alexa Control of Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica by virulent bacteriophages | OMICS International
ISSN: 1747-0862
Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Control of Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica by virulent bacteriophages

Stefanie Orquera1,*, Greta Gölz1, Stefan Hertwig2, Jens Hammerl2, Doreen Sparborth3, Alma Joldic3, Thomas Alter1

1Institute of Food Hygiene, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany,

2Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany,

3Frankenfoerder Forschungsgesellschaft, Luckenwalde, Germany

*Corresponding Author:
Stefanie Orquera
Tel: +49 30 838 62553
Fax: +49 30 838 62643
Email: [email protected]

Received date: 08 September 2011; Accepted date: 12 January 2012; Published date: 24 April 2012

© Copyright The Authors: Published by Library Publishing Media. This is an open access article, published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5). This license permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided the original work is appropriately acknowledged with correct citation details.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine

Keywords

Campylobacter, Yersinia, bacteriophage, food safety, biocontrol

Introduction

Campylobacter causes approximately 200,000 cases of campylobacterosis in the European Union (EFSA, 2009) and thus is one of the most important bacterial foodborne pathogens. Yersinia infections are of secondary importance with about 7,500 cases yearly (EFSA, 2009). Complete elimination of both pathogens in the food chain is currently not feasible, but the quantitative load can be reduced by several pre- and post-harvest applications. Post-harvest approaches exploiting virulent phages have already been described and focus up to now on the control of Listeria (L.) monocytogenes and Salmonella. Due to the effectiveness and innocuousness of Listeria phages, two products were already approved by the FDA: ListShield, the LMP-102 phage preparation comprising six phages for the control of L. monocytogenes on ready-to-eat foods (Bren, 2007), and Listex P100 (phage P100) for the control of this species in meat and cheese products (Carlton et al, 2005). P100 is able to eliminate or reduce Listeria up to 3.5 log10 cfu/g under appropriate conditions (Carlton et al, 2005; Holck and Berg, 2009; Soni et al, 2009; Soni and Nannapaneni, 2010). With Salmonella, up to 4 log10 unit reductions of cell number have been described in vegetables, chicken, chicken products, sausages and cheese (Modi et al, 2001; Goode et al, 2003; Leverentz et al, 2003; Whichard et al, 2003; Higgins et al, 2005). Some studies demonstrated the efficacy of phages on C. jejuni. Cell numbers were reduced by approximately 1 log10 unit at 4-5°C on chicken skin, and on raw and cooked meat (Atterbury et al, 2003; Goode et al, 2003, Bigwood et al, 2008). No data are currently available on post-harvest application of Y. enterocolitica phages.

This work describes the potential of the Campylobacter phages NCTC12684 and CP81 and of the Yersinia phage PY100 to control their hosts in broth and meat.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and bacteriophages

Two Campylobacter strains and one Yersinia strain were used in this study: C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and C. coli NCTC 12668 were obtained from the National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC), Health Protection Agency, United Kingdom. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 is a plasmid-cured derivative of the serogroup O:5,27, biogroup 2 strain 83/88 (Hertwig et al, 2003). Campylobacter strains were grown on Mueller- Hinton-blood (MHB) agar (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany), modified Charcoal-Cefoperazon-Desoxycholat (mCCDA) agar (Oxoid) or in Sodium-NZamines-Casaminoacids-Yeast- Magnesiumsulfate (NZCYM) medium (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 37°C under microaerobic conditions. Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 was grown on Luria Bertani (LB) agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Yersinia selective (CIN) agar (Oxoid) or in NZCYM medium at 37°C under aerobic conditions. C. jejuni phage CP81 isolated from retail chicken meat has recently been characterized (Hammerl et al, 2011). The NCTC group II phage 12684 that infects C. jejuni and C. coli strains has also previously been described (Sails et al, 1998). PY100 is a broad host range Yersinia phage lysing strains of Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. pestis (Schwudke et al, 2008).

Reduction of bacterial cell numbers in broth

Overnight cultures of bacterial strains were diluted to a final cell number of approximately 1x105 cfu/ml. 1ml phage lysate or SM buffer (negative control) was added to 1ml of the diluted culture. The mixture was incubated at 37°C (microaerobic/aerobic) or 4°C (aerobic). The initial bacterial host concentration was kept constant in all assays at approximately 1x105 cfu/ml. Bacterial counts were determined after 0, 6, 24, 27, 30, 48, 72 and 168 hours. The following MOIs were applied: high MOI for C. jejuni (102), and for C. coli and Y. enterocolitica (104); low MOI for C. jejuni and C. coli (101), and for Y. enterocolitica (102).

Reduction of bacterial cell numbers in meat

Raw chicken and pork meat was tested to be free of Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia spp. Meat was sliced aseptically into portions of 10gm, frozen at -20°C, and defrosted in a refrigerator 24hr prior to use. Campylobacter and Yersinia strains were grown overnight in NZCYM medium at 37°C under microaerobic (Campylobacter) resp. aerobic (Yersinia) conditions. Each meat portion was inoculated with 100μl of the diluted bacterial suspensions (approximately 1 × 106 cfu/ml). Bacteria were allowed to attach to the matrix for 30min at room temperature. Thereafter, 1ml of the corresponding phage lysate or SM buffer was added. All samples were vacuum sealed and stored either at 37°C or at 4°C, depending on the experimental setup. At each sampling time, inoculated meat pieces were diluted 1:10 with NZCYM medium, blended for 2min, and serially diluted with NZCYM medium before being spread onto mCCDA or CIN agar plates. For the enumeration of the bacteria, plates were incubated for 48hr (Campylobacter) or 24hr (Yersinia). All experiments were performed in triplicates. Statistical differences between bacterial cell numbers in the samples were assessed by using the Mann-Whitney-U test.

Results

All three phages reduced the numbers of their hosts in broth at 37°C. While the Campylobacter phages CP81 and NCTC12684 yielded reductions of only 1-2 log10 units, irrespectively of the applied MOI, PY100 reduced Y. enterocolitica cell numbers at a MOI of 102 by up to 3 log10 units (after 24hr) and at a MOI of 104 by up to 5 log10 units (after 1.5hr) (Figure 1). No growth inhibition of C. jejuni and C. coli was observed at 4°C in broth at any MOI (Figure 2 A and B). At this temperature, Y. enterocolitica cell numbers were reduced by up to 1 log10 unit (low MOI) after 24hr and up to 3 log10 units (high MOI) after 24hr (Figure 2C).

molecular-genetic-medicine-Phage-induced-lysis

Figure 1. Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in broth at 37°C. (A) C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). (B) C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). (C) Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100).

molecular-genetic-medicine-Campylobacter-Yersinia

Figure 2. Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in broth at 4°C. (A) C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). (B) C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). (C) Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100).

Due to restricted growth of Campylobacter at 4°C, experiments with chicken meat (Campylobacter assays) and pork meat (Y. enterocolitica assays) were exclusively carried out at high MOIs allowing lysis from without. Though, both Campylobacter phages did not lyse their host in chicken meat at 4°C (Figure 3A and B). By contrast, phage PY100 reduced the Y. enterocolitica cell numbers in pork meat significantly by approximately 2 log10 units after 24hr (Figure 3C).

molecular-genetic-medicine-Yersinia-meat

Figure 3. Phage-induced lysis of Campylobacter and Yersinia in meat at 4°C. (A) C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Phage CP81). (B) C. coli NCTC 12668 (Phage NCTC12684). (C) Y. enterocolitica 83/88/2 (Phage PY100). (*p <0.05)

Discussion

In this study the potential of the three phages to control foodborne pathogens at the post-harvest level was analysed. We ascertained that at 37°C the Campylobacter phages CP81 and NCTC12684 reduced the cell numbers of their respective host in broth, whereas no reduction was observed at 4°C, even at a high MOI (102 resp 104). The phages probably did not cause lysis from without under these conditions. Other studies demonstrated phageinduced lysis of Campylobacter at 4°C, where an up to 1 log10 unit reduction on chicken skin and in cooked and raw meat was achieved (Atterbury et al, 2003; Goode et al, 2003; Bigwood et al, 2008). As the lysis of Campylobacter at refrigeration temperatures is rather limited, post-harvest application of phages is apparently not a promising tool to reduce the Campylobacter load on carcasses or meat. On the other hand, high Campylobacter cell number reductions (2-5 log10 units) by phage were obtained in chickens at the pre-harvest level (Loc Carrillo et al, 2005; Wagenaar et al, 2005; El-Shibiny et al, 2009).

Contrary to the Campylobacter phages, Yersinia phage PY100 significantly reduced cell numbers of its host at 4°C in broth and in pork meat. The most efficient reductions occurred at the highest MOI. The data are consistent with previously published studies, in which a control of various pathogens was accomplished by application of high phage numbers (Goode et al, 2003; Leverentz et al, 2004; O’Flynn et al, 2004; Carlton et al, 2005; Guenther et al, 2009). To our knowledge, this is the first report on an application of phage to reduce Yersinia cell numbers in food.

Conclusion

An application of virulent bacteriophages for the control of Y. enterocolitica at the post-harvest level seems to be promising, whereas the potential of phages to control Campylobacter in food appears to be limited.

Competing Interests

None declared.

Acknowledgements

Parts of the project were funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology within the ZIM project (grant no. KF 2028504 SB8) and the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (grant no. FK 3-1329-438- 5766768). The authors thank Eckhard Strauch for providing phage PY100.

References

  1. Soni KA, Nannapaneni R and Hagens S. 2009. Reduction of Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of fresh channel catfish fillets by bacteriophage Listex P100. Foodborne Pathog Dis., 4, 427-434.
  2. Wagenaar JA, Van Bergen MA, Mueller MA, Wassenaar TM and Carlton RM. 2005. Phage therapy reduces Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broilers. Vet Microbiol, 109, 275-283.
  3. Whichard JM, Sriranganathan N and Pierson FW. 2003. Suppression of Salmonella growth by wild-type and large-plaque variants of bacteriophage Felix O1 in liquid culture and on chicken frankfurters. J Food Prot, 66, 220-225.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11811
  • [From(publication date):
    May-2012 - Jun 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8036
  • PDF downloads : 3775
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7