alexa Effect of Humidity, OH Radicals, UV Irradiation, Adhesive and Adsorption Effect on Photocatalyst Sterilization | OMICS International
ISSN: 2150-3494
Chemical Sciences Journal
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Effect of Humidity, OH Radicals, UV Irradiation, Adhesive and Adsorption Effect on Photocatalyst Sterilization

Shintani H*

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, 1-13-27, Kasuga, Bunkyo, 112-8551, Tokyo, Japan

*Corresponding Author:
Shintani H
Faculty of Science and Engineering
Chuo University, 1-13-27, Kasuga
Bunkyo, 112-8551, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: +81425922336
Fax: +81425922336
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: September 22, 2014; Accepted date: September 24, 2014; Published date: September 30, 2014

Citation: Shintani H (2014) Effect of Humidity, OH Radicals, UV Irradiation, Adhesive and Adsorption Effect on Photocatalyst Sterilization. Chem Sci J 5:e104. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000e104

Copyright: © 2014 Shintani H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Chemical Sciences Journal

The photocatalyst equipment consists of a titanium dioxide (TiO2) membrane and an ultraviolet (UV) lamp. The authors studied lf the photocatalyst equipment was practically useful in sterilizing environmental microorganisms in the health care facility. The number of microorganisms (CFU, colony forming unit) was compared in the cases of no sterilization (control), UV irradiation alone and photocatalyst sterilization. As a result, a statistical difference was observed between control and the photocatalyst sterilization against airborne microorganisms (p<0.01) but not against surface microorganisms (p>0.2). The photocatalyst uses an air sucking systemï¼so it may be ineffective against microorganisms tightly attached to surfaces (adhesive microorganisms). However, the effectiveness and significant difference compared with control of the photocatalyst to sterilize airborne microorganisms in the health care facility was successfully confirmed.

Concerning the humidity effect on the photocatalyst sterilization, the authors compared the number of airborne microorganisms in cases of the control, UV alone and photocatalyst sterilization when humidity was changed. A statistical difference was obs erved between UV alone and the photocatalyst sterilization (p<0.01) when humidity (RH, relative humidity) was increased to 60-70% (Figure 1), but not observed between UV alone and the photocatalyst sterilization (p>0.2) when humidity was controlled to 10-20% (Figure 2). This indicates that maintaining relatively higher humidity levels will present satisfactory sterilization results due to a greater production of OH radicals. From Figure 2, when humidity level was low, OH radical effect was not significant because no difference between photocatalyst and UV. Surely they present lower level of airborne microorganisms compared control (Figures 1 and 2), but this is mainly due to UV effect, not OH radical effect because OH radical was effected by humidity compared with UV.

chemical-sciences-journal-UV-sterilization

Figure 1: Results from the control, photocatalyst and UV sterilization of airborne bacteria and fungi when humidity was controlled to 60-70%.

chemical-sciences-journal-Results-from

Figure 2: Results from the control, photocatalyst and UV sterilization of airborne bacteria and fungi when humidity was controlled to 10-20%.

The UV irradiation sterilization was mainly surface sterilization and not always sufficiently effective against fungiï¼but effective against bacteria including spore formers. Fungi are most tolerant to UV sterilization than bacteria including spore formers. Fungi tolerate UV irradiation sterilization compared with bacteria including spore formers. The fungus most tolerant to UV irradiation steriliz ation was Aspergilus niger. The next tolerable fungus was Rhizopus spp.

UV or pulsed light irradiation alone may be sufficient to sterilize fungi. In that sense, the synergistic effect of OH radical and UV exposure when humidity was relatively rich at RH 60-70% (Figure 1) may be effective. This is the same as reported for the synergistic effect of UV irradiation and H2O2 gas exposure. The speculation synergistic effect of UV and OH radical contribution in the photocatalyst sterilization may be correct (Figure 1). However, the favorable synergistic effect of OH radical and UV irradiation was only when humidity was sufficient (Figure 1). When humidity was insufficient at RH 10-20% (Figure 2), the synergistic effect was unsatisfactory and the effect on airborne microorganism by UV alone and UV + OH radical was the same (Figure 2). This was due to the insufficient production of OH radicals from UV irradiated water. This was statistically confirmed from the comparison of UV vs. photocatalyst sterilization when humidity was sufficient (Figure 1) and insufficient (Figure 2). Maintaining the humidity at a higher degree is an essential factor to attain significant and reproducible photocatalyst efficiency to avoid any seasonable variation in performance.

From the comparison between Figures 1 and 2, sufficient humidity was indispensable to attain satisfactory sterilization effect against bacteria and fungi. UV sterilization efficiency was reported to decrease when the humidity is high by Ko et al. but the increase in OH radicals by increasing humidity could overcome the reported diminishment of UV irradiation efficiency and a desirable sterilization result was obtained. This indicates that the interference of humidity in UV sterilization was not significant contrary to the results reported by Ko et al. [1].

To conduct the statistical analysis of data in Figures 1 and 2, data were transformed to the square root value to perform the Student t testï¼ANOVA (analysis of variation) and/or χ2 test because the distribution of the environmental microorganisms is the Poisson distribution not the normal distribution. The p value determined by the paired Student t test for the airborne microorganisms using the square root value was conducted. The Student t test result from the data transformed to the square root values and that of ANOVA result was identical. The result of χ2 test was somewhat different from that of Student t test and that of ANOVA, however a tendency was identical. A statistically significant difference could be observed between the airborne microorganisms subject to the control and photocata lyst treatments (p<0.01, Figure 1). On the contrary, no statistical difference (p>0.2) could be observed between photocatalyst and UV sterilization in Figure 2 for both bacteria and fungi when the humidity was controlled at lower lever of 10-20 RH %. Howeverï¼a statistical difference (p<0.01) in bacteria and fungi could be observed between those receiving photocatalyst and UV exposure in Figure 1 when humidity was maintained at 60-70%. The photocatal yst sterilization performed well even though the UV function is thought to be somewhat decreased at high humidity as reported by Ko et al.. However, it is speculated that humidity at more than 70% would show inferior results to those obtained at 60-70% due to insufficiency of UV function as reported by Ko et al. [1].

In addition, it may be obvious that no significant differen ce in the CFU from air samples could be observed between the control and the photocatalyst equipment turned off UV irradiation. This indicates the adsorption phenomena of environmental microorganisms onto the TiO2 membrane with ion exchange, ionic bonding, hydrogen bonding or Van der Waals bonding was not significant. This can also be explained from the comparison between photocatalyst and UV irradiation in Figure 2 compared with that in Figure 1. The reason for the decrease in C FU by photocatalyst treatment in Figure 1 was not due to increasing adsorption but increasing 0H radicals by increasing humidity at 60- 70 RH%, which results in satisfactory sterilization. In addition, if adsorption phenomenon was significant, it could not be satisfactory explained no significant difference between UV alone and photocatalyst in Figure 2.

Even though OH radicals cannot be directly determined with ESR or chemiluminescence as OH radicals exist in the interior of the photocatalyst equipmentï¼we can speculate that the OH radicals will increase within the photocatalyst with increasing humidity up to RH 60-70%. This is because we determined stable radicals after photocatalyst sterilization and obtained the result that the stable radicals increased at higher humidity by ESR compared with fewer stable radicals at lower humidity levels. It is necessary to note that the life period of active radicals is quite short (OH radical is μs) and the produced amount of the active OH radicals is not abundant. In addition the production of stable radicals by increasing the humidity may not always parallel the produced amount of active OH radicals. It may be sure that active OH radicals will increase with increasing humidity up to 60 to 70%. In addition, there was no data supporting the adsorption phenomenon of environmental microorganisms on any membranes used in the photocatalyst sterilization, thus the adsorption phenomenon on to membrane can be denied in the photocatalyst function.

From the result, it was clarified that sufficient humidity for the photocatalyst equipment improves the sterilization efficiency. Humidity is an indispensable factor to increase the efficiency of the photocatalyst function.

The single exposure period of airborne microorganisms to OH radicals within the photocatalyst is quite short period. It must be lengthened to attain greater sterilization efficiency. In addition, OH radicals from the irradiated TiO2 must be increased to improve the sterilization effect of the photocatalyst on airborne microorganisms.

By lengthening the exposure period within the chamber and increasing the OH radical formation, photocatalyst sterilization efficiency may be much improved and as a result nosocomial infectious disease in the health care facility may be decreased in future when the improved photocatalyst equipment becomes available.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 14081
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2014 - Jun 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 10243
  • PDF downloads : 3838
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7