alexa Evaluation of Bacterial Strains for the Induction of Plant Biochemicals, Nutritional Contents and Isozymes in Barley | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9600
Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Evaluation of Bacterial Strains for the Induction of Plant Biochemicals, Nutritional Contents and Isozymes in Barley

Anam Yousaf1, Abdul Qadir2, Tehmina Anjum3, Dr Rizwan Ishaq Khan4, Declan Naughton5 and Ali Yousaf6

1College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

2College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

3Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh

4Cavan General Hospital, Ireland

5Kingston University, London

6University of Management and Technology, Lahore

*Corresponding Author:
Yousaf A
College of Earth and Environmental Sciences
University of the Punjab
Lahore, Pakistan
Tel: +4407848276881
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: July 20, 2017; Accepted Date: August 03, 2017; Published Date: August 10, 2017

Citation: Yousaf A, Qadir A, Anjum T, Khan RI, Naughton D, et al. (2017) Evaluation of Bacterial Strains for the Induction of Plant Biochemicals, Nutritional Contents and Isozymes in Barley. J Nutr Food Sci 7:623. doi: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000623

Copyright: © 2017 Yousaf A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences


Acetobacter aceti was successfully used to induce transcriptional analysis, plant biochemical profile and nutritional contents in barley. Association of barley and microbial strain AC8 was reported best combination among other eight microbial strains of Bacillus in this study. AC8 microbial strain was identified as A. aceti from Fungal Culture Bank, Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. Different strains of A. aceti i.e., AC1, AC2, AC3… AC8 were analyzed as plant inducers and AC8 was screened out as best inducer in barley. It induced highest quantities of plant biochemical (i.e., phytosterols, phenolics, alkaloids and terpenoids) in barley. Current study revealed that among eight microbial strains AC8 had maximum potential to increase ascorbic acid, panthothenic acid, pyridoxine, thiamine and riboflavin in barley than other microbial strains. AC8 screened out among other microbial strains on the basis of its high vitamins induction potential. AC3 plus AC6 were reported second in the recorded list although other strains had a chronological reduction in vitamins as AC2>AC7>AC4>AC5 and AC1. Further evaluation of AC8 was done to check its efficiency for biochemicals, nutritional and isozyme contents induction in barley. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and DMRT through DSAASTAT.


Fungal Culture bank Pakistan (FCBP); Acetobacter aceti; Oxidoaqualene Cyclase (OSC); Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)


Plant and microbes have a distinctive relationship among them from last decade. Worldwide plants including major crops facing serious threat due to biotic and abiotic stresses [1]. To minimize these challenges plants and microbes sometimes build a mutual relationship between them to benefit each other. However, very rarely it has seen that microbes use plants as host to invade them for their life cycle completion and parallel plants eat microbes identified as intruder as reported in recent study by Paungfoo-Lonhienne et al. [2]. In most of the cases plants and microbes develop symbiotic relationship where they do not cause pathogenicity to each other and develop bilateral combination to benefit each other as a host medium. Microbes and plants develop coordination and suppress the pathogenicity of certain host by limiting the infection [3].

Now a day Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) used widely in research to promote the plant microbe interaction without causing pathogenicity [4]. Because these are naturally occurring microbes mostly found in soil and water to make a mutual relationship with plants and induce their nutritional contents and growth promoting factors [5]. Such PGPR act as a barrier against small microorganism deleterious effects and protect the plant silently from its growth suppression. There are multiple ways through which these microbes enhance plant growth and ecologically modulate plant nutritional profile [6]. The certain ways are nutrients solublization such as P [7], nitrogen fixation [8], regulation of ethylene in roots [9], enhancing mycorrhizal function [10], phytohormones secretion [11,12], nutrilizing heavy metals absorption [13]. However, it is important to note that these microbes have active metabolites which eliminate the deleterious effect of small disease causing pathogens plus promote plant growth and increase its nutritional contents [14]. PGPR acts on plant roots to eliminate toxic compounds and promote plant growth [15].

Microbial inducer was used to induce plant biochemicals, nutritional contents and isozymes profile in this study. Induction of plant biochemicals and nutritional contents were induced with the help of microbial strain. The microbial strains of Bacillus obtained from the soil of Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. Further bacterial strains were used in this study to evaluate the best plant microbial interaction which has maximum affinity with barley and induced high levels of nutritional and biochemical profile. Total eight microbial strains were selected i.e., (AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, AC5, AC6, AC7 and AC8) on the basis of their contribution towards the plant growth and enhanced nutritional contents.


Procurement of Bacterial strains and Barley seeds

Different Bacillus strains (i.e., AC1, AC2, AC3..... AC8) were used and selected staple food crop i.e., barley (Zarghoon VI) was grown in semi controlled greenhouse conditions of “Institute of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab Lahore, Pakistan” at 22 ± 2°C. Barley was treated with different microbial strains (i.e., AC1, AC2, AC3..... AC8). Seeds were harvested and collected for further studies. Seeds were grown under semi controlled environmental factors to enhance inducers ability to induce phytosterols content. Seeds were physically examined to confirm their clear and mature size. Seeds were collected from the selected staple food crop barley which screened out as best phytosterols producing crop among other native cultivated staple food crops.

Preparation of inoculum

Inoculum of each microbial strain was separately prepared from 16 h old microbial cultures. Microbial cells were collected through centrifugation at 5000 rpm and then its inoculum was prepared in distilled sterilized water. Inoculum concentration of each microbial strain was adjusted to 1 × 106 microbial cells/mL by using haemocytometer.

Pot experiment

One hundred mL of microbial inoculum was added into soil of respective pots, containing three barley plants in each pot. Each treatment was replicated thrice, while each replicate was consisted of 32 pots. Plants were watered when needed and seeds of mature plants were randomly harvested prior to their processing for biochemical, nutritional and isozyme analysis. Barley plants were exposed to eight different bacterial strains and later on checked their association with the best bacterial inducer strain. When plants were matured their seeds were harvested and tested against plant biochemicals, nutritional contents and isozyme analysis.

Analysis of palatability related biochemicals

Palatability related biochemicals were assessed by “Double beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer-Shimadzu-1800, equipped with 1 cm quartz cell and dry mass suspension methods (Maynard, 1970). Results were recorded and analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).


Phytosterols mass was quantified by dry suspension method [16]. One gram of preweighed crushed seeds were taken and extracted with 80% ethanol. Mixture was left at room temperature for 30 min and filtered. Filterate was transferred in to a new preweighed petri plate. Next step was the addition of 5 mL of 1% NaOH in it and mixed well before the addition of 5 mL of n-Hexane. Filtrate was again mixed and let it dry for 24 h in hot air oven to obtain thick mass of phytosterols and weighed again. The final concentration of phytosterols was obtained through dry weight through this formula W2-W1 [17].


Coumarin contents were measured using spectrophotometer. Five grams seeds were crushed and 0.5 mL of extract was added into a test tube. Before carrying the dilution of extract with 9 mL of distilled water, added 9 mL of 5% lead acetate into it and mixed well. Two mL of this mixture was transferred to a new test tube. In the same tube 8 mL of 0.1 M HCl solution was added and left the test tube at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance was taken at this wavelength 320 nm which was then used to calculate the quantity of coumarins with the help of standard curve made by using different concentration of lead acetate [18].


Tannin content was quantified by spectrophotometer. Preweighed five grams of crushed samples were taken in 100 mL of volumetric flask and filled with 50 mL of distilled water. Mixture was shaken well and filtered. 5 mL of the filterate was transferred into another flask and added 3 mL of 0.1 M Feric Chloride (FeCl3) with 0.1 M (HCl) and 0.008 M potassium ferrocyanide. The absorbance was measured at 760 nm. A blank sample was prepared and calculated at the same wavelength. A standard was prepared using tannin acid to achieve 100 ppm concentration to quantify tannins [19].


Quantification of flavonoids was measured by taking 0.5 mL of sample extracts into a test tube. Then, 0.5 mL of 10% acetic acid solution was added into it and mixed well. Then, 2 mL of 5% pyridine solution was added with 1 mL of 5% aluminum chloride solution and 6 mL of 80% methanol. The mixture was then incubated at room temperature for 30 min and filtered through whatman filter paper number 42 thrice. The filterate was then transferred into a petri plate and evaporated to dryness on a hot plate and weighed [20].


Five grams of seeds were crushed and extracted with 80% of methanol at hot plate with constant temperature at 70°C for 15 min to obtain fat free sample. After 15 min the extract was filtered through filter paper to remove impurities and 1 mL of extract was transferred into a new glass test tube. Then, 5 mL of distilled water was added with 0.25 mL of 10% folin ciocalteau reagent. Then added 1 mL of 7.5% sodium carbonate. Mixture was incubated at 25°C for 30 min to develop colour. Then absorbance was recorded at 725 nm which was then used to calculate the quantity of phenolics with the help of standard curve made by using different concentration of gallic acid [21].


Five grams of crushed seeds were soaked into 20% of acetic acid solution which was prepared in ethanol. The mixture was incubated for 4 h at room temperature. Then mixture was filtered through filter paper to remove excess plant material. To determine alkaloid contents the reaction mixture was rotary evaporated to make it one fourth of its original volume. Later on concentrated ammonium hydroxide solution was added to precipitate alkaloids. The entire solution was allowed to stand and the precipitate was collected by filteration, after which it was left for 24 h and weighed with the help of dry mass [22].


Five gram of crushed seeds were taken and mixed in 100 mL of 20% ethanol. The mixture was heated for 4 h at 55°C. After, the heating process the extract was filtered through filtration process and divided into equal volumes with the further addition of ethanol. Extracts were incubated for 15 min, combined and evaporated to reduce the total volume up to 40 mL. Half volume was filled with diethyl ether up to 50 mL and given a vigorous shaking to obtain an aqueous layer. The same step was followed for another half of the filterate with n-butanol. Mixture was shaken well to obtain n-butanol layer. Remove the supernant and given a washing with 5% NaCl (10 mL) and then dried in hot air oven for 24 h to a constant weight. Saponin content was calculated with dry mass weight [22].


Preweighed 5 g of crushed seeds were mixed with distilled water at boiling temperature for 1 h to obtain seed extract. The extract was filtered to remove plant material and obtained clear extract. One mL of 5% NaOH solution and 30 mL of distilled water was added to this mixture and allowed to incubate for 24 h. Then 5 mL of 10% acetic acid solution was added into this mixture and left it overnight. After, 24 h incubation 2.5 mL of 1 N calcium chloride was added to obtain visible residues of pectins. The residues were transferred to the previously weighed petri plate. The petri plate along with the residue was placed on a water bath and dried in the oven at 100°C until a constant weight was obtained [23].


Terpenoids were quantified using one gram of preweighed crushed seeds which were soaked in 10 mL of heptane. Then the mixture was mixed well and extracted with the addition of water. After, the addition of water an organic visible layer was appeared and separated for terpenoids quantification. Absorbance was recorded at 190 nm which was then used to calculate the quantity of terpenoids with the help of standard curve made by using variable concentration of heptane [24].

Nutritional analysis

Nutritional importance of staple food crops were determined by evaluating the vitamin contents. The nutritionally important vitamins includes vitamin B3 which is also known as niacin, vitamin B6 as pyridoxine, vitamin B5 as panthothenic acid, vitamin B1 as thiamine, vitamin B2 as riboflavin, vitamin B9 as folic acid and vitamin C as ascorbic acid were evaluated by “Double beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer-Shimadzu-1800, equipped with 1 cm quartz cell. Selected vitamins standards were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Statistical data was obtained and measured through Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT), ANOVA, DSAASTAT [25].

Niacin (Vitamin B3)

Niacin was detected using spectrophotometer. For this purpose 5 g of crushed samples were mixed in 50 mL of 1 N H2SO4. The mixture was left for 30 min at room temperature. Then, added 3 drops of 10% ammonia solution in the mixture slowly. The mixture was allowed to stay for another 15 min. Reaction mixture was filtered and then transferred 10 mL of the filterate into 50 mL flask and added 5 mL of 0.1 M potassium cyanide which further acidified with 0.02 N H2SO4. Mixed well and absorbance was taken at 470 nm which was then used to calculate the quantity of niacin with the help of standard curve made by using different concentration of niacin standard [25].

Pyridoxine (Vitamin B6)

One gram of each sample was taken into 100 mL of volumetric flask and added 0.1 N HCl upto 50 mL. The reaction mixture was sonicated for 30 min, filtered and then again diluted with 0.1 N HCl to attain required pyridoxine concentration. Absorbance was measured at 290 nm which was further used to calculate the pyridoxine quantification with the help of standard curve made by using different concentrations of HCl [26].

Panthothenic acid (vitamin B5)

Five gram of crushed sample was transferred into 50 mL of volumetric flask and extracted with 0.05% phosphoric acid up to 50 mL. Mix it well at hot water bath for 30 min. Filter the solution. As pantothenic acid exhibits colorless solution and do not exhibit strong UV absorption above 240 nm. That is why absorbance was measured at low wavelength 190 nm for detection to obtain an adequate amount of panthothenic acid contents with the comparison against different concentration of phosphoric acid [27].

Thiamine (vitamin B1)

To determine thiamine five grams of each sample was transferred into 100 mL volumetric flask with 50 mL of 80% ethanol solution. The mixture was filtered and transferred 10 mL of the filtrate into another flask. Then, added 100 μ of HCl with 10 mL of 0.1 M (potassium dichromate) K3[Fe(CN)6] and filled distilled water upto the mark. Mixture was sonicated for 20 min. Absorbance was taken at 747 nm and compared with the standard curve of potassium dichromate [28].

Riboflavin (vitamin B2)

Quantification of riboflavin was done by taking five grams of each staple food crop sample into 100 mL of volumetric flask and added 100 mL of 50% ethanol. The mixture was sonicated for 1 hr to completely extract the sample. Mixture was filtered and 10 mL of extract transferred into 50 mL volumetric flask. Then, added 10 mL of 5% potassium permanganate with 10 mL of 30% H2O2. Mixture was sonicated for another 30 min. Then added 2 mL of 40% sodium sulphate to achieve 50 mL volume. Mixture was left for 15 min at room temperature to get the absorbance at 510 nm against different concentration of potassium permanganate [25].

Folic acid (vitamin B9)

Folic acid detection was carried out by taking five grams of each selected staple food crop sample was added into 25 mL volumetric flask and added three mL of 3% phosphate buffer solution of PH 9.0. It was mixed well, left for 2 hrs and then 10 mL of ethanol was added to the mixture. Absorbance was taken at 282 nm which was then used to calculate the quantity of folic acid with the help of standard curve made by using different concentration of ethanol [29].

Ascorbic acid (vitamin C)

5 g of each staple food crop sample was taken into a 25 mL conical flask. Then added 10 mL of 0.05 M oxalic acid, 0.02 M EDTA solution into the sample and allowed the mixture to stand overnight to achieve required reaction time. Samples were filtered and 2.5 mL of each sample mixture was transferred into another 25 mL brown volumetric flask. Then added 2.5 mL of 0.05 M oxalic acid and 0.02 M EDTA of the same concentration followed by 0.5 mL meta-phosphoric acid with 10% acetic acid, 1 mL of 5% H2SO4, 2 mL of 10% ammonium molybdate solution and distilled water that made the volume up to 25 mL. Mixture left for 10 min at room temperature and absorbance was taken at 760 nm with the help of standard curve made by using different concentration of acetic acid [30].

Isozyme analysis

Isozymes are also known as isoenzymes that exhibits different forms of enzymes in any chemical reaction. Different isozymes recognized with the same reaction end products. Isozymes have different shapes and sizes but their final end products are same due to their similar single reaction substrate outcome. To determine any particular enzymatic activity, polyacrylamide gel is recommended due to its single substrate reaction. Because polyacrylamide gel provides single substrate to run different enzymes at the same time in its natural undisturbed forms intact throughout the process. At the end of polyacrylamide gel process multiple bands appear which shows the number and quality of isozymes.

Total protein estimation

Total protein estimation was carried out using micro biuret method [31,32] was extracted by taking 1 g of selected staple food crops. Sample was washed with running tap water for 5 min. One gram of sample was crushed in chilled pestle and mortar for protein extraction. The sample was crushed in chilled “Tris HCl buffer” (appendix 2 a) for 15 min. Mixture was poured into centrifuge vials and centrifuged at 7490 × g at -4°C for 25 min to eliminate excess of plant debris. Supernatant was transferred into a new vial along with 1 mL of 0.7 M urea to dissolve total protein contents completely. The obtained solution was further used as total protein contents in the identification of Oxidosqualene Cyclase (OSC) isozymes.

Oxidosqualene Cyclase (OSC)

Oxidosqualene cyclase isozymes of selected staple food crops were identified with the help of a method by Mehlem et al., Plant material was extracted with sodium phosphate buffer at PH=7.0. Gel electrophoresis was done in 12% polyacrylamide gel and 1% squalene gel in their native states. The gel was incubated at 35°C for 24 hrs and then stained with “oil red O” dye for 30 min. After, staining multiple bands were appeared which were analyzed through “GELANALYZER” software (Lazar, Hungary). Statistical analysis was done through “MYSTAT” (Kroeger, Chicago, USA) software to find out the respective OSC bands in different staple food crops (Figure 1).


Figure 1: Barley plants grown in pots under greenhouse conditions to evaluate efficacy of bacterial inoculum.


Biochemical analysis after bacterial inoculum

Total eight microbial strains were induced in barley to enhance phytosterol contents. Among eight microbial strains of A. aceti AC8 was screened out as the best inducer in overall results. AC8 significantly (p ≤ 0.05) produced higher quantities of phytosterols (0.008 ± 0.004 g/kg) in barley when compared to other microbial strains. Treatment AC6 possessed relatively lower quantities (0.007 ± 0.004 g/kg) of phytosterols. AC5 and AC4 were found with equal numerical values of phytosterol i.e., 0.004 ± 0.0002 g/kg. AC3, AC2 and AC1 were found responsible to produce lower amounts of phytosterols (0.0008 ± 0.0000 g/kg and 0.009 ± 0.0003 g/kg). Among eight strains AC8 was screened out as the best inducer which produced maximum amount of phytosterols in barley (Figure 2H).

Eight microbial strains have been biochemically tested to detect quantities of tannins. Among eight strains AC8 and AC3 were screened out as the best inducer which produced maximum quantities of tannins in barley. AC8 and AC3 significantly (p ≤ 0.05) produced maximum quantities of 36.56 ± 2.13 g/kg and 34.32 ± 2.00 g/kg tannins respectively. After this AC2 and AC1 possessed relatively lower quantities (29.70 ± 1.73 and 26.71 ± 1.56 g/kg) of tannins. AC7 and AC4 were produced insignificantly lower amounts of tannins (19.25 ± 1.12 and 17.76 ± 1.03 g/kg) than AC2 and AC1. AC6 and AC5 showed almost equal quantities of tannins (16.26 ± 0.95 and 13.28 ± 0.77 g/kg) in treated plants (Figure 2E).

Barley had the best association with AC8, AC2 and AC3 which produced maximum amount of coumarins with the numerical values of 52.02 ± 3.04 g/kg, 51.40 ± 3.00 g/kg and 49.77 ± 2.91 g/kg. AC1 was second in the coumarin index with 42.22 ± 2.46 g/kg. Other strains had same coumarin induction as AC5 (32.02 ± 1.87 g/kg), AC4 (31.20 ± 1.82 g/kg), AC6 (30.38 ± 1.77 g/kg) and AC7 (28.55 ± 1.67 g/kg) respectively. Among eight microbial strains AC8, AC2 and AC3 showed the maximum potential to induce coumarins in barley. Increased amount of coumarins was related to sweet taste of barley (Figure 2G).

AC1 most significantly (p ≤ 0.05) induced maximum quantities (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg) of flavonoids in barley among other tested microbial strains. AC6 was found second in flavonoids index that induced quantities up to 0.007 ± 0.0004 g/kg. AC3 and AC4 were found third on flavonoids index with equal numerical values of 0.004 ± 0.0002 g/kg. AC2 was reported after AC3 and AC4 with lesser quantities (0.0003 ± 0.0001 g/kg) of flavonoids which were significantly lower than AC1 and AC6. Strains AC8, AC7 and AC5 were found responsible to produce least amounts of flavonoids (0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg). Hence, in case of flavonoids induction AC1 was screened out as the best inducer which produced maximum amount of flavonoids in barley (Figure 2I).


Figure 2: Quantification of different biochemicals in barley after microbial inoculum. Pectins (A), Alkaloids (B), Saponins (C), Phenolics (D), Tannins (E), Terpenoids (F), Coumarins (G), Phytosterols (H) and Flavonoids (I) . Data were statistically analysed through DMRT at p ≤ 0.05 and significance of data was shown by alphabets (a, b, c…f). Standard error were calculated through DSAASTAT (Onofri, Italy) and applied in the form of error bars.

Barley showed maximum association with AC6 which induced maximum amount (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg) of alkaloids. AC4 was found second in alkaloids index with the numerical value of 0.008 ± 0.0004 g/kg. AC5 possessed relatively lesser quantities of alkaloids (0.007 ± 0.0004 g/kg) than AC4. AC2 and AC3 were found next with the same numeric values of 0.004 ± 0.0002 g/kg, while AC8 was induced even lesser with 0.003 ± 0.0001 g/kg alkaloids. Other strains AC7 and AC1 induced alkaloids as 0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg of the same numeric values, while least alkaloids were induced in AC7 and AC1 among other strains. Barley had the maximum association with AC6 as a best inducer (Figure 2B).

Among eight microbial strains AC8 induced maximum quantities (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg) of total phenols in barley. AC1 and AC6 followed this with total phenols of 0.006 ± 0.0003 g/kg. AC7 and AC3 were found third on phenol index with a same numeric value of 0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg which was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lesser than AC8, AC1 and AC6 and higher than AC5, AC2 and AC4. Thus, AC5, AC2 and AC4 produced same quantities of phenols (0.001 ± 0.0000 and 0.0009 ± 0.0000 g/kg) in barley (Figure 2D).

AC4 induced highest quantities (0.004 ± 0.002 g/kg) of saponins in barley among other eight microbial strains. AC1 and AC2 induced saponin quantities (0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg) that were second highest among the eight strains. All the other strains including AC3, AC5, AC6, AC7 and AC8 were found statistically (p ≤ 0.05) similar (0.001 ± 0.0000 g/kg) for saponin production (Figure 2C).

AC8 induced highest quantities (0.003 ± 0.0001 g/kg) of pectin in barley. AC5 and AC6 induced slightly lower quantities of pectin (0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg) than AC8. However, all the remaining strains including AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4 and AC7 induced with the same numeric values of 0.001 ± 0.0001 g/kg (Figure 2A).

Barley showed maximum association with AC8 which induced maximum amount of 0.81 ± 0.04 g/kg and stood first in terpenoids index. AC1 and AC3 were found second in terpenoids index with the numerical values of 0.54 ± 0.03 g/kg. AC4 stood third and induced relatively lesser quantities of terpenoids (0.36 ± 0.02 g/kg) than AC1, AC3 and AC8. AC2 was next in terpenoids index with 0.27 ± 0.01 g/kg. AC5 and AC7 were found with the numeric values of 0.18 ± 0.01 g/kg among eight microbial strains. Thus, AC6 was reported with least (0.09 ± 0.005 g/kg) terpenoid contents. Hence, barley had the maximum compatibility with AC8 as a best inducer to enhance terpenoid quantities among other selected microbial strains (Figure 2F). Mean + SD computed for quantitative variables. To compare the means of quantitative values one way ANOVA and DMRT test was applied. The p value (p ≤ 0.05) was considered as statistically significant.

Nutritional analysis after bacterial inoculum

Results revealed that among eight tested microbial strains, AC8 showed maximum potential to induce vitamins including ascorbic acid, panthothenic acid, pyridoxine, thiamine and riboflavin (Figure 3). AC8 treated plants recorded with highest amounts of ascorbic acid (0.032 ± 0.001 g/kg). Following this AC3 and AC6 reported relatively lower amounts of ascorbic acid (0.029 ± 0.001 and 0.027 ± 0.001 g/kg respectively). AC4 induced 0.023 ± 0.001 g/kg of ascorbic acid. AC2 induced less amount of ascorbic acid (0.012 ± 0.0007 g/kg) than AC4. AC1 and AC5 reported statistically (p ≤ 0.05) almost equal quantities of ascorbic acid (0.009 ± 0.0005 and 0.008 ± 0.0004 g/kg). The least amount of ascorbic acid (0.0013 ± 0.00001 g/kg) was induced by AC7 (Figure 3A).


Figure 3: Quantification of vitamins i.e., Ascorbic Acid (A), Niacin (B), Pantothenic acid (C), Pyridoxine (D), Thiamine (E), Folic acid (F), Riboflavin (G) in barley after different microbial strain applications (ACE1, ACE2, ACE3….. ACE8). Data were statistically analyzed through DMRT at p ≤ 0.05 and significance of results has been mentioned through alphabets, while standard error has been plotted by error bars.

AC6 stood first in niacin induction with 0.04 ± 0.002 g/kg among other microbial strains. AC8 occupied second position in niacin index (0.028 ± 0.001 g/kg). Whereas, AC3 and AC2 induced slightly lower values (0.024 ± 0.001 g/kg and 0.023 ± 0.001 g/kg) than AC8 (Figure 3B). AC1 treated plants possessed 0.012 ± 0.001 g/kg of niacin contents. Descending trend of niacin quantities in other microbial strains was found as, AC7>AC4>AC5 with numerical values of 0.0061 ± 0.0003>0.009 ± 0.0005>0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg respectively.

AC8 induced maximum amounts of panthothenic acid (0.09 ± 0.005 g/kg) among tested microbial strains, while AC3 and AC2 stood second in the panthothenic acid index with almost equal statistical (p ≤ 0.05) values of 0.018 ± 0.001 g/kg and 0.016 ± 0.0009 g/kg. Other microbial strains induced panthothenic acid as AC6 (0.011± 0.0006 g/ kg)>AC5 (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg)>AC1 (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg)>AC7 (0.008 ± 0.0004 g/kg). Least quantity of panthothenic acid (0.002 ± 0.0001 g/ kg) was induced by AC4 (Figure 3C).

AC6 induced maximum amounts of pyridoxine (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg). AC5 occupied second position with production of pyridoxine (0.003 ± 0.0001 g/kg). AC3, AC8 and AC1 induced relatively lower quantities of pyridoxine than AC5 but with insignificant difference among their values i.e., 0.0021 ± 0.0001 g/kg, 0.0019 ± 0.0001 g/kg and 0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg respectively. AC2 0.011 ± 0.00001, AC4 0.001 ± 0.00001 and AC7 0.0009 ± 0.00001 g/kg induced least quantities of pyridoxine with insignificant difference among them (Figure 3D).

In case of thiamine, AC8 induced maximum amounts (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg) than other tested microbial strains. AC3 treated plants followed this with 0.008 ± 0.0004 g/kg, which was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than AC2 and AC7 with equal numeric values (0.006 ± 0.0003 g/kg). AC6 induced even lesser quantity of thiamine (0.003 ± 0.0001 g/kg). AC1 recorded 0.002 ± 0.0001 g/kg of thiamine quantity. AC4 and AC5 were found responsible in equal induction of thiamine with 0.001 ± 0.00001 g/kg (Figure 3E).

AC3 induced highest contents of folic acid (0.009 ± 0.0005 g/kg) followed by AC1 and AC8 with the same values of 0.007 ± 0.0004 g/ kg. AC6 ranked afterwards with 0.006 ± 0.0003 g/kg of folic acid. AC2, AC5, AC7 and AC4 induced almost equal amounts of folic acid 0.001 ± 0.0001 g/kg and 0.0009 ± 0.0001 g/kg respectively (Figure 3F).

Maximum amounts of riboflavin was induced by AC8 (0.022 ± 0.001 g/kg) with statistically (p ≤ 0.05) significant from AC3 (0.021 ± 0.001 g/kg). AC2 occupied second position (0.019 ± 0.001 g/kg) and AC6 (0.016 ± 0.0009 g/kg) was reported at third place with significant difference than AC2. AC7 and AC4 induced riboflavin in equal quantities (0.012 ± 0.0007 g/kg). AC5 (0.006 ± 0.0003 g/kg) recorded relatively lower riboflavin quantity than AC4 and AC7 (Figure 3G). The least amount of riboflavin was induced by AC1 with numeric value of 0.003 ± 0.0001 g/kg.

AC8 induced maximum vitamin contents in barley than other microbial strains. AC3, AC6 scored secondary position among other tested strains as AC2>AC7>AC4>AC5 and AC1. Mean + SD computed for quantitative variables. To compare the means of quantitative values one way ANOVA and DMRT test was applied. The p value (p ≤ 0.05) was considered as statistically significant.


OSC reported mainly five isozymes in barley. OSCs also reported significant difference in Rf values on native page gel i.e., OSC1=0.15, OSC2=0.352, OSC3=0.447, OSC4=0.562 and OSC5=0.737 respectively (Figure 4). Microbial strains AC8 and AC3 induced maximum number of OSCs. Plants treated with these both strains revealed equal number and same species of OSCs isozymes. OSC1 was observed in all the eight microbial strains. Whereas, three OSCs species i.e., OSC2, OSC3 and OSC5 were exhibited same isozyme pattern in plants treated with microbial stains AC1, AC4, AC5 and AC6. OSC4 band was observed in AC1, AC3, AC4, AC5, AC6 and AC8 and was absent in AC3 and AC7. Two OSCs isozyme species OSC1 and OSC4 were observed in AC2 and AC7 treated plants (Figure 4). The pattern between plants treated with AC2 and AC7 had 50% resemblance due to the presence of OSC3 band in them. Likewise, AC8 treated plants exhibited 50% similarity to AC2 and AC7 due to the presence of OSC3 isozyme band in them.


Figure 4: Native PAGE gel image of isozyme analysis of Oxidosqualene Cyclase (OSC) in eight microbial strains i.e., AC1, AC2, AC3….. AC8. Isozymes having significantly different Rf values have been titled with codes i.e., OSC1, OSC2….. OSC5.

However, AC1 and AC8 exposed plants showed two OSCs isozyme species i.e., OSC3 and OSC5 in their isozyme profile. AC1 and AC8 did not share any band with the AC2 and AC7 isozyme profiles, but all of their bands were present in rest of the five microbial strains treatments i.e., AC1, AC3, AC4, AC5 and AC6.

OSC2 band was recorded with 8.7% increased intensity than OSC5 band in AC8 (Figure 5A). In case of OSC3 isozyme the maximum intensity was recorded in AC2 and AC7 while OSC4 recorded in the least intensity (Figure 5B). Whereas, OSC2 recorded with 20% increased intensity in AC7 and AC8 than AC5 and AC6. Similarly OSC4 and OSC5 reported with 9% increased intensity with 12.5% in AC1 and AC3 than AC5 (Figure 5B and 5C). OSC1 and OSC4 isozyme species recorded with 5% decreased intensity in AC2 and AC7 than AC8 (Figure 5D and 5E). In case of AC7 and AC8 treatments, OSC3 recorded with 9% increased intensity than OSC4. While, OSC3 showed maximum intensity in AC7 and AC8 respectively (Figure 5F and 5G). Other isozymes recorded decreased intensities in descending order as OSC1>OSC2>OSC5. But the same pattern was found in AC3 and AC8 profiles. All the bands recorded in AC8 treated plants had slightly higher intensities than AC3.


Figure 5: Band intensity based analysis of ‘Figure 3’ showing precise position of each band with numeric values of their intensities. Analysis of eight microbial strains (i.e., AC1: A; AC2: B; AC3: C; AC4: D; AC5: E; AC6: F; AC7: G; and AC8: H) was carried out by using GELANALYZER (Lazar, Hungary). Gel slices have been provided under intensity based graphs of each sample and shows the position of sample run on ‘Native PAGE’ gel.

Discussion and Conclusion

Acetobacter aceti is a naturally occurring gram negative microorganism, present everywhere in the environment. It is widely distributed in water and soil [33]. They are obligate aerobic microorganism and grow best at temperature between 25 to 30°C. This microorganism had a strong history in modulation of foods. They have been used in fermentation industry for a long time to produce acetic acid from alcohol [34]. They have been used in food industry since 1850’s for the vinegar and wine production [35]. According to [36] A. aceti is safe to handle in food and beverage industry and do not cause any pathogenicity to humans. A study by Ref. [37] showed that this microbe has been used for cellulose production in paper and headphone industry as well for a long time.

PGPR has a great association with plants because they are present in plant roots under the upper layer of soil. They give support in plant production. The situation is much clearer with mycorrhizal bacteria where, through ecologically mutualistic symbiosis with the plant, the major feature involves improving plant nutritional status, perhaps water balance and thus plant growth [38]. During this study eight strains of bacillus have been procured from soil of agricultural department and used against staple food crops as inducer. Later on, after experimentation acetobacter aceti was identified as the best strain that have maximum affinity with the selected staple food crops.

The present study highlighted that microbial treatments affect physiological metabolism inside the plant body. Similar facts were explained by earlier workers [39-41]. Commonly, they can change the rates where genes are being transcribed inside the plant cells. Transcriptional rates modify nutritional contents of foods, thus modulating nutritional composition of plant produce [42-44]. Therefore, composition of plant produce can be modified by application of specific microbial treatments. In this way, food quality and yield can be improved through directing transcriptional modification of genes in a specific direction [45]. Current study describes the modulation of transcriptional rates of SS genes in order to improve phytosterol contents of barley. Thus, the investigation strengthens all previous reported studies in this direction and concluded that microbial isolates may be potentially used to improve phytosterol contents in routine diet [46-48].

Most effective inducer bacillus microbial species was identified as A. aceti (FCBP-537). A. aceti has never been involved in economically important plant and human disease. Therefore, it would be safe to use in agricultural fields to elevate the transcription of SS genes and nutritional contents in desired staple food crops [49]. Therefore, in this study active metabolites from A. aceti were studied and identified, which were responsible for enhancement of transcriptional rate of SS genes and nutritional profile in barley [50].

Transcriptional processes going on inside the plant cells are very complex in nature [51]. Therefore, the quantification of actual phytosterol contents was performed and it was recorded that highest quantities of phytosterols were present in seeds of A. aceti treated plants. It is important because A. aceti also recorded the maximum induction of SS genes during transcriptional analysis. Moreover, strain AC7 showed the least induction of SS genes, and it also recorded the least quantities of phytosterols in barley seeds. Hence, the current study proved a strict association between SS gene transcriptional rates and actual phytosterol contents. This finding comes in agreement with Ref. [52].

Further investigations described relationship between staple food crops and microbial strains, and how they elevate different plant biochemicals and other nutrients [53]. Procuring maximum nutrients from daily food is always an interesting phenomenon for the researchers and scientists [54]. There are many researchers discovering the effects of biological applications on plant metabolism [55-58]. Such microbial applications modulate plant metabolic pathways, hence may change the whole biochemical profile of plants [58,59]. Current investigation evaluates the efficacy of different microbial species for their potential to induce nutritional contents in plant produce. It would be a safer and cheaper way to get higher nutrition from normal food crops.

Bacterial strain AC6 could only induce two nutritional elements i.e. Niacin and Pyridoxine significantly higher than all other microbial applications. However, only one nutritional factor (Folic acid) was efficiently induced by AC3 application. Four nutritional contents i.e. pantothenic acid; thiamine, riboflavin and ascorbic acid out of seven nutritional elements were induced most efficiently by AC8. The identification of this inducer species was carried out as A. aceti (FCBP 537). The particular microbial species has been reported as nonpathogenic to plants as well as humans, therefore is recommended to be applied in agriculture farms without any risk [60].

It was recorded during present study that AC6 was the second best microbial application in terms of phytosterols induction, and phytosterols are very important food component specifically with reference to circulatory disorders [61]. Therefore, pectins are responsible for plant signaling pathways and play their role in seed coat hardening and define food shelf life [62]. Moreover, it decreases the cholesterol absorbance from other foods, thus foods with higher pectin contents are recommended for hyperlipidemia patients [63,64]. Therefore, microbial application of strain AC8 induced maximum pectin contents in barley and this is recommended to use in diet to prevent hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, the same microbial species AC6 was involved in the elevation of alkaloids in barley seeds, which is a very important defense chemical. However, its elevated quantities have strong inverse relation with food palatability [65]. The large alkaloid contents are toxic to humans as well as animals, and are strictly prohibited to be consumed in the form of food [66]. Even, their higher quantities cannot be used in medicines [67]. Toxicity of saponins towards humans and mammals and their inverse relation with food palatability are also documented by Ref.’s [68,69]. Therefore, the application of microbial species AC4 responsible for maximum induction of saponins can never be encouraged. However, AC8 was among the microbial applications showing moderate increase in saponin induction. Therefore, application of AC8 would be the best option according to this aspect.

It was recorded that three microbial applications i.e., AC1, AC6 and AC8 significantly elevated phenolics content in barley, which is an indication of stronger defense against a vast range of pathogens [70]. Moreover, phenolics exhibit anti-properties and play important role in therapeutic processes and healing of wounds [70]. Thus, human foods must contain sufficient amount of phenolics to provide curative and medicinal effects. Similarly, tannins are important biochemical restricting microbe linkages to host surface [71] growth and disorders of pathogenic cell [72] including abnormal function of pathogenic protein [73]. A number of studies in the past have concluded that those foods which have higher tannin contents have more potential to deal with health benefits [74]. According to current investigation, microbial application of AC8 was again found as the best option for elevation of tannin contents in barley seeds.

Terpenoids is important biochemical with respect to indirect insect resistance due to their significant attraction towards insect predators [75,76]. They also protect plants from insect transmitted viral diseases [77]. Therefore the application of AC8 can also be encouraged to avoid insect attacks and related viral diseases. Coumarins are considered as important antifungal defense of plants which enhance food palatability due to their pleasant odor [78,79]. Their anticoagulant properties are also well-known to researchers due to which they are also a recommended food component [80,81]. Currently, AC2, AC3 and AC8 were found as the leading microbial applications in the hierarchy of coumarins induction. Therefore, any of the three microbial species can be utilized to enhance palatability of barley. AC8 was important with reference to induction of phytosterol contents in barley, which are inversely associated with regulating cholesterol absorption in human body [82]. Increased quantities of phytosterols enhance the lipid metabolism and lower total cholesterol with reduction in blood pressure [83]. Keeping in mind all these results application of AC8 microbial strain gained much importance because it induced maximum phytosterols along other plant biochemicals. Vitamins belong to a cohesive group of biochemicals which are required in very minute quantities in human body to perform better function. Their major role is in absorbance of minerals, assimilation of nutrients, regulation of metabolism and synthesis of proteins [84]. Therefore, procurement of healthy quantities of vitamins has always been a point of interest. Current investigation showed that bacterial applications affect the vitamin contents of barley seeds, and AC8 also proved as the best microbial strain in terms of vitamin elevation. Moreover, the consumption of AC8 treated barley seeds would be beneficial for the persons who want to lose their weight without the risk of vitamin deficiency syndrome.

Oxidosqualene Cylases (OC) are responsible for the utilization of squalene in the production of phytosterols. However, it is a general notation that higher quantities of oxidosqualene cyclases lead toward increased quantities of phytosterols [85]. The same phenomenon was observed in current investigation when microbial applications increased phytosterol contents with enhanced activity of oxidosqualene cyclases. Therefore, it can be concluded that the microbial application may change the transcriptional profile of plant cell both quantitatively as well as qualitatively.

Phytosterols are synthesized by utilizing squalene substrate, which is regulated by oxidosqualene cyclase. Oxidosqualene cyclase is responsible for keeping balance among phytosterols, terpenoids and saponins [86,87]. Current investigation recorded that AC8 induced the quantities of phytosterols and decreased the saponin contents. It concluded that AC8 directed the metabolism towards phytosterols production. On the other hand AC4 modulated barley metabolism towards production of saponins, and that elevation of saponin contents resulted into reduced quantities of phytosterols and triterpenes. Therefore, AC4 was not recommended for barley production. However, AC8 elevated the phytosterols and decreased saponins putting a two way beneficial effect on food quality of barley; therefore highly recommended to augment nutritional value of barley seeds.

Due to plant microbe interaction elevated levels of proteins were also observed in barley. AC8 microbial strain helped the overall metabolic processes in barley. Earlier workers [88-90] had concluded in their previous studies that increased plants resistance is directly proportional to the elevated levels of proteins in their proteomic profiles. Because all the inner and intracellular interactions are due to the presence of proteins [91]. Increased quantities of proteins or elevated gene expression put more intracellular pressure to perform their metabolic functions more efficiently. That way more or less nutrients are absorbed by plants. Thus, the basic plant nutrients also help to give them resistance. Enhanced protein levels also give resistance to plants either naturally or can be boost up their function with the aid of microbes.

The current investigation described an array of metabolites which affect plant biochemicals. This study has highlighted the metabolites which more specifically enhanced nutritional quality related biochemicals in barley seeds. Barley is a staple food crop which can be routinely consumed by humans and animals. Therefore, the current investigation was advancement in the improvement of food quality of large population. It recommended the plant microbe applications for gaining elevated levels of plant produce and nutritionally important vitamins.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

  • 28th World Nutrition Congress
    August 9- 10 2018 Manila, Philippines
  • 6th International Conference on Sports Nutrition & Fitness
    August 06-07, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
  • 27th World Congress on Diet, Nutrition and Obesity
    September 7- 8, 2018 Auckland, Newzealand
  • 17th World Congress on Nutrition and Food Chemistry
    September 13-15, 2018 London, UK
  • 8th Annual Congress on Probiotics & Functional Foods
    September 24-25, 2018 Tokyo, Japan
  • International Conference on Food Production and Preservation
    Oct 17-18, 2018 Ottawa, Canada
  • International conference on Probiotics and Prebiotics
    October 31 - November 01, 2018 San Francisco, USA
  • 30th International Conference on Nutraceuticals & Public Health
    November 5-6, 2018 Bangkok, Thailand

Article Usage

  • Total views: 680
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2017 - Jul 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 615
  • PDF downloads : 65

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7