alexa Checklist of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) from the Southern Gulf of Mexico: Data-Base (1979-2010) and New Records | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2332-2543
Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Checklist of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) from the Southern Gulf of Mexico: Data-Base (1979-2010) and New Records

Licea S1*, Moreno-Ruiz JL2 and Luna R1

1Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Institute of Marine Sciences and Limnology, Mexico 04510, D.F., Mexico

2Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, C.P. 04960, D.F., Mexico

Corresponding Author:
Licea S
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Institute of Marine Sciences and Limnology
Circuito Exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, México 04510, D.F., Mexico
Tel: +52 5622 5689
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: November 11, 2016; Accepted Date: December 09, 2016; Published Date: December 15, 2016

Citation: Licea S, Moreno-Ruiz JL, Luna R (2016) Checklist of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) from the Southern Gulf of Mexico: Data-Base (1979-2010) and New Records. J Biodivers Endanger Species 4:174. doi: 10.4172/2332-2543.1000174

Copyright: © 2016 Licea S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compile a coded checklist of 430 taxa of diatoms collected over a span of 30 years (1979-2010) from water and net-tow samples in the southern Gulf of Mexico. The checklist is based on a long-term survey involving the 20 oceanographic cruises. The material for this study comprises water and net samples collected from 647 sites. Most species were identified in water mounts and permanent slides, and in a few cases a transmission or scanning electron microscope was used. The most diverse genera in both water and the net samples were Chaetoceros (44 spp.), Thalassiosira (23 spp.), Nitzschia (25 spp.), Amphora (16 spp.), Diploneis (16 spp.), Rhizosolenia (14 spp.) and Coscinodiscus (13 spp.). The most frequent species in net and water samples were, Actinoptychus senarius, Asteromphalus heptactis, Bacteriastrum delicatulum, Cerataulina pelagica, Chaetoceros didymus, C. diversus, C. lorenzianus, C. pelagicus, C. pseudocurvisetus, Coscinodiscus radiatus, Cyclotella striata, Diploneis bombus, Guinardia flaccida, Hemiaulus sinensis, Leptocylindrus danicus, Odontella aurita, O. mobiliensis, Paralia sulcata, Proboscia alata, Pseudo-nitzschia pseudodelicatissima, P. pungens, Skeletonema costatum, Thalassiosira eccentrica, T. partheneia, Thalassionema nitzschioides, and Thalassiothrix longissima. Ninety three taxa were new records for this region.

Keywords

Checklist; Marine diatoms; Data-base; Gulf of Mexico

Introduction

Diatoms are the most important primary producers of both marine and freshwater environments. Its role in regulating the ocean’s silicon cycle is considerable [1]. For taxonomists and ecologists these microalgae are useful for monitoring past and present environmental conditions. They are commonly used in studies of water quality, because they are sensitive to many environmental conditions related to water acidification, eutrophication and climate changes. Diatoms have also been used as valuable indicators in historical assessments of water quality [2-6].

Diatoms (Division Bacillariophyta, Class Bacillariophyceae) have been studied since the early nineteenth century when they were popular among microscopists. In the late nineteenth century many European workers produced hand illustrated monographs and descriptions of species which are still serve as valuable references reviewed in Werner [7]. Hasle and Syvertsen [8] analyzed the new taxonomic information on diatom morphology and presented a revision of the classical identification literature (atlases, floras and handbooks). Krayesky et al. [9] listed 850 diatom species for the entire Gulf of Mexico; however many of them were insufficiently known or, doubtful entities. Besides, several of the species in this list, have other accepted names according to Guiry and Guiry [10], an on-line resource available since September 2004. As a result, only 575 taxa have valid names.

Diatom studies in Mexican waters were recorded by Schmidt et al. [11] in the “Atlas der Diatomacenkunde” with illustrations of 313 species from locations in the Bay of Campeche in the southern Gulf of Mexico. Of these, 108 species were assigned to the genus Navicula, 36 to Amphora, 28 to Campylodiscus and 26 to Triceratium. Additionally, they included some infra-specific taxa that were considered as doubtful cases. Today, many of these names are no longer valid or their taxonomic status has changed. Through the 60’s until the 80’s, Soviet and Soviet-Cuban expeditions in the southern Gulf [12] found out that diatoms were the dominant group. Recently, many researchers reported the taxonomy and distribution of diatoms in this region [13- 20]. However, they did not report many of the small and rare species.

This study is part of a large-scale phytoplankton relational database for the southern part of the Gulf of Mexico. The diatom section of this program comprises 434 diatoms with a total of 14801 entries between June 1979 and December 2010. The objective of this study was to compile a checklist of diatom species from the southern Gulf of Mexico and to provide an update of valid taxonomic names for each one.

Materials and Methods

The study area

The study area in the southern Gulf of Mexico (herein referred to as SGM) lies between 24°38´ and 18°15´ N and between 86°15´ and 98°12´ W (Figure 1). The hydrographic conditions in this area are greatly influenced by the Loop Current and the detachment of anticyclonic eddies that migrate westward around the Gulf. These eddies tend to move northwards or southwards, depending on the expulsion of water masses. The south region of Campeche Bay has a predominantly cyclonic circulation mainly associated with the Yucatan Channel waters [21]. The presence of cold winds between October and April causes the formation of cold fronts. The dominant cyclonic circulation and fronts of the rivers create a dynamic system which provides the region with a unique environment. The Coatzacoalcos and the Grijalva-Usumacinta rivers represent approximately 11% of all fluvial discharges into the Gulf of Mexico. There is a notable presence of a permanent cyclonic eddy in the central region and beyond the continental shelf, as well as several lagoons that contribute to coastal outwelling [22-24]. More information concerning this area may be found in Yañez-Arancibia et al. [25]. The Yucatan Shelf is also greatly influenced by an upwelling in the north of Cape Catoche [26,27]. Consequently, while one portion of this water flows towards the west, the other part moves towards the east [28].

biodiversity-endangered-species-sampling-sites

Figure 1: Study area. Color points show 647 sampling sites during 20 oceanographic cruises were surveyed from June 1979 to December 2010 in the southern Gulf of Mexico.

This region is a highly productive fishing area, and profitable for the oil industry. Both activities have turned this region into an economically important area, but potentially critical as well due to continuous oil spills and the presence of toxic substances in untreated water that affect this region [29]. It is important to recognize marine diatoms as indicators of modern changes in oceanographic conditions [5], and likewise for oil and gas exploration [30].

Sampling strategy and laboratory analyses

This diatom checklist was compiled from 20 oceanographic cruises between July 1979 and May 2010. Most surveys were done on board the R/V “Justo Sierra”. During this period 647 sites were sampled (sometimes more than once) and the sampling stations covered the entire southern Gulf. Discrete water samples were taken by a CTD Neil Brown with a rosette of Niskin bottles and were preserved with acidified Lugol’s solution. Vertical net samples were collected using 20 μm and 35 μm mesh-sized plankton nets within 5 m from the bottom to the surface were carried out at each sampling site and the samples were preserved with 2% neutralized formaldehyde. Most species were identified in water mounts or on an inverted light microscope. In addition, acid-cleaned samples were mounted in Naphrax [31]. In some cases, transmission or scanning electron microscope allowed us the identification of difficult species of the genera Amphora, Pseudonitzschia, Thalassiosira, Psammodictyon and many small taxa. The reported species composition is based upon the database sponsored by The National Council for the Study and Conservation of Biodiversity (CONABIO) [32,33].

Species identification

The identification of some species was achieved using classic books [8,11,34-42], but specialized literature was needed for specific taxa. In addition, some diatom databases on web sites were also consulted [10,43,44]. Images in several databases illustrated intraspecific variability. Light and eventually electron microscopes were commonly used for routine analyses. In addition databases were used to review valid names to improve their spelling, and to standardize authorized names. Besides, there are pertinent links to obtain additional information, unless they are specifically unauthorized.

This checklist comes from a phytoplankton database that is at a medium stage of development. It contains mainly light micrograph images from 25 oceanographic cruises carried out at the SGM, also electron microscope photographs, light microscope digital images, information about samples, a short description of each species as well as a collection of permanent mounted slides from most net samples. This collection is known as the MEX-UNAM Diatom Collection and is stored at the Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México under curation of the corresponding author.

Results and Discussion

Collection and identification techniques

This is the first account of diatoms from the SGM. A total of 430 taxa are recorded and no synonyms are listed in Table 1. The great majority of species are tropical, subtropical or cosmopolitan. Some species have been recorded as brackish-water, fresh water and benthic. Around 45% of the diatoms were identified during analysis of water samples with the inverted microscope (Carl Zeizz ICM405) to identify forms and structures of colonies. The standard phase contrast Carl Zeizz photomicroscope was useful to observe other structures of taxonomic importance (striation, rimoportulae and fultoportulae etc.).

Habitat Species
BW Achnanthescurvirostrum
FW   Achnanthesexigua
NH Achnanthesmanifera
FW   Achnanthesventralis (Krasske)
FW Achnanthidiumexiguumvar. heterovalvum (G.Krasske)
M Actinocycluscircellus
M Actinocycluscurvatulus
M Actinocyclusoctonariusvar.crassus
M Actinocyclusoctonariusvar. ralfsii
M Actinocyclusoctonariusvar.sparsus
M Actinocyclusoctonariusvar. tenellus
M Actinocyclussubtilis
M Actinoptychuscampanulifer
NH Actinoptychusminutus
M Actinoptychusoctonarius
M Actinoptychussenarius
M Actinoptychussplendens
NH Actinoptychus vulgaris
M Alveusmarinus
M Amphicocconeisdisculoides
M Amphora angusta
M Amphora arenaria
NH Amphora bacillaris
NH Amphora bigibba
NH Amphora bioculata
NH Amphora contracta
NH Amphora costatavar.inflata
NH Amphora decussata
NH Amphora laevis
FW Amphora ovalis
FW Amphora pediculus
M Amphora proteus
NH Amphora rhombica
M Asterionellopsisglacialis
M Asterolampramarylandica
M Asteromphalusarachne
M Asteromphaluscleveanus
M Asteromphalusflabellatus
M Asteromphalusheptactis
NH Asteromphalusingens
NH Asteromphalusrobustus
M Asteromphalus sarcophagus
NH Asteromphalusshadboltianus
NH Asteromphalusstellatus
M Attheyaseptentrionalis
FW Aulacoseiragranulata
FW   Aulacoseiragranulatavar.angustissima
FW   Aulacoseiraitalica
M Azpeitianeocrenulata
M Azpeitianodulifera
NH Bacillariapaxillifera
M Bacteriastrumcomosum
M Bacteriastrumdelicatulum
M Bacteriastrumelegans
M Bacteriastrumelongatum
M Bacteriastrumfurcatum
M Bacteriastrumhyalinum
M Bellerocheahorologicalis
M Biddulphiabiddulphiana
M Biddulphia rhombus
M Biddulphiatridens
M Bleakeleyanotata
FW   Caloneis amphisbaena
BW Caloneis liber
NH Campylodiscusbraziliensis
M/FW Campylodiscus clypeus
M Campylodiscusdecorus
M Campylodiscussamoensis
M Campylosiracymbelliformis
M Carinasigma rectum
M Catacombasgaillonii
M Cerataulinapelagica
NH Ceratauluscalifornicus
M Cerataulussmithii
NH Cerataulusturgidus
M Ceratoneisclosterium
M Chaetocerosaffinis
M Chaetocerosanastomosans
M Chaetocerosatlanticusvar.neapolitanus
M Chaetocerosatlanticus
M Chaetoceros borealis
M Chaetocerosbrevisvar.brevis
M Chaetoceroscoarctatus
M Chaetoceroscompressus
M Chaetocerosconcavicornis
M Chaetocerosconstrictus
M Chaetoceroscurvisetus
M Chaetocerosdadayi
M Chaetocerosdanicus
M Chaetocerosdebilis
M Chaetocerosdecipiens
M Chaetocerosdichaeta
M Chaetocerosdidymusvar. didymus
M Chaetocerosdifficilis
M Chaetocerosdiversus
M Chaetoceroseibenii
M Chaetocerosgracilis
M Chaetoceroslaciniosus
M Chaetoceroslorenzianus
M Chaetocerosmessanensis
M Chaetocerosminimus
M Chaetocerospelagicus
M Chaetocerospendulus
M Chaetocerosperpusillus
M Chaetocerosperuvianus
M Chaetocerosprotuberans
M Chaetocerospseudocurvisetus
M Chaetocerosradicans
M Chaetocerosrostratus
M Chaetocerosseiracanthus
M Chaetoceros simplex
M Chaetocerossocialis
M Chaetocerossubtilis
M Chaetocerossubtilisvar.abnormis
M Chaetocerostenuissimum
M Chaetocerosteres
M Chaetocerostetrastichon
M Chaetocerostortissimus
M Chaetoceroswighamii
M Chaetoceroswillei
M Climacodiumfrauenfeldianum
M Climacospheniamoniligera
NH Cocconeisbritannica
M/FW Cocconeisplacentulavar.placentula
FW   Cocconeisplacentulavar.euglypta
M Cocconeispseudomarginata
NH Cocconeisscutellum
M Colliculoamphorareichardtiana
M Corethronhystrix
NH Coscinodiscopsisjonesiana
M Coscinodiscusalboranii
M Coscinodiscusasteromphalus
M Coscinodiscuscentralis
M Coscinodiscusconcinnus
M Coscinodiscusgigas
M Coscinodiscusgranii
M Coscinodiscusjonesianus
M Coscinodiscusmarginatus
M Coscinodiscusperforatus
M Coscinodiscus radiatus var. radiatus
M Coscinodiscusreniformis
NH Coscinodiscusrothii
M Coscinodiscuswailesii
FW Craticulaaccomoda
FW Craticulaambigua
M/FW   Craticulahalophila
FW   Craticulavixvisibilis
FW Cyclotellachoctawhatcheeana
FW Cyclotellalitoralis
FW Cyclotellameneghiniana
FW Cyclotellastelligera
FW Cyclotellastriata
FW Cyclotellastylorum
M Cymatonitzschia marina
M Cymatosiralorenziana
FW Cymbellamexicana
M Dactyliosolenfragilissimus
M Dactyliosolenphuketensis
M Delphineisangustata
M Delphineisminutissima
M Delphineissurirella
FW   Denticulakuetzingii
M Detonulapumila
M Dimeregrammamarinum
NH Diploneisbombus
M Diploneiscoffaeiformis
NH Diploneiscontiguavar.eugenia
FW Diploneiscrabro
NH Diploneisdecipiensvar.parallela
NH Diploneislineata
NH Diploneisobliqua
M/FW Diploneisovalis
M Diploneispapula
FW Diploneispuella
M/FW Diploneissmithii
NH Diploneissubadvena
M Diploneisvacillansvar.renitens
NH Diploneisvetula
M Diploneisweissflogii
M Ditylumbrightwellii
FW   Encyonemaminutumvar.pseudogracilis
M Entomoneisalata
M Entomoneisgigantea
M Entomoneispaludosavar.paludosa
M Entomoneispulchra
NH Envekadeapseudocrassirostris
FW Epithemiaadnata
M Eucampiacornuta
M Eucampiazodiacus
M Eunotogrammalaeve
M Eupodiscus radiatus
M Extubocellulusspinifer
M Falculahyalina
BW Fallaciapygmaea
FW   Fragilariaacus
FW Fragilariabrevistriata
NH Fragilariabrevistriatavar.elliptica
NH Fragilariagoulardiivargoulardii
FW   Fragilariatenera
M Fragilariopsisdoliolus
M Fragilariopsiskerguelensis
FW   Gomphonemaangustatum
FW   Gomphonema affine
FW   Gomphonemagracile
FW   Gomphonemagracilevar. naviculoides
FW   Gomphonemaintricatum
M Gossleriellatropica
M Grammatophoraangulosa
M Grammatophora marina
M Guinardiacylindrus
M Guinardiadelicatula
M Guinardiaflaccida
M Guinardiastriata
FW Gyrosigmaacuminatum
M Gyrosigmabalticum
M Gyrosigmafasciola
FW Gyrosigmamacrum
M Halamphoracapitata
M Halamphoraclara
BW Halamphoracoffeiformis
M Halamphoraexigua
FW   Halamphoraperpusilla
M Halamphoraterroris
FW   Halamphoraveneta
M Hasleafrauenfeldii
M Hasleagigantea
M Hasleaspicula
M Hasleawawrikae
M Helicothecatamesis
M Hemiaulushauckii
M Hemiaulusmembranaceus
M Hemiaulus sinensis
M Hemidiscuscuneiformis
M Hemidiscuscuneiformisvar.orbicularis
M Hemidiscuscuneiformisvar.ventricosus
M Isthmia nervosa
M Lampriscusshadboltianum
M Lauderiaannulata
M Leptocylindrusdanicus
M Leptocylindrusmediterraneus
NH Leptocylindrusminimus
NH Licmophoraabbreviata
NH Licmophoracommunis
M Licmophoraehrenbergii
BW Licmophoraflabellata
M Licmophoragracilis
NH Licmophoraremulus
M Liolomadelicatulum
M Liolomaelongatum
M Liolomapacificum
M Lithodesmiumundulatum
NH Lyrellaclavata
M Lyrellaexsul
M Lyrellahennedyi
NH Lyrellalyra
M Mastogloiaangulata
M Mastogloiabinotata
FW   Mastogloiaerythraea
M Mastogloiarostrata
M Melosiramoniliformis
M Melosiranummuloides
FW   Melosiravarians
FW   Meunieramembranacea
FW Minidiscustrioculatus
BW Naviculacincta
M Naviculadirecta
NH Naviculadistans
NH Naviculapelagica
FW Naviculapennata
M/FW Naviculatripunctata
M Neocalyptrellarobusta
M Neodelphineisindica
M Neodelphineispelagica
M Neodenticula
M/FW Nitzschiaacicularis
NH Nitzschiaangularisvar.affinis
M Nitzschiabicapitata
NH Nitzschia bifurcata
NH Nitzschiabraarudii
M Nitzschiacapuluspalae
M Nitzschiadietrichii
FW Nitzschiadissipata
NH Nitzschiafluminensis
M/FW Nitzschiafrustulum
NH Nitzschiagandersheimiensis
M Nitzschiainterruptestriata
M Nitzschialongissima
M Nitzschiaossiformis
FW Nitzschiaovalis
M Nitzschiapacifica
NH Nitzschiapaleavar.debilis
FW Nitzschiapalea
NH Nitzschiasicula var.sicula
NH Nitzschia sigma var. Sigma
FW Nitzschiasigmoidea
NH Nitzschiasocialis
M Nitzschiaspathulata
NH Nitzschiavidovichi
M Odontellaaurita
M Odontellalongicruris
M Odontellaregia
M Odontellaturgida
NH Oestrupiamusca
M Palmerinahardmaniana
M Paraliasulcata
NH Petroneisgranulata
FW   Pinnulariaacrosphaeria
FW   Pinnularia biceps
FW   Pinnularia borealis
FW   Placoneiselginensis
NH Plagiodiscusnervatus
M Plagiogrammopsisvanheurckii
M Planktoniella sol
FW Planothidiumlanceolatum
M Pleurosigmaacutum
M Pleurosigmaangulatum var.angulatum
M Pleurosigmadiversestriatum
M Pleurosigmanormanii
M Pleurosigmarhombeum
M Podocystisadriatica
M Podosirastelligera
M Probosciaalata
M Probosciaalata
M Probosciaeumorpha
M Probosciaindica
M Psammodictyonconstrictum
M Psammodictyonpanduriforme
FW   Psammodictyonpanduriformevar. minor
M Psammodiscusnitidus
NH Pseudoguinardia recta
M Pseudo-nitzschiadelicatissima
M Pseudo-nitzschialineola
M Pseudo-nitzschiamultiseries
M Pseudo-nitzschiapseudodelicatissima
M Pseudo-nitzschiapungens
M Pseudo-nitzschiasubfraudulenta
M Pseudo-nitzschiasubpacifica
M Pseudosoleniacalcar-avis
FW   Pseudostaurosirabrevistriatavar.inflata
M Rhaphoneisamphiceros
M Rhizosoleniaacuminata
M Rhizosoleniabergonii
M Rhizosoleniacastracanei
M Rhizosoleniaclevei
FW Rhizosoleniacleveivar. communis
M Rhizosoleniacrassa
M Rhizosoleniahebetata f. semispina
M Rhizosoleniahebetata
M Rhizosoleniahyalina
M Rhizosoleniaimbricatavar.imbricata
M Rhizosoleniapungens
M Rhizosoleniasetigera
M Rhizosoleniastyliformis
M Rhizosoleniatemperei
FW Rhopalodiagibba
M Rhopalodiagibberula
FW Rhopalodiamusculus
FW Roperiatesselata
FW   Sellaphorapupula
FW   Sellaphorapupulavar. capitata
M Sellaphorarostrata
M Seminavisgracilenta
NH Seminavismacilenta
M Shionodiscusoestrupii
NH Shionodiscusoestrupiivar.venrickiae
M Skeletonema costatum
M Skeletonemagrethae
M Skeletonemapseudocostatum
FW   Skeletonemasubsalsum
FW   Skeletonematropicum
FW Staurosiraconstruens
FW   Staurosirellaleptostauron
M Stellarimastellaris
M Stephanopyxispalmeriana
M Stephanopyxisturris
NH Striatellaunipunctata
M Surirellafastuosavar.recedens
NH Surirellafebigerii
FW Surirellaminuta
NH Surirellareniformis
NH Synedra ulna
NH Synedropsishyperborea
NH Tabulariafasciculata
M Thalassionemabacillare
M Thalassionemafrauenfeldii
M Thalassionemanitzschioidesvar.claviformis
M Thalassionemanitzschioides
M Thalassionemanitzschioides var. incurvatum
M Thalassionemanitzschioidesvar.lanceolatum
M Thalassionemanitzschioidesvar.parvum
M Thalassiosiraallenii
M ThalassiosirabinataFryxell
M Thalassiosiradecipiens
M Thalassiosiradelicatula
M Thalassiosiradiporocyclus
M Thalassiosiraeccentrica
M Thalassiosiraelsayedii
M Thalassiosiraleptopus
M Thalassiosiralineata
M Thalassiosiralineoides
M Thalassiosira mala
M Thalassiosira minima
M Thalassiosirananolineata
M Thalassiosiranordenskioeldii
M Thalassiosiraoceanica
M Thalassiosiraoestrupii
M Thalassiosiraoestrupiivar.venrikae
M Thalassiosirapartheneia
M Thalassiosirapunctifera
M Thalassiosirasacketti
M Thalassiosirasimonsenii
M Thalassiosirasubtilis
M Thalassiosiratubifera
M Thalassiothrixlongissima
M Toxariumundulatum
M Trachyneisaspera
M Triceratiumdubium
M Triceratiumfavus
M Triceratiumpentacrinus
M Trieresmobiliensis
M Trieres sinensis
M Trigoniumalternans
M Tryblionellaapiculata
M Tryblionellahungarica
M Tryblionellamarginulata
M Tryblionellapunctata
M Tryblionellavictoriae
NH Tryblioptychuscocconeiformis
M Ulnariadelicatissima
M Urosoleniaeriensis

Table 1: Checklist of 430 taxa from the southern Gulf of Mexico identified mainly by the light microscopy in water and net samples collected between June 1979 and December 2010. Species in bold letters are new records from southern the Gulf of Mexico. Underlined species were identified under the electron microscope. BW: Brackish Water Species; FW: Fresh Water Species; M: Marine Species; NH: Habitat Not Recorded. Ecology information retrieved mostly from Guiry and Guiry [10] and Horton et al. [44].

The abundance of suspended sediments in the coastal zone hinders species identification, especially of “small centrics and pennates”, and even medium-sized species of Thalassiosira, Diploneis, Fragilaria Lyrella, Navicula and Nitzschia. However some 90% of the recorded species can be identified on permanent slides under a light microscopy with a magnification up to X1200 (oil immersion, phase contrast and Nomarski optics). Scanning and transmission electron microscopes were required to identify certain species such as Pseudonitzschia, Minidiscus and many other small-celled taxa. There are several sampling techniques to study diatom species because there is a considerable variation in size, from approximately 3-5 μm to 1000 μm. Besides, it must be taken into account that rare species are usually low represented in water samples and net tows are selective.

Identification problems

It was difficult to distinguish closely related species even on permanent mounts since some descriptions were insufficient or inadequate. An example is the characterization of valves; they could be ‘rectangular’, ‘capitate’, ‘small’, ‘neat’ or ‘lanceolate’. Their morphological variation can be very broad, even if the striation is measured. An electron microscopy is necessary to solve this problem. Diatoms are extremely diverse and there are many species that have not been described yet, the species delimitation is still controversial.

The use of databases

Online databases have been very useful, especially those that provide additional bibliographic information and species distributions. Some online diatom collections and databases offer open access with descriptions, images, environmental and bibliographic data, and in some cases, the use of software for various purposes. It is important to recognize that there is a continuous need to update taxonomy and it requires a careful surveillance. We were able to review all species listed on Table 1 with specialized literature and with on line databases since they provided us with the necessary information to take a decision.

A correct identification of every species in a given region is of great importance, since every taxon plays a role in the ecosystem. In particular, small species (3-8 μm) are difficult to identify and an electron microscope is frequently required. On occasions, some of these species may become very abundant and widely distributed; they may even have blooms that affect the ecosystem. In the studied region we found several species with these characteristics: Minidiscus trioculatus, Cyclotella litoralis, Delphineis minutissima, Leptocylindrus minimus, Nitzschia bifurcata, Thalassiosira allenii, and Pseudonitzschia among others. The contribution of river flow and the discharge of several coastal lagoons into the region could explain the presence of fresh and brackish water species along the coast. Examples of these are many species of the genera Amphora, Achnanthes, Cyclotella, Diploneis, Navicula, and Nitzschia.

The potential use of validated diatoms checklists

In the past there was a tendency to erect taxa on the basis of tiny, subtle differences in morphology, sometimes in individual specimens without attempting to establish their stability. On the other hand, in the last 40 years, new genera or living diatoms have been discovered.

Validated and updated checklists are essential for ecological studies involving monitoring assessments or changes in the species composition in a given site. Without these checklists it would be impossible to detect changes in the structure of a community and the use of indicator species would be limited. There is a long-standing debate regarding the ecology of phytoplankton and this has been the controversy underlying a non-uniform distribution of species. A possible answer for the disagreements is that it depends on the spatial scale. With a scale of hundred kilometers, the differences between diatom communities are utterly related to geographic or hydrographic features. We were able to establish four regions in the southern Gulf of Mexico by using species association as part of this checklist [16]. Other authors have identified similar regions but using other organisms as a reference [45]. Another potential use for a diatom database is the detection of non-native species introduced via ship ballast water [30].

There is great risk that human activities could cause a loss in diatom biodiversity, it is fundamental to know about changes in species composition and its implications for ecosystem function. There is an urgent need to understand the marine ecosystems and other problems derive from natural and anthropogenic sources.

This checklist needs to be constantly updated, which is useful as a reference for ecological work considering that diatoms are good indicators of environmental changes. A good knowledge of the species composition is important to be competent in the recognition of changes in the paleo-environment.

Diatom species could indicate substantial differences and the degree of endemism in different regions, since they are indicators of the discharge of rivers and coastal lagoons [4,5]. Furthermore, diatoms are also useful for historical water quality assessments, bio monitoring and climate change., and additionally a checklist is important for the detection of non-native species, introduced by ballast water.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the crew members of the R/V “Justo Sierra” and the participating scientists and students in the PROGMEX, OGMEX and SGM oceanographic cruises. Partial support was provided by CONABIO (grants: FB683/ S088 and A0012/2002). J. Manuel Figueroa-MahEng by Figure 1 edition. Héctor Alexander-Valdes provided technical assistance. We acknowledge the Academic Writing Team of the Coordinación de Estudios de Posgrado, UNAM for their help to improve this manuscript.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 485
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2016 - Jul 27, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 405
  • PDF downloads :80
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords