alexa Clinical Judgement and the DSM5 | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0487
Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Clinical Judgement and the DSM5

Kathy Sexton-Radek*

Elmhurst College, Psychology Department, USA

Corresponding Author:
Kathy Sexton-Radek
Elmhurst College, Psychology Department, USA
Tel: 630-789-9785
Fax: 630-789-9798
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: March 04, 2015; Accepted date: March 09, 2015; Published date: March 16, 2015

Citation: Sexton-Radek (2015) Clinical Judgement and the DSM5. J Psychol Psychother 5:e107. doi:10.4172/2161-0487.1000e107

Copyright: © 2015 Sexton-Radek. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy

Editorial

One premise that influences the dimensional approach to the DSM5 was a more useful research approach. Evident of this circumstance was the suggestion to make two versions of the DSM5 – one for clinical use and one for research use. However, the resolution of this was to set the classifications up with sections of “criteria sets and axes provided for further study [1].” Herein the reliability for diagnostics are described. Also, the appendices were expanded to include research area. Commonly described examples of this include the 30 dimensions found by five factor model studies of anti-social personality disorder. Thus the constraint of fixed diagnostic criteria in the old categorical model has opened the way for valuable conclusions based on clinical experience and knowledge of psychopathology [2]. Additionally, the Personality disorders classification is considered to have both a clinical and research focus [3]. Research studies have completed Five Factor Model analyses of Personality Disorder types [3].

Given the novelness of the DSM5, controversial and conflictual comments about its formation still appear as relevant considerations. However, a pragmatic view of looking to the clinical judgment emphasis gained from the dimensional nature is advantageous [4]. The constraint of a categorical model with fixed, operational domains, while providing parity to operational definition, gives little to clinical decision making [5]. The clinical experience gained from exposure, understanding and sensitivity to a myriad of individual norms of expression provides essential context to the symptom presentation. The clinical decision making necessary to evaluate the presence of symptoms in a criteria set and determine if the severity level constitutes a mental disorder predicates sound clinical judgment [5,6]. The issue of dimensionality in the DSM5 is not so much to accommodate a research agenda or provide a balance component for operational definition and clinical diagnoses but rather that provides empirical guidelines for clinical judgment.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11912
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2015 - Jun 21, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8126
  • PDF downloads : 3786
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7