alexa Exposure to Reactive Oxygen Species and Piperacillin Leads to Multidrug Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2327-5073
Clinical Microbiology: Open Access
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Exposure to Reactive Oxygen Species and Piperacillin Leads to Multidrug Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

Sachiko Hayakawa1,2*, Emiko Furukawa1, Masato Kawamura1, Toshiaki Kikuchi3, Taizou Hirano4, Akira Watanabe5 and Shigeru Fujimura1,5

1Division of Clinical Infectious Disease & Chemotherapy, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan

2Department of Pharmacy, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Japan

3Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan

4Department of Respiratory, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

5Resarch Division of Development of Anti-Infective Agents, Institute of Development Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

*Corresponding Author:
Sachiko Hayakawa
Division of Clinical Infectious Disease & Chemotherapy
Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
Tel: +81-22-259-1221
Fax: +81-22-259-1232
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: October 15, 2016; Accepted date: October 31, 2016; Published date: November 20, 2016

Citation: Hayakawa S, Furukawa E, Kawamura M, Kikuchi T, Hirano T, et al. (2016) Exposure to Reactive Oxygen Species and Piperacillin Leads to Multidrug Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Clin Microbiol 5:264. doi: 10.4172/2327-5073.1000264

Copyright: © 2016 Hayakawa S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Clinical Microbiology: Open Access

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most common causes of nosocomial infections. Hospital associated infection by multidrug resistant (MDR) strains constitute a serious problem worldwide. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether exposure to sub-MIC levels of anti-pseudomonas antibiotics and reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals, could lead to MDR of P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa standard strain PAO1 was used in this study. All five anti-pseudomonas agents, that is, piperacillin, levofloxacin, meropenem, ceftazidime and amikacin, were investigated for induction of resistance and cross-resistance in vitro. The reference strain was incubated 24 h and transferred 5 times after being exposed to 1 mM H2O2 in addition to a sub-MIC of each antibiotic by the agar dilution method. When cross-resistance to another antibiotic was confirmed, ampC, mexAB, and oprD expression and mutation of QRDR were investigated. Sub-MIC of piperacillin induced resistance to piperacillin and levofloxacin under stimulation with ROS. The mechanism of multi-resistance to β-lactams and levofloxacin was confirmed by RT-PCR. It was a decrease of oprD expression (p<0.05). The increase of MIC was inhibited by the ROS scavenger sodium zinc histidine dihydrolipoyl histidinate (DHL-His-Zn). In conclusion, for P. aeruginosa PAO1 to acquire multidrug resistance, stimulation with ROS was as important as exposure to sub-MIC of piperacillin.

Keywords

Multidrug resistance; ROS; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Piperacillin; Levofloxacin; oprD; Sodium zinc histidine dihydrolipoyl histidinate

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa belongs to the bacterial family Pseudomonadaceae and is a main causative organism of healthcareassociated infection; it colonizes a wet environment such as a hospital or nursing home for a long term [1]. The compromised host easily contracts a disease such as sepsis, pneumonia, or urinary tract infection due to these bacteria. The failure of treatment because of the drug-resistant bacteria has become a serious problem recently. Sligl et al. reported the epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibilities and outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired gram-negative bacteremia. According to this retrospective survey of a period going from 2004 through 2012, adequate empiric therapy was related to the high mortality of patients (35% of 30-day mortality rate), and 18% of those bacteria were P. aeruginosa . Additionally the susceptibility rate of each anti-pseudomonas agent was 67% for piperacillin/tazobactam, 53% for ciprofloxacin, and 53% for imipenem [2]. The percentage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP), multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) isolated from patients with peritoneal infections, urinary tract infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia and bacteremia has continued increasing in the United States since 2000. The increase of these drug-resistant bacteria is associated to the rise in mortality due to infectious diseases, increase of medical expenses, extension of hospitalization, and duration of stay in the ICU [3]. According to the survey of P. aeruginosa in 12 institutions of United States, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, 30.5% of patients with pneumonia were infected with MDR strains, and that was one of the factors related to the increase of hospital mortality [4]. One of the causes of the appearance of drug-resistant bacteria is selection of the resistant strain by an inappropriate antimicrobial use [5-7]. As for the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of P. aeruginosa , gene mutation of quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDR), decrease of D2 porin, excessive expression of efflux pump, overproduction of β-lactamase by over expression of AmpC, and biofilm production, are known. Additionally, antimicrobial resistance is associated with acquisition of the metallo-β-lactamase gene, expression of the aminoglycoside modified enzyme [7-9]. Besides, it was reported that Escherichia coli , an Enterobacteriacae, suffered a mutation when exposed to reactive oxygen species (ROS) or an antimicrobial agent at a concentration below its MIC [10], and its antimicrobial susceptibility was decreased [11-13]. There have been a few reports about the effect of ROS on the acquisition of drug-resistance by P. aeruginosa , and most in vitro studies about antibiotic-resistance have been conducted using a bacterial strain and an antimicrobial agent [14,15]. However, thebacteria are exposed to anti-pseudomonas agents and ROS derived from white blood cells for a certain period of time. In this study, we investigated the tendency and mechanism of acquisition of multidrug resistance by P. aeruginosa using an in vitro experimental model in which ROS are added to anti-pseudomonas agents. Furthermore, the inhibition of multidrug resistance by sodium zinc dihydrolipoyl histidinate (DHL-His-Zn), α-lipoic acid derivative that is known as a ROS scavenger [16-19], was confirmed.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strain and antibiotic susceptibilities

The reference P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain was used in this study. MICs of piperacillin, levofloxacin, meropenem, ceftazidime, and amikacin were determined using E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Briefly, the bacteria were suspended in 3 mL of saline to achieve a turbidity equivalent to that of a No. 0.5 McFarland standard and were spread on Mueller-Hinton agar (Eiken, Tokyo). After having positioned an E-test strip on the agar plate, this was cultured at 35C for 16-20 h. The break point MICs were interpreted according to EUCAST ver. 6.0 recommendations [20].

in vitro selection of multidrug resistance

A powder of amikacin (Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo), ceftazidime (Glaxo SmithKline Co., Tokyo), meropenem (Dainihon- Sumitomo Pharmaceutical Ltd., Osaka, Japan), piperacillin (Taisho- Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo), and levofloxacin (Daiichi- Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo) was prepared. Each of these 5 antibiotics was investigated for in vitro induction of resistance and cross-resistance to the other 4 antibiotics. The reference strain PAO1 was incubated and transferred 5 times while being exposed to the sub-MIC of each antibiotic and/or 1 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as the source of ROS by the agar dilution method. The concentration of H2O2 was determined as maximum density not to inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa PAO1. The plates were incubated at 35C for 24 h. Each MIC following five serial passages was determined by the E-test method. When PAO1 strain developed drug-resistance, we investigated whether the tendency to the appearance of a DR-PAO1 mutant was inhibited by the addition of 1 mM sodium zinc histidine dihydrolipoyl histidinate (DHL-His-Zn, a ROS scavenger) [16-19].

Quantification of mRNA expression by RT-PCR

The PCR primers used in this study are listed in Table 1 [21].

The levels of expression of ampC , mexAB , and oprD respectively encoding ampC β-lactamase, efflux pump protein MexA, and outer membrane protein OprD, were determined by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) as previously described [21,22]. Briefly, the mutant DR-PAO1 that developed multidrug resistance was grown in 3 mL of nutrient broth at 36°C at 24 h and collected by centrifugation. Total RNA was eluted using the AurumTM Total RNA minikit (BIO-RAD, Tokyo). Then 50 ng of purified RNA was used for one-step reverse transcription and RT-PCR amplification, using the iScriptTM One-Step RT-PCR kit with SYBR® green (BIO-RAD) and a SmartCycler CFX96 (BIO-RAD). The reaction mix preparation and the thermal cycling protocol were as instructed by the manufacturer. The mRNA transcription of ampC , mexAB , and oprD was determined by qRT-PCR as described previously with some modifications. Relative quantities of gene expression were calculated using the standard curve method. Expression of 16S ribosomal RNA was used to normalize the transcriptional level of target genes. This experiment was performed in duplicate. Increases or decreases in normalized gene expression of >2 fold and <0.5 fold were taken as significant changes. Decreased oprD expression was considered relevant when it was ≤ 30% compared with that of P. aeruginosa PAO1.

Mutation of the quinolone-resistance-determining region (QRDR)

In the DR-PAO1 mutant, mutations of the genes coding for GyrA, GyrB, ParC and ParE were verified by sequencing of these genes after amplification by PCR. The PCR primers [23,24] used in this study are listed in Table 1. The PCR products of these 4 genes were sequenced employing the Dye-Terminator Cycle Sequencing method. The amplification procedure for gyrA, parC and parE comprised denaturation at 94C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94C , annealing for 30 s at 55C, and polymerization for 1 min at 72C . The amplification procedure for gyrB comprised denaturation at 94°C for 2 min followed by 25 cycles of denaturation for 1min at 94°C, annealing for 30 s at 60°C, and polymerization for 1 min at 72C. The reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μL with 0.625 U of Takara Ex Taq (Takara, Shiga, Japan). The PCR products were purified using the Fast GeneTM Gel/PCR Extraction Kit and sequenced. Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing with Quick Start Kit (GenomeLabTM) was used for the sequencing reactions, and sequences were analyzed employing the ABI 3130xl (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

clinical-microbiology-PCR-primers

Table 1: PCR primers used in this study.

Statistical analysis

The difference in expression of amp C, mex AB, and opr D between the reference PAO1 strain and DR-PAO1 mutant was analyzed by Student’s t-test. A p value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Selected multidrug resistant mutant

MICs of each anti-pseudomonas agent against the reference PAO1 strain were piperacillin: 2 μg/mL, ceftazidime: 0.25 μg/mL, meropenem: 0.25 μg/mL, levofloxacin: 0.25 μg/mL, and amikacin: 2 μg/Ml, respectively.

Figure 1 illustrates the changes of MIC after exposure of the reference strain to the sub-MIC (1/2 MIC) of each antibiotic. After being transferred 5 times on agar plates that contained 1/2 MIC of each antibiotic, the MIC of piperacillin increased 8 folds (from 2 to 16 μg/mL) by exposure to ceftazidime and levofloxacin. It was also increased 4 folds (from 2 to 8 μg/mL) by meropenem. The MIC of meropenem was increased 4 folds (from 0.25 to 1 μg/mL) by levofloxacin. However, no dramatic change of susceptibility occurred after exposure to each antibiotic alone. Subsequently, a similar experiment in which hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was added as the source of ROS was performed. The PAO1 strain was exposed to the 1/2 MIC of each antibiotic plus 1 mM H2O2, and the change of each MIC was assessed (Figure 2). The mutant (DR-PAO1) that acquired resistance to piperacillin and levofloxacin was selected after the fifth transfer onto agar plates containing piperacillin and hydrogen peroxide. The MICs of piperacillin and ceftazidime increased 32 folds (piperacillin: from 2 to 64 μg/mL, ceftazidime: from 0.25 to 8 μg/mL), and that of levofloxacin increased from 0.25 to 2 μg/mL (Figure 2). After exposure to 1/2 MIC of levofloxacin and 1 mM H2O2, the MIC of levofloxacin hardly increased. In the contrast, no increase of the MIC of either antibiotic was observed after exposure to hydrogen peroxide alone (Supplemental data 1).

clinical-microbiology-anti-pseudomonas-antimicrobial

Figure 1: Change of the MIC after exposure of the reference strain to 1/2 MIC of each anti-pseudomonas antimicrobial agent. Closed triangles: piperacillin, closed circles: levofloxacin, open circles: meropenem, cross: ceftazidime, open diamonds: amikacin.

clinical-microbiology-levofloxacin-open-circles

Figure 2: Change of the MIC after exposure of the reference strain to 1/2 MIC of each anti-pseudomonas antimicrobial agent plus 1 mM H2O2. Closed triangles: piperacillin, closed circles: levofloxacin, open circles: meropenem, cross: ceftazidime, open diamonds: amikacin.

Inhibition of multidrug resistance by a ROS scavenger

The increase of MIC of piperacillin and levofloxacin after exposure of the reference strain to piperacillin plus hydrogen peroxide shown in this study was completely inhibited by the addition of 1mM DHL-His- Zn (Figure 3). Thus, acquisition of multidrug resistance by P. aeruginosa PAO1 was inhibited by DHL-His-Zn.

clinical-microbiology-piperacillin-plus-ROS

Figure 3: MIC change after exposure of the reference strain to piperacillin plus ROS, and inhibitory effect of DHL-Zn-His. The MIC of each antibiotic was increased by treatment with 1 μg/mL piperacillin and 1 mM H2O2. DHL-Zn-His inhibited the increase of MIC. Open circles: 1 μg/mL piperacillin+1 mM H2O2, closed circles: 1 μg/mL piperacillin+1 mM H2O2+1 mM DHL-Zn-His.

Decrease of oprD mRNA expression

The mRNA transcription levels of ampC, mexAB, and oprD of the DR-PAO1 mutant were compared with those of the standard PAO1 strain (Figure 4). The value of normalized expression of opr D in PAO1 strain was 1.502 ± 0.005, and the value in DR-PAO1 mutant was 0.996 ± 0.004. The mean expression level of opr D in the DR-PAO1 mutant decreased by 33.7% (p<0.05). There were not statistical differences in mRNA expression between amp C and mex AB.

clinical-microbiology-lactam-levofloxacin-resistance

Figure 4: Comparison of mRNA expression of genes conferring β- lactam and levofloxacin resistance. White column: PAO-1 strain, gray column: drug-resistant (DR) PAO-1 strain induced by 1 μg/mL piperacillin+1 mM H2O2

parE Mutations

Multiple mutations in parE gene encoding ParE of type II topoisomerase were confirmed in the DR-PAO1 mutant. The amino acid sequences of ParE showed multiple replacements of Ser-373 to Ile, Ala-375 to Asp, and Arg-378 to His. There were no amino acid changes for GyrA, GyrB and ParC in the DR-PAO1 mutant.

Discussion

ROS are generated in vivo upon energy production, immune responses against foreign substances, processing of unwanted cells, cell signaling, simultaneously oxidized lipids, proteins, and enzymes, and occasionally cause DNA damage [10,11,25]. Bacteria are exposed to ROS in vivo during infection. The effects of ROS on cells vary with their concentration. Specifically, they have bactericidal effects and enhance the effects of antibiotics at high concentrations [25,26], while at low concentrations they may cause gene mutations resulting in drug resistance [11-15]. In P. aeruginosa , hydrogen peroxide and amikacin or tobramycin cause the expression of the drug efflux pump mex XY in vitro, which reduces the susceptibility of the bacteria to aminoglycosides [27]. Clinically, 54.4% of P. aeruginosa isolated from sputum samples collected from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) were mutated strains, which were more resistant to anti-pseudomonas agents (tazobactam/ piperacillin and ceftazidime) than non-mutated ones. In addition, sputum samples collected from CF patients were examined over time, demonstrating that the mutated strains could be detected for more than five years after infection, and with an increased number of mutations. That is, prolonged exposure to antipseudomonas agents and ROS facilitated selection of resistant P. aeruginosa strains during persistent infection [28].

In the present study, cross-resistance among various antibacterial agents was examined using P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 after the addition of H2O2 (in vivo oxidative stress). As a result, 1 mM H2O2 alone did not alter the MIC values of the antibacterial agents against PAO-1 strain. However, the addition of piperacillin to H2O2 increased the MIC of levofloxacin from 0.25 to 2 μg/mL, as well as of piperacillin, showing multidrug resistance. In this multidrug resistant strain DRPAO1, the expression of the oprD gene encoding D2 porin significantly decreased (p<0.05). In addition, amino acid mutations (S373I, A375D, and R378H), unreported in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) of parE, were detected. Such mutations were not found for other β-lactams, such as cephalosporins and carbapenems. Oxidative stress induced by ROS, besides exposure to penicillin antibiotics, might cause DNA damage and induce MDR phenomena in P. aeruginosa.

Kohanski et al. exposed various bacterial strains to antibacterial agents, and demonstrated the production of hydroxyl radical in E. coli after the addition of penicillin-derived antibiotics [10]. Interestingly, the addition of amoxicillin, induced hydroxyl radical production in two stages (within 1 and 2-3 hours), suggesting prolonged exposure to ROS, compared with other antibiotics. Besides 1 mM H2O2, ROS produced in bacterial cells by penicillin-derived antibiotics might suppress the oprD expression and cause the parE mutation, resulting in cross-resistance to quinolones.

The results of the present study suggest that at a low dose the antipseudomonas agent piperacillin may induce cross-resistance to levofloxacin when combined with ROS in vivo . In addition, it should be noted that the MIC of meropenem was increased on the same condition, although the increase did not result in resistance to this drug.

The in vitro MDR phenomenon, observed in the present study, was suppressed by the addition of the ROS inhibitor DHL-His-Zn (α-lipoic acid derivative). This agent is an antioxidant in which histidine and zinc are bound to α-lipoic acid. Its clinical applications, such as suppression of hair loss due to oxidative stress induced by antineoplastic agents in rats and suppression of in vitro colon cancer cell growth, have been investigated [17,19]. Traditionally, in vitro studies on bacterial antibiotic resistance have been conducted using bacteria and antibiotics. The present study also included ROS as a biological factor, providing an in vitro experimental system reflecting in vivo conditions. In the present situation, new multidrug resistant bacteria are increasing in the world, drug resistance suppression by combining DHL-His-Zn may improve the therapeutic outcomes of intractable infections. Anti-ROS agents should be investigated to solve the global problem caused by multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

In conclusion, we demonstrated multidrug resistance acquisition in P. aeruginosa stimulated with a low dose of piperacillin and oxidative stress using ROS as a biological factor. Although high-dose penicillin treatments have recently been recommended according to the PK-PD theory, they can be employed in a small number of countries in the world. In infectious diseases, such as deep abscesses and CF, antibacterial agents are less likely to migrate to the sites of infection, which may result in low exposure of pathogenic bacteria to antibiotics. Under such conditions, oxidative stress causes gene mutations, which may result in the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria. Our findings suggest, for potential infection by P. aeruginosa , high doses of antipseudomonas agents should be administered in combination with antioxidants (e.g., DHL-His-Zn) to improve therapeutic effects and prevent the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria.

Acknowledgement

We thank Yasuko Kariya and Tomoko Ito of IDAC, Tohoku University for technical assistance.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 8337
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2016 - Oct 20, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8243
  • PDF downloads :94
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords