alexa Enzymatically Enhanced Guided Tissue Regeneration | OMICS International
Bioceramics Development and Applications
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Enzymatically Enhanced Guided Tissue Regeneration

Jeroen J. J. P. van den Beucken*, Lise T. de Jonge, Adelina S. Plachokova, and John A. Jansen

Department of Biomaterials, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

*Corresponding Author:
Jeroen J. J. P. van den Beucken
Department of Biomaterials
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: January 14, 2011; Accepted date: February 03, 2011

Visit for more related articles at Bioceramics Development and Applications


alkaline phosphatase; coating; guided bone regeneration; electrostatic spray deposition; cell culture


Guided bone regeneration (GBR) involves the application of a membrane-like barrier covering the defect to ensure that cells with the capacity to regenerate bone tissue repopulate the defect site. According to the GBR principle, cells with access to the wound space will determine the nature of the regenerated tissue [5]. As a precautionary measure to prevent collapse of the membrane, graft material (e.g. ceramic granules) can be placed in the confined area.

To date, the role of the membrane in GBR has been rather passive, i.e. the membrane only has a barrier-function. In view of new developments at the level of surface modification with surface-active biological compounds, however, the role of the membrane can be converted to an active one with stimulatory effects on tissue regeneration. For preservation of surface-activity, delicacy of the technology to immobilize biological compounds is required. Electrostatic spray deposition (ESD) represents an efficient technology for the deposition of biological compounds, as the process is highly accurate (i.e. cost-effective) and preserves functional activity of biological compounds due to relatively low ambient temperatures and fast drying [4,7].

Recent studies on the use ESD for deposition of the promineralization enzyme alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as an immobilized catalyst to increase inorganic phosphate concentrations have demonstrated to accelerate surface mineralization [1] and enhance osteogenic cell behavior in vitro [2]. Furthermore, an implantation study in rats has shown in vivo potential of ALP-coatings by significantly improving boneto- implant contact compared to non-coated titanium controls [6].

The current study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects of ALP-coated GBR-membranes by immersion experiments in organic phosphate-containing medium and cell culture experiments with primary rat bone marrowderived osteoblast-like cells.

Materials and methods

BioGide© resorbable bilayer membranes (Geistlich Biomaterials, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) were cut into 1×0.5 cm square membranes. Prior to ALP-coating, the membranes were pre-treated by magnetron sputtering with a 50 nm layer of titanium to obtain a conductive material. Deposition of ALP was carried out using a commercially available vertical ESD set-up (Advanced Surface Technology, Bleiswijk, the Netherlands) using an aqueous ALP-solution (1mg/mL in 90:10 (v/v) water:ethanol) and standardized deposition parameters (15% relative humidity; 40 °C holder temperature; 40mm nozzle-tosubstrate distance; 0.15 mL/h flow rate; 8–11 kV applied voltage) with various deposition times (0–60 minutes).

Optimal ALP deposition time was assessed using ALPactivity assay [1] and 2-weeks immersion studies in culture medium (α-MEM, supplemented with 10% FCS, 10−8M dexamethason, 10mM β-glycerophosphate, and 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid.

Cell culture experiments were carried out with ALPcoated membranes and non-coated controls in two individual runs. For each run, cells were freshly isolated from the femora of male Wistar rats and pre-cultured for 1 week in culture medium, as described previously [3]. Subsequently, cells were seeded at a density of 40.000 cells/membrane and cultured for up to 24 days. Cell behavior was evaluated by assessing proliferation (protein BCA assay), differentiation (ALP-activity assay), mineralization (calcium assay), and cell morphology (scanning electron microscopy).

Results and discussion

Membrane optimization

ALP was deposited using ESD for up to 60 minutes, after which ALP-activity was assessed. Figure 1 shows a linear increase in ALP-activity with increasing ALP deposition time.


Figure 1: Active ALP-content of membranes coated with ALP for up to 60 minutes. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Subsequently, ALP-coated and non-coated control membranes were immersed in culture medium for a period of 2 weeks. The deposition of calcium onto the membranes during this immersion period is presented in Figure 2, showing a non-linear increase with ALP deposition time.


Figure 2: Calcium deposition onto membranes coated with ALP for up to 60 minutes after a 2-week immersion period in culture medium. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Together, the results on active ALP-content and calcium deposition demonstrate that a ALP deposition time of 30 minutes is optimal.

Cell culture experiments

Cell culture experiments were carried out using two experimental substrates: ALP-coated membranes (30 minutes ALP deposition time) and non-coated controls in two individual runs. Both runs showed similar results and the results of one run are presented below.

Cell proliferation (Figure 3(A)) showed an increase during cell culture for both experimental groups.


Figure 3: Proliferation (A), differentiation (B), and mineralization (C) of osteoblast-like cells cultured on ALP-coated and non-coated control membranes for up to 24 days. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). * indicates statistically significant difference (P <.05).

Osteoblast-like cell differentiation showed an increase till day 12 of cell culture, after which ALP-activity decreased. No statistically significant differences were found for cell proliferation and differentiation between the experimental groups at individual time points (P > .05). In contrast, ALP-coated membranes significantly accelerated mineralization of osteoblast-like cells compared to noncoated controls at days 8, 12, and 16 of cell culture (P < .05). After 24 days of cell culture, mineralization was equal for both experimental groups.

Scanning electron microscopy (Figure 4) confirmed the calcium measurement, showing an higher extent of deposition of calciumphosphate nodules on ALP-coated membranes compared to non-coated controls.


Figure 4: Scanning electron microscopy images of ALPcoated and non-coated control membranes after 16 days of cell culture with osteoblast-like cells.


The membrane optimization experiments demonstrate that the optimal ALP deposition time is found at 30 minutes. These ALP-coated membranes significantly accelerate mineralization during osteoblast-like cell culture compared to non-coated control membranes without affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and morphology. Consequently, the data of the present study justify continuation of experimental work on ALP-coated membranes towards animal experiments.


This work was supported by a grant from Osteology Foundation (Lucerne, Switzerland; grant #07-015).


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11749
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2011 - Jul 21, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7961
  • PDF downloads : 3788

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7