.14 .64 6 9
Danger Assessment 38 3.37 3.84 0 18 22 3.27 4.94 0 22
Marginalization 38 13.47 5.30 5 23 22 12.73 5.47 5 25
Safety Behaviors 38 4.17 1.85 0 7 22 4.68 1.34 2 7
Emotional Support 35 3.46 .78 2 4 20 3.24 .83 1 4
Tangible Support 35 3.70 .49 2 4 20 3.55 .76 1 4
Support Regarding Abuse 35 3.59 1.01 0 4 20 3.35 .86 1 4
Total Functional Support 35 3.58 .59 2 4 20 3.38 .68 1 4

Table 2: Means and Standard Deviations of Maternal Outcomes at 16 Months by Application for Legal Status

arts-and-social-sciences-journal-Overview

Figure 1: Overview of the differences in scores.

Discussion

Intimate partner violence, migration, and lack of legal immigrant status, have detrimental effects on women’s overall well-being. What happens when all these factors are present in a woman’s life? What happens when one of these elements is removed, such as legal immigrant status? A significant finding in the study was that women who had applied for legal immigrant status had higher levels of acculturation compared to those who did not apply for legal status. No other research describing the characteristics of immigrant women who apply for legal status was found in the literature. However, previous research indicates that abused immigrant women who are more acculturated are more likely to use safety behaviors but also more likely to experience depression and anxiety [26]. Acculturation is a complex process. The scale used in this study focused only on English language as a proxy to measure level of acculturation. Perhaps being able to communicate in the language of the host country, in this case English, overrides the impact of poor mental health, facilitating a woman to access resources and apply for legal immigrant status. According to Capps, Bachmeier, Fix, and Van Hook [4] 70% of undocumented adults immigrants have limited or no English language skills. These findings indicate that undocumented abused women may need assistance in English language proficiency to access appropriate resources in moving through the immigration process.

According to the International Organization for Migration, it is critical to create programs and provide assistance for language training and bi-lingual service providers to enable immigrant women [5]. Currently, most of the immigration application forms are in English. A collaborative approach is needed to develop and implement the above mentioned programs to meet the needs of abused immigrant women. Schools and Parent Teachers Organizations (PTO) members can serve as collaborators to develop and implement educational programs [27]. At the same time programs are urgently needed to continue to improve paths and eliminate barriers for undocumented women to obtain employment authorization and to adjust their status [5]. One of the most challenging aspects of applying to a visa for immigrant women is to meet eligibility criteria [14]. More emphasis is needed on increasing knowledge of available legal rights and services specific for abused undocumented women such as VAWA, U-visa, free legal aid, protective orders, and safe shelters. In order to increase reports of violence to authorities and decrease fear of deportation, it is important to identify and use appropriate sources of information about available services. Such sources need to be trusted by undocumented women.

No significant relationships were found between applying for legal status and all outcome and demographic characteristics with the exception of acculturation. Contrary to the results, an expected finding was that abused women who had increased levels of social support, self-efficacy and decreased levels of psychological distress, PTSD, and marginalization, would be more likely to apply for legal immigrant status but no difference was measured in this sample. Ryan and colleagues [28] used BSI to examine levels of distress among a group of people who applied for asylum in Ireland. Unlike the findings in our study, the researchers found that people seeking asylum experienced high levels of distress at entry and follow-up; however, distress decreased in persons who obtain a legal immigrant status. The lack of significant findings in this study may indicate that no significant barriers impede immigrant women from applying for legal status if they decide to do so as long as they are proficient in English.

Limitations

As with all research limitations to this study exist. This study used language preference as a proxy for acculturation. Other multidimensional scales are available to measure acculturation. The potential exists that other measures could reveal different findings with this population. Another limitation is that the sample of immigrant women were primarily from Spanish speaking countries. This sample reflects the immigrant population in the area where the study was conducted. In addition, women were recruited from shelters only for abused women and from the local district attorney’s office where they applied for a protection order. Thus, abused immigrant women who accessed help at homeless shelters or who used private legal firms to apply for a PO were not included in this sample. In spite of the limitations, this study contributes to the literature with significant findings about immigrant women who report abuse and documents the need for future research as well as services.

Implications for Future Research

Research is needed that uses a multidirectional scale to measure acculturation that includes other aspects of acculturation in addition to language. Also studies that include a heterogeneous sample to include abused immigrant women from different parts of the world and who seek help at other types of services, such as counseling.

Conclusion

Around the world, women are affected by immigration, laws conferring or denying legal immigrant status, and abuse. The findings in this research document women who are more acculturated, meaning have higher English speaking proficiency, are more likely to apply for legal status. And while no other demographic characteristics or outcome measures were significant, the positive acculturation findings indicate that when immigrant abused women possess more English speaking skills, they are much more likely to apply for legal status.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the 300 women and children who allow us to record their pain and recovery and who take emotional risks each time we meet. As one woman said, “I want to talk but it hurts to remember.” We thank each woman who chose to remember and dedicate the findings of this research to her courage and determination.

Funding

The Houston Endowment in Houston, TX funded the research of this report.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11754
  • [From(publication date):
    specialissue-2014 - Dec 11, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7956
  • PDF downloads : 3798
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version