alexa Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Oats (Avena sativa) Grown in Mixture with Vetch (Vicia villosa) with or Without Phosphorus Fertilization in East shoa Zone, Ethiopia
ISSN: 2155-9600
Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Oats (Avena sativa) Grown in Mixture with Vetch (Vicia villosa) with or Without Phosphorus Fertilization in East shoa Zone, Ethiopia

Negash D1*, Animut G2, Urgie M2 and Mengistu S3

1Ethiopian Meat and Dairy Industry Development Institute, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

2Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

3Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Holetta, Ethiopia

*Corresponding Author:
Negash D
Ethiopian Meat and Dairy Industry Development Institute
Debre Zeit, Ethiopia
Tel: +251912088441
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: May 31, 2017; Accepted Date: June 13, 2017; Published Date: June 20, 2017

Citation: Negash D, Animut G, Urgie M, Mengistu S (2017) Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Oats (Avena sativa) Grown in Mixture with Vetch (Vicia villosa) with or Without Phosphorus Fertilization in East shoa Zone, Ethiopia. J Nutr Food Sci 7:609. doi: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000609

Copyright: © 2017 Negash D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences


A study was conducted to determine forage chemical composition as well as in vitro and in sacco dry matter digestibility of oats-vetch mixture forage. The study was conducted in a 5 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The first factor was five different seed proportions, i.e., 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of oats and the remains vetch for SP1, SP2, SP3, SP4 and SP5, respectively. The sole oat had a seeding rate of Oats 80 kg/ha or 48 gm/plot, and that of sole vetch had a seeding rate of 25 kg/ha or 15 g/plot. The second factor was either without (P0) or with (P1) phosphorus fertilizer (DAP) application at a rate of 100 kg/ha or 60 g/plot. The size of the plots was 3 × 2 m. Seeds were drilled by hand in rows 30 cm apart, spaced approximately 5 cm between plants and covered with soil to about 3 cm depth. The CP content of forages was affected (P<0.01) by seed proportion but not by phosphorous application. The CP content increases with increasing proportion of vetch in the forage mixture and ranged from 12.4 to 23.5%. The contents of NDF, ADF and ADL appeared to increase with increasing proportion of oats in the mixture. In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility (IVDMD) was not affected (P>0.05) by both seed proportion and phosphorus application. Conversely, in sacco DM degradability was significantly affected (P<0.01) by seed proportion across the different incubation hours, but without a consistent trend for a conclusive remark.


In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility (IVDMD); In sacco; Oats; Vetch


Ethiopia has one of the largest livestock populations in Africa, which is supporting and sustaining the livelihoods of an estimated 80% of the rural population [1]. Livestock is an integral part of the farming systems in the country. It is the source of many social and economic values such as food, draught power, fuel, cash income, security and investment in both the highlands and the lowlands/pastoral farming systems. The contribution of livestock to the national economy is estimated to be 30% of the agricultural GDP and 19% of the export earnings [2]. In spite of the immense contribution of the livestock sector to the national economy, animal productivity is extremely low mainly due to poor standard of feeding both in terms of quality and quantity as the production performance of an animal often reflects its nutritional status [3].

In most tropical countries, inadequate supply of feed is the bottleneck to livestock production. This is due to the dependence of livestock on naturally available feed resources and little development of forage crops for feeding to animals. Like in other tropical countries, in Ethiopia, most of the areas in the highlands of the country are nowadays put under cultivation of cash and food crops. This resulted in keeping large number of livestock on limited grazing area leading to overgrazing and poor productivity of livestock. Though, expansion in the cultivation of cereal crops increased the supply of crop residues for animal feeding, crop residues have low nutritive value and could not support reasonable animal productivity. Hence, shortage of nutrients for livestock is increasingly becoming serious. One of the alternatives to improve livestock feeding, and thereby their productivity could be the cultivation of grass-legume mixtures and offer them to animals during critical periods in their production cycle and when other sources of feeds are in short supply [4].

Profitable livestock production could be easily achieved partly through the feeding of quality forage. Mixed cropping of cereals with forage legumes can improve both quality and quantity of fodder over a pure cereal crops. Vetches (Vacia sativa) are reputed for their beneficial compatibility with cereal crops when they grow in mixture [5]. It was reported that mixture containing 25-50% legume produces more quality forage and yield per unit area than those of pure sowings [5]. In forage crop production systems, grass-legume mixtures are preferred due to their several advantages over monoculture. Legumes have ability to fix atmospheric free nitrogen into the soil by symbiotic living with bacteria of Rhizobium species and sustaining of soil fertility [6]. Legumes are rich in terms of protein concentration, whereas cereals have higher carbohydrate contents, and cereals benefit from the nitrogen fixed by legumes when they are grown together. Forage species such as vetch (Vacia sativa) and oat grass (Avena sativa) are high potential feed sources to fill the gap of feed shortage. They are also well adapted to drought stress areas. They are promising due to their high quality feeding value. Their production potential and utilization under arid conditions to provide low cost fodder to animal particularly during the dry season, and the potential ease of agronomic practices to produce these forage species make them of higher choice and priority [7]. Their multipurpose role as source of food, fodder and improve soil fertility through legume and oat production as food-feed source under farmers homestead could be promoted. However, there is limited information on the agronomic practices, biomass production and feeding value of annual grass species like oat grass when grown alone or in mixture with legumes like vetch with and without phosphorus fertilization. Therefore, this study was conducted with the following objectives:

• Determine the effect of mixed cropping of vetch and oats at different seed proportion with or without phosphorus fertilization on chemical composition and in vitro and in sacco digestibility.

Material and Methods

Description of the study area

The experiment was conducted at Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Centre (DZARC) [8]. Debre Zeit is located at 47 km South East of Addis Ababa at 80044’ North latitude and 38058’ East longitude. The altitude is 1900 m above sea level. It receives 1100 mm rainfall per annum. The minimum and maximum mean annual temperature is 8.9-28.3ºC, respectively [9]. The soil of the experiment site is black cracking type clay (Vertisol) soil [8].

Land preparation and time of sowing

The experiment plot consisted of heavy black clay soil (Vertisol) the major arable soil type around Debre Zeit. The plots used for this study were located within DZARC main campus, flat land protected by fencing for forage research purpose. Land was ploughed in May and harrowed in June. After preparing a fine seedbed free of weeds, planting was done in July when continuous rain was assured for successful germination.

Treatment and experimental design

A grass-legume mixture of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) and oats (Avena sativa) were used for the study. The selected varieties were oats variety CI-8237 and hairy vetch variety DZF-00329 from DZARC gene bank collections. The rationale of selecting the aforementioned grass and legumes species for the study was based on their high yield and quality fodder potential and the easy of cultural practice in growing these fodder crops that has close relationship with that of arable crops.

The experiment was a factorial arrangement of treatments in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Factor 1, was the oats-vetch mixture at different seed proportion including mono-crops of either species; factor 2 was phosphorus fertilizer application. Factor 1 consisted of 5 seed proportion, i.e., mono-crop of either species (Oats CI-8237, and hairy vetch), and three different oats-vetch seed mixtures with the combination 25% vetch+75% oat; 50 vetch%+50% oat; 75% vetch+25% oat (Table 1). The seed proportion is based on 25 kg seed/ha or 15 g/plot for the 100% vetch and 80 kg seed/ha or 48 g/plot for 100% oat treatment [5,10]. Factor 2 consisted of two levels of phosphorus fertilizer application: with and without 100 kg Di-ammonium Phosphate (DAP) on the basis of recommendations for vetch and oats crops, which is 100 kg/ha DAP as an optimum level [5,10,11].

Phosphorus level Seed required for sole and mixture   planting/plot
Oats (%) Vetch (%) SP (P1: with P; P0: without P) Oats (Avena sativa)
Amount (g/plot)
Vetch (Vacia  villosa)
Amount (g/plot)
0 100 SP1 P0 0 15
25 75 SP2 P0 12 11.25
50 50 SP3 P0 24 7.5
75 25 SP4 P0 36 3.5
100 0 SP5 P0 48 0
0 100 SP1 P1 0 15
25 75 SP2 P1 12 11.25
50 50 SP3 P1 24 7.5
75 25 SP4 P1 36 3.5
100 0 SP5 P1 48 0

Table 1: Treatments for the study and amount of seed used for sole and grasslegume mixture treatments.

The experiment consisted of three blocks; each block contained 10 plots, which were fully randomly assigned to treatments. The spacing between blocks and plots was 1.5 m and 1 m, respectively. The size of the plots was 3 × 2 m. Seeds were drilled by hand in rows 30 cm apart, spaced approximately 5 cm between plants and covered with soil to about 3 cm depth. Inoculation of the vetch component was not necessary because vetches are known to take up the right strains of Rhizobium bacteria from the soil (Solomon Mengistu, personal Communication). Coarse weeds were removed by hand throughout the growing period.

Data collection

Chemical analysis: The partially dried forage sample was ground in a cyclone mill to pass 2 mm screen for in sacco and 1 mm screen for other analysis at Holleta Agricultural Research Canter Animal Nutrition Laboratory. The Dry Matter (DM), Crude Protein (CP) and ash contents was analyzed following the procedure described by AOAC [12]. The Nitrogen (N) content was analyzed using the Kjeldhal [12] and converted to CP as N × 6.25. Analysis for Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL), Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) was carried out using the methods of Van Soest and Robertson [13]. Hemicellulose was determined by difference of NDF and ADF.

In vitro dry matter digestibility: The two stage rumen inoculums-pepsin method of Tilley and Terry [14] were used to determine IVDMD. Rumen liquor was collected from three ruminally festulated steers and transported to the laboratory using thermos flasks that had been pre-warmed to 39ºC. Rumen liquor was taken in the morning before animals are offered feed. A duplicate sample of 0.5 g of each were incubated with 30 ml of rumen liquor and a buffer in 100 ml test tube in water bath at 39ºC for a period of 48 h for microbial digestion followed by another 48 h for enzyme digestion with acid pepsin solution. Blank samples containing buffered rumen fluid were incubated in duplicates for adjustment.

In sacco dry matter degradability: The ruminal in sacco DM degradability was determined by incubating 3 g of dried forage sample in nylon bags (41 μm pore size and 6.5 × 14 cm dimension) in three rumen fistulated steers for 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Upon the removal of nylon bags at the end of each incubation hours, all bags including zero hour were washed manually under a running tap water until the water is clean, gently squeezed to remove excess water, and dried at 60ºC for 48 h in a forced draft oven. DM content was determined in the original samples as well as in the residues according to standard procedure [12]. The degradability of DM (DMD) was determined for each incubation time using the following formula; DMD (%)=100 × (DM in forage sample–DM in residue)/DM in forage.

Statistical analyses

The data of the study was subjected to ANOVA using the General Linear Model Procedure of SAS. Least significant difference at 5% level of significance was used for comparison of means when treatment effect is significant. The model for data analysis is shown below. For in sacco data analysis, block effect was removed from the model as the samples are bulked per treatment and the three festulated animals serve as a replication.



Yijk=Individual observation;

µ=Overall mean;

Fi=Effect of forage species mixture;

Pj=Effect of P fertilization;

BK=Block effect;

FPij=Interaction effect of forage species mixture and P fertilization;

Eijk=Random error term.

Results and Discussion

Chemical composition of mixed and pure stands of oats and vetch

Dry mater content was not significantly affected (P>0.05) by seed proportion, phosphorous application and their interaction (Table 2). The obtained results of chemical composition of oats and vetch mixture were comparable to those reported by Alemu et al. [15]. The differences observed between various research findings, can be attributed to the differences in soil related factors, climate and probably the physiological stage of the plant at harvest [16].

  Factors  Chemical composition (% for DM and%DM for others)
Seed proportion
SP1 18.05 12.94 56.95d 40.83d 23.54a 9.37c 16.13ab 62.79
SP2 19.29 12.88 61.57c 42.51d 17.73b 9.43c 11.58c 62.84
SP3 22.21 12.85 66.80b 49.13c 17.30b 10.01bc 17.67ab 62.18
SP4 19.43 12.77 70.67a 55.92b 15.56c 10.49b 15.14b 61.14
SP5 20.5 12.41 71.06a 59.09a 12.35d 11.20a 19.06a 58.17
SEM 1.26 0.2 0.89 0.67 0.37 0.24 1.18 1.35
Phosphorus level
P0 20.05 12.92 65.77 49.86 16.98 10.28 15.19 60.81
P1 19.75 12.62 65.05 49.13 17.61 9.91 15.92 62.04
SEM 0.8 0.13 0.57 0.43 0.23 0.15 0.75 0.85
Interaction of seed proportion and phosphorus level
P0SP1 18.28 12.81 56.89 41.4 22.81 11.7 15.49 57.01
P0SP2 19.91 12.15 61.94 43.06 24.28 10.7 18.87 60.22
P0SP3 21.7 12.59 65.2 49.95 17.5 9.99 15.25 62.51
P0SP4 19.05 12.54 72.46 55.75 17.95 9.16 16.71 61.8
P0SP5 21.28 13.02 72.39 59.14 17.52 9.85 13.25 60.52
P1SP1 17.82 12.95 57.01 40.25 17.08 10.7 16.76 59.34
P1SP2 18.67 12.68 61.2 41.96 14.99 10.27 19.25 60.05
P1SP3 22.73 12.28 68.41 48.32 16.11 10.17 20.09 63.17
P1SP4 19.5 13.16 69.67 56.1 12.05 9.7 13.57 60.52
P1SP5 19.72 12.52 68.95 59.05 12.64 8.89 9.91 63.84
SEM 1.79 0.28 1.72 0.95 0.52 0.34 1.68 0.52

Table 2: Chemical composition of pure and mixed stands of oats and vetch.

The total ash content was not significantly affected (P>0.05) by seed proportion, phosphorous fertilization and their interaction (Table 2). The ash content in all treatments is about 13%. Assefa [17] reported higher ash value for two vetch verities and lower ash content for three oat verities used in his oat/vetch trail, which is not in line with the results of the present study. The higher concentration of ash in vetches than oats has been also reported by Bediye [18]. According to Jennings [19], herbaceous forage legumes have higher content of some minerals like calcium, sulfur and possibly phosphorus than grasses, and well nodulated legumes contain large amount of calcium, magnesium and other essential elements. Concentration of minerals in forage varies due to factors like plant developmental stage, morphological fractions, climatic conditions, soil characteristics and fertilization regime [20].

The CP content of forages was highly significantly affected (P<0.01) by seed proportion but not with phosphorous fertilizer application (Table 2). The CP content increases with increasing proportion of vetch in the forage mixture, as legumes are rich in protein than cereals. This result is in line with the result of numerous authors. The main advantages of legume-cereal mixtures have been increased CP yield, relative to sole cereal crops. The CP content of all seed proportion in this study was above the minimum level of 7.5% required for optimum rumen function [21]. A review by Adugna and Said [22] indicated that CP value less than 7.5% inhibits intake, digestibility and proper utilization of feeds. In addition, the CP content of the forage species under most of the treatments in this study could also satisfy the requirement for lactation and growth. Norton [23] reported that a minimum of 15% CP is required for lactation and growth. Therefore, oats-vetch mixtures grown at different seed proportion contained high CP, which is well above the critical level for milk production and fattening and body growth. Oats/vetch associated forage crops could be categorized under medium to high quality forage groups and it could be potentially useful as a supplement to crop residue and natural pasture in mixed farming system of Ethiopia [24].

The NDF, ADF and ADL contents of the sole and mixed forages of oats and vetch was significantly affected (P<0.01) by seed proportion, but not by phosphorous fertilizer application and by the interaction of the two factors. The contents of NDF, ADF and ADL appeared to increase with increasing proportion of oats in the mixture. This result was supported by the report of Karachi [25] who reported lower NDF contents of legumes than grass at the same stage of growth. Increasing dietary NDF concentration most often has a negative impact on the amount of DM consumed by animals [26]. However, legume fibers ferment more rapidly in the rumen which is a reason for ruminants to consume larger amounts of legumes than grasses [27]. According to Sing and Oosting [28] roughage diets with NDF of 45-75% and below 45% are generally considered to be medium to high quality feeds, respectively. The current results in NDF content are within the mentioned range signifying the good nutritional value of the forages of the current study.

Acid detergent fiber is the percentage of highly indigestible and slowly digestible material in a feed or forage. Acid detergent fibre was significantly affected (P<0.01) by seed proportion, but not by phosphorous fertilizer application and by the interaction of the two factors (Table 2). Lower ADF indicates more digestible forage and is more desirable. Decrease in ADF levels with increasing vetch proportion observed in this study is in agreement with the finding of Aesen et al. [29], who reported that increasing the legume proportion resulted in decreased ADF and NDF concentrations for the legumegrass mixtures. Acid detergent fiber is a highly determinant factor for the digestibility of forage and intake of the animals. The acid detergent fiber and digestibility of forages have negative relationship with digestibility [30]. Acid detergent fiber has a positive relationship with the ages of the plant [31]. The hemicelluloses content took almost a similar trend like that of the NDF and ADFF content in the current study. The study showed the highest hemicellulose content in grass as compared to grass/legumes as well as to sole legumes. Such trends in hemicellulose content of forage have also been reported by Van Soest [21] who noted that the content of hemicelluloses in grass was higher than the quantity of legumes.

Lignin is a component that gives strength and resistance to plant tissue thereby limiting the ability of rumen microorganisms to digest the cell wall polysaccharides, cellulose and hemicelluloses [32]. As the seed rate of vetch increased the acid detergent lignin decreased in this study. This is in line with the report of Maynard and Loosli [33]. Generally, the presence of insoluble fiber, particularly lignin, lowers the overall digestibility of the feed and limits nutrient availability [34].

In vitro dry matter digestibility

Analysis of variance data showed that in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) was not significantly affected (P>0.05) by both seed proportion and phosphorus fertilizer application, and their interaction (Table 2). IVDMD of any forage crop varied with harvesting stage, fiber and cell wall constituents, proportions of morphological fractions, soil, plant species and climate [35]. The composition and content of cell walls are the key factors affecting herbage digestibility. Cell walls are predominately composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The higher structural carbohydrate content in the feed limits digestibility [36]. Generally, with addition of legume fodder to roughages (straw or poor quality hay) both digestibility and intake of the total diet increases, because of desirable nutritional attributes of tropical legumes [37]. However, significant improvement in IVDMD with inclusion of vetch to oats was not observed in this study. This was in contrast to the findings of Getnet [7] who reported average IVDMD result of 57.80% for oats vetch mixtures with an increasing value from pure stands of oats to oats/vetch mixtures and higher at pure vetch stand. The IVDMD values greater than 55% indicates good feeding value (McDowell, 2003) and values below this threshold level results to reduced intake due to lowered digestibility. The IVDMD values observed in this study were above this threshold level which results in higher voluntary intake and digestibility, which is supported by Getnet and Ledin [38].

In sacco dry matter degradability

Analysis of variance data revealed that seed proportion showed significant differences (P<0.01) across all incubation periods (Table 3), although the trend in variation of means across the incubation hours is not consistent. Interaction effect at 12, 24, and 48 h of incubation was significant (P<0.05), but with no consistent trend to make a conclusive remark. On the other hand phosphorus fertilizer application decreased in sacco DMD at 6 and 12 h but increased degradability of DM at 48 h. Generally the highest in sacco DMD was recorded at 96 h incubation period and the lowest value was obtained at 6 h incubation period in all seed proportions in the present study. This is similar to the result reported by Klopfenstein et al. [39] that indicated that as the period of incubation period increases from 0 to 96 h in the rumen, the in sacco DM degradability also increases.

Factors Incubation period (hours)
6 12 24 48 72 96
Seed proportion
SP1 38.40a 46.92c 58.61b 59.52b 61.63b 64.09b
SP2 33.18c 41.02d 52.63c 65.71a 62.12b 70.29a
SP3 35.83b 50.92a 59.98a 64.87ab 68.73a 70.57a
SP4 37.11ab 49.61ab 53.89c 63.36b 67.83a 70.55a
SP5 36.97ab 48.19bc 57.32b 65.27ab 67.27a 70.76a
SEM 0.68 0.57 0.57 0.67 1.4 0.34
Phosphorus level
P0 37.07a 45.43a 56.17 63.02b 65.99 69.31
P1 35.53b 46.25b 56 64.48a 65.05 69.2
SEM 0.43 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.88 0.21
Interaction of seed proportion and phosphorus level
P0Sp1 38.37 46.64c 57.05b 59.48f 61.28 63.36
P0SP2 33.95 43.72d 50.75d 63.09cd 65.64 70.87
P0SP3 37.62 50.61a 57.85b 65.85abc 69.02 70.77
P0SP4 36.63 49.70a 56.99b 62.34de 66.37 70.63
P0SP5 38.76 51.48a 58.20b 64.30bcd 67.63 70.92
P1SP1 38.42 47.28bc 56.17bc 59.56ef 61.98 64.83
P1SP2 32.4 38.32e 54.51c 68.34a 58.59 69.73
P1SP3 34.05 51.24a 62.11a 63.89bcd 68.44 70.36
P1SP4 37.59 49.51ab 50.78d 64.38bcd 69.29 70.47
P1SP5 35.18 44.91cd 56.43bc 66.23ab 66.91 70.59
SEM 0.96 0.8 0.81 0.95 1.98 0.48

Table 3: In sacco dry matter degradability of mixed and pure stands of oats and vetch.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 15th International Conference on Clinical Nutrition
    May 24-26, 2018 Vienna, Austria
  • 21st World Congress on Nutrition & Food Sciences
    July 09-10, 2018 Sydney, Australia
  • World Congress on Nutraceuticals and Natural Medicine
    July 18-19, 2018, Czech Republic, Prague Prague, Czech Republic
  • 7th International Conference and Exhibition on Probiotics, Functional and Baby Foods
    July 18-19, 2018, Czech Republic, Prague Prague, Czech Republic
  • 14th International Congress on Advances in Natural Medicines, Nutraceuticals & Neurocognition
    July 19-20, 2018 London, UK
  • 28th World Nutrition Congress
    August 9- 10 2018 Manila, Philippines
  • 6th International Conference on Sports Nutrition & Fitness
    August 06-07, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
  • 27th World Congress on Diet, Nutrition and Obesity
    September 7- 8, 2018 Auckland, Newzealand
  • 17th World Congress on Nutrition and Food Chemistry
    September 13-15, 2018 London, UK
  • 8th Annual Congress on Probiotics & Functional Foods
    September 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan

Article Usage

  • Total views: 646
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2017 - Apr 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 575
  • PDF downloads : 71

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]m

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version