Distribution of Eight Vitamin E Homologs Found in 81 Plants Using LC-MS3
Received Date: Sep 20, 2017 / Accepted Date: Oct 05, 2017 / Published Date: Oct 15, 2017
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use liquid chromatography/multistage mass spectrometry to demonstrate the distribution of eight vitamin E homologs in plants. Many tocopherol homologs, which showed higher antioxidant activity than tocotrienol homologs, were discovered and α-tocopherol, which had the highest antioxidant activity among these homologs, was widely distributed in all plants. In addition, α-tocopherol occurred at high concentrations in the leaves of plants belonging to the sumac family, which is native to tropical regions. Furthermore, 25.9% of plants contained α-tocopherol alone, whereas the remaining 74.1% contained α-tocopherol in combination with other homologs. The detection frequency was the highest for a combination of α-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol, which is a precursor of α-tocopherol in plants. The highest number of vitamin E homologs was found in leaves, followed by stems, flowers, branches, and buds. Furthermore, tocotrienol homologs were present only in leaves. This indicates that the distribution of homologs in plants reflects the intensity of the antioxidant activity of homologs. It also suggests that the distribution of α-tocopherol in combination with γ-tocopherol is influenced by the α-tocopherol synthetic pathway in plants.
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; LC-MS3; Tocopherol homologs; Tocotrienol homologs; Vitamin E
Based on its chemical structure, vitamin E can be divided into tocopherol and tocotrienol homologs. Because each homolog comprises α, β, γ, and δ forms, vitamin E has a total of eight homologs (Figure 1) . Herbs contain only α- and γ-tocopherol homologs . Eight vitamin E homologs have been found in rice bran , seeds, endosperm , barley, wheat, and rice  but not in leaves and stem of plants. Because these eight homologs were previously analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a fluorescence detector, which has a low detection sensitivity (156 ng/mL) , the precise distribution of homologs in plants was not well understood. We previously developed and reported regarding a highly sensitive analytical method (detection sensitivity of 20 ng/mL) that could simultaneously analyze the eight homologs present in plants using liquid chromatography/multistage mass spectrometry (LC-MS3) . This LC-MS3 method made it possible to detect homologs without the effect of the matrix; therefore, a highly sensitive analysis was established, where MS3 enables extraction from plants using only methanol. β and γ homologs could not be separated using RP-HPLC with an ODS column . Because these homologs could be separated under RP-HPLC conditions using long-chain alkylbonded C30 silica, it was not a rapid method for separating the eight components of vitamin E [7-9]. However, using LC-MS3, complete separation of these compounds under the condition used during RPHPLC led to establishing a simultaneous and rapid determination method. In this study, we used LC-MS3 for analyzing the vitamin E homologs present in plants, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elucidate the distribution of the eight homologs in plants.
Materials And Methods
Of 81 plants analyzed, 44, 31, and six plants were obtained from the Botanical Garden at Showa Pharmaceutical University, the Research Institute of Evolutionary Biology, and the Tokyo University of Agriculture, respectively. The plants were then rinsed with tap water and freeze dried immediately by storing them at −80°C for 24 h.
After freeze-drying, each plant part was separated and crushed using a mortar and pestle. Plastic centrifuge tubes that contained 0.2 g of each sample and approximately 2 mL of methanol (analytical grade reagent; Wako Junyaku Co., Osaka, Japan) were vortexed, and the material was extracted overnight at room temperature. The tubes were then centrifuged, and each extract was transferred to a separate tube, after which 2 mL of methanol was added to the residue in the initial centrifuge tube. This procedure was repeated twice. The extracts collected from the three extraction procedures were combined, and the volumes were adjusted to 6 mL to prepare the sample solutions.
Chemicals and reagents
In brief, 100 mL of methanol solutions, with each solution containing exactly 0.2 g of α-, β-, γ-, or δ-tocopherol (purity of all standards was>98.5%) or α-, β-, γ-, or δ-tocotrienol (purity of all standards was >98.5%), was prepared such that the standards contained 2000 μg/mL of each reagent. Each standard was diluted with methanol (LC/MS grade reagent; Wako Junyaku Co., Osaka, Japan) to prepare 20, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 ng/mL of the standard solution to produce a standard curve.
Analytical equipment and conditions
A mass spectrometer (QTRAP5500 by AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) and an HPLC system (1200 series with a binary pump, degasser, auto sampler, and column oven by Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used. Measurement conditions for mass spectrometer and HPLC analyses were set using those reported by Inoue et al. .
A qualitative analysis was conducted by comparing the retention time and spectrum pattern of chromatograms obtained using LC-MS3. The quantity of each homolog in the sample solution was obtained from the peak area of the chromatogram of each homolog and was compared to the standard curve of each homolog. In cases wherein the homolog concentration in the sample solution was above the upper limit of the standard curve, the sample solution was appropriately diluted with methanol (LC/MS grade; Wako Junyaku Co., Osaka, Japan) for quantitation using the standard curve method.
Distribution of vitamin E homologs in plants
The detection rates of the eight vitamin E homologs present in the 81 plants are shown in Figure 2. The detection rates of the tocopherol homologs were higher than those of the tocotrienol homologs. Among the tocopherol homologs, α-tocopherol was detected most often (in all 81 plants). Furthermore, 63.0%, 44.4%, and 35.8% of the plants contained the γ-, β-, and δ-tocopherol homologs, respectively. In all 81 plants, α- and β-tocotrienol homologs were found, while γ- and δ-tocotrienol homologs were not found. Figure 3 shows the combinations of homologs present in the plants. In total, 25.9% of the plants contained α-tocopherol alone, and the remaining 74.1% of plants contained more than two homologs. Overall, 18.5% of the plants contained a combination of all four tocopherol homologs; 17.3% of the plants contained α- and γ-tocopherol homologs; 14.8% contained α-, β-, and γ-tocopherol homologs; 4.9% contained α-, γ-, and δ-tocopherol homologs; 2.5% contained α-, γ-, and δ-tocopherol homologs with α-tocotrienol; and 1.2% continued four other combinations with γ-tocopherol. Thus, among the plants found to contain more than two homologs, 84.5% contained both α- and γ-tocopherol homologs.
Figure 3: The distribution of vitamin E homologs in 81 plants. Only α-tocopherol was the most detected (25.9%), followed by α-, β-, γ- and δ-tocopherols (18.5%); α- and β-tocopherol (17.3%); α-, β-, and γ-tocopherols (14.8%); and α-, β-, and δ-tocopherol (4.9%). The presence of the combination of α-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol is remarkable.
The concentration of each homolog is given in Table 1. Among the 81 plants assessed, α-tocopherol was present in the highest concentration at 0.6-750.1 μg/g. Homologs with the next highest concentrations were β-tocopherol (0.6-33.3 μg/g), followed by γ-tocopherol (0.6-29.1 μg/g), α-tocotrienol (0.6-14.0 μg/g), δ-tocopherol (0.6-13.8 μg/g), and β-tocotrienol (0.8-5.3 μg/g).
|Species||Tocopherol (µg/g dry tissue)||Tocotrienol (µg/g dry tissue)|
|Acmella oleracea (L.) R.K.Jansen||79.8 ± 0.2||0.6 ± 0.0||1.0 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Adansonia digitata L.||8.0 ± 0.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Adansonia za Baill.||224.8 ± 0.3||1.0 ± 0.3||20.9 ± 0.1||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Adansonia za var. bosy||217.2 ± 5.8||6.9 ± 0.5||5.2 ± 0.1||2.0 ± 0.3||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Agastache foeniculum (Pursh) Kuntze||72.1 ± 1.4||nf||2.0 ± 0.0||2.3 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Alluaudia procera Drake||0.7 ± 0.01||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Aloe vaombe Decorse & Poiss.||190 ± 7.4||1.3 ± 0.1||tr||7.3 ± 0.1||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Ampelopsis japonica (Thunb.) Makino||148 ± 0.4||tr||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Arctium lappa L.||48.2 ± 4.2||nf||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Artemisia absinthium L.||35.4 ± 0.9||nf||3.8 ± 0.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch. ex Lnk) Bunge||57.1 ± 3.7||1.9 ± 0.0||2.5 ± 0.1||1.1 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Atractylodes ovata (Thunb.) DC.||108.0 ± 1.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh.||6.3 ± 0.4||tr||tr||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (L.) Lam.||257.3 ± 6.3||nf||29.1 ± 0.2||1.1 ± 0.1||2.7 ± 0.0||nf||tr||nf|
|Bupleurum stenophyllum (Nakai) Kitag.||19.5 ± 2.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Catharanthus roseus G.Don||102.4 ± 1.0||3.4 ± 0.1||1.4 ± 0.3||3.9 ± 0.1||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Celosia argentea L.||184 ± 2.0||1.6 ± 0.2||2.2 ± 0.1||0.9 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Ceratotheca triloba E.Mey. ex Bernh.||4.3 ± 0.2||0.6 ± 0.1||1.5 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Chamaecrista nomame (Siebold) H.Ohashi||285.0 ± 0.9||nf||5.5 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Cichorium intybus L.||7.8 ± 0.4||0.7 ± 0.1||9.0 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson||84.6 ± 2.9||tr||tr||0.6 ± 0.0||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf|
|Coix lacrymanfjobi L. var. manfyuen (Roman.) Stapf||8.0 ± 0.2||2.0 ± 0.1||4.7 ± 0.0||2.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Copaifera officinalis L.||200 ± 4.1||nf||1.6 ± 0.4||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Crateva religiosa G.Forst.||213.2 ± 2.6||10.6 ± 0.1||4.5 ± 0.1||1.1 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Didierea madagascariensis Baill.||213.8 ± 1.6||5.6 ± 0.1||7.2 ± 0.1||0.6 ± 0.1||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench||266.4 ± 4.3||1.3 ± 0.4||0.9 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Elaeocarpus sylvestris var. ellipticus||0.6 ± 0.0||tr||tr||nf||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf|
|Euphorbia stenoclada Baill.||8.4 ± 0.9||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ex DC.||21.8 ± 0.2||nf||1.0 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Hibiscus sabdariffa L.||3.7 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Hypoxidaceae Spiloxene Salisb.||23.9 ± 0.4||tr||tr||tr||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Isodon japonicus (Burm.f.) H.Hara||113.2 ± 1.5||6.6 ± 0.1||10.3 ± 0.1||0.7 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Jatropha curcus L.||42.7 ± 1.4||nf||tr||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Kalanchoe beharensis Drake||72.9 ± 4.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Kalanchoe prolifera Raym.-Hamet||37.0 ± 3.9||0.7 ± 0.0||tr||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Kalanchoe synsepala Baker||26.1 ± 0.8||tr||1.9 ± 0.0||tr||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Kalanchoe tubiflora Raym.-Hamet||68.4 ± 3.8||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Kandelia obovata Sheue , H.Y.Liu & J.W.H.Yong||0.8 ± 0.1||nf||1.1 ± 0.0||0.8 ± 0.1||0.9 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf|
|Lavandula angustifolia Mill.||21.7 ± 0.2||6.5 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Leonurus japonicus Houtt.||33.5 ± 0.5||nf||2.1 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Linum usitatissimum L.||156.6 ± 3.5||1.9 ± 0.5||4.5 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Lycium chinense Mill.||57.7 ± 0.2||nf||7.5 ± 0.2||5.7 ± 1.6||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Malva sylvestris L.||58.7 ± 4.1||1.0 ± 0.1||3.6 ± 0.1||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Malvaceae Hibiscus L.||2.1 ± 0.4||0.8 ± 0.2||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel||18.0 ± 0.8||0.9 ± 0.03||0.6 ± 0.0||0.7 ± 0.0||nf||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf|
|Moringa drouhardii Jum.||125.3 ± 3.7||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Moringa oleifera Lam.||218.0 ± 0.8||1.1 ± 0.01||2.0 ± 0.1||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Myrtus communis L.||24.2 ± 1.3||nf||nf||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Neodypsis decaryii Jumelle||145 ± 1.6||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Operculicarya decaryii H.Perrier||750 ± 3.0||nf||6.3 ± 0.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Origanum majorana L.||5.5 ± 0.1||1.2 ± 0.1||2.2 ± 0.0||0.7 ± 0.0||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf|
|Origanum vulgare L.||2.3 ± 0.3||0.6 ± 0.1||1.1 ± 0.0||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Pachypodium lamerei var. ramosum||8.2 ± 3.0||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||2.2 ± 0.1||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf|
|Pachypodium rutenbergianum var. meridionale||7.0 ± 0.8||1.3 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Pandanus dyckioides Baker||14.1 ± 0.2||tr||8.8 ± 0.1||tr||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Patrinia scabiosifolia Fisch.ex Trevir||5.4 ± 0.4||tr||0.6 ± 0.0||0.7 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton var. frutescens||3.7 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Persicaria tinctoria (Aiton) Spach||54.4 ± 4.3||1.4 ± 0.1||0.6 ± 0.0||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A.DC.||43.4 ± 0.6||nf||2.0 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Prunella vulgaris L. subsp. Vulgaris||268.4 ± 3.3||tr||0.8 ± 0.0||13.6 ± 0.1||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Ravenea musicalis Beentje||468 ± 1.0||15.1 ± 0.5||3.3 ± 0.1||nf||14.0 ± 0.0||5.3 ± 0.7||nf||nf|
|Rhizophora mucronata Lam.||5.5 ± 0.3||2.5 ± 0.1||2.0 ± 0.0||tr||0.8 ± 0.1||nf||nf||nf|
|Rosmarinus officinalis L.||131.6 ± 2.6||3.1 ± 0.0||0.8 ± 0.0||tr||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge||259.5 ± 1.3||0.8 ± 0.2||1.0 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Salvia officinalis L.||59.9 ± 3.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Sanguisorba minor Scop.||116.2 ± 0.3||nf||nf||3.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Saponaria officinalis L.||168.1 ± 1.5||1.7 ± 0.1||1.2 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi||143.3 ± 1.3||tr||5.9 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Simmondsia chinensis C.K.Schneid.||2.7 ± 0.1||6.0 ± 0.2||1.1 ± 0.1||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench||25.1 ± 3.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Sporobolus virginicus Kunth||5.6 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Symphytum officinale L.||30.3 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Terminalia catappa Linn.||82.1 ± 0.4||1.7 ± 0.3||1.8 ± 0.2||tr||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze||27.4 ± 2.6||1.4 ± 0.2||0.8 ± 0.0||0.7 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Tetrastigma lanceolarium Planch.||476 ± 1.4||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Thymus vulgaris L.||59.8 ± 1.2||0.9 ± 0.0||0.6 ± 0.1||0.6 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Typhonodorum lindleyanum Schott||46.5 ± 0.7||nf||4.6 ± 0.2||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Uncarina grandidieri (Baill.) Stapf||4.8 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Uncarina leandrii var. recbergii||83.2 ± 1.3||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Vanilla decaryana H.Perrier||2.5 ± 0.1||33.3 ± 1.4||1.1 ± 0.1||12.4 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf|
|Verbena officinalis L.||39.5 ± 0.3||tr||1.0 ± 0.0||nf||nf||nf||nf||nf|
The amounts of eight vitamin E homologues are determined by the mean and standard deviation value of each vitamin E homologue in leaves, stems and branches of each plant. Values are the mean of three replicates ± SD.. nf, not found; tr, trace = detected but not quantified.
Table 1: The contents of tocopherols and tocotrienols in 81 kinds of plant.
Distribution of vitamin E homologs in different parts of the plants
The distribution of each homolog in different parts of the plants is shown in Table 2. The highest concentrations of vitamin E homologs were found in leaves, where six homologs were detected, including the four tocopherol homologs and α- and β-tocotrienol homologs. The next highest concentrations of tocopherol homologs were found in stems and flowers, where the four tocopherol homologs were identified. Branches and buds of the plants contained the next highest concentrations of three tocopherol homologs. In contrast, ears only contained α-tocopherol.
|Tissues||Tocopherol (µg/g dry tissue)||Tocotrienol (µg/g dry tissue)|
The amounts of eight vitamin E homologues are determined by the mean of each vitamin E homologue in different tissues of each plant. nf, not found; tr, trace = detected but not quantified.
Table 2: The contents of tocopherols and tocotrienols in different tissues in 81 kinds of plant.
When homolog distributions were examined, α-tocopherol was present in all parts of the plants, whereas β-tocopherol was present in leaves, stems, flowers, and buds. Moreover, γ-tocopherol was present in leaves, stems, flowers, branches, and buds, whereas δ-tocopherol was present in leaves, stems, flowers, and buds. Tocotrienol homologs were only found in leaves and not in any other parts of the plants.
The homolog concentrations in leaves, where most homologs were found, are shown in Table 3 with respect to the plant family. A particularly high concentration of homologs was found in leaves of the sumac and mint families, where concentrations of α-tocopherol were 1470.4 μg/g and 699.1 μg/g, respectively. Only 0.6 μg/g each of α-tocopherol and α-tocotrienol was detected in Elaeocarpaceae plants.
|Family||Tocopherol (µg/g dry tissue)||Tocotrienol (µg/g dry tissue)|
The amounts of eight vitamin E homologues are determined by the mean of each vitamin E homologue in leaves of each plant. nf, not found; tr, trace=detected but not quantified.
Table 3: The contents of tocopherols and tocotrienols in different dry tissues.
This is the first study to use LC-MS3 for analyzing the eight vitamin E homologs and clarifying their distributions in plants. It was found that tocopherol homologs, which exhibit a stronger antioxidant activity than tocotrienol homologs [10,11], exist at higher concentrations in plants than tocotrienol homologs. Among the eight homologs, α-tocopherol having the highest antioxidant activity [10,11] was present at high concentration. The concentrations of β, γ and δ-tocopherol in plants tended to depend on the strength of each antioxidant activity. In the tocotrienol homologs with low antioxidant activity [10,11], α and β forms were detected slightly and γ and δ forms were not detected. From these results, the distribution of vitamin E homologues may be related to the antioxidant activity of each homolog. Therefore, the distribution of vitamin E homologs may be related to the intensity of the antioxidant activity of each homolog. α-Tocopherol, which showed a high antioxidant activity, was present in leaves of plants belonging to the sumac family, which is native to tropical regions. Active oxygens such as super oxide radicals (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and singlet oxygen (1O2) are produced after exposure to high light intensity [12-15]. Because tropical plants are highly exposed to environmental stresses such as high temperature and high light intensity, active oxygens are readily produced in tropical plants. This suggests that α-tocopherol, which possesses the highest active oxygen scavenging activity, is present at a high concentration in plants to support plant life .
Lipid-soluble tocopherol homologs are present in plant parts where there is a large amount of lipids present [16,17]. The presence of tocopherol homologs has been reported in rice bran , seed, endosperm , barley, wheat, and rice . The current study revealed that α-, β-, γ-, and δ-tocopherol homologs were also present in leaves and stems. Leaves and stems contain chloroplasts, where lipid-containing thylakoid membranes are found [18-20]. This may explain the high levels of lipid-soluble α-tocopherol homologs that are present in leaves and stems. Thus, the distribution of tocopherol homologs may be influenced by the lipid solubility of tocopherol homologs.
Simultaneous analysis of the eight homologs revealed their distribution patterns for the first time. Furthermore, we revealed that α-tocopherol in combination with γ-tocopherol most often found in plants. As shown in Figure 4, α-tocopherol is synthesized from homogentisic acid via 2,3-dimethyl-5-phytyl-1,4-benzoquinone and γ-tocopherol [21-23]. In other words, γ-tocopherol is a precursor of α-tocopherol, which is the homolog most often found in plants. Thus, the presence of α-tocopherol in combination with γ-tocopherol may be because of the α-tocopherol synthetic pathway in plants.
Figure 4: The tocopherol biosynthetic pathway in plants. Compound abbreviations: HGA, homogentisic acid; PDP, phytyl diphosphate; MPBQ, 2-methyl-6-phytyl-1,4- benzoquinone; DMPBQ, 2,3-dimethyl-5-phytyl-1,4-benzoquinone. Circled numbers refer to the enzymes: (1) Homogentisic acid phytyl transferase. (2) 2,3-dimethyl- 5-phytyl-1,4-benzoquinone transferase. (3) tocopherol cyclase. (4) γ-tocopherol methyl transferase.
This study elucidated the distribution of the eight vitamin E homologs by analyzing vitamin E homologs in plants using LC-MS3. The results indicated that the distribution of vitamin E homologs was affected by the intensity of the antioxidant activity. Alpha-tocopherol, which showed the highest antioxidant activity, may be present in all plants to support plant life by acting as an active oxygen scavenger. The common occurrence of α-tocopherol in combination with γ-tocopherol in plants was predicted to be because of the α-tocopherol synthetic pathway. The highest distribution of α-tocopherol homologs was found in the plant leaves. This finding indicates that lipid-soluble tocopherol homologs are localized to the lipid component of leaf chloroplasts. Thus, the distribution of vitamin E homologs was found to be related to supporting plant life.
From this study, it was clarified that ingestion of vitamin E in plants can efficiently ingest tocopherol homologs with high antioxidant activity including the α form. This study can provide more knowledge about the nutritional value of vitamin E in plants.
We extend our gratitude to Esai Co. for donating vitamin E homolog standards for free.
- Schneider C (2005) Chemistry and biology of vitamin E. Mol Nutr Food Res 49: 7-30.
- Gómez-Coronadoa DJM, Ibanez E, Rupereza FJ, Barbasa C (2004) Tocopherol measurement in edible products of vegetable origin. J Chromatogr A 1054: 227-233.
- Sookwong P, Nakagawa K, Murata K, Kojima Y, Miyazawa T (2007) Quantitation of Tocotrienol and Tocopherol in Various Rice Brans. J Agric Food Chem 55: 461-466.
- Horvath G, Wessjohann L, Bigirimana J, Jansen M, Guisez Y, et al. (2006) Differential distribution of tocopherols and tocotrienols in photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic tissues. Phytochemistry 67: 1185-1195.
- Irakli MN, Samanidou VS, Papadoyannis IN (2012) Optimization and Validation of the Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection Method for the Separation of Tocopherol and Tocotrienol. J Agric Food Chem 60: 2076-2082.
- Inoue T, Tatemori S, Muranaka N, Hirahara Y, Homma S, et al. (2012) The Identification of Vitamin E Homologues in Medicinal Plant Samples Using ESI(+)-LC-MS3. J Agric Food Chem 60: 9581-9588.
- Rupérez FJ, Martín D, Herrera E, Barbas C (2001) Chromatographic analysis of α-tocopherol and related compounds in various matrices. J Chromatogr A 935: 45-69.
- Stöggl W, Huck C, Wongyai S, Scherz H, Bonn G (2005) Simultaneous determination of carotenoids, tocopherols and γ-oryzanol in crude rice bran oil by liquid chromatography coupled to diode array and mass spectrometric detection employing silica C30 stationary phases. J Sep Sci 28: 1712-1718.
- Irakli MN, Samanidou VS, Papadoyannis IN (2012) Optimization and validation of the reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection method for the separation of tocopherol and tocotrienol isomers in cereals, employing a novel sorbent material. J Agric Food Chem 60: 2076-2082.
- Munné-Bosch S, Alegrea L (2002) The Function of Tocopherols and Tocotrienols in Plants. Plant Science 21: 31-57.
- Falk J, Munne-Bosch S (2010) Tocochromanol functions in plants: antioxidation and beyond. J Exp Bot 61: 1549-1566.
- Blokhina O, Virolaonen E, Fagersted KV (2003) Antioxidants, Oxidative Damage and Oxygen Deprivation Stress: a Review. Ann Bot 91: 179-194.
- Munné-Bosch S (2005) The role of a-tocopherol in plant stress tolerance. J Plant Physiol 162: 743-748.
- Maeda H, DellaPenna D (2007) Tocopherol functions in photosynthetic organisms. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10: 260-265.
- Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M (2012) Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Damage, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism in Plants under Stressful Conditions. J Bot: 1-26.
- Dörmann P (2007) Functional diversity of tocochromanols in plants. Planta 225: 269-276.
- Asensi-Fabado MA, Munné-Bosch S (2010) Vitamins in plants: occurrence, biosynthesis and antioxidant function. Trends Plant Sci 15: 582-592.
- Gounaris K, Barber J, Harwood JL (1986) The thylakoid membranes of higher plant chloroplasts. Biochem J 237: 313-326.
- Sprague SG (1987) Structural and functional consequences of galactolipids on thylakoid membrane organization. J Bioenerg Biomembr19: 691-703.
- Rottet S, Besagni C, Kessler F (2015) The role of plastoglobules in thylakoid lipid remodeling during plant development. Biochim Biophys Acta 1847: 889-899.
- Della Penna D (2005) A decade of progress in understanding vitamin E synthesis in plants. J Plant Physiol 162: 729-737.
- Volodymyr I, Nadia MS (2012) Tocopherol biosynthesis: chemistry, regulation and effects of environmental factors. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 34: 1607-1628.
- Watts EJ, Shen Y, Lansky EP, Nevo E, Bobe G, et al. (2015) High Enviromental stress yields greater tocotrienol content while changing vitamin E profiles of wild emmer wheat seeds. J Med Food 18: 216-223.
Citation: Inoue T, Honma S, Otsuka Y, Nakane T, Takano A, et al. (2017) Distribution of Eight Vitamin E Homologs Found in 81 Plants Using LC-MS3. J Nutr Food Sci 7: 636. Doi: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000636
Copyright: © 2017 Inoue T, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
September 7- 8, 2018 Auckland, Newzealand
17th World Congress on Nutrition and Food Chemistry
September 13-15, 2018 London, UK
8th Annual Congress on Probiotics & Functional Foods
September 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
International Conference on Food Production and Preservation
Oct 17-18, 2018 Ottawa, Canada
International conference on Probiotics and Prebiotics
October 31 - November 01, 2018 San Francisco, USA
30th International Conference on Nutraceuticals & Public Health
November 5-6, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand
- Total views: 1274
- [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Aug 19, 2018]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 1217
- PDF downloads: 57