alexa Comparison Biomethane Potential (BMP) Test of Sewage Sludge Recovered from Different Treatment Processes | OMICS International
E-ISSN: 2252-5211
International Journal of Waste Resources
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Comparison Biomethane Potential (BMP) Test of Sewage Sludge Recovered from Different Treatment Processes

Odey Emmanuel Alepu1*, Kaijun Wang2, Zhengyu Jin2, Giwa Abdulmoseen Segun2, Zifu Li1 and Harrison Odion Ikhumhen1

1School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants, University of Science and Technology Beijing Xueyuan 30, Beijing 100083, P.R. China

2State key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China

*Corresponding Author:
Alepu OE
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource-Oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants
University of Science and Technology Beijing Xueyuan 30
Beijing 100083, PR China
Tel: +8615652933203
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: June 24, 2016; Accepted Date: July 07, 2016; Published Date: July 14, 2016

Citation: Alepu OE, Wang K, Jin Z, Segun GA, Li Z (2016) Comparison Biomethane Potential (BMP) Test of Sewage Sludge Recovered during Different Treatment Processes. Int J Waste Resour 6:233. doi:10.4172/2252-5211.1000233

Copyright: © 2016 Alepu OE, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Waste Resources


Anaerobic digestion of sewage concentrates represents a very suitable means of generating bioenergy while reducing a huge amount of waste to disposal. Effective biogas production from sewage sludge can be achieved by optimizing operational conditions. In this study, the research was designed to compare the biogas production efficiency from sewage sludge recovered from coagulation and absorption process with sludge recovered from bioflocculation, centrifuged and chemical coagulation (Al2(SO4)3+CMC) processes through biomethane potential experiment (BMP). From the results obtained, the maximum methane production rate of 56.85 mLCH4/gCOD was achieved from concentrates collected during coagulation and absorption treatment process without solid retention time (SRT), concentrates collected during 0.5 d SRT had maximum methane production rate of 110.88 mLCH4/gCOD, methane production rate of 154.28 mLCH4/gCOD was achieved from 2 d SRT concentrate. The Al2(SO4)3+CMC treated concentrate had methane yield of 143 mLCH4/gCOD while bioflocculation concentrate had methane yield of 139 mL/gCOD and centrifuged concentrate had the yield of 124 mL/gCOD within the period of 22 to 29 days. The overall result showed that concentrates recovered from coagulation, adsorption and Al2(SO4)3+CMC processes produced the highest methane with better efficiency and recorded the most stable performance throughout the period of the experiment and this encouraged the future use in anaerobic digestion for large scale methane production.


Biomethane potential; Sewage concentrate; Methane; Coagulation and adsorption; Bioflocculation; Centrifuged concentrate; Chemical coagulation


It is important to ascertain methane potential of sewage concentrate before long term anaerobic digestion process for methane recovery. Biomethane potential (BMP) test is the best method to achieve this purpose. BMP is a lab-scale test, usually lasting 30 days. It was developed to determine the anaerobic biodegradability of a substrate or feedstock [1]. This substrate is usually tested in a laboratory environment under optimal conditions. The results obtained from the test can ascertain the concentration of organics in a substrate that can be anaerobically converted to biogas or methane [2]. This is then used to evaluate the potential efficiency of the anaerobic process for a specific waste. Although, the configuration of anaerobic digestion reactors and some parameters such as longer SRT may enhance high methane production than BMP but BMP test remains the best method to initially test biogas production from sewage concentrate and other wastes [3]. Several authors have indicated BMP yield for different results depending on the type of method used [4].

Browne et al. [5] stated that sewage sludge produced unsuitably substrate for commercial-scale anaerobic digestion for bioenergy recovery because of their low solid content and low methane yield as compared to food waste, kitchen waste and vegetable waste [5]. However, in a recent study by Jin et al. [6] Sewage concentrate has been identified as bioenergy potential substrate that will contribute to future green energy considering the huge amount of sludge recovered from wastewater treatment process [6]. As such, effective biogas recovery from sewage concentrate depends on the treatment process used. Sewage concentrates recovered from coagulation and adsorption process have proven to produce a suitable concentrate with COD value suitable for bioenergy recovery [7]. Jin et al. [6] used highbred coagulation-microfiltration reactor for sewage treatment and achieved concentrate with COD value of 15,000 mg/L suitable for bioenergy recovery [6]. Other methods of sewage treatment for concentration efficiency include bioflocculation method, chemical coagulation (Al2(SO4)3+CMC), and mechanically enhanced concentration process.

During bioflocculation, microorganisms act on suspended organic matters which make them clump together as floc. Then the floc may float on the surface of the water, bottom or sometimes filtered out of the liquid [8]. Bioflocculants generally have received attention recently due to their biodegradability strength and lack of secondary pollutants from their degradative intermediates. High loaded membrane bioreactor (MBR) can concentrate sewage organic matter by aerobic bioflocculation for anaerobic conversion to methane in a very short solid retention time (SRT) [9]. Bioflocculation process is crucial for membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge process to enhance floc formation and sludge settleability during treatment [10]. The procedure to bioflocculants production is generally found to be at the late period of the process or the stable period of bacterial growth. Energy recovery from sewage concentrates may play a vital role in reducing the amount of waste generating daily and reduce the issue of global warming due to direct emission of methane from untreated sewage sludge.

However, apart from separate studies on bioenergy recovery from concentrated sewage, there are limited publications that properly assessed and compared the optimum methane potential of sewage concentrates recovered from several treatment processes. As the spectrum of potential substrates for biogas production expands to include sewage concentrates recovered from different processes and organic waste, a suitable approach to determine the methane potential of substrate is the BMP test. In this study, the experiment was designed to compare BMP of sewage concentrates collected from pilot-scale membrane coagulation and absorption process with BMP of substrates collected from bioflocculation, centrifuged and chemical coagulation (Al2(SO4)3+CMC) processes based on their methane proportion.

Materials and Methods

Experimental setup

The instrument reactor set up used for the experiment comprises of three units, a, b, c as indicated in Figure 1. It consists of a water bath that controls temperature with the reactors of 200 mL volume placed in the bath with a mixer that continuously stirred, A CO2 fixing unit with NaOH that often absorb the CO2 and hydrogen sulfide produced in the course of AD process, also consisting a gas measuring unit that comprises of 15 cells in which the gas is measured from water displacement. Vial glasses of 200 mL were provided, 50 mL of substrates was added to the bottles. One of the bottles served as a blank sample. In each of the bottles, 150 mL of BMP activator (microorganism) was added and 150 mL of pure water was added to the blank bottle, 0.5 g of NaHCO3 was added to each of the three bottles, 2 mL of reagent A, 0.4 ml of reagent B, and 0.2 ml of reagent C,D, and E were added to the three bottles accordingly, the pH value of the three set up were checked. In a situation where the pH was above the required value of 6.8 and 7.0, several drops of hydrochloric acid (HCl) was added to drop or balance the value and when the pH value was too low, NaOH was added to step up the pH value, extra bottles were provided with sludge and 10 g/l of NaOH was added to each vial bottle, The three bottles were fixed into nitrogen gas tube to remove oxygen present in the reactor for about 5 minutes, the bottles were then connected to the BMP machine and the data software was restarted for the experiment to proceed.


Figure 1: The bio process reactor used for the BMP test (a) Flow cells that transmit data (b) NaOH trap CO2 (c) AMPTS II.

Sewage concentrate used

The sewage concentrates used was taken from Xiao Jiahe municipal wastewater treatment plant in Beijing P.R China. The plant treats 20,000-ton sewage each day which is usually collected from nearby communities and had no mixture of industrial wastewater. The plant treats sewage with different processes including bioflocculation, chemical coagulation (Al2(SO4)3+CMC), coagulation and absorption process. BMP study was tested on all substrates simultaneously.

Analytical method

Anaerobic biodegradability test of the substrates was carried out using automatic methane potential test system of bioprocess Sweden. The system has the same measuring principles as conventional methane potential tests which made the result comparable with standard methods; however, it provides efficient information which provides a better understanding of the degradation dynamics behavior of a specific biomass substrate and improved process operations. Three criteria were used to evaluate BMP anaerobic feedstock in the lab and this includes feedstock characterization: This involves the test for chemical oxygen demand (COD), volatile suspended solids (VSS), pH, and total suspended solids (TSS). Results obtained prior to the experiment are used to know the quantity of feedstock needed to maintain the BMP or keep the BMP experiment stable for a long period, total biogas production: this was measured continuously throughout the BMP experiment by software designed for observing gas production, biogas analysis: Gas chromatography was often used to determine biogas composition during the BMP experiment. This instrument provides accurate and real measurements of the produced biogas during the BMP test. The set-up of gas chromatography enables it to determine the concentration of hydrogen gas, nitrogen, methane and carbon dioxide. Matrix laboratory (MATLAB) computing environment was used to simulate the overall results, plotting of functions and data analysis for efficient results interpretation. Previous studies documented the importance and efficiency of MATLAB in data analysis [11-16].

Results and Discussion

Bioflocculation, centrifuged and chemical coagulation (Al2(SO4)3+CMC) substrate

Results from the three BMP test showed that bioflocculation substrate enhanced degradability in BMP process and produced methane rapidly. The gas production increased gradually from the beginning of the experiment to a stable state within 7th day of the experiment as shown in Figure 2. Gas production was stable throughout the remaining period of the experiment. The result showed that there is a large variation in actual methane production from the stream of bioflloculation enhanced substrate. The average methane yield during the stable condition was 20 mL. Even though bioflocculated sewage sludge can be affected by numerous chemical, physical and biological parameters, the BMP results demonstrated that it is possible to initiate and maintain methane production from bioflocculated sludge by controlling the most important process performance factors as process performance was suggested to have influenced the stability in methane production at the later stage of the experiment. Methane production from bioflocculated concentrate was characterized by rapid microbial biodegradation. This perhaps indicates that sewage sludge recovered from bioflocculation process is easily biodegradable and undergoes biodegradation quickly within few days of anaerobic digestion. Extracellular polymeric substances excreted from bacteria during bioflocculation is an important components that serve as carbon and energy during the digestion process and this was suggested to have influence methane production.


Figure 2: BMP of sewage conctrates collected from bioflocculation, centrifugation and chemical coagulation process.

Chemical coagulation sewage sludge used was recovered from Ultrafiltration membrane that treats sewage with the addition of Al2(SO4)3+CMC when brought into contact with water, they formed positively charge aluminum hydroxide floc which agglomerates the negatively charged bacteria, clays, silt and organic matters causing them to settle at the bottom of the membrane. The sludge was then used as a substrate for BMP test. Results from the BMP test revealed that chemical coagulation process produced a suitable concentrate for anaerobic digestion process for biogas recovery. Biogas production was stable on the 8th day of the experiment with average volume of 19.4 mL.

Centrifuged concentrates refer to the sewage sludge that was mechanically sieved, the particles, and soluble organic matters were settled at the bottom as concentrates. The concentrate was used as feed substrate in the second vial BMP bottle. Gas production increased from the beginning to the 8th day. The degradability and gas production fluctuated within 17 mL and 16 mL throughout the stable period of the experiment. The biochemical methane potential result from centrifuged sludge showed a significant difference when compared to bioflocculation and chemical coagulation sludge. Centrifuged sludge can undergo anaerobic biodegradation but the rate of production of methane from the sludge is very low. This was suggested to be as a result of the presence of easily degradable and none easily degradable organic particles that was forced to settle at the bottom during centrifugation. Easily degradable substances only were methanized during the 27 days BMP test. Biogas productions from bioflocculation enhance substrates was much higher than the mechanically enhanced substrate and Al2(SO4)+CMC substrates.

Methane yield

Figure 3 depicts methane yield per gram COD of the three substrates. Biodegradability from the three processes revealed differences in methane yield. The Al2(SO4)3+CMC enhanced substrate had the highest methane yield of 143 mL/gCOD while the concentrate from bioflocculation had the second highest methane yield of 139 mL/ gCOD. The centrifuged substrate produced the lowest methane with the methane yield of 124 mL/gCOD. The BMP result conducted on the three different substrates collected revealed that biogas potential in sewage concentrates depends highly on the pretreatment process. The bioflocculation enhanced substrate and Al2(SO4)3+CMC enhanced substrate produced more biogas than the mechanically sieved or centrifuged substrate. However, the result here was compared to the BMP result from substrates collected from pilot-scale enhanced membrane coagulation reactor (E-MCR) which was treated with coagulation and adsorption process. The biodegradation kinetics was studied and the result showed that the biodegradability of the sewage concentrates used was different. The metabolic activity was different from the three samples. This was explained that the behavior of the sewage sludge was dependent on its ability to break down organic matter according to classes of biodegradation


Figure 3: Methane yield from the three BMP process of bioflocculation, centrifuged and chemical coagulation substrate.

BMP test result of concentrates recovered from coagulation and absorption process

Concentrates were collected from enhanced membrane coagulation reactor (E-MCR) during different operational conditions (startup period, 0.5d and 2d SRT). The startup period had COD value within12081 mg/L. This was high because of the continuous concentration without discharge, and the concentrate value collected during 0.5 days SRT was within 6508 mg/L while the concentrates collected during 2 days SRT was within 8815 mg/L. Table 1 shows COD variation of the collected concentrates from E-MCR. The total solid per gram per liter during the startup period without discharge was within 12.5 g/L, 6.3 g/L during 0.5 d SRT and 8.9 during 2 days SRT. The result obtained during the BMP test is shown in Figure 4. The curve indicated that there was no delay in methane production which showed that these sewage concentrates are highly biodegradable under suitable anaerobic digestion conditions. However, concentrates from 0.5 day SRT had the highest methane production rate even with the low COD concentration. The gas production increased gradually from the startup day to a stable state on the 4thday; the methane production per gram COD during the stable period was 180 ml CH4/g COD while the production from concentrates collected during 2 d SRT was stable on day 10 but the methane production was less than that of 0.5 d concentrate, with the production at the steady state within 140 mlCH4/gCOD. The period without discharge had the lowest biogas production. This is because it was difficult for the highly concentrated sewage to degrade and produce biogas. However, the suitable concentrate for the BMP test was the one from 0.5d SRT and 2 d SRT.

  COD(mg/L) TS(g/L) VS(g/L) pH
No Discharge 12081345 12.5 ± 0.6 6.5 ± 0.2 7.78
SRT0.5d 6508 ± 117 6.3 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.1 7.82
SRT2d 8815 ± 136 8.9 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 0.2 7.79

Table 1: COD variation of collected concentrate with different SRT conditions.


Figure 4: BMP of concentrates from E-MCR coagulation and absorption process.

From the result, concentrates collected during the startup period without discharge indicated a delay in methane production with the anaerobic biodegradability of 0.42 and with the maximum methane production rate of 56.85 mlCH4/gCOD·d. Concentrates collected during 0.5d SRT had the highest anaerobic biodegradability rate with the value of 0.53 and maximum methane production rate of 110.88 mlCH4/ gCOD·d. However, the methane production rate of the period with 2d SRT was the highest with the maximum methane production rate of 154.28 mlCH4/gCOD·d. Table 2 shows anaerobic biodegradability rate from the concentrates collected during the three different operational conditions of pilot scale enhanced membrane coagulation reactor.

Condition Anaerobic Biodegradability Maximum methane production
No discharge 0.42 56.85
0.5d SRT 0.53 110.88
2d SRT 0.41 154.28

Table 2: Anaerobic biodegradability of the sewage concentrate.


The BMP test was used to verify the variability of methane gas between different potential substrates for biogas production. It was also used to determine the potential toxic substrate and biomethane kinetics in biogas production. From the results presented in this research, it was concluded that substrates collected from coagulation and absorption process had the highest methane potential. A continuously fed anaerobic digestion process is needed to determine the actual organic loading rate and a suitable HRT for maximum and long term methane production and to monitor inhibitory compounds like ammonia which is required to check long term suitability of feed substrates during digestion process. Thus, a small scale continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) anaerobic digester is required to accurately access the long term digestion stability of the sewage concentrates recovered from coagulation and absorption process.

Overall, the various methane potential test shows that coagulation and absorption process for sewage treatment for organic matter recovery has a greater advantage in concentration efficiency suitable for anaerobic digestion process for biogas recovery


The authors would like to express their thanks to the financial support from Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China (2012ZX07205-002), Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (No.20121087922).


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

  • 8th World Congress and Expo on RECYCLING
    June 25-26, 2018 Berlin, Germany
  • 10th World Congress and Expo on Recycling
    July 26-27, 2018 Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 9th World Convention on Recycling and Waste Management
    October 22-23, 2018; Osaka, Japan
  • 9th International Conference on Recycling : Reduce ,Reuse and Recycle
    December 5-6, 2018 Vancouver, Canada

Article Usage

  • Total views: 9616
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2016 - Jun 25, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 9320
  • PDF downloads : 296

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7