alexa Elucidation of Sorption Mechanism of R. arrhizus for Reactive Blue 222 using Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies | OMICS International
ISSN: 1948-5948
Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Elucidation of Sorption Mechanism of R. arrhizus for Reactive Blue 222 using Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies

Sukhada Saraf* and Varsha K Vaidya

The Institute of Science, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

*Corresponding Author:
Sukhada Saraf
The Institute of Science, Madam Cama Road
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Tel: +919969574411
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: May 25, 2016; Accepted date: June 07, 2016; Published date: June 14, 2016

Citation: Saraf S, Vaidya VK (2016) Elucidation of Sorption Mechanism of R. arrhizus for Reactive Blue 222 using Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies. J Microb Biochem Technol 8:236-246. doi:10.4172/1948-5948.1000292

Copyright: © 2016 Saraf S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Visit for more related articles at Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology


The equilibrium and kinetics of the biosorption of Reactive Blue 222 from aqueous solution were investigated using dead biomass of Rhizopus arrhizus in a batch system. Biosorption equilibrium was established in about 180 min. The sorption data obtained at pH 1.5 conformed well to the Langmuir isotherm model. The Reactive Blue 222 biosorption data were analyzed using the pseudo-first, the pseudo-second order, Elovich kinetics models as well as intra-particular rate diffusion and liquid film diffusion. The second-order equation was the most appropriate equation to predict the biosorption capacities of the biosorbent. The reusability of the biosorbent was tested in five consecutive adsorption–desorption cycles and the regeneration efficiency was above 97%. The XRD, SEM, FITR analyses helped to elucidate the mechanism of biosorption. From the practical viewpoint, the abundant and inexpensive dead fungal biomass could be used as an effective, low cost and environmentally friendly biosorbent for the removal of Reactive Blue 222 from the aqueous solution.


Biosorption; Isotherms; Kinetics; Reactive Blue 222; Rhizopus arrhizus


India's dye industry produces all types of dyes such as disperse, reactive and direct dyes, which are used extensively in textile, paper, printing industries and dye houses. Textile industry is one of the most water- and chemical-intensive industries worldwide and leaves one of the largest water footprints on the planet [1,2]. Of all the dyed textile fibers, cotton occupies the number-one position and more than 50% of its production is dyed with reactive azo dyes, owing to their technical characteristics such as bright and water-fast colors, simple application techniques with low energy consumption. Unfortunately, this class of dyes is also the most unfavorable one from the ecological point of view, as the effluents produced are relatively heavily colored, contain high concentrations of salt and exhibit high BOD/COD values [3]. The release of colored wastewater in the ecosystem is a prominent source of aesthetic pollution, eutrophication and perturbations in natural equilibrium of the aquatic environment [4]. Dyes, even at very low concentrations are often toxic, carcinogenic or mutagenic for various organisms [5].

Textile dyes are designed to resist fading upon exposure to sweat, light, water, oxidizing agents, which limits the application of various physico-chemical treatment methods like chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, ozonation, membrane filtration, photo-degradation, etc. [6,7]. Unfavourable conditions found in the textile dyeing effluents are known to inhibit the conventional biological treatment processes. Moreover, various azo dyes have been shown to be anaerobically decolorized by the cleavage of azo bond, resulting in the formation of potentially carcinogenic aromatic amines [7].

Thus, the treatment of textile effluents is under the strong radar of the environmental agencies making it imperative to take new initiatives for environmental restoration and provide inexpensive and reliable method for the removal of dyes. Among all the wastewater treatments, the adsorption process has been recognized to be an effective and economical procedure for the elimination of dyes from the industrial effluents. Adsorption can handle large flow rates, producing a high-quality effluent that does not result in the formation of harmful substances. Activated carbon is one of the most widely used adsorbents because of its excellent adsorption capacity for organic pollutants. However, high costs, difficulty in regeneration, problems with regard to final disposal, inefficient adsorption of cationic dyes limit its commercial application [8-10]. Hence, low-cost biosorbents such as waste materials from industry and agriculture, as well as biosorbents derived from microbial biomass (yeasts, fungi, algae, etc.) with high adsorption capacities have gained increasing attention in reducing the adsorbent dose and minimizing the disposal problem [11,12].

Application of fungal biomass to remove textile dyes from the effluent is attractive for industry as it may decrease the overall effluent treatment costs. Industrial fermentation processes can provide a cheap and constant supply of fungal biomass or the biomass can be cultured using inexpensive growth media and unsophisticated fermentation techniques. Traditionally, the fungal biomass by-product is incinerated for disposal or used as a fertilizer for agricultural use. Due to its poorly biodegradable biopolymers (cellulose, chitin, glucans, etc.) fungal biomass used as a fertilizer has a low economic value. However, it is possible to consider the potential economical reuse of the biomass in the biosorption of dyes [13]. There are many advantages of using inactivated mycelium for biosorption such as easy storage, selectivity, high removal rates, low costs and regenerative potential. The efficiency of the biosorption of reactive azo dyes by some fungi under equilibrium conditions has been shown to be more than that of activated carbon [14].

The efficiency of the sorption process is governed by the cost and performance of a sorbent as well as the mode of application. Hence, an attempt was made to evaluate two vital elements of the adsorption process viz. equilibrium of the sorption and the sorption kinetics [15,16]. Adsorption isotherms are critical for predictive modelling and comparing the adsorption performance, besides providing a view on the degree of affinity of the adsorbents, adsorption mechanism and course taken by the system under study in a concise form. In this research, four isotherm models viz. Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) models were used to verify the affinity between Rhizopus arrihizus biosorbent and Reactive Blue 222 (RB 222) dye, a commonly used dye in the Indian textile industry. The kinetics data were used to identify the adsorption mechanism and the rate limiting step. Surface characterization of the biosorbent was done using XRD, SEM, FTIR analyses, modification of functional groups on the biosorbent and determination of pHzpc.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of adsorbate

Reactive Navy Blue BF (C.I. Reactive Blue 222, CAS 93051-44- 6, chemical formula: C37H23ClN10Na6O22S7, MW: 1357.49 gmol-1) a bifunctional diazo reactive dye (Figure 1) was obtained as a solid powder from DyStar, India and used without further purification. Stock solution of the dye (1 gL-1 at pH 1.5) prepared in double distilled water was diluted to obtain solution of desired concentration (88 mgL-1) for experimental purpose. The pH of the solution was measured using a pH meter (Control Dynamics, India). All the chemicals and reagents used for experiments were of analytical grade and supplied by HiMedia, Mumbai, India [17].


Figure 1: Structure of RB 222.

Preparation of the biosorbent

Fungal biomass was acquired by aseptically transferring mycelia from the potato dextrose agar (PDA) spread-plate cultures to 100 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB) (gL-1: potato infusion from 200 g potatoes, dextrose 20, yeast extract 0.1, pH 5.0) containing 0.25% Tween 80 (to prevent sporulation) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The biomass was harvested after seven days of incubation at 30 ± 1°C under static conditions with sporadic shaking. The biomass was then washed thoroughly with double distilled water and dried at 80oC for 24 h. The size of the biomass particles was kept uniform by grinding into a fine powder and sieving through a 150-mesh sieve. Dried biomass was preserved in a desiccator till further use [17].

Characterization of the surface chemistry of the biosorbent: Surface characterization of the dead biomass of R. arrhizus was carried out before and after biosorption with RB 222. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis, a very powerful tool to study the nature of the biosorbent, was used to assess the presence of crystalline phases present in the biosorbent. X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded in a scanning mode using Rigaku Miniflex X-ray diffractometer equipped with a Cu target having wavelength of 1.54 A° with 2θ angle varying between 5° and 80°. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (Philips XL 30 SEM) was employed to study the surface morphology and fundamental physical properties of the biosorbent surface at 10 KV with tilt angle of 45°. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy(FTIR) (Shimadzu 8400S) analysis of the biosorbent was carried out over a spectral range varying from 4,000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 to identify the characteristic functional groups responsible for biosorption. The infrared spectra were obtained and averaged over 32 scans in the transmission mode (Figures 1-4).


Figure 2: : XRD spectra of a) Biosorbent after adsorption with RB 222and b) Biosorbent before adsorption with RB 222.


Figure 3: a) Biosorbent before adsorption with RB 222and b) Biosorbent after adsorption with RB 222.


Figure 4: FTIR spectra of a) Biosorbent after adsorption with RB 222 and b) Biosorbent before adsorption with RB 222.

Modification of functional groups on the biosorbent: The chemical modification of amino (–NH2) and carboxylic groups (– COOH) as well as the extraction of lipids was carried to study the extent of their involvement in biosorption. Methylation of amines was carried out by treating 1 g of biosorbent with 20 mL of formaldehyde and 40 mL of formic acid. Esterification of carboxylic acids was carried out by suspending 1 g of biosorbent in 65 mL of ethanol and 0.6 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid. Both the mixtures were shaken separately for 5 h at 150 rpm. Extraction of lipids was carried out by heating 1 g of biosorbent in 75 mL of benzene under reflux conditions for 6 h. After all the treatments, the solutions were filtered using Whatman No. 42 filter paper and the biosorbent was washed with distilled water to remove all the traces of the chemicals and dried at 80ºC for 8 h. The effect of each functional group modification was studied by measuring the change in biosorption capacity of the biosorbent [18,19].

Determination of zero point of charge (pHzpc): The zero point of charge (pHzpc) is a point at which the charge of the solid surface is zero and the surface acidic (or basic) functional groups no longer contribute to the pH value of the solution. The determination of pHzpc of the chosen biosorbent was done by introducing 0.1 g biomass each into nine 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of 0.1 M potassium nitrate solution. Initial pH values of the nine solutions were adjusted between 2–10 by adding either 0.1 M HNO3 or NaOH. The solutions were then allowed to equilibrate on an orbital shaker (Labtop Quality Lab Equipment, India) (30 ± 1ºC) for 48 h at 150 rpm. The suspension in each sample was then filtered and the final pH was measured again. The pHzpc is the point where the curve of pH final (pHfinal) versus pH initial (pHinitial) crosses the line [20].

Equilibrium studies

Batch biosorption experiments were performed in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of reaction mixture by using conditions optimized earlier (results not shown) under following conditions: pH 1.5,RB 222 dye concentration 88 mg L-1, biosorbent concentration 1.2 g L-1, temperature 35°C, speed of agitation 80 rm-1. Samples were withdrawn at definite intervals of 20 min over a period of 240 min for determination of the residual colour in the solution after centrifuging at 4000 rm-1 for 10 min. The concentration of the dye in the solution was determined from the calibration curve prepared by measuring the absorbance of known concentrations of RB 222 at 609 nm using UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan UV1800 UV/VIS) reporting each data point as an average value of the triplicates recorded. Simultaneously a blank without biosorbent was run as a control. The concentration of the dye on the fungal biomass at the corresponding equilibrium conditions was determined using a mass balance equation expressed as specific uptake capacity (SUC) [21].

image (1)

Where, C0 and Ct are the initial and final concentrations (mgL-1) respectively, M is the biosorbent dosage (g) and V the volume of the solution (L) [17].

Isotherm models: In an endeavour to effectively design, develop and optimize an ideal adsorption system and to study the performance of an adsorbent it is essential to establish the most fitting adsorption equilibrium correlation for reliable prediction of the adsorption parameters. In this regard, equilibrium relationships, known as adsorption isotherms, describe how pollutants interact with the adsorbents [22,23]. In addition, the quality of the fit of the experimental results indicates whether adsorption is monolayer or multilayer, on a homogeneous or a heterogeneous surface [24].

The linearized form of Langmuir adsorption isotherm is given below:

image (2)

Where, qm is the maximum monolayer adsorption capacity (mg/g), KL is the Langmuir constant (Lm/g), and qe and Ce are the adsorption capacity (mg/g) and equilibrium concentration (mg/L), respectively. A straight line of slope 1/qm and intercept 1/KLqm is obtained by plotting Ce/qe versus Ce [25].The dimensionless biosorption intensity (RL) is calculated using the following equation:

image (3)

Where, Co is the initial concentration in the solution (mg/L).

Freundlich isotherm is the earliest known relationship describing the non-ideal, reversible and heterogeneous adsorption due to the diversity of adsorption sites [26] and its linear expression is given as:

image (4)

Where, KF, an empirical constant, is defined as a sorption coefficient representing the amount of dye molecules for a unit equilibrium concentration and is related to the sorption capacity of the sorbent. Slope, 1/n is an empirical constant related to the intensity of sorption and varies with surface heterogeneity and affinity.

Temkin isotherm contains a factor that explicitly takes into account adsorbent-adsorbate interactions. By ignoring the extremely low and high values of concentrations, the model assumes that the adsorption is characterized by a homogenous distribution of binding energies, up to a maximum binding energy [27]. The linearized form of Temkin isotherm is given as:

image (5)

Where, B (=RT/b) in (J/mol) is related to the heat of adsorption, T (K) is the absolute temperature, b is the Temkin’s isotherm constant and AT (L/g) = (RT lnAT)/b is the equilibrium binding constant, corresponding to the maximum binding energy. R is the universal gas constant (8.314Jmol-1K) [27]. A plot of qe versus ln Ce enables the determination of the isotherm constants B and A from the slope and intercept of the straight line plot [25,28].

The D–R isotherm equation has been often used to determine the mean adsorption energy (E) which may provide useful information with regard to whether or not biosorption is subject to a chemical or physical process [29]. Dubinin and Radushkevich developed the following isotherm in accounting for the effect of the porous structure of an adsorbent [30]:

image (6)

Where, BD is the Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm constant related to the degree of sorbate sorption by the sorbent surface representing the theoretical monolayer saturation capacity (mg/g), KD is related to the free energy of sorption per mole of the sorbate as it migrates to the surface of the biomass from infinite distance in the solution (mol2/KJ2) and is related to mean adsorption energy (E) (KJ/mol) through

image (7)

The Polanyi potential ε is defined by

image (8)

It is apparent that the D–R isotherm equation would not be simplified to the Langmuir or Freundlich type of isotherm. Furthermore, plot of lnQeversus ln2(1+(1/Ce) should lead to a straight line, and its slope is given by

image (9)

Thus, the mean adsorption energy (E) can be calculated as follows:

image (10)

Where, BD is denoted as the isotherm constant representing the theoretical monolayer saturation capacity [29,30].

Biosorption kinetics

The kinetics represents reaction rate which determines the residence time required for completion of the sorption and elucidates reaction pathways which cannot be explained by the isotherms [31]. In the present study, five kinetics models viz. Lagergren’s pseudo-first order, the pseudo-second order [32], Elovich kinetic model [33], the intra-particle diffusion model [34] and liquid film diffusion model [35] were employed, assuming that the measured concentrations are equal to cell surface concentrations. One of the most widely used equations for the sorption of the solute from a liquid solution describing the adsorption of liquid-solid systems based on solid capacity is the pseudo-first-order rate equation of Lagergren [36]. The linear form of Lagergren’s pseudo-first order equation is given as:

image (11)

Where, qe and qt are the sorption capacity (mg/g) of the dye at equilibrium and at a time t, respectively, and k1 is the rate constant for pseudo-first order sorption (1/min). A plot of log (qeqt) against t should give a straight line to confirm the applicability of the kinetic model [37].

The pseudo second-order equation, based on the sorption capacity of the solid phase, predicts the behaviour over the whole range of adsorption and is in agreement with chemisorption mechanism being the rate controlling step and the linear form pseudo-second order kinetic model is [32]:

image (12)

Where, qe and qt are the sorption capacity (mg/g) of the dye at equilibrium and at a time t, respectively, and k2 is the rate constant for pseudo-second order sorption (gmg-1 min-1). In the limit qt/t=0, the initial sorption rate, h, is given by k2qe2. Thus, a plot of t/qt against t of equation should give a linear relationship with a slope of l/qe and an intercept of l/k2qe2, i.e., l/h [38].

Elovich equation is used successfully to describe second order kinetics assuming that the actual solid surfaces are energetically heterogeneous, but the equation does not propose any definite mechanism for adsorbate–adsorbent [33]. The linear form of the Elovich model is presented by the following equation:

image (13)

The constants α and β were obtained from the slope and intercept of the linear plot of qt versus ln t [39]. Teng and Hsieh [40] proposed that constant α is related to the rate of chemisorption while β is related to the surface coverage. A higher value of α indicates a better adsorption mechanism [41].

The prediction of the rate-limiting step is important in the adsorption processes. It influences design and scale-up of the process. The mechanism of adsorption is generally considered to involve one or any combination of the rate-controlling mechanisms: bulk diffusion, film diffusion, pore diffusion or intra-particle diffusion and chemical adsorption of dye at an active site on the surface. Bulk diffusion is non-limiting when agitation is sufficient to avoid concentration gradients in solution. So, the most important steps are film diffusion, pore diffusion and chemical reaction. Therefore, adsorption diffusion models are mainly constructed to describe the process of film diffusion and/or intra-particle diffusion because the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models cannot identify the diffusion mechanism [42,43]. Weber and Morris [34] described the intra-particle uptake of the adsorption process to be proportional to the half-power of time. The intra-particle diffusion rate constant (kid) is given by the following equation:

image (14)

This parameter, although not a reaction rate, can be correlated with system variables to characterise the influence of intra- particle diffusion.

When the boundary plays the most significant role in adsorption during the transport of the solute molecules from the liquid phase up to the solid phase; the liquid film diffusion model may be applied as follows:

image (15)

Where, F is the fractional attainment of equilibrium F=qt/qe and kfd is the external mass transfer coefficient (1 min-1) [28,35,41].

Error analysis

Determination of the best isotherm or kinetics model though possible through analysis of the correlation coefficient (R2), is not sufficient and can lead to some ambiguities when the set of data is not complete. The linearization of isotherm equations using data transformations will implicitly alter the error structure and may also violate the error variance and normality assumptions of standard least squares. Due to the inherent bias from linearization, alternative isotherm parameter sets were determined by non-linear regression. This provides a mathematically meticulous method for determining the isotherm parameters by using the original form of the isotherm equation [24]. In all of the error analysis methods it is assumed that both the liquid-phase concentration and the solid-phase concentration contribute equally to weighting the error criterion for the model solution procedure. In the present study, five error deviation functions were used to predict the optimum isotherm and kinetics model as follows [44]:

The Sum of Squared Errors (SSE) (Equation 16) is the most commonly utilized error function. It is assumed that the model which gives the lower SSE values is the best model for dye sorption.

image (16)

In Sum of absolute errors (SAE) (Equation 17), the approach is similar to the SSE method. Isotherm parameters determined using this error function provides a better fit as the magnitude of the error increases, biasing the fit towards the high concentration data.

image (17)

The average relative error (ARE) (Equation18) function attempts to minimize the fractional error distribution across the entire concentration range.

image (18)

Hybrid fractional error function (HYBRID) (Equation 19), a composite fractional error function was developed in order to improve the fit of the SAE method at low concentration values [24]. In this method each SAE value is divided by the experimental solid-phase concentration value q. In addition a divisor is included as a term for the number of degrees of freedom for the system—the number of data points minus the number of parameters within the isotherm equation.

image (19)

The Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD) (Equation 20) is similar in some respects to a geometric mean error distribution modified according to the number of degrees of freedom of the system.

image (20)

Where qe,calc are the theoretical adsorbed solid phase concentrations of sorbate on sorbent, which have been calculated from one of the isotherm equations and qe,meas are the experimentally determined adsorbed sorbate concentrations obtained from Equation (1) using the experimentally measured equilibrium sorbate liquid phase concentrations, Ce.

Desorption and reuse of the biosorbent

The dye loaded biosorbent prepared by exposing the dried biomass of R. arrhizus (1.2 g/L) to RB 222 solution (88 mg/L) at pH 1.5 for 111 min at 35oC on a rotary shaker (80 rpm) was used for desorption. The biomass covered with RB 222 was separated by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min, washed repeatedly with deionized water to remove any residual dye and dried at 80ºC for 24 h before use. The amount of RB 222 absorbed was calculated to be 72.89 mg/g. Desorption studies were initially optimized using this pre-loaded biosorbent of R. arrhizus by using solutions of different molarity (0.001, 0.0015, 0.0025, 0.005, 0.01, 0.1) of NaOH as eluant at a constant solid to liquid ratio (S/L) of 10, in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. The desorption of the dye was optimized over a range of S/L of 2, 5, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40 and 50 using the molarity of NaOH that yielded the highest desorption [45]. Each desorption cycle was allowed 120 min of contact time. The eluted biosorbent was washed repeatedly with deionized water to remove any residual desorbing solution and placed into dye solution for the succeeding biosorption cycle after drying to a constant weight. The cycles were repeated five times using the same biomass.

Desorption efficiency was calculated by using following equation:

image (21)

Results and Discussion

Characterization of the biosorbent

XRD analysis: The XRD pattern of R. arrhizus revealed poorly resolved peaks indicating a predominance of amorphous nature thereby proving the suitability of the biosorbent for biosorption. The broad peaks obtained at 2θ were 19.7572, 21.4273, 24.0244 and a small sharp peak at 2θ of 72.6714 with d spacing 4.49365, 4.14703, 3.70429 and 1.30113, respectively [46]. Presence of broad peaks can be attributed to a heterogeneous and complex matrix composed of several substances, including proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, etc. Adsorption of dye may lead to change in molecular and crystalline structure of the adsorbent as was evident from the XRD pattern of the dye laden biosorbent. It exhibited more amorphous character along with appearance of two crystalline peaks at 2θ of 43.6184 and 51.0984 suggesting that the crystalline dye molecules were adsorbed on the surface mostly by chemisorption causing alteration of the structure of the biosorbent [47].

SEM analysis: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been a primary tool for characterizing the surface morphology and fundamental physical properties of the adsorbent surface. It is useful for determining the particle shape, porosity and appropriate size distribution of the adsorbent [21,42,48]. The morphological profile of the biosorbent revealed a rough and heterogeneous surface with relatively porous matrix of macroporous character, pointing towards its potential in taking up the dye. Figure 3 shows the change in the structure of the biosorbent after sorption with RB 222 showing less porous structure indicating effective adsorption of dye molecules in the pores, interstices and cavities on the external surface of this biosorbent. The macropores facilitated easy diffusion of RB 222 into the pores and also assisted adsorption of dye molecules on the surface of the biosorbent.

FTIR analysis: The biosorptive removal of the dyes by the fungal biosorbent is mainly linked to the composition of the cell wall, which is considered as the primary site of bioavalibility [49]. The hexosamines-chitin and chitosan constituting approximately 24–40% of the cell dry weight of Rhizopus along with proteins and lipids serve as a matrix of various functional groups like amine R–NH2 (amino acids, proteins, glycoproteins, etc.), carboxylic (fatty acids, lipopolysaccharides, etc.), which take part in binding of dye ions [50]. A closer insight into the biomass surface properties was obtained by comparing the FTIR spectra of biomass of R. arrhizus, before and after biosorption with RB 222 in the range of 400–4000 cm-1. The infrared spectrum of the biosorbent displayed the complex and heterogeneous nature showing characteristic bands of proteins, lipids and polymeric compounds. Despite the complexity, certain typical characteristic peaks could be assigned to functional groups [51].

Peaks between 3500 to 3200 cm−1 represent–OH groups of alcohols and phenols and primary, secondary amines or amide –N-H groups, while peaks between 3300 to 2500 cm-1 indicate O-H stretch of carboxylic acids [52]. Peak positions between the wave number ranges of 2000 cm-1 to 500 cm-1, indicate the vibrational modes that are specific to the type of polysaccharides and glycosidic linkages and denote the presence of aldehyde groups which are actively involved in biosorption. Amide I bands (1700-1600 cm-1) due to C=O stretching vibrations of peptide bond provide insight into the protein secondary structure. Peaks between 910-665 cm-1 represent N-H wag of primary and secondary amines. The FTIR spectra of the biosorbent exhibited appearance, disappearance and shifting of various peaks with change in intensity due to change in bonding energy in the corresponding functional groups after biosorption. This confirmed changes in the availability of the functional groups and active role played by them in biosorption (Figures 5-8).


Figure 5: Plot of initial versus final pH for the determination of pHzpc of R. arrhizus biomass.


Figure 6: Intra-particle diffusion model


Figure 7: Liquid film diffusion.


Figure 8: Quantity of Reactive Blue 222 dye adsorbed and desorbed in sorption/deorption cycles.

Peaks at 3523.95-3302.13 cm-1 indicate the presence of carboxyl, primary and secondary amines and amides. Disappearance of peaks at 3523.95, 3302.13 cm-1 indicates their involvement. The spectrum displayed the absorption peaks at 1743.65, 1710.86, and 1238.3 cm−1, corresponding to carboxyl groups. Shifts in peaks corresponding to carboxylic groups (1238.3 to 1228.66 cm-1) and disappearance of peaks at 1743.65 and 1710.86 cm-1 indicates their participation. Disappearance of peaks at 3226.91 cm-1 and shifting of peak at 1539.2 to 1543.05 cm-1 indicated the contribution of amine groups in the binding of RB 222. Disappearance of peak at 1031.92 cm-1 and shifting of bands from 3282.84 to 3294.42 cm-1; 2852.72 to 2854.65 cm-1 and 1159.22 to 1161.15 cm-1 indicated the involvement by C-O stretching vibrations, NH bending, C-O-C linkage, bonded hydroxyl OH of water in binding of the dye when compared to that of the biomass of R. arrhizus before biosorption. Several bands in the range of 1658.78-1379.10 cm-1 are assigned to phenolic and amine groups. The disappearance of peak at 1379.10 cm-1 after binding of RB 222 indicated their participation in the biosorption. The peaks at 2924.09 cm−1 can be attributed to asymmetric C—H stretching vibrations of methyl, methylene and methoxy groups did not change even after biosorption with RB 222, indicating that these groups did not participate in in the biosorption process [53-55]. FTIR technique proved to be an efficient tool for detecting structural changes and probable binding sites induced by the biosorption of RB 222.

Modification of the functional groups: The potential functional groups implicated in biosorption by FTIR analysis, were blocked by chemical treatments to study the extent of their involvement by measuring the percent reduction in the biosorption. The treatment of the biosorbent with formic acid (HCHO-HCOOH) causes blocking of primary and secondary amines on the biosorbent due to their methylation [19]. The reaction occurs as follows:


The methylation of the positively charged amino groups strongly affected the removal of RB 222 by R. arrhizus showing a significant reduction of 57.29% in biosorption. This reduction can be attributed to prevention of their participation in dye biosorption, indicating a major role played by them in biosorption of RB222. Chitin carries one linear amino group per glucose unit and thus exhibits a high dye uptake capacity [54].

Treatment of the biosorbent with ethanol results in esterification of carboxylic acids causing reduction in the number of positively charged sites present on the cell wall of the biosorbent and the reaction occurs as follows [19]:


Esterification of the carboxyl groups decreased the biosorption of RB 222 by 8.61% indicating that carboxylic groups also to some extent contributed to biosorption of RB 222. Thus, it can be inferred from the above results that amines and the carboxyl groups of chitin do play a role in the sorption of RB 222. However, the role of carboxylic acids is minor to that of amines. Since RB 222 has only one NH2 group in the dye molecule, interactions between carboxyl and carbonyl groups of the biosorbents and NH2 group of the dyes maybe less important than that of NH2 groups of biosorbent and SO2-3 groups of the dye [56].

Removal of lipids from the biosorbent also exhibited a negative effect causing 4.44% reduction in the biosorption of RB 222, which revealed the contribution of lipids present on the cell wall of R. arrhizus in biosorption. The reduction in biosorption can be attributed to possible structural changes that may have occurred due to the harsh condition employed for the extraction process [57].

Determination of zero point of charge (pHzpc): The pH of the dye solution affects surface functionality and thus plays a vital role in the adsorption process and particularly affects the adsorption capacity. A convenient index of the propensity of a surface to become either positively or negatively charged as a function of pH is the value of the pH required to give zero net surface charge, called point of zero charge (pHZPC) [58]. This indicates that the surface has a negative surface charge above the pHZPC and a positive surface charge below the pHZPC [59]. The R. arrhizus biosorbent used in this study has the pHZPC value of 4.88. This means that at pH higher than 4.88 the surface bears a negative charge, while at pH below 4.88 the surface functional groups, such as amino and carboxyl groups are positively charged providing cationic anchor points with which the dye anions can interact [26].

Isotherm studies

An equilibrium analysis is the most important fundamental information required for evaluation of the affinity of a sorbent as well as the applicability of sorption process as a unit operation. The shape of an isotherm can provide qualitative information on the nature of the solute–surface interaction and predict if a sorption system is favourable or unfavourable [60]. Isotherm curve for the biosorption of RB 222 by R. arrhizus showed concave shape and a plateau which is characteristic of the L2-type curve according to the Giles and Smith classification [61].

The L2-type isotherms indicate adsorption of the solute on the adsorbent until the formation of a monolayer without the existence of strong competition between the adsorbate and the solvent to occupy the adsorption sites. The formation of more than one layer is not possible due to the electrostatic repulsion between adsorbed dyes molecules and those in solution [29,61]. Since biosorption isotherm curve of RB 222 was of L2-type, four widely used mono-component isotherm models were employed (Table 1).

Langmuir Freundlich Temkin Dubinin-Radushkovich
qe,exp (mg/g) 72.94 qe,exp (mg/g) 72.94 qe,exp (mg/g) 72.94 qe,exp(mg/g) 72.94
qe, cal(mg/g) 72.88 qe, cal(mg/g) 72.58 qe, cal(mg/g) 72.51 qe, cal(mg/g) 79.06
KL (L/mg) 3.4 KF 74.664 B(J/mol) 6.06 BD (mg/g) 1*10-07
RL 0.003 n 10.869 AT (L/g) 2.16*1005 E (KJ/mol) 2.236
        b 0.4227    
R2 0.999   0.979   0.974   0.966
SSE 3.6*10-03   0.1296   0.1849   37.45
SAE 06*10-02   0.36   0.43   6.12
ARE 8.22*10-02   0.4935   0.5895   8.39
HYBRID 4.93*10-05   1.70*10-03   2.5*10-03   0.51
MPSD 6.76*10-07   2.44*10-05   3.47*10-05   7.00*10-03

Table 1: Isotherm parameters and error analysis for adsorption of RB 222 on R. arrhizus.

The essential characteristics of the Langmuir isotherm, expressed in terms of a dimensionless constant separation factor or equilibrium parameter, RL, indicates the nature of adsorption to be either unfavourable (RL>1), linear (RL=1), favourable (0<RL<1) or irreversible (RL=0) [62]. The low RL value (0.003) in the present investigation indicated that the adsorption of RB222 onto the biosrbent is favorable. A high value of Langmuir parameter qcalc predicts the monolayer biosorption capacity of the biomass and is suggestive of high biosorption capacity. The second Langmuir parameter KL reflects the affinity of a sorbent for a particular dye ion. Langmuir isotherm model fitted the results reasonably well (R2=0.999), suggesting that the surface of the sorbent could be homogenous and attainment of saturation during dye biosorption was achieved. It also indicated that the sorbed molecules are organized as a reversible monolayer, all sites are energetically equivalent and there is no interaction between the sorbed molecules [63]. However, biosorption sites on the fungi are not homogeneous, as presumed in the Langmuir model, because they contain functional groups of diverse kind, which vary in their affinity for dye ions.

The Freundlich isotherm model for sorption of RB 222 also fitted well yielding a straight line. The values of 1/n and KF were calculated from the slope and intercept of the plot of ln qe versus lnCe. The KF is found to be primarily related to the capacity of the adsorbent for the given ion; the higher the value of KF the larger is the capacity of sorption. A very high value of KF (74.66) compared favourably with other adsorbents used for the sorption of RB 222 by other researchers viz. 22.6-43.6 mg/g for chitosan [64]; industrial solid waste included Al (III) hydroxide 5.83 mg/g [65]. Freundlich isotherm constant 1/n can be used to calculate the adsorption capacity and intensity of the reaction and to explore the favourability of adsorption process. The slope 1/n value indicates the type of isotherm to be irreversible (1/n=0), favorable (0<1/ n<1), unfavorable (1/n>1). A value of 1/n=1 shows that the partition between two phases does not depend on the concentration, while 1/n>1 indicates a cooperative sorption involving strong interactions between the molecules of adsorbate. The slope of 0.092 suggested that the adsorption is heterogenous. Isotherms with value of 1/n below unity are classified as L-type isotherms reflecting a high affinity between adsorbate and adsorbent and are indicative of chemisorption whereas 1/n above one is an indication of cooperative adsorption. In the present investigation values of slope below one indicated chemisorption [62]. Conformity to the Freundlich model indicated that the biomass was completely saturated and the dye ions were adsorbed reversibly onto the surface in a multilayered pattern [66]. The regression coefficient (R2) value (0.979) for RB 222, was lower compared to Langmuir model, which can be attributed to assumption of the Freundlich model that dye biosorption does not saturate. However, isotherm curve of RB 222 clearly depicted saturation of dye ions. Thus, the Freundlich model is less appropriate than Langmuir model for defining dye biosorption by the biosorbent, even though its parameters do convey some important information regarding dye biosorption and intensity [29].

Linear plot for Temkin adsorption isotherm, which considers monolayer chemisorption of an adsorbate onto the adsorbent, fitted quite well (R2=0.97). This further supports the findings that the adsorption of RB 222 onto the biosorbent occurs by a chemisorption process. The D-R isotherm model is more general than the Langmuir isotherm as its deviations are not based on ideal assumptions such as equipotential of sorption sites, absence of steric hindrances between sorbed and incoming particles and surface homogeneity on microscopic level. In the present study, the estimated constant, BD, related to adsorption energy was 1*10-7 mg/g. This constant gives an idea about the mean free energy which was valued as E=2.236 kJ/mol. E is a parameter used in predicting the type of adsorption. Based on this energy of activation one can predict whether an adsorption is physisorption or chemisorption [30]. However, deviation from the measured SUC of the biosorbent for RB 222 showed that D- R isotherm model did not give very good description of the sorption process. Thus, it can be assumed that the sorption takes place by chemisorption as suggested by Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherms though the data were described well by the Langmuir model based on the error analysis (Tables 1 and 2).

First Order Second Order Elovich Intra particle Liquid film diffusion
qe,exp(mg/g) 72.94 qe,exp(mg/g) 72.94 qe,exp(mg/g) 72.94 qe,exp(mg/g) 72.94 qe,exp(mg/g) 72.94
qecalc(mg/g) 1.36 qecalc(mg/g) 73.55 qecalc(mg/g) 94.29 qecalc(mg/g) 79.25 qecalc(mg/g) 75.35
k1(min-1) 0.016 k2 (gmg-1min-1) 0.3647 a (mg/gmin) 1613.56 kid(mg/(g min1/2)) 3.053 F 1.00
        ß (g/mg) 0.138 C (mg/g) 46.09 kfd(L/min) 0.053
R2 0.988   0.999   0.889   0.926   0.948
SSE 5123.7   0.37   455.82   39.82   5.81
SAE 71.58   0.61   21.35   6.31   2.41
ARE 98.13   0.836   29.271   8.651   3.304
HYBRID 70.24   0.005   6.249   0.546   0.08
MPSD 0.963   1*10-04   0.086   7*10-03   1*10-03

Table 2: Kinetics parameters and error analysis for adsorption of RB 222 on R. arrhizus.

Kinetic studies

It has been reported that the Lagergren’s model does not fit the kinetic data well for the entire range of contact time and is generally applicable over the initial 20–30 min of the sorption process and results generally show highly varied qe values as seen in this study [15]. The reason for this difference in the qe value is that there is a time lag at the beginning of the sorption process, possibly due to a boundary layer or external resistance control [32]. Thus, the adsorption of RB 222 on the biosorbent did not follow the pseudo-first order adsorption kinetics.

On the other hand, a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.999 and the closeness of the experimental equilibrium capacity qeqexp estimated from the pseudo-second order kinetics with theoretical qeq value indicated a good compliance with the pseudo second-order model, based on the assumption that the rate limiting step may be chemisorption [67].The biosorption data were further analyzed using the Elovich equation. It has extensively been accepted that the chemisorption process can be described by this semi-empirical equation [68]. Teng and Hsieh [40] proposed that constant α is related to the rate of chemisorption while β is related to the surface coverage. The constants depend significantly on the amount of adsorbent with the adsorption constant, α, being a more sensitive parameter. A good biosorption process is indicated by a higher value of α, as seen in this case (1613.56). The correlation coefficients of Elovich equation (0.889), was lower than those of the pseudo secondorder equation.

The relatively short contact time, necessary for achieving equilibrium conditions (less than three hours as seen in this study), apart from the evident processing advantages, is considered as an initial indication that adsorption of dyes on R. arrhizus is chemical-reaction controlled, rather than a diffusion controlled process [15]. A more appropriate quantitative approach to distinguish between kinetic and diffusion rate control is to perform the square root of contact time analysis. The plot of qt versus t0.5 (Figure 6), presents multi-linearity implying that more than one process affected the adsorption, which was also shown in previous studies [16,60,64]. The first, sharper portion was attributed to an instantaneous adsorption stage of diffusion of dyes through the solution to the external surface of the biosorbent, or the boundary layer diffusion effect (i.e., external film resistance) of solute molecules. The second portion described the gradual adsorption stage of intra-particle diffusion (macro- and meso-pore diffusion). The third portion was attributed to the final equilibrium stage where the dye is adsorbed on sites on the interior surface of the biosorbent. This stage is assumed to occur very rapidly and does not form a rate-limiting stage in the adsorption of dyes onto the biosorbent. The intra-particle diffusion also starts to slow down due to the extremely low dye concentration left in the solution. The rate of uptake might be limited by the size of adsorbate molecule, concentration of the adsorbate and its affinity to the adsorbent, the pore-size distribution of the adsorbent, etc. [44].

The rate constant kid (mgg-1 min-0.5) of the intra-particular diffusion on the biosorbent was low probably indicating slow diffusion of the bulky molecule of RB 222 during the adsorption process. Jadhav and Vanjara [69] reported slow rate of sorption in case of big molecules such as acidic, basic and disperse dyes on sawdust, polymerized sawdust and sawdust carbon. According to Weber and Morris [34], if intra-particle diffusion is involved in the adsorption process, then the plot of the square root of time versus the uptake would result in a linear relationship and intra-particle diffusion would be the rate-limiting step if this line passed through the origin. The deviation of the straight line from the origin is indicative of some degree of boundary layer control and further shows that the intra-particle diffusion is not the only rate controlling step, but that other processes may control the rate of adsorption [60,68]. The extrapolation of the linear straight line to the time axis gives intercepts C, which is proportional to the boundary layer thickness. This is attributed to the instantaneous utilization of the most readily available adsorbing sites on the adsorbent surface [60]. In the present study, a very large value of C suggests a greater boundary layer effect and greater contribution of the surface adsorption in the rate limiting step [70].

The linear plot of –ln (1-F) vs. t whereby F=qt/qe, despite providing good linearity does not pass through the origin (Figure 7). Thus, it can be concluded that liquid film diffusion is not the predominant mechanism for RB 222 adsorption on the biosorbent. Error analysis revealed that the second order kinetic model best described the biosorption of RB 222 on the biosorbent.

Desorption and reuse of the biosorbent

One of the key factors in assessing its potential for commercial application is the regeneration of the biosorbent. Desorption studies not only help to elucidate the nature of adsorption, they are also critical in keeping the costs down while recovering the dye non-destructively from the liquid phase in a concentrated form, facilitating its disposal and thus restoring the biosorbent for effective reuse. The stability and the potential reusability of the biosorbent were assessed by monitoring the change in recovery through five consecutive adsorption– desorption cycles of 200 min each.

As the molarity of NaOH increased (S/L at 10) from 0.001 M to 0.01 M, the percent desorption increased from 2.18 to 96.22%. This can be attributed to the increase in negative OH-ions creating a negatively charged surface on the biosorbent which favoured the desorption of dye anions due to the electrostatic repulsion [71]. Use of 1 M NaOH reduced the desorption of RB 222 similar to the trend reported by Arami et al. [71], Kadirvelu et al. [72] and Patel and Sumathi [73] during desorption of dyes from orange peel, activated carbon and Aspergillus foetidus, respectively.

The efficiency of the desorbing agent is often expressed by the solid to liquid ratio (S/L). High values of S/L are desirable for complete elution and to make the process more economical [74]. However, at the same time, the volume of the solution should be enough to provide maximum solubility for the desorbed dye. Hence, using 0.1 M NaOH as an eluant, S/L was optimized from 2 to 50.The desorption increased with increase in S/L from 2 to 10 yielding highest value (98.51%) at S/L of 10, decreasing thereafter (Figure 7). The biosorbent undergoing successive adsorption–desorption processes retained good adsorption capacity even after five cycles and only a maximum of 1.26 % decrease in sorption capacity was observed after five cycles.

Mechanism of biosorption

The determination of the adsorption mechanism is important for design purposes. The adsorption mechanism often depends on the chemical composition of the adsorbent, the nature of adsorbate and the solution environment. The fitting of the experimental data to both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models suggested that the biosorption process was a monolayer capacitive sorption process in which homogeneous and heterogeneous biosorption patches coexisted on the surface of R. arrhizus and the biosorption process involved more than one mechanism. The goodness of fit provided by pseudo second-order equation suggested that the rate limiting step may be chemisorption. FTIR analysis and modification of amino groups indicated a dominant sorption mechanism involving electrostatic interaction of the anionic groups of RB 222 with protonated amine/ imine groups of the biosorbent [67]. Binding of RB 222 to R. arrhizus can be attributed to electrostatic interactions between six SO3-2 groups on the dye and positively charged amine sites in the biomass [54]. Simultaneously, weak interactions between the sorbent matrix and numerous benzene rings in the dye molecule, as well as hydrogen bonding, could play an important role. The availability of amine groups is controlled by two important parameters: the crystallinity of the polymer and the diffusion properties. Predominance of amorphous nature revealed by the XRD analysis indicated the accessibility of adsorption sites and thus the suitability of the biosorbent for biosorption. Overall, the sorption process can be described as follows: RB 222 is first adsorbed on the surface of R. arrhizus by chemisorption via electrostatic interaction until the surface functional sites are fully occupied; thereafter dye molecules diffuse into the pores of the biosorbent layers for further interactions [39,42]. A greater boundary layer effect shown by intra-particle diffusion model suggested a greater contribution of the surface adsorption in the rate limiting step. Similar results were reported by Uzun [75].


R. arrhizus, a low cost waste biomass from industrial fermentations proved to be a promising biosorbent due to a short equilibrium time and high specific uptake capacity. The XRD pattern of R. arrhizus revealed preponderance of amorphous nature thereby proving the suitability of the biosorbent for biosorption. The heterogeneous surface with relatively porous profile of the biosorbent was revealed by SEM analysis. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin models fitted the adsorption equilibrium data with high correlation coefficients, though the Langmuir model described the data most efficiently. The suitability of the pseudo-second order equation for the sorption of RB 222 pointed towards chemisorption as the mechanism of biosorption. The experimental data also showed that intra-particle diffusion plays a significant role in determination of the sorption rate. FTIR analysis and modification of functional groups showed contribution of amino and carboxyl groups in biosorption. Desorption and reusability studies using 0.1 M NaOH as eluant at S/L of 10, showed potential for the recovery and the further containment of RB 222. The biosorbent could be regenerated and reused at least five times in biosorption–desorption cycles successively.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8782
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2016 - Feb 21, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8656
  • PDF downloads : 126

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version