alexa Efficiency of Different Sources of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Bind Aflatoxin B1 in Phosphate Buffer Saline | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7110
Journal of Food Processing & Technology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Efficiency of Different Sources of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Bind Aflatoxin B1 in Phosphate Buffer Saline

Gonçalves BL, Rosim RE, Oliveira CAF and Corassin CH*

Department of Food Engineering, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo Av Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, CEP 13635-900, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Corassin CH
Department of Food Engineering
School of Animal Science and Food Engineering
University of São Paulo. Av. Duque de Caxias Norte
225, CEP 13635-900, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil
Tel: +55193565-4145
Fax: +55193565- 4284
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: May 20, 2014; Accepted date: June 26, 2014; Published date: July 4, 2014

Citation: Gonçalves BL, Rosim RE, Oliveira CAF, Corassin CH (2014) Efficiency of Different Sources of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Bind Aflatoxin B1 in Phosphate Buffer Saline. J Food Process Technol 5:342 doi: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000342

Copyright: © 2014 Goncalves BL, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Processing & Technology

Abstract

Aflatoxins, a group of carcinogenic mycotoxins, can cause acute and chronic intoxications and also liver cancer in humans and animals. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is the most potent, having proven toxic properties. Biological decontamination of mycotoxins is one of the well-known strategies for management of mycotoxins in foods and feeds, presenting some advantages over physical and chemical methods. Among the different possible decontaminating microorganisms, Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a potential group since it is widely used in preservation and food fermentation. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall consists of a network of β-1,3 glucan back bone with β-1,6 glucan side chains, which is attached to highly glycosylated mannoproteins making the external layer. Binding of different mycotoxins to yeast cell surface has been reported. This study was carried out to investigate the efficiency of S. cerevisiae to remove AFB1 in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) solution (pH 7.3 25°C). Saccharomyces cerevisiae concentration from four different sources (dried yeast of sugar cane, autolyzed yeast, cell wall and brewery dehydrated residue) was determined by a Neubauer-counting chamber, using 1x1010 non-viable cells for each 3.0 mL of PBS containing 0.5μg L-1 AFB1. The assay was performed at contact times of 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes. Among all analyzed yeasts, the dried yeast of sugar cane presented highest removal capacity of AFB1, with an average reduction of 98.3%. Autolyzed yeast and brewery dehydrated residue presented extensive removal capacity, with averages of 93.8 and 84.6%. The yeast cell wall showed the lowest removal capacity (82%).

Keywords

AFB1; S. cerevisiae ; Decontamination; Binding; PBS

Introduction

Aflatoxins are one of the most important mycotoxins known, being Aspergillus species distributed worldwide, although their optimal growth conditions are relative humidity of 80-85% and temperature around 30ºC. Aflatoxins are secondary metabolites of low molecular weight produced by filamentous fungi, particularly Aspergillus flavus , A. parasiticus and A. nomius , distinguished by their wide distribution in food and pronounced toxic properties [1]. There are currently 18 similar compounds described by the term aflatoxin, but the most prevalent and toxic is aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) [2]. Aflatoxins are also of great importance for the Public Health, as they are main factors involved in the etiology of human hepatic cancer, as a consequence of the ingestion of contaminated foods.

After oral ingestion, AFB1 is efficiently absorbed and bio transformed before urinary and fecal excretion. Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 family are responsible for the biotransformation of absorbed aflatoxins. These enzymes convert AFB1 into its carcinogenic form, AFB-8,9-epoxide, which bonds covalently to DNA and serum albumin, producing AFB1-N7-guanine and lysine adducts, respectively. The bond between AFB1 and DNA modifies the structure and biological activity of DNA, leading to the basic mutagenic and carcinogenic mechanisms of the toxin. Besides being epoxided, AFB1 can be also oxidized into several other derivatives. The main hydroxylated metabolites are aflatoxin M1 (AFBM1), aflatoxin Q1 (AFQ1), a demethylated metabolite, aflatoxin P1 (AFP1), and a reduced metabolite, aflatoxicol. The most important effect of aflatoxins on human health is the Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). This disease represents more than 80% of primary malignant tumors of the liver, and it is the 7th to 9th most common type of cancer worldwide affecting men and women, respectively [3].

The best way to prevent aflatoxin contamination is the adoption of improved agricultural practices and control of storage conditions of products. However, practical difficulties to effectively prevent contamination, along with the stability of aflatoxins under normal food processing conditions, have led to investigation on decontamination methods for food products [4]. The use of microorganisms offers an attractive alternative for the control or elimination of aflatoxins in foodstuffs [5,6]. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the most effective for binding AFB1 [7], although several Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) strains have shown different capabilities for binding AFB1 in phosphate buffer solutions and in milk [8,9]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of a SC strain from four different sources (dried yeast - DY, autolyzed yeast - AY, cell wall - CW and brewery dehydrated residue - BDR), to bind AFB1 in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) spiked with 0.5 ng mL-1 AFB1, during contact times of 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes.

Materials and Methods

SC sources

Commercially available sugar cane yeast (dried yeast from sugar cane - DY, autolyzed yeast from sugar cane - AY, cell wall from sugar cane – CW) and brewery yeast (brewery dehydrated residue - BDR) were used in the experiment.

The number of yeast cells in the products was determined by light microscopy using a modified Neubauer chamber. The products were weighed to reaching a cell concentration of 1.0X1010 cells mL-1. All SC cells were heat-killed, being inactivated by autoclaving at 121°C for 10 minutes before the binding assays, to avoid any possible fermentation during the contact time.

Aflatoxin B1 binding assays

AFB1 standard solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) was diluted in acetonitrile and spectrophotometrically calibrated [10] in order to obtain a 2.5 μg mL-1 stock solution. A 0.15 μg mL-1 working solution was prepared in PBS (Laborclin Ltd., Pinhais, Brazil), pH 7.3, evaporating the acetonitrile by nitrogen injection and heating in a hotwater bath (45°C) until visible acetonitrile droplets disappeared.

The assay of AFB1 binding in PBS was performed in triplicate as described by Bovo et al. [9] with some modifications. A volume of SC strains from each different source corresponding to 1.0X1010 cells mL-1 were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and suspended in 3.0 mL of PBS spiked with 0.5 ng mL-1 of AFB1. Following the contact times of 5, 10, 20 and 30 min., the tubes were centrifuged at 1,800 g for 15 minutes, and the supernatant removed for analysis of AFB1. The same procedures as described above were performed in triplicate positive controls (only spiked PBS containing 0.5 ng mL-1AFB1), negative controls (only different sources of SC) and non-spiked PBS controls .

Analysis of aflatoxin B1 in PBS

Quantification of AFB1 in PBS solutions was performed by injection of supernatant in a High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC) Shimadzu® system (Tokyo, Japan), consisting of a fluorescence detector RF-10A XL (Shimadzu®) equipped with a Synergy Fusion column 4μm C18 4.6×150 mm (Phenomenex®, Torrance, USA) and autosampler SIL- 10AF (Shimadzu®). A flow rate of 1 mL/min was used with a mobile phase containing water, acetonitrile, and methanol (60:20:20). Detection was made at an excitation wavelength of 366 nm and emission at 428 nm. Detection limit for AFB1 was 0.01 ng/mL, as considered by the minimum amount of AFB1 that could generate a chromatographic peak three times over the baseline standard deviation. Under these conditions, the retention time of AFB1 was 6.9 min.

The equation below was used to determine the percentage of AFB1 bound by the microorganisms tested in each assay. Letters B, C, D and E are the mean areas of chromatographic peaks of positive controls, non-spiked PBS controls, sample analyzed and negative controls, respectively.

image

Statistical analysis of AFB1 binding assays was carried out in the General Linear Model of SAS☒ [11] by using the Tukey Test for significant differences between the sources tested (DY, AY, CW and BDR) and contact time (5, 10, 20 and 30 min.) at p<0.05.

Results and Discussion

The results show the AFB1 levels at PBS in the binding assays with heat-killed SC cells from four different sources. AFB1 levels in spiked PBS (0.5 ng AFB1 mL-1) treated with inactivated dried yeast from sugar cane (DY) cells (1010 cells mL-1) for 5, 10, 20 and 30 min were < 0.010 ng mL-1, 0.021 ± 0.003 ng mL-1, 0.022 ± 0.005 ng mL-1 and 0.035 ± 0.002 ng mL-1, respectively. The treatment DY achieved the best results in the binding assays, but without statistically significant differences on the contact time.

The second best response was achieved using the treatment of autolyzed yeast from sugar cane (AY). The values of AFB1 in PBS for AY treatment were 0.046 ± 0.008 ng mL-1, 0.025 ± 0.006 ng mL-1, 0.034 ± 0.003 ng mL-1 and 0.096 ± 0.005 ng mL-1 for 5, 10, 20 and 30 min, respectively.

The mean percentages of AFB1 bound by the CW in PBS were 80.1 ± 0.5%, 78.3 ± 0.9%, 83.6 ± 0.7% and 86.1 ± 0.8% for 5, 10, 20 and 30 min, respectively. Compared to the CW, BDR cells had higher capability to bind AFB1 in PBS (81.0 ± 0.3%, 86.0 ± 0.8%, 83.7 ± 0.2% and 87.8 ± 0.7% for 5, 10, 20 and 30 min, respectively), although there were no significant differences between the treatments and contact times evaluated.

Compared to the CW and BDR treatments, DY and AY had higher (p<0.05) capability to bind AFB1 in PBS, although there were no differences (p>0.05) between the contact times evaluated. When comparing DY with AY, a non-significant increase (p>0.05) was observed in the percentages of AFB1 bound, which mean values ranged from 97.9 ± 0.5% to 94.9 ± 1.3% (Table 1).

S. cerevisae products % of bound AFB1 (mean ± SD)
  5 min. 10 min. 20 min. 30 min.
Dried yeast 99.3 ± 0.2a 97.9 ± 0.5a 97.8 ± 0.8a 96.5 ± 1.1a
Autolyzed yeast 95.3 ± 1.4a 97.5 ± 1.1a 96.6 ± 1.6a 94.9 ± 1.3a
Cell wall 80.1 ± 0.5b 78.3 ± 0.9b 83.6 ± 0.7b 86.1 ± 0.8b
Brewery residue 81.0 ± 0.3b 86.0 ± 0.8b 83.7 ± 0.2b 87.8 ± 0.7a

Table 1: Percentages of aflatoxin B1 bound to S. cerevisae products at different contact times in PBS (a-b In the same column, means followed by different superscript letters differ significantly (p<0.05)).

By the findings of this study, it is apparent that celular viability is not a prerequisite for removal of AFB1 by SC. The mechanism involved in SC ability to bind aflatoxins remains unclear. It is currently accepted that yeast cell wall has the ability to adsorb the toxin [12-14]. Bueno et al. [12] and Lee et al. [8] concluded that both viable and nonviable SC cells have the same adsorbent ability to bind AFB1, which is in accordance with data on removal of AFB1 due SC in PBS as reported in the present study.

Previous reports on the use of SC for decontamination rates of AFB1 from feeds reached to 90% [15,16]. In the present study, SC cells bound from 99.3 ± 0.2% (using DY for 5 min) to 78.3 ± 0.9% (using CW for 10 min) of AFB1 content in PBS.

When heat-killed cells of SC from different sources were used the removal efficiency of AFB1 was highly effective (99.3 ± 0.2%). There are no previous studies evaluating the different sources of SC from coproducts of alcoholic fermentation for aflatoxin removal. However, the increase in the binding percentages may be explained due the presence of a greater number of cells available for the sequestration of AFB1.Our results indicate that non-viable cells of SC from different sources may be used for highly removing AFB1 from phosphate buffer saline containing up to 0.5 ng mL-1. Thus further studies are necessary to investigate these effects on other matrices, such as feed, milk or cereals.

Conclusion

Heat-killed cells of different sources of SC, from co-products of alcoholic fermentation, has high efficiency (>90%) to bind AFB1 in PBS in a relatively short period, as there were no differences in the toxin binding between the contact times of 5, 10, 20 or 30 min. Therefore the methods of aflatoxin removal employing SC have a potential application for reducing the levels of AFB1. However, additional studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms involved in the removal process of toxin due SC and the factors that affect the stability of the toxin sequestration aiming the commercial application in the food industry.

Acknowledgements

The research is financed by: Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP) and the National Research Council (CNPq)

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12196
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2014 - Nov 18, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8399
  • PDF downloads : 3797
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords