Epigenetics Evolution and Replacement Histones: Evolutionary Changes at Drosophila H3.3A and H3.3B
Received Date: Sep 08, 2016 / Accepted Date: Nov 15, 2016 / Published Date: Nov 21, 2016
Histone modification and replacement in variant histones result in nucleosome remodeling and play an important role in epigenetics. The evolutionary mechanism of epigenetics was investigated by analysing the variant histone 3 genes, H3.3A and H3.3B, in 12 Drosophila species. A U11-48K-like gene coding for a zinc finger domain was located in the region upstream of the H3.3A gene in all Drosophila species studied. The U11-48K-like and H3.3A genes may be co-regulated, as is the case for the H3-H4 gene pair. However, no strongly conserved nucleotide sequence was found in the 5`- regions of the two genes. Various combinations of gene pairs were found upstream or downstream of the H3.3B gene but none were conserved amongst a broad range of Drosophila species. Moderately conserved DNA sequences were found in the H3.3B gene regions around the first intron and outside the coding region of the fifth exon, but DNA sequences in the upstream or downstream regions of the H3.3B genes were not strongly conserved. Different codon usages for three H3 genes (H3, H3.3A and H3.3B) were found for 13 of 18 amino acids and codon usages characteristic of replacement histones (H4r, H3.3A and H3.3B) were found for several amino acids. Several histone modification sites in H3, H3.3A and H3.3B showed extraordinarily biased codon usages. These results suggested the importance of the translational step for histone modification and for the development of epigenetic systems.
Keywords: Epigenetics; Variant histones; H3.3A; H3.3B; Drosophila
Understanding the evolutionary mechanisms by which phenotypes develop requires studying the systems responsible for the phenotypes. It is now clear that epigenetics play an important role in phenotypic expression and many biological phenomena [1-9]. Both the modification of histones and their replacement with variants causes chromatin remodeling and these are recognized as epigenetic mechanisms [10-11]. Therefore, the evolutionary mechanism underlying epigenetics can be studied by investigating evolutionary changes in the system for histone replacement and modification .
Histone 3 is a small (about 135 amino acid) protein and binds histone 4 (H4) to form a H3-H4 dimer . Together with histone 2A (H2A) and histone 2B (H2B), four histones are assembled into the histone core of the nucleosome . In Drosophila there are three H3 proteins, a replication-dependent H3 and two variant H3s, H3.3A and H3.3B [14-15]. In contrast to the replication-dependent H3 gene [16- 18], the H3 variant genes are single copy genes with introns and are located at IIL25C3 for H3.3A and at X8C14 for H3.3B in Drosophila melanogaster . Four amino acid substitutions between H3 and the H3 variants have been identified [1,5,19-20]. H3 variants are highly conserved and no amino acid changes have been observed between H3 variants . It is now known that biological ‘meaning’ is triggered by replacing histones with other histones that may carry different chemical modifications [1-2,21]. Several important questions remain to be answered, including 1) when and how histone variants are replaced, 2) which histones are modified, 3) which amino acids are modified, 4) at which sites amino acids are modified, and 5) what kinds of modifications occur. For example, a single site methylation at K9 (Lys at position 9) of H3 results in ‘gene silencing’, whereas multiple modifications such as methylation at K4 and acetylation at K9 of H3 result in ‘gene expression’ . Clearly, the mechanisms of histone modification and replacement are very important [1-2,21].
It was recently reported that some histone modifications, such as the methylation of H3 Lys9, occur during translation but not after translation . This finding suggested a possible relationship between translation and histone modification. We previously analysed the structure, genetic variation, and evolution of codon bias and guaninecytosine content of Drosophila histone genes [17-18,23-30]. The evolutionary change of H4r, a replacement for H4, has been reported in Drosophila . Here, the variant H3.3A and H3.3B genes from 12 Drosophila species were examined to study the mode of evolution of these replacement histones and their effect on the evolution of epigenetics.
Materials And Methods
The nucleotide sequences of the regions flanking and including the histone 3 genes (H3, H3.3A and H3.3B) from each of 12 Drosophila species (D. simulans, D. sechellia, D. melanogaster, D. yakuba, D. erecta, D. ananassae, D. pseudoobscura, D. persimilis, D. willistoni, D. mojavensis, D. virilis and D. grimshawi) were obtained from either FlyBase (FB2016 02) or DDBJ (Table 1). Clustal W (ver. 2.1) was used for multiple sequence alignment .
|Species||H3 gene||H3.3A gene||H3.3B gene|
|Drosophila melanogaster||AB019400 (DDBJ)||CG5825 (FlyBase)||CG8989 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila simulans||AB019401 (DDBJ)||GD23319 (FlyBase)||GD27984 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila sechellia||AB019402 (DDBJ)||GM18523 (FlyBase)||GM13676 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila yakuba||AB019405 (DDBJ)||GE11328 (FlyBase)||GE17412 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila erecta||AB019406 (DDBJ)||GG25048 (FlyBase)||GG19000 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila ananassae||GF21608 (FlyBase)||GF15720 (FlyBase)||GF19171 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila pseudoobscura||AB044538 (DDBJ)||GA19158 (FlyBase)||GA22698 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila persimilis||AB044539 (DDBJ)||GL26550 (FlyBase)||GL26831 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila willistoni||GK19237 (FlyBase)||GK23881 (FlyBase)||GK25162 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila mojavensis||GI21876 (FlyBase)||GI16984 (FlyBase)||GI14879 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila virilis||GJ18585 (FlyBase)||GJ17231 (FlyBase)||GJ15308 (FlyBase)|
|Drosophila grimshawi||GH23749 (FlyBase)||GH11489 (FlyBase)||GH24723 (FlyBase)|
Table 1: Analysis of the H3, H3.3A and H3.3B genes in 12 Drosophila species Nucleotide sequence data were obtained from FlyBase (annotation ID) or DDBJ (accession number).
Analysis of the genomic organization of the H3.3A and H3.3B genes in twelve Drosophila species
In contrast to the tandem cluster array for H3 genes [16-18,23-26,32], H3.3A and H3.3B are single copy genes with introns and are located at IIL25C3 and X8C14, respectively, in D. melanogaster (Figure 1) . Genomic arrangements of the H3.3A and H3.3B genes from 12 Drosophila species are shown diagrammatically in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. For all 12 species, the H3.3A gene was paired with the U11-48K-like gene in a head-to-head manner (Figure 2). The U11- 48K-like gene encodes a 48 kDa protein with a zinc finger domain. The strong conservation of pairing of the H3.3A gene and the U11-48Klike gene suggests coordinated transcriptional control. A Rpn11 gene is located downstream of the H3.3A gene in a tail-to-tail configuration in all 12 species. The Rpn11 gene encodes a protein exhibiting thioldependent ubiquitin-specific protease activity. However, in five species of the melanogaster group, a peptidase M13 gene has been inserted between the H3.3A gene and the Rpn11 gene.
Five different genes are located upstream of the H3.3B gene and three are located downstream in the 12 Drosophila species studied (Figure 3). None of the gene arrangements for the H3.3B gene have been conserved in all 12 Drosophila species. A Bap111 gene located downstream of the H3.3B gene was observed in nine species and an Ost48 gene was observed in eight species. The Bap111 gene encodes a DNA binding transcription coactivator with a high mobility group box domain and the Ost48 gene encodes a protein glycosyltransferase 48 kDa subunit. The transcriptional orientation of the Bap111 gene is tail-to-tail relative to the H3.3B gene, suggesting that there is at best a weak relationship between them. However, two genes that are strongly related to histone modification were found in several species: A Ser/Thr protein kinase-like gene was located upstream of the H3.3B gene in D. ananassae in a head-to-head orientation, and a Lys methyltransferase gene was located downstream of the H3.3B gene in D. mojavensis and D. virilis with the same transcriptional orientation. It remains unknown whether these gene combinations in these limited species are by random occurrence.
Analysis of the nucleotide sequences outside the coding regions for the H3.3A and H3.3B genes
DNA sequences with important roles can be detected by investigating their evolutionary conservation between distantly related species. The regions upstream and downstream of the H3.3A and H3.3B genes were investigated for the 12 Drosophila species. No strongly conserved DNA sequence amongst the 12 species has been identified in the upstream regions of these two genes. Furthermore, no signal sequence for transcription was recognized upstream or downstream of the genes (H3.3A and H3.3B). However, DNA sequences observed for several of the 12 species investigated could have species (or species group)-specific functions. In addition, exons and introns within a gene were studied in the same way as the upstream and downstream regions. Moderately conserved DNA sequences between eight species, including distantly related species, are shown in Figures 4 and 5. Short DNA sequences (7-14 bp) were intermittently preserved in the region of exon 1 and intron 1 for the H3.3B gene (Figure 4). One of the conserved sites corresponded to a splicing site of exon 1. A conserved DNA sequence of about 60 bp outside the protein coding region was recognized in the last exon of the H3.3B gene of eight species (Figure 5). It is possible that small RNA molecules interact with this region. However, a BLAST search with the DNA sequence for the D. melanogaster genome failed to detect a similar DNA sequence; consequently, the functional importance of this conserved DNA region of the H3.3B gene should be studied.
Analysis of the coding regions for the H3, H3.3A and H3.3B genes in Drosophila
The amino acid sequences of the histones encoded by the H3.3A and H3.3B genes of 12 Drosophila species showed no amino acid substitution: all variant H3s in the 12 species (12 H3.3A and 12 H3.3B) had identical amino acid sequences. However, as described previously [15,19-20], four amino acid substitutions (positions 31, 87, 89 and 90) were found between H3 and the H3 variants H3.3A and H3.3B. These substitutions were type-specific, replication-dependent or replacement, but their functional significance remains unknown. A single substitution was found in H3 in three species: at position 28 in D. pseudoobscura, at position 7 in D. erecta, and at position 124 in D. persimilis (Supplementary Figure S).
The codon usage for amino acids was compared for three H3 genes (H3, H3.3A and H3.3B) (Figure 6). Significant differences in codon bias were found for the H3 genes for 13 of 18 amino acids with multiple synonymous codons (Table 2). Of these 13 amino acids, seven (Gln, Asn, Ile, Pro, Ala, Arg, Leu) showed different patterns of codon usage for the H3.3A gene compared to the H3.3B gene, whereas the remaining six amino acids (Glu, Thr, Lys, Ser, Cys, Phe) showed similar patterns of codon usage for both the H3.3A and H3.3B genes. Few codons for Asn and Cys were compared as these amino acids appear only once. The patterns of codon usage were also compared for the H4 and H4r genes; the patterns of codon bias for five amino acids are compared in Figure 7 and the result showed that the pattern of codon usage for H4r was similar to that for H3.3A and H3.3B. For example, AAA was used 33.3% of the time for Lys in the H3 gene and thus AAG was used 66.7% of the time, whereas AAA was used 23.1% and 13.5% of the time in the H3.3A and H3.3B genes, respectively. Thus AAA was used more frequently in the H3 gene compared to the replacement type. A similar tendency was found for the H4 gene: AAA was used 38.6% of the time in H4 but 17.4% of the time in H4r. AAG was used more frequently in the replacement types, H4r, H3.3A and H3.3B genes. These results suggested that for several amino acids, a type-specific (replicationdependent or replacement) pattern was observed for codon usage at certain sites.
Table 2: χ2 tests for codon bias in the H3, H3.3A and H3.3B genes in 12 Drosophila species.
Codon usage was analysed site-by-site to study the relationship between codon usage and histone modification (Figure 8). Three histone modifications (methylation, acetylation and phosphorylation) for four amino acids (Lys, Arg, Thr, Ser) were analysed [2,33]. Most of the sites for Lys (10 of 13 sites) were modified, and some of these sites showed extraordinarily different codon biases. AAG was predominant at positions 4, 36 and 56, whereas AAA was used most frequently at positions 9 and 27 in the replacement types H3.3A and H3.3B. All these sites except 56 were modified, although a recent study suggested that position 56 can be modified . For the Arg sites, CGU was used most of the time at positions 2 and 52, CGC was predominant at positions 17, 40, 53, 63 and 129, and AGA was most frequent at position 128 but was not used at the other sites. Four of these sites at 2, 17, 128 and 129 were modified sites for Arg. Threonine was more commonly encoded by ACU at position 11 of H3 compared to the other Thr sites. The Ser at position 28 of H3 was typically encoded by AGU and position 28 is one of two phosphorylation sites for Ser. These results indicated that the codon biases observed at several histone modification sites showed extraordinary different patterns compared to other sites, suggesting that there is a connection between codon bias and histone modification.
The GC content at the third codon position was compared for the 12 H3 genes (Figure 9). As was found for the H4 genes , the GC content at the third codon position was higher in the replacement type genes H3.3A and H3.3B (Figure 9).
Analysis of the genomic organization of genes showed that most combinations of gene pairs were not conserved amongst the 12 Drosophila species studied. The unique gene pair U-11-48K-like and H3.3A showed a strong connection but strongly conserved DNA sequences for transcriptional signalling or control have not been observed between these genes. The existence of U-11-48K-like and H3.3A genes may result in similar expression conditions such as timing and tissues due to the similar nucleosome structure. Indeed, several functionally related gene pairs, such as a Ser/Thr protein kinase-like gene upstream of the H3.3B gene in D. ananassae and a Lys methyltransferase gene downstream of the H3.3B gene in D. mojavensis and D. virilis were observed for a specific species or species group. If these gene pairs have a biological significance, a narrow distribution in phylogeny suggests that these must be a newly generated or designed gene pair.
Moderately conserved sequences were found within the H3.3B gene, with eight short segments conserved in the first exon and first intron. The significance of these DNA sequences is unknown but they may interact with the spliceosome, and indeed one segment corresponds to the splicing site (Figure 4). A DNA sequence of about 60 bp located outside the coding region at exon 5 in the H3.3B gene is highly conserved and appears to have functional significance. Akhmanova et al. compared the H3.3B genes from D. melanogaster and D. hydei and also detected these conserved regions . Neither palindrome sequences nor stem-loop structures were detected in this region, indicating that the sequence itself, and not its secondary structure, could interact with small molecules such as RNA. However, similar sequences were not detected in the genome by a BLAST search.
Analysis of the codon bias in H3 genes and the results from H4 genes  provided a characteristic bias pattern for several amino acids in replacement histones, suggesting a connection between translation and histone replacement. Moreover, the ‘special’ codon bias was observed only for some sites of modified amino acids, further supporting a relationship between translation and histone modification. A better understanding of the ‘meaning’ of histone modifications may clarify the relationship with codon bias as well as the importance of the translational step in histone replacement, histone modification, and the development of epigenetics.
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research to Y. M. from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
- Grunstein M (1997) Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature 389: 349-352.
- Kouzarides T (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128: 693-705.
- Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S (2005) Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns. Nat Genet 37: 1090-1097.
- Feng S, Jacobsen SE, Reik W (2010) Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 330: 622-627.
- Rothbart SB, Strahl BD (2014) Interpreting the language of histone and DNA modifications. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839: 627-643.
- Weber CM, Henikoff S (2014) Histone variants: dynamic punctuation in transcription. Genes Dev 28: 672-682.
- Elliott GO, Murphy KJ, Hayes JJ, Thiriet C (2013) Replication-independent nucleosome exchange is enhanced by local and specific acetylation of histone H4. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 2228-2238.
- Riddle NC, Minoda A, Kharchenko PV, Alekseyenko AA, Schwartz YB et al. (2011) Plasticity in patterns of histone modifications and chromosomal proteins in Drosophila heterochromatin. Genome Res 21: 147-163.
- Wang CI, Alekseyenko AA, LeRoy G, Elia AEH, Gorchakov AA, et al. (2013) ChIP-mass spectrometry captures protein interactions and modified histones associated with dosage compensation in Drosophila. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 202-209.
- Apostolou E, Hochedlinger K (2013) Chromatin dynamics during cellular reprogramming. Natur e 502: 462-471.
- Maze I, Noh KM, Soshnev AA, Allis CD (2014) Every amino acid matters: essential contributions of histone variants to mammalian development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 15: 259-271.
- Yamamoto Y, Watanabe T, Nakamura M, Kakubayashi N, Saito Y, et al. (2016) Epigenetics evolution and replacement histones: Evolutionary changes at Drosophila H4r. J Phylogenet Evol Biol 4: 170.
- Kornberg RD (1977) Structure of chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem 46: 931-954.
- Fretzin S, Allan BD, van Daal A, Elgin SCR (1991) A Drosophila melanogaster H3.3 cDNA encodes a histone variant identical with the vertebrate H3.3. Gene 107: 341-342.
- Akhmanova AS, Bindels PC, Xu J, Miedema K, Kremer H, et al. (1995) Structure and expression of histone H3.3 genes in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila hydei. Genome 38: 586-600.
- Lifton RP, Goldberg ML, Karp RW, Hogness DS (1977) The organization of the histone genes in Drosophila melanogaster: functional and evolutionary implications. Proc Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 42: 1047-1051.
- Matsuo Y, Yamazaki T (1989) Nucleotide variation and divergence in the histone multigene family in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 122: 87-97.
- Matsuo Y (2006) Genomic structure and evolution of the histone gene family in Drosophila. Current Topics in Genetics 2: 1-14.
- Waterborg JH, Robertson AJ (1996) Common features of analogous replacement histone H3 genes in animals and plants. J Mol Evol 43: 194-206.
- Talbert P, Ahmad K, Almouzni G, Ausio J, Berger F, et al. (2012) A unified phylogeny-based nomenclature for histone variants. Epigenetics Chromatin 5: 7
- Loyola A, Bonaldi T, Roche D, Imhof A, Almouzni G (2006) PTMs on H3 variants before chromatin assembly potentiate their final epigenetic state. Mol Cell 24: 309-316.
- Rivera C, Saavedra F, Alvarez F, Diaz-Celis C, Ugalde V, et al. (2015) Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 occurs during translation. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 9097-9106.
- Matsuo Y, Yamazaki T (1989) tRNA derived insertion element in histone gene repeating unit of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 225-238.
- Tsunemoto K, Matsuo Y (2001) Molecular evolutionary analysis of a histone gene repeating unit from Drosophila simulans. Genes Genet Syst 76: 355-361.
- Kakita M, Shimizu T, Emoto M, Nagai M, Takeguchi M, et al. (2003) Divergence and heterogeneity of the histone gene repeating units in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genes Genet Syst 78: 383-389.
- Nagoda N, Fukuda A, Nakashima Y, Matsuo Y (2005) Molecular characterization and evolution of the repeating units of histone genes in Drosophila americana: coexistence of quartet and quintet units in a genome. Insect Mol Biol 14: 713-717.
- Matsuo Y (2000) Evolutionary change of codon usage for the histone gene family in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila hydei. Mol Phylogenet Evol 15: 283-291.
- Matsuo Y (2000) Molecular evolution of the histone 3 multigene family in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Mol Phylogenet Evol 16: 339-343.
- Matsuo Y (2003) Evolution of the GC content of the histone 3 gene in seven Drosophila species. Genes Genet Syst 78: 309-318.
- Nakashima Y, Higashiyama A, Ushimaru A, Nagoda N, Matsuo Y (2016) Evolution of GC content in the histone gene repeating units from Drosophila lutescens, D. takahashii and D. pseudoobscura. Genes Genet Syst 91: 27-36.
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
- Kremer H, Hennig W (1990) Isolation and characterization of a Drosophila hydei histone DNA repeat unit. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 1573-1580.
- Li KK, Luo C, Wang D, Jiang H, Zheng YG (2012) Chemical and biochemical approaches in the study of histone methylation and demethylation. Med Res Rev 32: 815-867.
Citation: Matsuo Y, Kakubayashi N (2016) Epigenetics Evolution and Replacement Histones: Evolutionary Changes at Drosophila H3.3A and H3.3B. J Phylogenetics Evol Biol 4: 174. Doi: 10.4172/2329-9002.1000174
Copyright: © 2016 Matsuo Y, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
- Total views: 9772
- [From(publication date): 11-2016 - Dec 08, 2019]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 9551
- PDF downloads: 221