alexa Development of Probiotics Based Culture System of Macrobrachium rosenbergii Using Different Stocking Densities | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9546
Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Development of Probiotics Based Culture System of Macrobrachium rosenbergii Using Different Stocking Densities

Istiaq Ahmad Chowdhury*, Jewel Das and Nani Gopal Das

Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh

*Corresponding Author:
Istiaq Ahmad Chowdhury
Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries
University of Chittagong
Tel: +880 1819-979279
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: July 03, 2017; Accepted date: July 20, 2017; Published date: July 22, 2017

Citation: Chowdhury IA, Das J, Das NG (2017) Development of Probiotics Based Culture System of Macrobrachium rosenbergii Using Different Stocking Densities. J Aquac Res Development 8: 494. doi: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000494

Copyright: © 2017 Chowdhury IA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development


Owing to the problem of antibiotic resistance and subsequent reluctance of using antibiotics, probiotics use in aquaculture is becoming popular day by day. One experimental design with 150 days culture period of Macrobrachium rosenbergii was conducted with 3 treatments maintaining stocking density of 02/m2, 03/m2 and 04/m2 in T1, T2 and T3 respectively. Each of the treatments was with 3 replicates where each replicate was segmented into two parts to separate probiotics and non-probiotics based culture system. The higher body weight of 63.7 g was recorded in lower SD of T1 in comparison to lower body weight of 55.7 g and 43.0 g in higher SD of T2 and T3 respectively for probiotics application segments. The average body weight of 55.7 g, 46.7 g and 37 g respectively were found for the same treatments in non-probiotics segments. The average survival rate of 69.3%, 62.7% and 58.3% were recorded in probiotics and 68.3%, 63% and 57.7% respectively in non-probiotics treatments. Average daily growth rate and gross production were found better in probiotics than that of non-probiotics segments in all the treatments. Average daily growth rate of T1 was found 0.41 g and 0.36 g respectively for probiotics and non-probiotics segments. Similarly, for T2 and T3 average daily growth rate were found 0.35 g and 0.27 g for probiotics and 0.30 g, 0.23 g for non-probiotics segments respectively. Gross average production showed better result of 103 g/m2/crop in T2 probiotics treated segment than that of other two results of 87.23 g/m2 and 98.10 g/m2 in T1 and T3 treatments respectively where as 74.62 g, 87.23 g and 84.26 g/m2/crop was recorded in T1, T2 and T3 respectively in nonprobiotics treatments. Abiotic parameters in all segments of 3 treatments were within the optimum ranges for M. rosenbergii culture during the study period.


Probiotics; M. rosenbergii; Stocking density; Treatment; Production


The most widely cultured fast growing two giant prawns in the globe including Bangladesh are Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Their culture techniques are traditional, extensive, improved extensive, and mainly based on the stocking density of post larvae and management techniques of the culture ponds. Both monoculture as well as polyculture with fin fish (mullets, carps and tilapia) is the common practice in the South and Southeast Asian countries. Extensive and improved extensive polyculture are widely practiced in the freshwater environment throughout the country [1]. In Bangladesh, prawn farming can play an important role in poverty reduction by increasing job opportunity especially for the rural women that help to enhance their contribution to household income [2]. With increasing demand of environment friendly aquaculture, the use of probiotics in aquaculture is now widely accepted and recently, the use of probiotics to improve and maintain healthy environment for prawn culture has become popular in Bangladesh. Probiotics has been used to supply beneficial bacterial strains in rearing water that will help to increase microbial species composition in the environment and ultimately to improve water quality conditions [3]. This study attempted to make familiar with the fish farmer as well as farm owner’s application of probiotics in the culture system of Macrobrachium rosenbergii and ultimately to minimize or totally stop the antibiotic application in farming system and finally draw the attraction of export market of the aquaculture products.

Materials and Methods

M. rosenbergii can be cultured in earthen ponds, concrete tanks, small reservoirs, cages, pens and paddy fields. In the present experiment, it was conducted in 9 ponds of two rural villages of Chittagong division, South-Eastern part of Bangladesh.

Probiotics selection, mode of action, doses and usage instruction

Methods of selection for probiotics use in Macrobrachium culture were considered the following steps:

1) Collection of background information

2) Acquisition of potential probiotics

3) Estimate the ability of potential probiotics to out-compete pathogenic strains

4) Assessment of pathogenicity of potential probiotics

5) Evaluation of effect of potential probiotics in culture and

6) An economic cost-benefit analysis and to check their availability in the market.

Selection of commercial probiotics

• Sanolife® Pro-1 was used by mixing with feed. Sanolife® Pro-1 contains specific mixture of strains of Bacillus spp. Minimum of 3 × 1010 cfu/g. Standard Sanolife® Pro-1 application rates instructed 5 g/kg feed.

• Biomin® Pondlife was another type of probiotics used in pond water. Biomin® Pondlife consists of Bacillus sp., Enterococcus sp.,

Thiobacillus sp. and Paracoccus sp. Organic carrier product contains a minimum 2 × 1010 cfu/g. Instructed initial stage dose was 0.175 g/m2 and final stage dose was 0.3 g/m2 of pond area.

• Sanolife® Pro-W was the 3rd type of probiotics used in the study. The product is a mixture strain of Bacillus spp. of minimum 5 × 1010 cfu/g. Standard Sanolife® Pro-W application rate was instructed 0.02 g/m2 .

Site selection and pond construction for freshwater prawn farming

The experiment was conducted in two different rural areas of Chittagong division, South-Eastern part of Bangladesh. Total nine ponds were selected for the experiment from two different villages and size varies from 1200 m2 to 3600 m2. Among the nine selected ponds seven were old and two were newly excavated. Aquatic vegetation and weeds were eradicated from the old ponds. Weed fishes as well as predatory fishes were eradicated by drying the old pond bottom.

Liming and fertilization

Required amount of lime was applied into the ponds to make the desired pH level. Depending upon soil pH, agricultural limestone was applied at 25 g/m2 to 50 g/m2. To increase the fertility and productivity of the ponds both organic and inorganic fertilizers were used. Raw cow dung was applied at 75 g/m2 to 125 g/m2 along with 6.25 g/m2 triple super phosphate and 3.75 g/m2 Urea. This application was continued for every 7 days interval up to the whole culture period.

Increasing surface area

Like many other crustaceans, M. rosenbergii shows strong territorial defense and hiding behavior. During molting, there is always a considerable risk of predation by larger dominant prawns. Hence, to increase habitat surface area and hiding, substrates are required to reduce predation in grow out ponds. Bushes, palm and coconut-leaves, bamboo, tiers, tree branches, etc. were used indigenously to provide substrates for prawns to cling and to hide in.

Juvenile collection and stocking

Good quality prawn juveniles were collected from a commercial private hatchery of Chittagong where the production of M. rosenbergii was done through probiotics based rearing system. The prawn juveniles were stocked at a size of 2 g to 3 g in the different ponds. In this experiment juveniles were stocked with three different stocking densities. In treatment 1 (T-1) juveniles were stocked at a rate of 2/m2, in treatment 2 (T-2) at 3/m2 and in treatment 3 (T-3) at 4/m2.

Feed and feeding

In this experiment stocked juveniles were fed on a commercial pellet feed. Feeds were broadcasted evenly along the marginal areas of the pond. Pellet feeds were given at 3% to 15% of the body weight of prawn daily twice, where 60% to 75% of total feed should be fed at late evening of the day. Initially feeding was started at 15% of total biomass which was gradually reduced to 3% to 4% at the final stage of culture period.

Probiotics application with feed

In the present study, some replicates were practiced with probiotics mixed feed. At first the amount of feed was calculated required for those replicates for the day and then calculated the probiotics (Sanolife® Pro- 1) amount at a rate of 5 g/kg feed. Probiotics was mixed with required amount of clean water to evenly spread over all the feed particles. Finally, probiotics mixed feed was kept for air drying and then applied to the pond.

Probiotics application in pond water

In this experiment threereplicates of each treatment was practiced with probiotics in pond water. Two commercial probiotics such as Sanolife® Pro-W and Biomin® Pondlife were used. Sanolife Pro-W powder was mixed with clean pond water and then evenly distributed directly to the pond water. For Biomoin® Pond life the calculated amount of powder was kept for germination in a 20-liter clean water and 50 g of sugar mixed solution for 3 hours as per given instruction and then evenly distributed directly to the pond water.

Statistical analysis

t- test was done to find out the value of ‘p’ by using software-R for the final average body weight, mean growth rate and gross production, where p=0.04018, p=0.03503 and p=0.00036 respectively. For all the three factors p value is smaller than 0.05, which indicates the results are highly significant.

Pearson's product-moment correlation was done for correlation analysis of survival with stocking densities and found, r=-0.98 and p=5.277e-06. r=-0.98 indicates that, there is a high degree of negative association between stocking density and survival rate. That is as the stocking density increases the survival rate decreases. P=5.277e-06 implies that the result is highly significant.

Observations and Results

Growth, survival and production performance

The experiment was carried out for 150 days. In the experiment T-1 (2/m2), the final average weight gain was 63.7 g and 55.7 g in probiotics based and non-probiotics based culture systems respectively, in experiment T-2 (3/m2), average weight gain were 55.7 g and 46.7 g and in experiment T-3 (4/m2), average weight gain were 43 g and 37 g in probiotics and non-probiotics based culture system respectively. Mean growth rates were found higher (Table 1) in probiotics then in nonprobiotics culture systems in all replicates.

Experiment Stocking density (ind/m2) Initial average body
wt. (g)
Final average body wt. (g) Mean growth rate (g/day)
Sanolife® Pro-1 Average Non-probiotics Average Sanolife® Pro-1 Average Non-probiotics Average
T-1 2 2.3 65 63.7 57 55.7 0.42 0.41 0.36 0.36
2 2.3 62 54 0.4 0.35
2 2.3 64 56 0.41 0.36
T-2 3 2 55 55.7 46 46.7 0.34 0.35 0.29 0.3
3 2 56 44 0.36 0.28
3 2 56 50 0.36 0.32
T-3 4 2 44 43 37 37 0.28 0.27 0.23 0.23
4 2 42 35 0.27 0.22
4 2 43 39 0.27 0.25

Table 1: Final body weight and mean growth rate of M. rosenbergii in probiotics and non-probiotics based culture system.

In three treatments, the mean growth rates were recorded as 0.41 g, 0.36 g and 0.27 g per day in T-1, T-2 and T-3 treatments respectively for Sanolife® Pro-1 culture system. On the other hand, the average growth rates were recorded as 0.35 g, 0.30 g and 0.23 g per day in T-1, T-2 and T-3 treatments respectively with same stocking densities of non-probiotics culture system.

Survival rate of cultured M. rosenbergii found different with the same stocking densities among the probiotics and non-probiotics culture system. The highest average survival rates recorded were 69.3% and 68.3% (Table 2) in T-1 (2/m2) for probiotics ponds and nonprobiotics ponds respectively. The lowest average survival rate of 58.3% and 57.7% (Table 2) was found in T-3 (4/m2) for probiotics and nonprobiotics ponds respectively.

Experiment Stocking density (ind/m2) Survival (%) Gross Production (g/m2/crop)
Sanolife® Pro-1 Average Non-probiotics Average Sanolife® Pro-1 Average Non-probiotics Average
T-1 2 68 69.3 66 68.3 88.00 87.23 75.00 74.62
2 70 69 86.20 75.25
2 70 70 87.50 73.60
T-2 3 63 62.7 64 63.0 104.00 103.0 88.20 87.23
3 61 60 102.50 79.20
3 64 65 102.50 94.30
T-3 4 57 58.3 56 57.7 100.00 98.1 82.80 84.26
4 58 58 92.50 81.20
4 60 59 101.75 88.78

Table 2: Survival and gross production of cultured M. rosenbergiiin different culture systems.

Gross production from different culture systems also differs in probiotics and non-probiotics culture system. The estimated average gross production of M. rosenbergii in T-1 at a stocking density of 2/ m2 was calculated 87.23 g/m2 and 74.62 g/m2 (Table 2) per crop for probiotics and non-probiotics based culture system respectively. On the other hand, the estimated gross productionin T-2 at a stocking density of 3/m2 was found to be 103 g/m2/crop and 87.23 g/m2/crop (Table 2) for probiotics and non-probiotics culture system respectively. In treatment three (T-3) at stocking density of 4/m2 the final gross production was estimated to be 98.1 g/m2/crop for probiotics based culture system and 84.26 g/m2/crop (Table 2) for non-probiotics based culture system.

Influence on water quality

In the present study, the water parameters were recorded weekly basis in all ponds and found the recorded parameters within the range of Macrobrachium culture. Average water temperature range was from 29°C to 31°C in three replicates of all treatments pond which were found optimum for Macrobrachium culture. Average pH ranged from 8 to 8.2 in all ponds. Dissolved oxygen ranged from 4.8 mg/l to 5.5 mg/l, ammonia ranged from 0.1 mg/l to 0.19 mg/l. Nitrite concentration varied from 0.1 mg/l to 0.22 mg/l in all the replicates. Transparency also ranged from 33.5 cm to 35.25 cm. Alkalinity ranged from 77 mg/l to 88 mg/l. The variation of dissolved oxygen, pH and N-ammonia was recorded throughout culture period. Among all the three treatments, only some selected T1R3, T2R3 and T3R3 treatments were practiced with probiotics application in pond water. In those cases, ammonia and nitrite were variable results (Table 3) by the probiotics application. Due to the probiotics action waste feed and other waste matters were degraded more than other treatments those were practiced without probiotics. As a result, the concentration of toxic gases in those ponds was reduced in some extent. In all those three treatments ammonia and nitrite concentration found less (Table 3, highlighted value) compare to other treatments among the three different stocking density groups.

Experiments Temp. (°C) pH DO (mg/l) NH3 (mg/l) NO2 (mg/l) Transparency (cm) Alkalinity (mg/l)
T1R1 29.65 8 5.49 0.125 0.1 35.25 77
T1R2 29.95 8.01 5.12 0.19 0.18 35.5 80
T1R3 30.4 8.1 4.96 0.15 0.1 36 83
T2R1 30.1 8.12 5.35 0.155 0.18 39.75 86
T2R2 30 8.16 5.09 0.13 0.22 34.5 88
T2R3 30.7 8.1 4.9 0.1 0.15 35.5 81
T3R1 29.7 8.11 5.41 0.165 0.18 36 82
T3R2 30.05 8.06 5.03 0.15 0.2 34.25 82
T3R3 30.85 8.2 4.8 0.12 0.15 35 81

Table 3: Average water parameters of different experimental ponds.


Probiotics used in feed and pond water has a significant role in the growth of prawn culture. In the present experiment, it was found that in every replicate of the three different treatments higher growth and higher net gross production were found from the probiotics treated pond. The present may be compared with the following authors. Ziaei- Nejad et al. [4] and Wang [5] reported the benefits of the probiotics supplements improved feed value, enzymatic contribution to digestion, inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms, anti-mutagenic and anticarcinogenic activity, growth promoting factors, and increase immune response. Dalmin et at. [6] reported that use of Bacillus sp. improved water quality, survival, growth rates and health status of the juveniles of P. monodon and reduced the pathogenic vibrios. Keysami et al. [7] mentioned that prawns gained higher weight and better FCR by using B. subtilis in feed.

In the present experiment, different survival rates were recorded in different treatments. Higher survival rate 69.3% was found where the stocking density was maintained at 2/m2 and in this treatment average growth was also recorded higher in probiotics based treatment. In other two treatments, stocking density (3/m2) and (4/m2) showed lower survival as well as lower growth than the treatment with 2/m2 stocking density. On the other hand, the average final body weights in three treatments were 55.7 g, 46.7 g and 37 g respectively for T-1, T-2 and T-3. Among three treatments the best result was found at treatments 2 where stocking density was maintained 3/m2. Balcazar et al. [8]; Gullian et al. [9] reported that prawn’s survival was also found significantly greater in B. subtilis treated groups than in the control group. It is possible that this phenomenon operates by the substitution of opportunist pathogens that reduced growth.

It was found that the final body weight gained 63.7 g and 55.7 g in Sanolife® Pro-1 and non-probiotics based culture systems respectively in T-1 treatment (2/m2). Similarly, the body weight gained 55.7 g and 46.7 g in T-2 (3/m2) and 43 g and 37 g in T-3 (4/m2) in probiotics and non-probiotics treatment respectively. It was found from the above results that body weight was higher in lower stocking densities and lower in higher stocking densities. Siddiqui et al. [10] and Karplus and Sagi [11] reported in their research that, the prawn response to higher density uneven increase in number of small males. According to FAO [12], lower to higher yield of species depends on three different culture systems related to stocking density.

Improved water quality has an especial affinity with the pobiotics. It was reported by Dalmin et al. [6] that use of Bacillus sp. improves the water quality, survival, growth rates and the health status of juvenile P. monodon and reduced the pathogenic vibrios. Average water temperature ranges from 29°C to 31°C and pH from 8-8.2 in all three treatments of the experimental ponds are suitable for Macrobrachium culture. Timmons et al. [13] recommended pH level ranging from 6.5 to 8.5 for aquaculture, while Boyd and Zimmerman [14] recommended pH level from 7.0 to 8.5 as ideal for M. rosenbergii production. Dissolved oxygen is one of the important factors which limit the intensification of freshwater prawn culture. In the present study DO was recorded 4.8 mg/L to 5.49 mg/L which was in optimum level for prawn culture. Timmons et al. [13] recommended DO level above 5 mg/L for M. rosenbergii culture, while Boyd and Zimmerman [14] reported that M. rosenbergii can tolerate 2 mg/L with no stress, and level below 1 mg/L start to cause mortality. Ammonia ranges from 0.1 mg/L to 0.19 mg/L in different ponds in the present study. At the same time nitrite concentration varied from 0.1 mg/L to 0.22 mg/L in different water samples. Timmons et al. [13] recommended nitrite level below 1,000 mg/L for aquaculture systems, while New [15] stated that concentration under 2,000 mg/L is adequate for M. rosenbergii. But in this experiment, observed levels were lower than the results mentioned above. Low nitrite concentration indicates that released ammonia is rapidly assimilated by phytoplankton and nitrification is adequately occurred. Therefore, results suggest that both nitrification and photosynthesis were not negatively affected by intensification. According to Wang et al. [16] showed that the use of commercial probiotics in P. vannamei ponds can reduce the concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus that increase the shrimp yields. In this study alkalinity ranges from 77 mg/L to 88 mg/L. Boyd and Tucker [17] stated that alkalinity has an indirect effect on organisms, making pH stable, increasing water fertility and decreasing toxic potential of metals. Timmons et al. [13] recommend alkalinity range from 50 mg/L to 300 mg/L in aquaculture ponds. On the other hand, Boyd and Zimmerman [14] and New [15] recommended the values between 20 mg/L and 60 mg/L for M. rosenbergii culture. Transparency is related to the quantity of suspended materials. Boyd and Zimmerman [14] and New [15] recommended transparency values from 25 cm to 60 cm for M. rosenbergii culture. In the present study, the transparency was recorded from 35 cm to 39.75 cm which is good for prawn culture.


The technical potentials of prawn (M. rosenbergii) polyculture using probiotics based system were investigated in this study. This study demonstrated that pond prawn production was significantly increased with the introduction of probiotics. Prawn stocking in monoculture has the potentials of increasing total yields as well as farm income with probiotics application. Some ecological advantages of probiotics based prawn culture, such as improved water quality help to increase the sustainability of this system of aquaculture.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 606
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2017 - May 22, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 539
  • PDF downloads : 67

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7