alexa Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect with Percutaneous Closure Device or Surgery: Which Technique is Safe? | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2329-6925
Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect with Percutaneous Closure Device or Surgery: Which Technique is Safe?

Ersin Kadirogullari*, Ünal Aydin, Onur Sen, Kürsat Öz and Ihsan Bakir

Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Traning ve Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

*Corresponding Author:
Ersin Kadirogullari
Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and
Cardiovascular Surgery Traning ve Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey
Tel: 905326736557
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: September 15, 2015; Accepted Date: October 21, 2015; Published Date: October 27, 2015

Citation: Ersin Kadirogullari, Ünal Aydin, Onur Sen,Kürsat Öz and Ihsan Bakir (2015) Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect with Percutaneous Closure Device or Surgery: Which Technique is Safe?. J Vasc Med Surg 3:225. doi:10.4172/2329-6925.1000225

Copyright: © 2015 Kadirogullari E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery

Abstract

An iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) is a rare complication in cardiac surgery. A postoperative iASD was closed with a percutaneous closure device in a 37-year-old patient who had undergone mitral valve replacement via transseptal incision. Hemodynamic instability occurred in the 6th hour of the post-procedural period, and echocardiography imaging showed the closure device free in the left atrium. An emergent operation was performed on the patient, the device was retrieved, and the iASD was closed with a pericardial patch. In this study we evaluated the efficiency and safety of percutaneous closure devices, which have been used for iASDs.

Keywords

Atrial septal defect; Mitral valve surgery; Iatrogenic; Percutaneous closure

Introduction

An iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) is an uncommon complication of mitral valve surgery through transseptal incision [1]. Surgical closure for a large iASD is re-operation; however, percutaneous closure with different devices is considered an alternative approach to surgery in small iASDs with an adequate rim [2,3]. The efficiency of closure devices, which are used routinely for the closure of congenital ASD pathologies, is unclear for the treatment of an iASD complication. The percutaneous closure system is a good alternative method because re-operation results in high mortality and morbidity rates. However, the risks of a percutaneous closure procedure should also be considered.

Case

A 37-year-old man was evaluated because of symptoms of fatigue and palpitation. Diagnostic studies showed severe mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation. The patient underwent mitral valve replacement (27-mm Sorin; SorinBiomedica, Saluggia, Italy) and radio-frequency ablation procedures via transseptal incision. The patient was discharged from hospital asymptomatically; nevertheless, on postoperative day 25 the patient re-applied to the emergency department with congestive heart failure symptoms. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed an atrial septum-located iASD (2.5 cm) and a Qp/Qs rate of 2.5. Based on these results, a percutaneous closure procedure was planned. Under mild sedative anesthesia, a sheath was inserted in the right femoral vein (11 French), and the iASD was crossed with a multipurpose catheter (5F) over a 0.035 Amplatz Super Stiffwire (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA, USA). A helex septal occluder was successfully deployed with excellent positioning and a trivial residual leak (Figure 1). Hemodynamic instability occurred 6 hours after the procedure, and TEE imaging showed that the closure device had dropped into the left atrium (Figure 2). Following embolization of the closure device, the patient underwent emergent operation with a median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. The left atrium was explored through the interatrial septum, and the free closure device was retrieved from the chamber. The septal defect was then closed with a pericardial patch (Figure 3). Echocardiography confirmed no residual shunt. The patient was discharged asymptomatically and was followed up uneventfully for 6 months.

vascular-medicine-surgery-implantation

Figure 1: Successful implantation of an iASD closure device under fluoroscopy.

vascular-medicine-surgery-Dropping

Figure 2: Dropping of a closure device into the left atrium.

vascular-medicine-surgery-Retrieving

Figure 3: Retrieving the device from the left atrium.

Discussion

Cardiac invasive intervention and alternative surgical procedures are potential risk factors for iASD occurrence. Mitral valve surgery via transseptal incision, left ventricle assist device implantation, Mitraclip system implantation, percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty, and pulmonary vein cryoablation procedures are the main causes of iASD [3-7].

A transseptal incision provides optimal surgical exposure for mitral valve surgery [8]. Although iASD occurrence is rare, it is an anticipated risk [9]. With the occurrence of an iASD, the diameter of the ASD or symptoms make an intervention essential for the patient. Percutaneous closure systems have been an alternative to operative procedures because of the high risk of mortality and morbidity of surgery.

The malposition of closure devices is frequently caused by an inadequate rim and inaccurate calibration of the device size during the treatment of congenital ASD with the percutaneous closure technique. However, the etyopathogenesis of this malposition has not been clarified for iASD [10].

Closure device placement could expand the septal defect and cause a device embolization because a closure device applies tension to the surrounding septal tissue. Even if patients with an iASD have been treated successfully with closing systems, hemodynamic monitoring and performing frequent echocardiography imaging are essential during the early post-procedural period. The risk of expanding a septal defect and device embolization should not be underestimated.

Conclusion

Percutaneous closure device placement for an iASD, which is related to a transseptal incision, is an alternative to surgery. Closure device placement for a postoperative iASD, which originates from suture defects of transseptal closing, might cause expansion of the defect and embolization of the device. Consequently, the potential risks of this procedure should be kept in mind, and close follow-up should be performed, especially in the early post-procedural period.

References

  1. Timmis Gerald C, Seymour Gordon SA Razvi (1972) Iatrogenic atrial septal defect: An unusual complication of valvular heart surgery. American Heart Journal 83: 804-809.
  2. Khanna, Avinash, Jaime Barberena, David Skolnick (2005) An unusual case of shunting across the atrial septum after mitral valve repair. Journal of theAmerican Society of Echocardiography. 18: 78-79.
  3. Pitcher A, Schrale RG, Mitchell AR, Ormerod O (2008) Percutaneous closure of an iatrogenic atrial septal defect. Eur J Echocardiogr 9: 294-295.
  4. Sur JP, Pagani FD, Moscucci M (2009) Percutaneous closure of an iatrogenic atrial septal defect. Catheter CardiovascInterv 73: 267-271.
  5. Schueler R, Öztürk C, Wedekind JA, Werner N, Stöckigt F, et al. (2015) Persistence of iatrogenic atrial septal defect after interventional mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system: a note of caution. JACC CardiovascInterv 8: 450-459.
  6. Korkmaz S, Demirkan B, Guray Y, Yilmaz MB, Sasmaz H (2011) Long-term follow-up of iatrogenic atrial septal defect after percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty. Texas Heart Institute Journal 5: 523-524.
  7. Rillig A, Meyerfeldt U, Birkemeyer R, Treusch F, Kunze M, et al. (2008) Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after pulmonary vein isolation : incidence and clinical implications. J Interv Card Electro physiol 22: 177-181.
  8. Cohn LH, Edmunds LH Jr (2003) Cardiac surgery in the adult. (2ndedn), McGraw-Hill.
  9. Khanna A, Barberena J, Skolnick D (2005) An unusual case of shunting across the atrial septum after mitral valve repair. J Am SocEchocardiogr 18: 78-79.
  10. Misra M, Sadiq A, Namboodiri N, Karunakaran J (2007) The ‘aorticrim’ recount: Embolization of interatrial septal occluder into the main pulmonary artery bifurcation after atrial septal defect closure. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6: 384-386.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 19th Annual Cardiology Conference (10 Plenary Forums - 1 Event)
    August 31-September 01, 2017 Philadelphia, USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11694
  • [From(publication date):
    October-2015 - Aug 21, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7882
  • PDF downloads :3812
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords