alexa Evaluation of Macular Thickness in Patients Underwent Combined Cataract and Epiretinal Membrane Surgery | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9570
Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Evaluation of Macular Thickness in Patients Underwent Combined Cataract and Epiretinal Membrane Surgery

Hakan Baybora*, İbrahim Koçak, Faruk Kaya and Ali Aydin
Istanbul Medipol University Esenler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Corresponding Author : Hakan Baybora, MD
Istanbul Medipol University Esenler Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey
Tel: 9005326215561
Fax: 9002124523336
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: October 16, 2015 Accepted: January 25, 2016 Published: January 30, 2016
Citation: Baybora H, Koçak I, Kaya F, Aydin A (2016) Evaluation of Macular Thickness in Patients Underwent Combined Cataract and Epiretinal Membrane Surgery. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 7:515. doi:10.4172/2155-9570.1000515
Copyright: © 2016 Baybora H, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology


Cataract and idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) are eye diseases especially seen in elderly people. We may observe them at the same time. Both surgeries may affect macular thickness and combining surgery may worsen macular edema. Total 54 cases that were operated for ERM, combined with cataract surgery or vitrectomy only, were included the study. Pre-operative, post- operative 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month macular OCT images were taken. Macular thickness (MT) was decreased in both groups at the end of six months. When we compared the both groups measurements no difference was found. Pre-operative MT values and last visual acuity were correlated weakly. Visual acuity was also increased in both groups. But this was not significant between groups. In this study we found that combined surgery was not increasing macular thickness more than vitrectomy only in ERM surgery.

Epiretinal membrane; Macula; Phacoemulsification; Vitrectomy
Epiretinal membranes (ERM) are avascular fibro cellular proliferations at the vitreoretinal junctions [1]. Idiopathic epiretinal membranes are mostly seen in elderly people [2].
Cataract is pathology of crystalline lens that is also seen elderly people. Both cataract and ERM should affect the visual acuity and may be observed at the same time. Performing surgery in the same session may reduce cost and shorten the postoperative recovery [3].
Phacoemulsification surgery without any complication may affect macula. Cystoid macular edema (CME) is a cause of vision decrease after both complicated and uncomplicated cataract surgery and release of prostaglandins is the reason even after minimal traumatic surgery [4]. Degenring studied on 108 nondiabetic and 24 diabetic patients, measured their macular thicknesses (MT) by SD-OCT before surgery and performed uncomplicated phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. After surgery they followed up the patients and measured MTs’ in every visit up to four weeks and found that the mean of the measurements increased from 183 ± 27 to 191 ± 37 microns at the end of the study [5]. Clinically and approved by optical coherence tomography, CME after uncomplicated cataract surgery is present in around 0%, 1%-2%, 35% respectively [6-8].
ERMs’ deteriorates visual acuity and also distorts images. Vitreomacular traction is present when vitreous separation is incomplete and an area of attachment of the ERM to the posterior hyaloid remains. The membrane may be associated with the presence of CME on fundus fluorescein angiography. Cataract appears in 47%-80% of cases and frequently requires surgical treatment within 2 years after the vitrectomy performed [9]. In this study our objective is to evaluate the macular thickness (MT) differences in early periods of combined cataract and vitrectomy and only vitrectomy surgery performed for patients who have epiretinal membrane.
Materials and Methods
Between 2009-2015, selected 54 patients who were being performed pars plana vitrectomy or combined with cataract surgery for ERM are included the study. For 28 patients only vitrectomy and for 26 combined surgery was performed. Patients with ERM secondary to uveitis or trauma or associated with simultaneous retinal detachments, who have myopia more than 6D, were excluded. Patients operated for cataract after 6 months was also an exclusion criterion. Indication for ERM surgery is decreased vision below 20/80 measured by Snellen acuity test and combined cataract surgery if fundus periphery is not observed well.
Before surgery an informed consent was taken from all patients. The protocol was in accordance with the tenets of the Decleration of Helsinki. Visual acuity was measured with Snellen chart; results are converted into logMAR values. With a calibrated Goldman applanation tonometer ocular tension was measured. Anterior and posterior segment examinations were performed. Macular OCT images were taken by Cirrus HD-OCT (Zeiss Meditech AG, Jena, Germany). From The patients’ preoperative charts data concerning age, sex was gathered.
Nepafenac drop is instilled three times for all patients before surgery. All surgeries are done by the same surgeon (Kocak I). Under local anesthesia first 23G vitrectomy ports were opened. After core and peripheral vitrectomy, if not detached, by using suction mode, posterior vitreous cortex was elevated and then vitrectomised. Trypan Blue was applied with another injector on macula from one port, irrigation was stopped, waited for a 2 minutes and then epiretinal membrane was grasped from thickest side region and peeled with membrane forceps. Afterwards brilliant blue was applied on macula and ILM pinched with forceps and peeled. Peripheral retina was checked for tears. Air fluid exchange was made and C3F8 is injected, the ports were removed. Nephafenac sodium and topical antibiotics were instilled. In combined group under local anesthesia vitrectomy ports are opened first than clear corneal and two side port incisions are made. After capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, hydrodelineation, phacoemulsification, cortical cleaning, Alcon SA 60 intraocular lens is implanted in the capsular bag. After this, ERM surgery is performed. Nephafenac drop is also applied to this group. Post operatively macular OCT images are taken first week, after one month, 3rd month and 6th month from every patient in both groups.
Statistical analysis
One way ANOVA for repeating measurements test is used for significance of macular thickness (MT) results in each group, Man- Whitney U test for to compare MT results of both groups,Wilcoxon Rank Test for to compare visual acuities in preoperatively and at the end of the study and correlation analysis for analyze any relation between pre-operative MT measurements and last visual acuity.
The mean age for combined surgery group was 68.16 ± 3.37 and 66.76 ± 8.36 for other group. Female/Male ratio was 15/13 and 14/12 respectively. MT was decreased significantly after the surgery in combined group (0.043, p<0.05) and in vitrectomy group (0.04). But when we compare the results between two groups there was no significant difference (p=0.59, p<0.001). The Mean MT values of both groups’ at the beginning and at the end of the study are shown in Table 1. The mean MT values of all measurements of both groups are shown in Figure 1.
There was a positive but not strong correlation between end visual acuity and pre- operative MT measurements in combined surgery group (r=0.58, p<0.1) and vitrectomy group (r=0.41, p<0.1). Visual acuity change between preoperative and at the 6th month measurements was significant (Table 2). It was increased in both groups.
Corneal edema was seen in 3 patients in combined surgery group and in 1 in other group lasted more than a week. Retinal detachment was observed in one patient in vitrectomy only group and operated immediately. No intravitreal hemorrhage and no endophthalmitis was seen in both groups. No posterior capsule rupture was seen after phacoemulsification in combined group. Two case undergone cataract surgeries in vitrectomy only group at the end of six months, three cases in combined surgery group had temporary elevated intraocular pressure elevation and medicated for a short period. Recurrence of membrane is seen in one case also in this group. There was 3 pseudophakic patiens in vitrectomy group who were operated more than a year before.
Since vitreoretinal surgery for epiretinal membrane is described by Machemer, today it’s being performed worldwide. Improvement in visual acuity is seen 75%-85% of cases [10]. Different techniques are used. In technique as described by Peyman is, after standard pars plana vitrectomy ERM is elevated by a pick and then grasped by a forceps and peeled [11]. We were not used pick, elevated and peeled membrane by forceps. Non vitrectomised techniques are also described but recurrence rate is too high and floaters are mostly seen [12]. At the beginning only ERM peeling was enough but today it’s generally accepted to peel also internal limiting membrane because of reduced recurrence rate [13]. So we also preferred peeling ILM. In Perrier’s study trypan blue was used for ERM peeling. And no related toxicity was found for one year follow up [14]. No side effect was seen by using trypan blue dye for ERM in our cases. We directly applied it on the macula and waited for two minutes by stopping the irrigation without air-fluid exchange. Because of its side effects on ganglion cells ICG is not used and brilliant blue is preferred for ILM peeling. There are reports about increasing complications in cataract surgery in vasectomized eye [15]. It’s pointed out that if surgeons wait longer for cataract extraction, they could be faced with perioperative complications. In our study two patients were undergone surgery at the end of six months and no complication was seen. A common complication of combined surgery is PCO but this is generally seen as a long-term complication and was not seen in our short term study [16]. In our study we found reduction in MT measurements in both groups. At the end of six months mean MT was 271 ± 71.99 and 269.07 ± 108 microns respectively and it was better than the measurements in Dugas study (406 ± 74 in combined group, 416 ± 84 in vitrectomy group) [17] . There wasn’t MT difference between two groups in Yiu and co-workers [18] study that was similar with our results. Mean MT of vitrectomy only group seems a little bit higher than the other group but at the end of the study they were almost equal in our study. Visual acuity change in our study was also significant as these two authors’ results and our cases mean ages were younger.
It’s defined in the prospective non randomized controlled clinical study of Mylonas et al that the mean MT was greater after successful cataract surgery in cases that were operated for ERM before [19]. Various theories have been proposed for the MT increase including releasing of inflammatory mediators during the surgery [20]. Nepafenac, as a non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, prevents cystoid macular edema especially in diabetics after cataract surgery [21]. We instilled it before and after surgeries of both groups. This may affect MT but needs prospective randomized clinical study. In a new study, Kauffmann showed preoperative prognostic factors for combined surgery in idiopathic ERM is pointed out such as age, disease duration and photoreceptor layer impairment [22]. Also in this study Kauffmann and co-workers found that there was no correlation between initial MT and final visual acuity in their combined surgery group. We found weak but positive correlation. We didn’t studied on factors predicted by Kauffmann and this may be one the weakness of our report and the others are our limited cease series and it’s a retrospective study. The reason for this study limited to 6 months is we wanted to do measurements before cataract surgery of vitrectomy only group. The other authors were continued to measure MT also after phacoemulsification.
As conclusion we found that uncomplicated cataract surgery was not increased macular thickness when combined with vitrectomy in ERM surgery.

Tables and Figures at a glance

Table icon
Table 1


Figures at a glance

Figure 1
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8194
  • [From(publication date):
    February-2016 - Jul 19, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8136
  • PDF downloads : 58

Review summary

  1. Zhangho
    Posted on Jul 15 2016 at 4:36 pm
    The authors investigated the role of combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy alone in patients with ERM. The topic of the paper has potential interest and gives additional information to the literature. The article is very well organized and written appropriately. The one limiting issue here is the number of patients in each cohort is small and so may not be representative of the conclusion that has been drawn in this article.

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

+1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7