alexa Evaluation of Blood and Urine Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0703
Journal of Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Evaluation of Blood and Urine Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Ali Akbar Heydari*

Mashhad University of medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

*Corresponding Author:
Ali Akbar Heydari
Research Center for Infection Control and Hand Hygiene
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Tel: 985118515001
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 18, 2014, Accepted Date: July 14, 2014, Published Date: July 16, 2014

Citation: Heydari AA (2014) Evaluation of Blood and Urine Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis. J Med Microb Diagn 3:e125. doi: 10.4172/2161-0703.1000e125

Copyright: © 2014 Heydari AA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Medical Microbiology & Diagnosis

Summary

Tuberculosis (TB) has killed 1.4 million people in 2011 and, like Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the main cause of death from infectious agents in the world [1]. Stained smears and cultures of sputum samples are the first step for evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. However in some cases, there is no sputum, or its obtaining is impossible due to depressed mental status of the patients. Furthermore, in some cases obtaining the specimens for smear and culture needs performing invasive procedures. In the other hand, sometimes patient’s clinical status does not permit performing invasive procedures. Finally in many cases Mycobacterium tuberculosis is not detectable with the help of a microscope or culture. Thus it is necessary to find faster and/or more accurate methods such as blood and urine TB- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

In the recent years, molecular diagnostic methods by Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (RNAAT), have replaced traditional diagnostic methods [2]. These methods can detect very small numbers of microorganisms in clinical specimens. The urine PCR was evaluated for diagnostic value in Burkina Faso. The authors concluded that this test is not an appropriate method to detect new TB cases in the usual laboratory. However, it can be beneficial for cases where the clinical and bacteriological diagnosis of TB is not definite [3]. Rebollo in his study collected blood and urine specimens of patients with tuberculosis on several occasions [4]. The PCR-TB urine specimens increased the diagnostic sensitivity of blood PCR by 10%. In another study in Italy researchers determined that the sensitivity of urine PCR was 79%. They concluded that the DNA fragments of TB microorganisms can be measurable in the urine of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis [5].

In a study [6] that was conducted prospectively and included 65 patients with proven pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB and 28 subjects who were completely healthy, we observed that Blood PCR in 23 out of 65 patients with tuberculosis were positive, but none of the controls had a positive PCR (sensitivity of 35 /7% and specificity of 100%). In another case-control study [7] with 77 proven pulmonary TB cases and 30 subjects who were completely healthy, we mixed 50 ml of urine with 0.5 ml EDTA. DNA extraction and PCR testing using SI 6110 primers was performed for all blood samples. Sputum and urine samples of patients, was also cultivated for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Of 77 patients, 48 (62.3%) cases had positive sputum culture. Urine cultures and acid-fast smears were negative. Urine PCRTB was positive in 48.0%( 37/77) of patients. The TB complex specific PCR was positive in 56.2% (27/48) of the culture positive and 34.4% (10/29) of the culture negative PTB patients. The control group hafd negative urine PCR (sensitivity 56.2% and specificity 100%).

The sensitivity of blood PCR in diagnosis of tuberculosis (extrapulmonary and disseminated) has been reported as 20% to 95% in different studies. [8,9] These values was lower for pulmonary tuberculosis (0 to 8/43%) [10,11], although in some cases amounts of 93% have been reported [12]. However, the results of the most of these studies are similar to the results of our studies. Considering the mentioned points and the fact that blood and urine collection is simple and noninvasive, these methods can be suitable diagnostic tools for diagnosis of pulmonary or disseminated tuberculosis.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 10th World Congress on Alzheimers Disease & Dementia
    May 30-31, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • 4th World Congress and Exhibition on Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance
    June 14-15, 2018 Barcelona, Spain
  • 4th Annual Congress on Infectious Diseases  
    September 17-18, 2018 San Diego, USA
  • 13th World Congress on Virology
    September 26-27, 2018 Montreal, Canada

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8684
  • [From(publication date):
    June-2014 - Apr 27, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8573
  • PDF downloads : 111
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version