alexa
Reach Us +44-1904-929220
Environment-Friendly Electrostatic Spraying Technology of Solvent-Based Coatings | OMICS International
ISSN: 2165-784X
Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Environment-Friendly Electrostatic Spraying Technology of Solvent-Based Coatings

Yanyan Wei, Daoxing Sun* and Xilei Chen
Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
Corresponding Author : Daoxing Sun
Qingdao University of Science and Technology
Qingdao 266042, China
Tel: (86) 0532-84023844
Fax: (86) 532- 84022961
E-mail: [email protected]
Received October 28, 2011; Accepted November 18, 2011; Published November 21, 2011
Citation: Wei Y, Sun D, Chen X (2011) Environment-Friendly Electrostatic Spraying Technology of Solvent-Based Coatings. J Civil Environment Engg 1:101. doi:10.4172/2165-784X.1000101
Copyright: © 2011 Wei Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering

Abstract

Environment-friendly electrostatic spraying technology and its advantages were introduced. The development prospect of electrostatic spraying technology, mechanism and design principle of the recipe of solvent-based coatings were discussed.

Keywords
Electrostatic spraying; Resource saving; Conductivity; Electrostatic thinner; Sent-based coatings
Introduction
A lot of solvent-based coatings have been used in automobile, equipments, motorcycle and machine trade, etc. As the work pieces which need to be sprayed with solvent-based coatings are different in shape and size, therefore, the spraying difficulty levels are different. Only about 30 percent coatings can be effectively used in conventional spraying process, and most of the coatings are wasted and lead to serious environmental pollution. In order to improve the spraying efficiency and reduce the environmental pollution, great effort has been made by many related manufactures. Bayat et al. [1,2] proved that many advantages of electrostatic spraying technology, such as high transfer efficiency, reduced emissions of VOC and coating, suited for irregular parts and saving spraying materials and labors. With the improvement in transfer efficiency, the clean-up cost went down, the material consumption and the disposal cost decreased, and manpower was saved. This technology can also be used in agriculture area for chemical spraying and waterborne coatings. Although most researchers have focused on the electrostatic spraying of pesticide [1,2] and the exploitation of electrostatic equipments [3,4], little work has been reported on the modulation method of solvent-based coatings in electrostatic spraying. This study offers an effective and simple method to paints praying factories on solvents-based electrostatic spraying technology.
Fixed cup and high-speed rotated cup type electrostatic sprayers had been used in China which could fulfill the demands of resource saving and environmental protection partly in the late twentieth century. As the limitation of the electrostatic spraying technology then, the disadvantages of those electrostatic spraying equipments were insufficiently atomizing and non uniformly spraying. This case can reduce spraying efficiency and make the work pieces need re-spraying and the post-treatment wasted much time and manpower. For this reason, the electrostatic spraying equipments were insufficiently used then. Since 1990s, some spraying factories in China have imported advanced electrostatic spraying equipments from America, Germany and other developed countries. The advanced spraying equipments have some new advantages such as light weight, sufficiently atomizing, uniformly spraying, clean and easy to use which are of much beneficial to economy and environment. Compared to a conventional electrostatic spraying gun (like American JSS10 hand-held equipment), it was found that the utilization efficiency of solvent-based coatings increased from 35% to 68%. One of these electrostatic equipments could save 120 kg coatings and 60 kg solvents within 18h, and save the cost almost 380$ per day. The data from this tractor factory showed that about 730,000$ materials and 36,000$ electrical energy and labor cost were saved by using electrostatic spraying equipments in 2008.
Principle of electrostatic spraying
The nozzle of an electrostatic spraying gun is an ionized electrode, which can make atomized particles of coatings pick up additional electrons and change to negative electric charge. An electrostatic field created by a grounded power not only draws the paint particles to the work piece and minimizes the drift and overspray, but also makes the droplets of the coatings absorbed on the parts tightly. Then the electrical charges are driven and returned to the power supply to complete a circuit. During the spraying process, paint droplets flow to the work piece and are attracted so tightly that the paint drift, overspray and the consumption of the solvent and material in each work piece are minimized [5,6].
Technological parameters of electrostatic spraying
An electrostatic spraying system can output 30~150 kV adjustable voltage, 50~100 mA adjustable direct current in operation, and give about 200 ml paint conveying capacity per minute. The spraying viscosity of paint is 9~18 s (Ford 4# viscosity cup), the volume resistivity of the coatings is 0.2~2.0 Mega-Ohm-meter (MΩ·m), and the jet breadth of the spray is 25 to 35 centimeters [6].
Formula Design of Electrostatic Spraying Coatings
Choice of original paint
The type of paint is chosen according to the properties of match, protection, decoration and adhesion of the work pieces needed. The balance between the original viscosity and conductivity of original coatings is determined by the spraying viscosity and type of the thinner.
Choice of the electrostatic thinner
As the volume resistance resistivity of an original paint is about 0.75~4.0 MΩ·m, it is unfit for spraying before adjustment, so electrostatic thinner must be added to raise conductivity. The electrostatic thinner is a high polar solvent and its conductivity is less than 0.10 MΩ·m. Butyl acetate, diacetone alcohol, low carbon alcohol and low carbon ketone are commonly used as electrostatic thinner [7]; their dosages are determined by the spraying conductivity. Metal and carbon black powder have higher conductivity. If the paint has conductive powder, less electrostatic thinner is needed for its adjustment. And as the original viscosity of the paint is higher than its spraying viscosity, the paint must be diluted by thinner before spraying. Usually the adding amount of thinner is about 40% of the original paint, and the amount of the conductive thinner must be controlled strictly. Insufficient conductive thinner could not reach the spraying conductivity and lead to sputter and insufficient atomization. Instead, excess electrostatic thinner may cause leakage, so “non polar” solvents are needed to balance the viscosity and conductivity.
The dosage and type of the thinners are chosen according to the electrostatic equipments and the weather. The paint droplets move faster in electrostatic spraying system than that in conventional spraying, so the thinner volatilizes faster and more thinner is consumed in the electrostatic spraying. Furthermore, hot weather also makes the thinner volatilize fast. In order to slow down the evaporation of the thinner and balance the conductivity in electrostatic spraying process, some slow-evaporating solvents such as high boiling aromatic, n-butyl lactate solvents are needed. Pay attention to the balance of evaporation velocity and solubility of the electrostatic thinners, because they are different with the type.
Calculation of electrostatic parameters
There is an exponent relationship between the conductivity of an electrostatic paint and the conductive thinner. The eligible conductivity of a spraying paint is between 15 and 0.40 MΩ·m. The relationship between the adding dosage x (wt%) and the whole conductivity y of the coatings (MΩ·m) is shown in the formula (1) [8].
y=A1e-BX+A2XB                                                        (1)
Where A1 is the conductivity of original coatings;
A2 is the conductivity (MΩ·m) of the thinner;
B is the characteristic constant of the thinner, and the B value is about 10 to 200. From the formula (1) we can know that that: limX→0, y=A1. y is the conductivity of unadjusted coatings, and no electrostatic thinner is added in this case. When limX→1, y=A1e-B+A2≈A2, y is the conductivity of the electrostatic thinner now. As the y value in formula (1) is not easy to get, and the A2XB is much less than A1e-BX, A2XB can be ignored in the calculation, so the formula (1) can be changed to the formula y=A1e-BX., The A1, A2, and B value of some materials are listed in Table 1.
Generally speaking, if the A2 value of different electrostatic thinners is similar, the B value of the thinners will be similar too. We can estimate the B value of an electrostatic thinner using this rule in Table 1. Butyl acetate, diacetone alcohol, cyclohexanone, and high boiling point hydrocarbon have lower volatility, and alcohol, acetone and toluene etc have higher volatility, so we should choose the thinner according to the weather flexibly. We can use formula y=A1e-BX and Table 1 to calculate the conductivity of the paint. In fact, it is convenient to control the conductivity of the paint using a high volt shake meter.
The conductive mechanism of electrostatic thinner
As polar molecules, the electrostatic thinners possess dipole moment, which can produce induced polarization and reinforce directed dipole in external electric field. The polar molecules of the electrostatic thinner in the paint are orientation polarization in the external electric field and the conductivity is reinforced [9]. The more the electrostatic thinner in coatings, the higher conductivity of the paint is obtained. Two reference recipes of the electrostatic paint are listed in Table 2 and Table 3.
Conclusion
Electrostatic spraying is a practical technique; it can increase the utilization ratio of coatings from 35% to 68%. This technology not only saves the consumption of the paint and thinner, but also reduces air pollution. It highly benefits economy and society, and should be developed widely.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51172116) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (Grant No. ZR2010BL022).
References

Tables and Figures at a glance

Figure Figure Figure
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12639
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2011 - Dec 16, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8816
  • PDF downloads : 3823
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri and Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

agriaq[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

streamtajm

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version