alexa Endothelial Denudation of Isolated Human Internal Mammary Artery Segments | OMICS International
ISSN: 2329-6607
Cardiovascular Pharmacology: Open Access
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Endothelial Denudation of Isolated Human Internal Mammary Artery Segments

Victor Lamin1, Michael Worthington2, James Edwards2, Fabiano Viana2, Robert Stuklis2, David Wilson1 and John Beltrame1*

1Discipline of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide and Cardiology Research Unit, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Australia

2D’Arcy Sutherland Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital North Terrace, Australia

*Corresponding Author:
John F Beltrame
Professor of Medicine, Discipline of Medicine
School of Medicine, University of Adelaide
Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road
Woodville SA, 5011, Australia
Tel: 61 8 8222 6740
E-mail: [email protected]

Received April 14, 2016; Accepted May 06, 2016; Published May 10, 2016

Citation: Lamin V, Worthington M, Edwards J, Viana F, Stuklis R, et al. (2016) Endothelial Denudation of Isolated Human Internal Mammary Artery Segments. Cardiovasc Pharm Open Access 5: 180. doi:10.4172/2329-6607.1000180

Copyright: © 2016 Lamin V, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Cardiovascular Pharmacology: Open Access


Background: Endothelial denudation is an important approach to evaluate the role of the endothelium in vascular reactivity studies. Although approaches to remove the endothelium are well established in animal models, these methods have proved difficult to effectively translate to remnants of human Internal Mammary Artery (IMA) obtained during coronary bypass. This study sought to identify the optimal technique for endothelial denudation of IMA while preserving vascular contractile responses. Methods: IMA segments were subject to endothelial denudation using one of the following techniques: (1) surface abrasion, rubbing with a stainless steel wire, (2) vasoconstriction abrasion or (3) shear abrasion via infusion of an effervescent solution. Following intervention, IMA segments were evaluated by: (1) histochemistry to quantify structural damage and endothelial cell abundance and (2) functional endothelium-dependent vasodilator response using vascular myography in an organ bath preparation. Results: Vasoconstriction abrasion removed endothelial cells and caused disruption of the internal elastic lamina, these vessels failed to respond to the vasoconstrictor Phenylephrine (PE) or the endothelium-dependent vasodilator A23187. Surface abrasion alone was incomplete in removing endothelial cells, vessel vasodilated partially when challenged with A23187 in the presence of PE. Shear abrasion removed endothelial cells most effectively, as these pre-constricted vessels did not relax to A23187 but demonstrated increased sensitivity to PE. Conclusions: In this controlled comparative study assessing both structural and functional endpoints of endothelial denudation techniques, we have demonstrated that shear abrasion by infusion of an effervescent solution is the optimal technique to remove the endothelium and preserve vascular function in human IMA.


Internal mammary artery; Endothelium denudation; Vascular reactivity


IMA: Internal Mammary Artery; CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft; PE: Phenylephrine; VIP: Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide; BMI: Body Mass Index; ACE-inhibitor: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor; SSRI: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor; H&E: Haematoxylin and Eosin


The research carried out during the last 3 decades gave us deeper insight into our understanding of the complexity of the vascular endothelium. Previously perceived as an inert cellular lining, it is now appreciated as a complex endocrine organ regulating vascular function via the release of vasoactive autocoids as well as influencing platelet activity [1,2]. Vascular endothelial denudation leads to loss of endothelial function and a subsequent increase vascular sensitivity to vasoactive autocoids [3,4]. This has been a fundamental method to assess the role of the endothelium of an isolated vessel preparation in vascular reactivity studies. Previous vascular reactivity studies have denuded the vascular endothelium of isolated vessel via mechanical and chemical approaches. Chemical endothelial denudation through treatment with detergent [5,6] is considered unsafe and has been found to compromise the viability of the smooth muscle cell [7].

Mechanical endothelial denudation has been undertaken in both animal and human isolated vessel via (1) the gentle rubbing of the luminal surface of the vessel with wooden stick [8], syringe needle [9], stainless steel wire [10,11], forcept [12], blunt seeker [13] and balloon catheter [14,15], (2) intense vascular constriction upon a intravascular rod [16] and (3) the passing of air bubbles through the lumen of the vessel [17]. Similar studies utilising the human internal mammary artery (IMA) have been problematic and met with variable success in achieving consistent endothelial denudation, since the vessel is not amenable to the above established denudation techniques.

The objective of this study is to determine the most effective endothelial denudation technique for IMA in isolated vessel preparations, as assessed by vascular reactivity studies.


Patients scheduled for elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), were consented pre-operatively for the use of their discarded IMA vessel. The study was approved by the Royal Adelaide Hospital Human Ethics Committee. Standard cardiac surgical procedures were undertaken utilising a combination of opioid (fentanyl), inhalation (isoflorane) and muscle relaxant (rocuronium) in anaesthesia, followed by a primary median sternotomy approach.

The left IMA was harvested as a pedicle graft with the excess vessel length trimmed. The remnant IMA segment from the region prior to the bifurcation was available for the experimental studies before the treatment with papaverine.

Vessel isolation

The IMA segments were immediately placed into ice-cold Krebsbicarbonate solution containing in mmol/L: NaCl 118, KH2PO4 1.18, KCl 3.89, NaHCO3 25, MgCl2 1.05, CaCl2 2.34, EDTA 0.01 and glucose 5.56 at pH 7.4, previously aerated with carbogen gas (95% O2 and 5% CO2). Each vascular segment was dissected free of connective tissue and cut into 3mm wide segments.

Endothelial denudation techniques

The IMA segments were assigned to either a control group (no endothelial denudation) or one of the following experimental luminal mechanical endothelial denudation approaches:

Surface abrasion method: This traditional approach involves mechanical removal of the endothelium by gentle rubbing of the intimal surface with stainless-steel wire as described previously by Wackenfors [10] and Aleksandar [11].

Constrictor abrasion method: In this technique, a stainless steel rod is inserted through the lumen of the vascular segment, ensuring that the rod occupies ≥ 90% of the vessel lumen. The vessel (with the rod insitu), is then immersed in high potassium (KPSS) solution containing in mmol/L: KH2PO4 1.18, KCl 16, NaHCO3 25, MgCl2 1.05, CaCl2 2.34, EDTA 0.01 and glucose 5.56 at pH 7.4) previously aerated with Carbogen gas (95% O2 and 5% CO2) to induce vascular constriction upon the stainless steel rod. The rod was then carefully moved back and forth three times within the vessel lumen thereby removing the endothelium. This is a hybrid approach to similar methods that utilise an inflated balloon catheter rather than the stainless steel rod as described previously by Lu [16].

Shear abrasion method: This technique involves high velocity intraluminal infusion of an effervescent solution consisting of air and physiological Krebs solution through a catheter, moving the catheter tip within the lumen for 90 seconds as described previously by Guyton [17] with some modifications.

Assessment of endothelial integrity

Structural assessment: Control and experimental isolated IMA preparations were fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin, embedded in paraffin before being sectioned transversely (5 μm sections), and mounted on glass slides. Sections were immuno-stained for CD 34 and Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological examination. The total number of CD 34 positive cells per view was estimated as the average number of cells in 20 views at different location. Images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope and recorded on a Nikon cool snap HQ camera.

Functional assessment: Vascular reactivity was assessed using vascular myography in an organ bath preparation with the isolated IMA segments mounted on stainless steel hooks and vessel tension measured with a force transducer. The organ bath preparation involved a 15 ml jacketed organ bath containing Krebs solution bubbled with Carbogen. Isometric tension was recorded using Lab chat 6 software with the system being calibrated each day before the start of any experiment. The vessel segments were allowed to stabilize at a resting tension of 19.6 mN for 1 hour at 37°C before the experiments commenced. The vessels were submaximally contracted with KPSS solution three times, to confirm a functional vessel and optimize the vascular contractile apparatus function. Following a further 30 minute equilibration period, a cumulative dose response curve to the phenylephrine agonist (PE, 0.01 μM - 300 μM) was generated and the dose producing a half maximal response determined. After the last response, vessel was allowed to equilibrate for 1 hour and pre-contracted to a dose of the agonist that produces 70% constriction. Upon reaching a plateau constrictor response, the endothelium-dependent vasodilator A23187 (a calcium ionophore, 2 μM), was added to confirm endothelial integrity.

Data analysis

Vascular constriction was expressed as change in weight per mili- Newton (mN) normalized with the KPSS response and relaxation responses as the percentage reduction in the agonist-induced constriction. Dose-response curve to PE constriction was obtained. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis of paired data has been made using student t-test to compare and analyze the variance (ANOVA) of two or more than two groups. Differences are considered significant at p<0.05.


IMA segments were obtained from 15 patients (60% male) with mean age: 68.0 ± 13.25) undergoing CABG. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. A total of 48 segments were studied with similar luminal diameters between the study groups. A total of 12 experimental conditions were undertaken per intervention.

Total Patient 15
Male 60%
Mean age 68.0 ± 13.25
Vascular Risk Factors  
Current smoker 2 (13%)
Ex-smoker 3 (20%)
Diabetic 6 (40%)
Hypertensive 11 (73%)
Hypercholesterolemia 8 (53%)
BMI 26.7 ± 4.50
Drug therapy  
Anti-platelet 9 (60%)
Statin 13 (86%)
Beta-Blocker 11 (73%)
ACE-Inhibitor 6 (40%)
Calcium Channel Blocker 4 (26%)
Nitrate 2 (13%)
Diuretic 5 (33%)
SSRI 2 (13%)
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker 4 (26%)

Table 1: Patient characteristics and pre-operative medications for included patients.

Structural assessment

Histological examination of the control group revealed a continuous lining of endothelial cells, separated from the smooth muscle layer by an intact continuous internal elastic lamina (Figure 1). An intact internal elastic lamina was also evident in all the segments subjected to the mechanical shear abrasion method, suggesting intact sub-intimal layers despite denudation of the endothelial lining (Figure 1). IMA segments subjected to the mechanical surface abrasion method demonstrated variable amounts of distortion in the elastic lamina, which occasionally extended into the smooth muscle layer (Figure 1). In the mechanical constrictor abrasion method, there was substantial disruption in the elastic lamina, which extended into the smooth muscle layer. Endothelial denudation by shear abrasion demonstrated very few endothelial cells remaining within the luminal lining and minimal damage to the vascular smooth muscle cell layer. This was confirmed by quantification of the average number of CD34 positive cells per view (intact IMA=13.15 ± 6.3, surface abrasion IMA=3.7 ± 2.8 and shear abrasion IMA=1.6 ± 1.4, Figure 2). This suggests that endothelial denudation by the surface abrasion method was not as effective as the shear abrasion method.


Figure 1: Structural and functional findings from endothelial denudation of human IMA segments.


Figure 2: Endothelial cell loss with denudation.

Functional assessment

IMA denudation using surface and shear abrasion method has equivalent contraction responses to the potassium depolarising solution, whereas constriction abrasion has a reduced response compared to the intact IMA (Intact IMA: 27.3 ± 17.8 mN, surface abrasion: 20.9 ± 16.7 mN, constriction abrasion: 7.5 ± 1.15 mN and shear abrasion: 23.7 ± 12.2 mN, Figure 3).


Figure 3: Contractile responses to potassium ion following mechanical denudation.

Vasoconstrictor responses to incremental PE concentrations produced concentration-dependent contractions in intact and denuded IMA segments. There was a significant difference in maximal endothelium dependent vascular relaxation to A23187 between control IMA (84 ± 2.0%), IMA subjected to surface abrasion (29.43 ± 1.5%) and shear abrasion (0.04 ± 0.3%).

There was no difference in the EC50 of the concentration-response curve of the surface abrasion (compared to intact vessel), indicating equal sensitivity to PE. However, there was a difference in the EC50 of the concentration-response curve of the mechanical shear abrasion denudation (compare to intact IMA), indicating that they are more sensitive to PE than the intact IMA (EC50: intact vessel=2.41 ± 0.34 μM, surface abrasion=2.07 ± 1.33 μM, and shear abrasion=1.29 ± 0.34 μM, Figure 4).


Figure 4: Vascular hypersensitivity to PE following endothelium denudation.


This study is the first comprehensive systematic evaluation of endothelial denudation techniques for the IMA. Using both structural and functional assessments, the study demonstrates that the shear abrasion technique is the optimal method for denuding the endothelium from isolated IMA segments obtained from patients undergoing elective CABG. Although there was no differences between intact IMA, surface and shear abrasion in response to the standard potassium depolarising stimulus, there was a trend of reduced responses in the surface abrasion suggesting that part of its smooth muscle cell apparatus was damaged. Constriction abrasion (compare to intact IMA) had the least potassium contractile response (generated a force <9.8 mN) indicating that there was substantial smooth muscle cell damaged during the denudation procedure. These were considered unresponsive tissues and further evaluation with PE or A23187 was not undertaken.

The mechanical shear abrasion method is similar in effect to the ‘bubble passage’ techniques for arterial injury used previously by Guyton et al. [17]. As anticipated, histological examination revealed a denuded endothelial lining and functional studies showed a loss of endothelium-dependent vasodilation as well as hyperconstrictor responses to PE, using this denudation method. In contrast, IMA subjected to the surface abrasion technique resulted in incomplete endothelial denudation on histological examination and an intact endothelium-dependent vasodilator response to A23187. On the other hand, the constrictor abrasion method produced severe damage to the smooth muscle cell layer so that constrictor responses to vasopressor could not be evoked.

In contrast to these human IMA studies, endothelial denudation with surface abrasion and constrictor methods have been successfully employed in animal studies. Wang et al successfully used a sand paper polished cat whisker in surface abrasion method to denude the endothelium of foetal pulmonary resistance artery [18]. He obtained total endothelial removal as depicted by vascular hypersensitivity after endothelial removal. Lu et al used a specifically designed catheter in constriction abrasion method to successfully denude the artery of Wistar rat [16]. Other successful denudation methods employed in animal vascular reactivity studies include: gentle rubbing of the luminal surface of the vessel with wooden stick [8], syringe needle [9], stainless steel wire [10,11], forcept [12], blunt seeker [13], balloon catheter [14,15] and intense vascular constriction upon a intravascular rod [16]. This clearly illustrates the differences between animal and human isolated vessel studies.

The difficulty in achieving effective endothelial denudation in isolated human vessels has been reported by other investigators. For example, Lu et al. applied mechanical surface abrasion techniques to denude IMA and subjected them to Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) to evoke endothelium dependent relaxation and observed 20% relaxation to the VIP. This is consistent in our studies involving surface abrasion demonstrating that there is residual endothelial vasodilatory function in response to VIP [19]. A similar result was observed by Pagan et al. using urotensin II as a vasodilator after IMA denudation with a residual 20% endothelium-dependent relaxation response [20]. Thus although these studies reported IMA denudation by surface abrasion, the residual endothelium-dependent relaxation responses infer that an endothelium-dependent mechanism had not been completely excluded.

The human IMA is an outstanding conduit of choice for CABG. Unlike saphenous vein graft, which has a median patency of 7 years, more than 90% of IMA grafts are patent at 15 years [21]. This in part is attributable to its endothelial function. Moreover, despite CABG patients having established atherosclerotic disease and significant CV risk factors (contribute to endothelial dysfunction) all of the IMA segments demonstrated intact endothelial responses with little or no atherosclerotic plaque formation prior to the interventions.

The challenge of denuding the IMA is due to its unique structural and morphological arrangement compared to other vessels [22]. Structural and morphological analysis reveal that the media of the IMA is organized into two distinct layers: the internal muscular layer and an external layer with spirally oriented elastic lamellae that house the smooth muscle cells in between these layers [23]. The endothelial layer has fewer fenestrations and lower intercellular junction permeability [22], both of which contribute to its resilient nature to atherosclerotic plaque formation and provide greater endothelial attachment to the luminal surface. This later property limits endothelial denudation by the surface or constrictor abrasion methods, whereas the shear abrasion method is effective and superior to the other methods. Moreover, it has an additional theoretical advantage of keeping the vascular segment under a more physiologic condition during the denudation process and requires less skill to be successful.


In this systematic, comprehensive, controlled comparative study assessing both structural and functional endpoints of endothelial denudation techniques, we have demonstrated that the shear abrasion method is the optimal technique for human IMA segment endothelial denudation. This should be employed in future isolated human IMA vascular reactivity studies requiring endothelial denudation.

Authors’ contributions

Victor Lamin performed the experimental studies. Victor Lamin, David Wilson & John Beltrame participated in study design, data analysis and critical revisions of the manuscript. Michael Worthington, James Edwards, Fabiano Viana and Robert Stuklis assisted in undertaking the studies and reviewing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.


We thank Irene Stafford, Cardiology Research Unit for her assistance in data interpretation and other technical support in histological sample preparation.



Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

  • 3rd International Conference on Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiac Surgery
    July 05-06, 2018 Berlin, Germany
  • 25th Annual Congress on Cardiology and Medical Interventions
    July 16-17, 2018 Atlanta, USA
  • 6th Global Experts Meeting on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Pharmacology
    September 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
  • Current and Future trends in Cardio Vascular Diseases: Research and Outcomes
    October 05-06, 2018 Los Angeles, USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8832
  • [From(publication date):
    May-2016 - Jun 23, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8740
  • PDF downloads : 92

Review summary

  1. Garland Sargent
    Posted on Sep 19 2016 at 5:43 pm
    This paper sought to identify the optimal technique for endothelial denudation of internal mammary artery while preserving vascular contractile responses. The authors demonstrated in this controlled comparative study that shear abrasion by infusion of an effervescent solution is the optimal technique to remove the endothelium and preserve vascular function in human Internal Mammary Artery.

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7