alexa Congenital Aglossia and the Report by Antoine de Jussieu: A Critical and Historical Review | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2375-4427
Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Congenital Aglossia and the Report by Antoine de Jussieu: A Critical and Historical Review

Frederico Salles1, Betty McMicken2, Marcos Anchieta3, Margaret Vento-Wilson4*, Long Wang5, Kelly Rogers6 and Patrícia Costa Bezerra7

1School of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil

2Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Chapman University, California, USA

3Artis Tecnologia, Brasilia, Brazil

4College of Educational Studies, Chapman University, California, USA

5Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, USA

6Department of Communication Sciences, Saddleback College, California, USA

7Brasilia Body Composition Evaluation Center, Brasília, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Margaret Vento-Wilson
3809 Pine Ave, Long Beach
CA 90807, 562/243-2334
California, USA
Tel: +1714-220-6900
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: February 27, 2016; Accepted date: April 26, 2016; Published date: May 11, 2016

Citation: Salles F, McMicken B, Anchieta M, Vento-Wilson M, Wang L, et al. (2016) Congenital Aglossia and the Report by Antoine de Jussieu: A Critical and Historical Review. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids 4:157. doi:10.4172/2375-4427.1000157

Copyright: © 2016 Salles F, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids

Abstract

Objective: Antoine de Jussieu, renowned French botanist and physician, laid the groundwork for future research on the topic of congenital aglossia when his study, “Observation About How a Girl Born Without the Tongue Was Able To Perform All Functions That Depend On That Organ,” was presented to the 22-member assembly of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Paris on April 22, 1718. This study reviews the literature on de Jussieu’s report.
Study design: The original report by de Jussieu was read and translated into English, after which 94 studies about congenital aglossia history and botany were selected.
Results: Of the 95 studies selected, one refers to de Jussieu’s report (the groundwork), Annex I; 85 discuss congenital aglossia; five are about history and four about botany. Of the 85 directly associated with congenital aglossia, 36 do not mention de Jussieu, and 49 cite his observations differently.
Conclusion: Because of the 1718 report, de Jussieu became a major figure in the history of congenital aglossia and the author most often quoted in studies about it. However, there were historical facts that needed to be clarified. Some of the issues addressed in this review included the replacement of the letter A with M as the initial of de Jussieu’s first name; the omission of the word née in the original title; the replacement of née sans langue with privée de langue in the title; the change of the girl’s age from 15 to nine years; the suggestion that the patient had limb defects; the change of year from 1718 to 1717 and 1719; the incorrect spelling of de Jussieu’s name and title of his report.

Keywords

Congenital aglossia; Historical review; Antoine de Jussieu

Introduction

Three factors convinced the authors of this manuscript of the importance of publishing a full and reliable English version of the original manuscript [1], originally written in French, which was extracted from the minutes of the assembly during which de Jussieu made his report. The first factor relates to the rich details contained in his observations, which likely make it the most complete medical report to this date on a case of congenital aglossia (CA), even though it was produced at a time when medicine did not rely on diagnostic tests. At that time, physicians had only their cognition and their sensessight, hearing, smell and taste- to guide their diagnoses, and de Jussieu examined the patient only two times, once at night by candlelight, and once in daylight. The second factor has to do with the differences in the notation of the citations of de Jussieu in bibliographies, where the letter A , as in Antoine , was often replaced with M , as in Monsieur [2-20], which corresponds to Mr. in English, and which was found before the name de Jussieu on page 12 of the minutes that announced his lecture. This finding is confirmed by the fact that all the names of other assembly members were preceded by an M, when referring to only one member, or MM , the abbreviation of the plural form of Monsieur , to announce a group of lecturers. It is still standard for male names, and the abbreviation Mme , for Madame , before female names. Finally, the third factor can be found in the fact that in addition to errors in interpretation, made even by some respectable authors [2,4,14], other lapses have been found: (a) incorrect spellings, such as De Jéssieu [5], Jusquieu [21] and Jessieu [22]; (b) in-text citations but with no indication of source or inclusion of reference in a bibliography [21,23-33]; (c) omission of the initial letter of the author’s first name and of the title of the report in bibliographies, as well as misspellings of the author’s name that listed, for example, only Jessieu , or De Jéssieu (1718, Hist. De l’Acad. des Sciences, 612) [22,34-37]; (d) omission of the word née (“born”) found in the original title [2-20]; (e) replacement of the words née sans langue (“born without the tongue”), found in the original title, with privée de langue (“deprived of the tongue”), without mentioning the source or including a reference in a bibliography [25]; (f) inclusion of the information that the patient had limb defects [25]; (g) inclusion of another inaccurate reference to the fact that the girl had limb defects in a report made ten years later by another author [28] who did not cite his source; and (h) the use of the year 1719 instead of the year 1718 [2-4,6,10,11,14,16-20] ; and (i) incorrect citation dates that include 1717-1719 [3].

An intriguing finding was the omission of the word née (“born”), found in the original title. Almost all references, even those that correctly spell the name de Jussieu A, omit the French word née in the original title, which was only kept by three texts by two authors [38-40]. The word née (the past participle or adjective in the French language) used in the title has the same meaning as congenital . This detail is important because it identifies de Jussieu as the first author to have identified a case of CA. His intention was to establish a difference between his case and that of the boy from Saumur, who had lost his tongue due to gangrene resulting from smallpox.

The authors are unaware of any versions other than the original text by de Jussieu; however, Rosenthal [2] reported that the article was republished in several European periodicals, the last time as late as 1770. Meyer, in his article, “Ueber die angeborenen Fehler der Zunge und die dadurch bedingte Hinderung des Saugens” (In English, “On congenital anomalies of the tongue and the consequent difficulties of suction and swallowing”) [23], stated that the Portuguese physician Dr. Somarive published a description of the same case in a special pamphlet.

The references made by most authors seem to have been based on secondary citations, and not on direct readings or analyses of the original text by de Jussieu, or the European publications mentioned by Rosenthal [2] and Meyer [23]. The omissions and misspellings of the author’s first name and the title of his original report, the omission of the word née in the title, the use of the years 1717 and 1719 instead of 1718, the replacement of née sans langue (“born without the tongue”) with privée de langue (“deprived of the tongue”) and the presumption that the Portuguese girl had limb defects may have resulted from the errors found in those European publications. Meyer [23] includes a reference to de Jussieu in the body of his article and states that a Portuguese physician named Somarive had published a report of the same case in a special newsletter. However, he does not mention the title of that publication or any references that may facilitate the search for such an important source. He also does not clarify whether Dr. Somarive had examined the Portuguese patient described by de Jussieu, or only reproduced the report with additional comments. Moreover, Rosenthal [2] did not offer the bibliographic pathway to find those reissues in several European periodicals.

Considerations about the de Jussieu Family

From 1686, when Antoine Laurent de Jussieu was born, to 1853, when Adrien-Henri de Jussieu died, France was the birthplace of five notable botanists, all from one of the branches of the large de Jussieu family [41,42]. These botanists contributed to the rise of botanical science, made important journeys in Europe and Latin America to study the flora and fauna of those still virgin regions, and contributed significantly to the enrichment of taxonomy. They were so highly regarded that the name de Jussieu is currently associated with the classification of several plant species, such as the Simaruba jussiaei , the quassia plant named after Antoine by Linnæus [41,42]. Further, the six Brazilian biomes- Amazon, Caatinga, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Pampa and Pantanal- are rich in plants of the Sapindaceae Jussieu and Araceae Jussieu families [43-46]. Bernard de Jussieu, the second in chronological order, was the first to classify whales as mammals42 and Joseph de Jussieu, the youngest, participated as a botanist in the scientific expedition called La Condomine , which was sent to Peru and other South American countries by France to measure a meridian arc. After the investigations were completed, Joseph de Jussieu remained in South America practicing medicine.

France still honors the de Jussieu family today, and their name was given to a campus of Université Pierre-et-Marie-Currie, to streets and subway lines in Paris, Marseille, and Nice, and to the planetary asteroid # 9470 named after de Jussieu, as well as to several schools, hotels and other places.

The group discussed above was composed of three brothers (Antoine, Bernard and Joseph), a nephew (Antoine Laurent) and a son and grandnephew (Adrien-Henri, Laurent’s son). Of the five relations, four studied medicine, but only Antoine, the oldest, and Joseph, the youngest, actually practiced it. Antoine dedicated special attention to the poor [41], which places him among the precursors of social medicine and contributes to the perpetuation of his name in the history of medicine. Moreover, evidence of his commitment to social medicine is found in the fact that his patient with CA was a very poor girl from a small village in Alentejo, a province in Portugal.

Absence in the Medical Literature

De Jussieu did not publish his observations because there was no medical literature at the time when he wrote them. The first attempt to edit a medical journal was made by Nicolas de Blegny [47,48], who was the editor of the journal “Nouvelles Découvertes sur Toutes les Parties de la Médicine (in English, “New Findings in All Areas of Medicine”), which was released monthly from 1679 to 1712. The same journal was edited also in Switzerland and translated into Latin under the title “Zodiacus Medico Gallicus,” from 1680 to 1685. The second medical journal, also French, was edited by the priest J.P. de la Roque, under the title Journal de Savants (“Scientists’ Journal”), and was published from 1681 to 1685. Finally, a third medical journal was edited by Claude Brynet, under the suggestive title of Progress de la Médicine (“Medical Advances”). The latter was the medical journal with the longest life, as it was published from 1695 to 1709. None of these journals were in publication when de Jussieu examined the case of CA.

Consideration about the report made by de Jussieu

The observations made by de Jussieu were organized according to the structural norms of present-day reports. He begins with a short introduction that justifies his intention to report the case for the scientific community and continues with information about the patient, including her age, origin and social status, as well as how he gained access to her. He then reports on the detailed oral examination, and describes a protuberance rising 4 mm on the floor of the mouth, and concludes that the protuberance is part of the tongue. He also evaluates the way the girl, a 15-year-old Portuguese adolescent, performs the five functions of the tongue (mastication, taste, deglutition, articulation, oral cleansing), and notes how fundamental the genioglossus, mylohyoid and geniohyoid muscles are for her speech performance. He describes the tongue functions one by one, and makes considerations about the areas of taste perception, physiology, nutrition, speech, and hearing, and provides a detailed description of her pronunciation of some phonemes, as well as the resources that she used to overcome difficulties. He clarifies the difference between swallowing solids and liquids, and the use of her fingers to help the distribution of solids during mastication. This description is one of the few detailing such use of the fingers. He provides a detailed explanation of how she spit. He makes comments about the strategy that the mother adopted to feed the child, which consisted introducing the nipple into the infant’s mouth and pressing her breast to make the milk flow into the infant’s pharynx. He also describes the details of the girl’s mandibular dentition, reporting that her teeth were not distributed in a double row and were not inclined lingually, as those of the boy in the report made by the Saumur surgeon, and classifies such distribution as a notable fact.

The enlarged uvula is referred to as displaying hypertrophy, which allowed it to function in a vicarious role that reduced the opening of the throat and modulated the sounds produced through the nose. De Jussieu continues with a detailed description of all organs that compose what today are known as the speech organs. He mentions the successful experiments conducted by Ambroise Paré, who used an instrument in the form of a gutter to help patients without the tongue to communicate better. Finally, he concludes with a discussion and makes the surprisingly up-to-date conclusion that “the parts that form the mouth are so necessary for speaking that they may compensate for the absence of the tongue” [1]. This conclusion is consistent with current knowledge and has been discussed by Twisleton [49] in his book, The Tongue Not Essential to Speech, based on reports that African confessors were able to speak after their tongues had been amputated.

Review of the Literature

The review of the literature revealed surprising and intriguing facts. Of the 95 studies selected, 85 discussed CA; five were about history and four about botany. The first one, obviously, was the original of de Jussieu’s report. Of the 85 directly associated with CA, 36 did not mention de Jussieu [50-85], and 49 mentioned him in different ways (Supplementary file 1) [2-40,86-95]. Of the 49 that mention him, 27 included his work in a list of references, [2-20,34-40], ten referred to other authors that quoted him [86-95], and 12 mentioned him only in the body of the text [21,23-33]. Of the 27 that included his work in the list of references, 19 used the letter M as the initial of his first name [2-20], 6 correctly used the letter A (texts 37, 38 and 40 were published by the same author) [35-39,49] and two did not mention either A or M in the title [22,34].

Twenty-two authors omitted the word née (“born”) in the original title [2-20,35-37]. Only three texts [38-40] kept the original title of the document provided by the Royal Académie de Sciences de France, as found in the hand-written text in French, the focus of this study. In fact, these texts were produced by only two authors, as the texts [39,40] were published by the same author.

Of the 10 studies that mentioned de Jussieu in the text only, without information about the source of that citation, two stated that the patient had limb defects [25,28]. One of them [25] replaced the terms née sans langue (“born without the tongue”), found in the original title, with privée de langue (“deprived of the tongue”). The word née (past participle or adjective in the French language) used in the title has the same meaning as congenital . This is important because it identifies de Jussieu as the first author to have identified a case of CA. His intention was to establish a difference between his case and that of the boy from Saumur, who had lost his tongue due to gangrene resulting from smallpox.

Other intriguing oddities were found, such as misspellings of his name in texts that used De Jéssieu , [5] Jusquieu [21] or Jessieu [22], instead of de Jussieu , mistakes in the title [3,15,19], and listings without his first name and title, as in Jussieu, Hist. de l’acad. des Sciences – 612 [22,34], as well as changes in the girl’s age, from 15 to 9 years [34,88] , and inclusion of the years 1717 [3] and 1719 [2,4,6,10,11,14,16-20] as the date of the original report (Supplementary file-2).

Discussion

Numerous discoveries and discussions have taken place in the 287 years that separate de Jussieu from our time, always in the search of explanations for CA and its association with other anomalies. Although the actual etiology has not been clarified, the action of drugs during pregnancy, gestational hyperthermia, and genetic factors have been pointed as possible causes, but conclusions are all still speculative.

In the last three centuries, some authors, such as Rosenthal [2], Fulford [87], Gardiner [34], Hall [4], and Gorlin [14] have attempted to determine the occurrence of cases, define causes and stablish a coherent classification. Despite all their efforts, toward cohesion, paradigms of classification still need improvement. Although the classification system devised by Hall seems to be coherent, it has not settled the question of how to classify CA. Our literature review also revealed that some surprising historical facts should be clarified, and some issues addressed: the replacement of the letter A with M as the initial of the French physician’s first name; the omission of the word née in the original title; the replacement of née sans langue with privée de langue in the title; the suggestion that the patient examined by de Jussieu had limb defects; and the incorrect spelling of his name and title. Details found in texts all suggest that the source or sources of information of the authors reviewed might have been texts other than the original manuscript by de Jussieu; perhaps those found in the European publications of the 1770s mentioned by Rosenthal [2]. To answer these questions, such publications should be found and studied, particularly the newsletter published by the Portuguese physician named Somarive mentioned by Meyer [23]. Did Dr. Somarive see the patient examined by de Jussieu before or after the French physician made a report of the case? Did the patient described by de Jussieu actually have limb defects, as reported by Grislain and Deffez [25,28]? Did de Jussieu overlook (unlikely) such abnormalities, whereas Dr. Somarive noted them and later described them, after de Jussieu had made his report? Is the newsletter published by Dr. Somarive, together with the publications by his contemporary authors, the source reviewed by those that have misrepresented so many facts in their reports? The authors of this study expect to answer these and other questions in the future, as studies already underway disclose new findings about the publications by Somarive and the other authors quoted by Rosenthal. These findings will be the topic of a future report.

References

  1. de Jussieu A (1718) Observation sur la manière dont une fille née sans langue s’acquite des fonctions qui dependent de cet organe. In: Imprimerie Royale, Paris; Histoire de l’Académie Royale de Sciences de Paris; Memoire: 10-22
  2. Rosenthal R (1932)Aglossia congenital: Report of a case of the condition combined with other congenital malformations. American Journal of Diseases of Children 44: 383-389.
  3. Weinberg B, Christensen R, Logan W, Bosma J, Wornall A (1969) Severe hypoplasia of the tongue. J Speech Hear Disord 34: 157-168.
  4. Hall BD (1971) Aglossia-adactylia. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 7: 233-236.
  5. Roth JB, Sommer A, Strafford C (1972) Microglossia-micrognathia: a case report and a survey of 30 others on record. ClinPediatr (Phila) 11: 357-359.
  6. Nevin NC, Burrows D, Allen G, Kernohan DC (1975) Aglossia-adactylia syndrome. J Med Genet 12: 89-93.
  7. Alvarez GE (1976) The aglossia-adactylia syndrome. Br J PlastSurg 29: 175-178.
  8. SaavedraOntiveros D, de Alfaro SK, Ascencio D, Cantú Garza JM (1976) Aglossia-adactilia syndrome]. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 33: 1171-1177.
  9. Stallard MC, Saad MN (1976) Aglossia-adactylia syndrome. Case reports. PlastReconstrSurg 57: 92-95.
  10. Lecannellier J, Vischer D (1976) The aglossia-adactylia syndrome. HelvPaediatrActa 31: 77-84.
  11. Grosse FR, Wiedemann H (1977) Syndromes with reduction and surplus anomalies of the hand. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 13: 301-318.
  12. Shah RM (1977) Palatomandibular and maxillo-mandibular fusion, partial aglossia and cleft palate in a human embryo. Report of a case. Teratology 15: 261-272.
  13. Johnson GF, Robinow M (1978) Aglossia-adactylia. Radiology 128: 127-132.
  14. Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ, Cohen M (1978) Syndromes of the head and neck, Toray, Barcelona.
  15. Wada T, Inoue K, Fukuda T, Nuzijawa N, Tanaka T, et al. (1980) Hypoglossia-hypodactylia syndrome: Report of a case. Journal of Osaka University Dental School 20: 297-304.
  16. Lustmann J, Lurie R, Struthers P, Garwood A (1981) The hypoglossia--hypodactylia syndrome. Report of 2 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 51: 403-408.
  17. Chicarilli ZN, Polayes IM (1985) Oromandibular limb hypogenesis syndromes. PlastReconstrSurg 76: 13-24.
  18. Nabeshima K, Ishikawa T, Miura K, Nagasaka N (1988) A case of congenital microglossia. ShoniShikagakuZasshi 26: 415-422.
  19. Weingarten RT, Walner DL, Holinger LD (1993) Tongue hypoplasia in a newborn. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol 25: 235-241.
  20. Thorp MA, de Waal PJ, Prescott CA (2003) Extreme microglossia. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol 67: 473-477.
  21. Cadenat H, Fabié M, Gely P (1967) A study of microglossia. Rev Odontostomatol Midi Fr 25: 366-373.
  22. Magnusson TE (1972) Congenital aglossia with aplasia of several teeth and multiple impactions. Transactions European Orthodontic Society: 517-526.
  23. Meyer MW (1849) As to the faults of the tongue and the consequent hindrance of sucking. JFKinderkr 13: 3283.
  24. Pettersson G (1961) Aglossiacongenita with bony fusion of the jaws. Report of one case. ActaChirScand 122: 93-95.
  25. Grislain J, Mainard R, de Berranger P, Brelet G, Cadudal JL, et al. (1971) Aglossia, adactylia and Hanhardt's syndrome. Apropos of 2 cases. Pediatrie 26: 353-364.
  26. Claustre P, Garcin M, Gagnol C, Gola R (1971) Syndrome aglossieadactylie avec synostosebimaxillaireantérieure. Journal Françaisd'Oto-rhino-laryngologie, Audio - phonology and Maxillofacial Surgery 20: 621-624.
  27. Bernard R, Giraud F, Lachard J, Garcin M, Gola R, et al. (1971) Aglossia-adactylia syndrome with anterior bimaxillarysynostosis. Pediatrie 26: 877-883.
  28. Deffez JP, Rostand B, Allain P, Brethaux J, Grimbert N, et al. (1981) An unusual aglossia-adactylia syndrome (author's transl). Rev StomatolChirMaxillofac 82: 241-246.
  29. Schuhl JF (1986) Aglossia-adactylia. Apropos of a case. Review of the literature. Ann Pediatr 33: 137-140.
  30. BoutsenM, Mercier J, Delaire J (1987) Malformation syndromes of the oromandibular region and limbs. Observations on microglossia-hypodactyly. ActaStomatolBelg 84: 7-27.
  31. Casha P, Carreau JP, Koné-Paut I, Palix C, Dejode JM, et al. (1996)Hypoglossia - Hypodactylie Syndrome: A Report of a case with synostosemaxillomandibular , glossopalatineankylosis and cleft palate, hypoglossia - hypodactylia syndrome with maxillo- mandibular fusion , glossopalatineankylosis and cleft palate . Pediatric Archives 3: 241-244.
  32. Tan HK1, Smith JD, Goh DY (1999) Unfusedhypoplastic tongue in a newborn. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol 49: 53-61.
  33. Meundi MA1, Nair GR, Sreenivasan P, Raj AC (2013) Oromandibular Limb Hypogenesis Syndrome Type IIB: Case Report of Hypoglossia-Hypodactyly. Case Rep Dent 2013: 370695.
  34. Gardiner JH (1959) Congenital partial aglossia. Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics 10: 83-89.
  35. Herrmann J, Pallister PD, Gilbert EF, Viseskul C, Bersu E, et al. (1976) Studies of malformation syndromes of man XXXXI B: Nosologic studies in the hanhart and the möbius syndrome. European Journal of Pediatrics: 122.
  36. Simpson AP, Meinhold G (2007) Compensatory articulations in a case of congenital aglossia. Clin Linguist Phon 21: 543-556.
  37. McMicken B, Von Berg S, Iskarous K (2012) Acoustic and perceptual description of vowels in a speaker with congenital aglossia. Communication Disorders Quarterly 34: 38-46.
  38. Salles F, Anchieta M, Costa Bezerra P, Torres ML, Queiroz E, et al. (2008) Complete and isolated congenital aglossia: case report and treatment of sequelae using rapid prototyping models. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 105: e41-47.
  39. McMicken B, Vento-Wilson M, Von Berg S, Rogers K (2014) Cineradiographic examination of articulatory movement of pseudo-tongue, and mandible in congenital aglossia. Communication Disorders Quarterly 36: 3-11.
  40. Micken BL, Kunihiro A, Wang L, Salles F, Bezerra PC, et al. (2014) Randomized testing of taste discrimination in a case of congenital aglossia. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 4: 120-126.
  41. Catholic Encyclopedia. Available at: www.newadvent.org/cathen/08569a.htm. Accessed July 5, 2015.
  42. Columbia Encyclopedia. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Jussieu. Accessed July 5, 2015.
  43. Rosado A, Souza MC, Ferrucci MS (2014) List of species of Sapindaceae to a remnant of Flora Seasonal Ecological Semidecidual in southern Brazil: Ecological Caiuá Station. R. bras. Biocidal, Porto Alegre 12: 148-157.
  44. Herculano ACM, Matos WR (2008) Survey of the species of tree Sapindaceae in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Health and Environment in Review 3: 76-85.
  45. GuarimNeto G, Corrêa AL, Gonçalves NS (2010) The sapindaceae family will kill Grosso, Brazil. Annals of the 61th National Congress of Botany. Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
  46. Batista CASG, Pereira AG (2013) The araceae family Jussieu to the flora of Mato Gross, Brazil. Annals of the 61th National Congress of Botany. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  47. Garrison FH (1921) An introduction to the History of Medicine. Philadelphia and London: Saunder.
  48. Nicholls AG (1934) Nicolas de Blegny and the first medical periodical. Canadian Medical Association Journal 31: 198-202.
  49. Twileston E (1873) Tongue Not Essential to Speech, with Illustrations of the Power of Speech in the African Confessors. William Clowes and Sons, London: England.
  50. Kettner MR, (1907)KongenitalerZungendefect. Deutsch Medical Wehnschr 33: 352.
  51. Sinclair J, McKay J (1945) Median harelip, cleft palate and glossal agenesis. The Anatomical record 91: 155-160.
  52. Eskew HA, Shepard EE (1949) Congenital aglossia; a case report. Am J Orthod 35: 116-119.
  53. Ardran GM, Beckett JM, Kemp FH (1964) AglossiaCongenita. Arch Dis Child 39: 389-392.
  54. Ernst T, Meinhold G (1964) A contribution to congenital aglossia. Dtsch Zahn MundKieferheilkdZentralblGesamte 43: 375-384.
  55. Merson RM (1967) Speech rehabilitation in congenital aglossia. J Rehabil 33: 33-34.
  56. Kelln EE, Bennett CG, Klingberg WG (1968) Aglossia-adactylia syndrome. Am J Dis Child 116: 549-552.
  57. Gellis SS,Feingold M (1970)Aglossiaadactylia syndrome (Absence of digits by hand and foot , avant- arm absence rétrognathie and dental anomalies). American Journal of Diseases of Children 119: 255-256.
  58. Nevin NC, Dodge JA, Kernohan DC (1970) Aglossia-adactylia syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 29: 443-446.
  59. Cohen Jr MM, Pantke H, Siris E (1971)Nosologic and genetic considerations in the aglossy-adactyly syndrome. Birth Defects Original Article Series 7: 237-240.
  60. Tuncbilek E, Yalcin C, Atasu M (1977) Aglossia-adactylia syndrome (special emphasis on the inheritance pattern).Clin Genet 11: 421-423.
  61. Elzay RP, Van Sickels JE (1979) Oromandibular-limb hypogenesis syndrome: type II C, hypoglossia-hypodactylomelia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 48: 146-149.
  62. Régy JM, Bertrou G, Ségui J (1979) A new case of aglossia-adactyly syndrome with possible cytomegalovirus infection.Pediatrie 34: 267-271.
  63. Campistol J, Molina V, Gonzalez A, Rissech M, Baraibar R, et al. (1980) Hypoglossia-hypodactylia. Apropos of a case associated with Moebius' syndrome and temporomandibularankylosis. Pediatrie 35: 257-260.
  64. Cuvelier B, Cousin J, Pauli A, Fournier A, Risbourg B, et al. (1981) Aglossia-adactylia syndrome: two new cases (author's transl). Ann Pediatr (Paris) 28: 433-435.
  65. Goto S, Tanaka S, Yanagisawa S (1982) An orthodontic case report of congenital aglossia. Nihon KyoseiShikaGakkaiZasshi 41: 746-756.
  66. Bökesoy I, Aksüyek C, Deniz E (1983) Oromandibular limb hypogenesis/Hanhart's syndrome: possible drug influence on the malformation. Clin Genet 24: 47-49.
  67. Boraz RA, Hiebert JM, Thomas M (1985) Congenital micrognathia and microglossia: an experimental approach to treatment. ASDC J Dent Child 52: 62-64.
  68. Sekhar HK, Sachs M, Siverls VC (1987) Hanhart's syndrome with special reference to temporal bone findings. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 96: 309-314.
  69. Tsuruda H, Watanabe Y, Yamauchi K (1988) A case report of microglossia: findings and discussions. Hiroshima DaigakuShigakuZasshi 20: 180-187.
  70. Neidich JA, Whitaker LA, Natowicz M, McDonald DM, Schnur R, et al. (1988) Aglossia with congenital absence of the mandibular rami and other craniofacial abnormalities. Am J Med Genet Suppl 4: 161-166.
  71. Purohit SK, Kumta SM, Rao PP, Thatte RL (1989) An interesting case of aglossia-adactylysyndrom. Br J PlastSurg 42: 228-229.
  72. Cañete Estrada R, Gil Rivas R, Alvarez Marcos R, Burón Romero A, RomanosLezcano A (1990) Hanhart syndrome (aglossia-adactylia syndrome). Report of 2 cases. An EspPediatr 33: 465-468.
  73. Dunham ME, Austin TL (1990) Congenital aglossia and situsinversus. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol 19: 163-168.
  74. Walker PJ, Edwards MJ, Petroff V, Wilson I, Temperley AD, et al. (1995) Agnathia (severe micrognathia), aglossia and choanal atresia in an infant. J Paediatr Child Health 31: 358-361.
  75. Khalil KC, Dayal PK, Gopakumar R, Prashanth S (1995) Aglossia: a case report. Quintessence Int 26: 359-360.
  76. Higashi K, Edo M (1996) Conductive deafness in aglossia. J LaryngolOtol 110: 1057-1059.
  77. Jang GY, Lee KC, Choung JT, Son CS, Tockgo YC (1997) Congenital aglossia with situsinversustotalis-a case report. J Korean Med Sci 12: 55-57.
  78. Grippaudo FR, Kennedy DC (1998) Oromandibular-limb hypogenesis syndromes: a case of aglossia with an intraoral band. Br J PlastSurg 51: 480-483.
  79. Mandai H, Kinouchi K (2001)Perioperative management of a neonate with aglossia-adactylia syndrome. Masui 50: 773-775.
  80. Kantaputra P, Tanpaiboon P (2003) Thyroid dysfunction in a patient with aglossia. Am J Med Genet A 122A: 274-277.
  81. Singh DJ, Bartlett SP (2005) Congenital mandibular hypoplasia: analysis and classification. J CraniofacSurg 16: 291-300.
  82. Kumar P, Chaubey KK (2007) Aglossia: a case report. J Indian SocPedodPrev Dent 25: 46-48.
  83. Faqeih E, Farra H, Al-Hassnan Z (2008) A further case of micrognathia, aglossia, and situsinversustotalis with additional features. ClinDysmorphol 17: 219-220.
  84. Rasool A, Zaroo MI, Wani AH, Darzi MA, Bashir SA, et al. (2009) Isolated aglossia in a six year old child presenting with impaired speech: a case report. Cases J 2: 7926.
  85. Bhat S, Babu SG, Shetty SR, Fazil KA (2013) Atypical presentation of oromandibular limb hypogenesis with ankyloglossia: A rare entity. Research Journal of Diagnostic Radiography 1: 1-3.
  86. Rabbelo FLC,Aglossia congenital. Revista de Medicina, Cirurgia e Farmácia 243: 337-339.
  87. Ardran GM, Fulford GE, Kemp FH (1956) Aglossiacongenita; cineradiographic findings. Arch Dis Child 31: 400-407.
  88. Salzmann JA, Seide LJ (1962) Malocclusion with extreme microglossia. Am J Orthod 48: 848-857.
  89. Hoggins GS (1969) Aglossiacongenita with bony fusion of the jaws. Br J Oral Surg 7: 63-65.
  90. Niegel S (1975)Aglossia-adactylia-syndrome. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 36: 509-521.
  91. Bury F, Willekens H, de Waele P, Marchal G, Kerremans R, et al. (1977) Aglossia-adactylia with jejunal atresia. Arch FrPediatr 34: 604-610.
  92. Kuroda T, Ohyama K (1981) Hypoglossia: case report and discussion. Am J Orthod 79: 86-94.
  93. Castillo S, Rojas J, Monasterio L (1985) Hanhart's syndrome. Rev ChilPediatr 56: 180-183.
  94. Weckx LL, Justino DA, Guedes ZC, Weckx LY (1990) Hypoglossiacongenita. Ear Nose Throat J 69: 108, 111-113.
  95. Hernández SNS (1999)Microglossia: A case report . Journal of the Mexican Dental Association 56: 80-82.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8069
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2016 - Aug 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7981
  • PDF downloads :88

Review summary

  1. Alcott Jane
    Posted on Aug 29 2016 at 6:48 pm
    The timely development of techniques and practice of medicine requires evaluation of the clinical documents every now and then. This article is a good trial in this way. The manuscript is well designed and discussed.
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords